One of the five Supreme Court judges that will decide Tinubu’s case on Friday, Justice Helen Ogunwumiju, has been bursted to have a son who is a member of the APC. Not only is he a member of the APC, he’s currently a Member-elect of the Ondo State House of Assembly.

Can she still be neutral?

Recall that in 2019, Justice Bulkachuwa, the then president of the Court of Appeal, recused herself from the Presidential Petition Tribunal Panel due to the fact that her husband is a serving senator of the APC.

Is this not enough reason for Justice Ogunwumiju to recuse herself off this case? Can we still trust her to do justice?

Continue fooling ureself. ...

Nigeria is moving forward not backward

I guess the judges of the appeal and Federal high court that threw the case out were also bias and have family members in the APC

wike wife is a judge too, she was appointed by Ameachi, she has been presiding on pdp matter for a long time now

Losers already looking for excuses when they know they don't have locus standi in the case as only APC can challenge its own nominations of its own member

It's like my neighbors and rival trying to sue me to court why I took two pieces of meat and replaced it with a turkey peice in my own house

What's PDP's business with APC internal politics


.

Penguin2:
One of the five Supreme Court judges that will decide Tinubu’s case on Friday, Justice Helen Ogunwumiju, has been bursted to have a son who is a member of the APC. Not only is he a member of the APC, he’s currently a Member-elect of the Ondo State House of Assembly.

Can she still be neutral?

Recall that in 2019, Justice Bulkachuwa, the then president of the Court of Appeal, recused herself from the Presidential Petition Tribunal Panel due to the fact that her husband is a serving senator of the APC.

Is this not enough reason for Justice Ogunwumiju to recuse herself off this case? Can we still trust her to do justice?

Nonsense
As if Justice Mary Odili was not married to the PDP big wig ex Gov of Rivers State

Obidients slaves have started the blackmail...

In short, all the judges are supporting APC

Mynd44:
I guess the judges of the appeal and Federal high court that threw the case out were also bias and have family members in the APC

This is deep

Penguin,me and Fergie have discussed this exhaustively.at least half of our judges are linked directly to judges.

garfield1:
Penguin,me and Fergie have discussed this exhaustively.at least half of our judges are linked directly to judges.

All not half... ALL

They got nominated by card carrying political office holder, and no Politician nominates their enemy to the bench

LVStone:
This is deep

it's not... Una just like blackmail when things don't go your way

So what do you want?..
Is it your father or mother that knows nothing about Law that you want to go and preside over the case? or you want angel to come down from heaven to deliver judgement? Dey play.

Mynd44:
I guess the judges of the appeal and Federal high court that threw the case out were also bias and have family members in the APC

After the 2015 elections, Wike lost at the Tribunal and at the Appeal Court but won at the Supreme Court.

Ikpeazu too, lost at the Tribunal and Appeal Court but won at the Supreme Court.

After the 2019 elections, Uzodimma lost at the Tribunal and Appeal Court but won at the Supreme Court.

I hope that with these few points of mine, I’ve been able to prove to you that that a plaintiff lost at the lower courts doesn’t mean he must lose at the Supreme Court. And that’s why we want impartial judges without any emotional attachment to either side of the divide.

Is that too much to ask?

Moh247:


All not half... ALL

They got nominated by card carrying political office holder, and no Politician nominates their enemy to the bench

shatap

POL 909: Advanced Politricking

Emilokan Bola Ahmed Tinubu the Jagaban Borgu City Boy Extraordinaire. The kingmaker that made himself King.

We will continue to teach you politics

Penguin2:


After the 2015 elections, Wike lost at the Tribunal and at the Appeal Court but won at the Supreme Court.

Ikpeazu too, lost at the Tribunal and Appeal Court but won at the Supreme Court.

After the 2019 elections, Uzodimma lost at the Tribunal and Appeal Court but won at the Supreme Court.

I hope that with these few points of mine, I’ve been able to prove to you that that a plaintiff lost at the lower courts doesn’t mean he must lose at the Supreme Court. And that’s why we want impartial judges without any emotional attachment to either side of the divide.

Is that too much to ask?

Nah, the issue is not that the supreme court must follow the judgment of the lower courts but if you want to learn towards saying she will be compromised based on her son, what happened with the judges at the high and appeal courts?

Odili's wife sat on the Supreme Court's bench for years and no one accused her because she is a professional and will carry out her job to the best of her capability.

Plus do you realize the judgenent tomorrow is actually not one that is capable of removing the president elect but to decide if the high court was wrong in refusing to hear the case hence even if the APC loses, the court process will now go to the high court to be tried?

Mynd44:
I guess the judges of the appeal and Federal high court that threw the case out were also bias and have family members in the APC

I guess the Imo tribunal and appeal court's decision against uzodimma were right then?

BaddestQueen:
shatap

You go weep for long oooo

Moh247:



Losers already looking for excuses when they know they don't have locus standi in the case as only APC can challenge its own nominations of its own member

It's like my neighbors and rival trying to sue me to court why I took two pieces of meat and replaced it with a turkey peice in my own house

What's PDP's business with APC internal politics


.

Is exchanging chicken for turkey in your own house a crime? No. That’s why your neighbor can’t sue you for that.

But what if you murder your wife? Would you still say “this is my house, and my neighbor has no business here” after you have broken the law?

I’m trying to school you to use the right analogies when you want to use analogy.

Stealing meat from your wife’s pot of soup is immoral but not illegal. That’s why it’s not gonna be any of your neighbors’ business.

