Majesty7:



THANK YOU!!! I don't understand why others are not reading it even including the guy giving update.

Very laughable scenerio. He did the findings himself and concluded by himself. If the judge is merciful, he should be sentence to a very long term. Others would have sentence him first to a psychiatric hospital and if confirmed well, he will be sentence to death

senatordave1:


And he went unprepared and unclad

LADEMINUS:


The problem was that, even in the 12 he examined, he went on to say he did not question anybody, nor confirm the physical copies. So the physical copies may have as well been same as the metadata.


He was judge and jury on his activities. It's difficult to prove that results were wrong online when you admit you never checked what was declared to actually confirm if they were wrong

senatordave1:


Apc need not prove anything but inorder to bury obi,they will simply call presiding officers and collation officers that will attest to upload.
Secondly,they will provide hardcopies of 18000 unit results and also show that obi didn't have agents in most of them.
They will show that inec can have a glitch locally.
They will show that tinubu won in all result copies.
The nitda dg will reject the staff that came.aws will be called to reject their so called staff

IamV:


The highlighted statement alone is the exact reason I won't be expending my time & energy with you.
We have different understanding of what it means to be "truthful" & attributes we consider "intelligent".
Honestly, it's not worth it.

No disrespect intended,take care.

senatordave1:


Ask yourself,how has metadata helped to prove massive irregularities

XY23:


I saw through the gamble PO's lawyers are playing by allowing cross-examination deferred to a later day. It seems they're using it to draw the respondents out. The more questions they ask, the clearer the WSOO. I said it before that, cross-examination is a double-edged sword, it only works one way IF you know the right questions to ask. Unfortunately, the respondents have shown they don't. Why? Because they have something to hide.

loosecanon50:


Omo today's witnesses chop gun powder oo!!...inec lawyers just dey vex anyhow .

IamV thanks for today's update. More grease to your elbows.

Tomorrow is another day to go harder!🔨⚒️ 🔥

pacesetting:
You started by saying APC do not need to prove anything, but ended with so many things they need to prove. That's a massive heap of contradiction.

mtngloetiartel:
u no get joy and job walai

IamV:


The highlighted statement alone is the exact reason I won't be expending my time & energy with you.
We have different understanding of what it means to be "truthful" & attributes we consider "intelligent".
Honestly, it's not worth it.

No disrespect intended,take care.

IamV:


Q. In Para 20 of your witness deposition, you said you can identify all Forms (listed in the picture attached) and all INEC electoral documents

A. Yes

[ Respondents remind the court of time and the time keeper notes that he has 5 more minutes.]

IamV:


[The Petitioners now seek to tender the Receipts Issued By INEC for Certification of It's Documents into evidence.]

All Respondents:
They all do not object to the tendering of the documents into evidence.

IfnobeGod20:

This is more of a hostile witness than anything. The respondents are hearing it hot like hot iron. Thumb up guy.

yusfatedeeprof:

Don't close your eyes to reality, open it so you can see properly.

These two up there, the drug case and Irev irregularities are DOA. What Peter Obi must prove is:

1. That he got 25% in 8 more states
2. That he won the election with majority of the votes.

senatordave1:


Those 18000 blurred sheets are irev copies which may be blurred due to bad bvas camera or the posture of the photographer.all lp needed to do was to confirm from the physical copies

Abemy:


Shetima actually withdrew from being a senatorial candidate, he wrote his constituents and his party, a fresh nomination was conducted.


What I don't understand is when witness' statements are objected but court adminting them.

LADEMINUS:


You can prove irregularities from a sample using metadata.
LP doesn't have to prove massive irregularities. However the evidence is dead as the sampled results were not crosschecked to confirm the irregularities. That's the massive drawback of allowing the respondents a day to prepare. They were able to see that the sampled units were won by PDP and LP and were also consistent with the hardcopies which the court will now differ to.


And just to educate here...


There is a reason LP/PDP brought loads of physical copies. The court will simply not consider these Irevs/bvas without the actual machines. And they know this.


LP smartly supoenaed Nitda for this very reason, but NITDA messed them up, so they supoenaed a friendly NITDA staff which is smart. Note the Respondent saying confidently that the NITDA DG did not send the expert because they have the nITDA DG in line. They will now bring the NITDA DG as Thier own witness to counter

Hope15:
Did anyone notice the respondents lawyers tried to use the testimony of the guy from NITDA to punch holes in the LP's Cybersecurity expert? Per ISO 27001/2 being in the NITDA Act, and the need to communicate with INEC. I don't know what they would make of those though.

PoliticalUpdate:


You just brought the bigger picture to bare.

OfoIgbo:


So far, Peter Obi's people have submitted enough evidence to prove that
1. Shettima had another nomination before he was declared Tinubu's running mate
2. Tinubu didn't get 25% of Abuja votes, which is a constitutional requirement
3. Cast doubt on how INEC arrived at the decision that Tinubu won, especially as there were thousands of blurred results, and huge discrepancies in certain states.

The only point Peter Obi now has to prove is that he actually won that election. Even though I know he has submitted EC8A forms for the election, the prosecution still needs to collate the exact results in those forms, as the court may not have time to go through that mountain of evidence.

All I can say at the moment is that Peter Obi has proven enough points for the judges to cancel that election and call for a re-run. He needs to do a bit more for the courts to have enough evidence to declare him the winner.

Let us wait for the defence, and what points they have

Creeza:
And how did he rubbish it?

Take crash courses on IT una no go gree.... Apply simple logic in scenarios like this....No!!!

He said he did 12 with " Consent"

what else is your question.... Ask it and i will reply

Dumbo!

Majesty7:


Park far. You are not different. Just a forum where we discuss and argue diligently. In reality, you might not be up to my least employee.

Mr. Smart keep enjoying your folly in your virtual world.

Bye

GoodGovernance:
Issue:

INEC certified blurred result sheets.

So how did INEC determine the winner when the electoral act requires that the IRev results must tally with what is collated ?

18,000 blurred results from polling units.

There are averagely 500 voters in a polling unit,equating to 9million voters!

LADEMINUS:



A hostile witness is one that goes against the person he is testifying for. For the guy to be a hostile witness, he will have been going against LP

Majesty7:


Park far. You are not different. Just a forum where we discuss and argue diligently. In reality, you might not be up to my least employee.

Mr. Smart keep enjoying your folly in your virtual world.

Bye

Majesty7:



THANK YOU!!! I don't understand why others are not reading it even including the guy giving update.

Very laughable scenerio. He did the findings himself and concluded by himself. If the judge is merciful, he should