But battering or murdering your wife is both immoral and illegal and have lost all rights to privacy when you do that because your neighbors will have every right to take you up.

Penguin2:


Is exchanging chicken for turkey in your own house a crime? No. That’s why your neighbor can’t sue you for that.

But what if you murder your wife? Would you still say “this is my house, and my neighbor has no business here” after you have broken the law?

I’m trying to school you to use the right analogies when you want to use analogy.

Stealing meat from your wife’s pot of soup is immoral but not illegal. That’s why it’s not gonna be any of your neighbors’ business.

But battering or murdering your wife is both immoral and illegal and have lost all rights to privacy when you do that because your neighbors will have every right to take you up.

Capital offense like murder, or criminal offense is against the State of the Nation that is why in court the petition reads Suspect vs Police Comm, or Suspect vs IG

Nomination and electoral matter is niether criminal nor capital, it's civil and must be treated civil

And notice I said I took 2 prices of meat and replaced it in my own "house" my jurisdiction, and PDP unlawful interference won't be tolerated


Hope you have learnt now how my anology works or you would go for more whataboutism


.

The Nigerian State have been criminally captured

oyebanji44:
Continue fooling ureself. ...

Nigeria is moving forward not backward

Tinubu is leaving tomorrow.

Mynd44:

Nah, the issue is not that the supreme court must follow the judgment of the lower courts but if you want to learn towards saying she will be compromised based on her son, what happened with the judges at the high and appeal courts?

Odili's wife sat on the Supreme Court's bench for years and no one accused her because she is a professional and will carry out her job to the best of her capability.

Plus do you realize the judgenent tomorrow is actually not one that is capable of removing the president elect but to decide if the high court was wrong in refusing to hear the case hence even if the APC loses, the court process will now go to the high court to be tried?

Has Justice Ogunwumiju earned such trust as did Justice Odili? Has she given us enough reason to trust her to do justice even when a member of her family is an interested party?

Then about the case being about whether PDP has right to sue Shettima, it’s actually intricate and dicey. That’s why Tinubu’s camp is jittery. Because if the Supreme Court agrees that PDP has locus to sue, the case is as good as over since Shettima and APC’s lawyers have never contested the fact that Shettima was nominated in two constituencies. All their arguments has been, “yes there was double nomination but it’s non of PDP’s business”. It is said that Shettima’s lawyer even admitted to such before the Justices of the Supreme Court.

So, no one is sure that the Supreme Court is not going to make consequential orders should they agree that PDP has locus. And remember, the case was already struck out at High and Appeal Courts which means they are concluded in the lower courts already.

Moh247:


Capital offense like murder, or criminal offense is against the State of the Nation that is why in court the petition reads Suspect vs Police Comm, or Suspect vs IG

Nomination and electoral matter is niether criminal nor capital, it's civil and must be treated civil

And notice I said I took 2 prices of meat and replaced it in my own "house" my jurisdiction, and PDP unlawful interference won't be tolerated


Hope you have learnt now how my anology works or you would go for more whataboutism


.

Is the Police member of your “house”?

Because if your analogy was to hold water, then even the police has no right to sue you since they are not members of your house. Or are they?

Mynd44:



Plus do you realize the judgenent tomorrow is actually not one that is capable of removing the president elect but to decide if the high court was wrong in refusing to hear the case hence even if the APC loses, the court process will now go to the high court to be tried?

who told you all these. The case is a legal question that does not require a large amount of evidence during trial. The lower courts have heard the case and given the final judgement. There is no retrial.

Penguin2:


Is the Police member of your “house”?

Because if your analogy was to hold water, then even the police has no right to sue you since they are not members of your house. Or are they?

Then go and learn what Criminal offense, Capital offense are

Also go and learn what Civil cases are

This would tell you why Police the prosecutor can sue you unbehalf of Nigerian state for crime commited against a Nigerian citizen

And PDP can not sue APC on what they do in their party reason

Also learn what Locus standi means in a civil case

Learn all this and you won't bother yourself on this case


.

Moh247:


Then go and learn what Criminal offense, Capital offense are

Also go and learn what Civil cases are

This would tell you why Police the prosecutor can sue you unbehalf of Nigerian state for crime commited against a Nigerian citizen

And PDP can not sue APC on what they do in their party reason

Also learn what Locus standi means in a civil case

Learn all this and you won't bother yourself on this case


.

stop talking nonsense
tanganga boys are watching ooo

Moh247:


Then go and learn what Criminal offense, Capital offense are

Also go and learn what Civil cases are

This would tell you why Police the prosecutor can sue you unbehalf of Nigerian state for crime commited against a Nigerian citizen

And PDP can not sue APC on what they do in their party reason

Also learn what Locus standi means in a civil case

Learn all this and you won't bother yourself on this case


.

Lol!

You are just running helter-skelter trying to conjure up anything that will help your flawed argument stay afloat.

Remember in my analogy I used murder or battery but you have chosen to clutch onto murder because you wanna help your poor argument with the difference between capital and civil offenses.

But when you argued that nobody outside your house has right to sue you for whatever you do in your house, did you exclude the police?🤔

Armaggedon:
who told you all these. The case is a legal question that does not require a large amount of evidence during trial. The lower courts have heard the case and given the final judgement. There is no retrial.

Same thing I tried to make him understand.

I don’t know where APC guys got that notion from. That even if PDP wins in court tomorrow, the case will just go back to High Court for retrial when lower courts already gave their judgments on the case.

Okoroawusa:
Obidients slaves have started the blackmail...

Where can we meet?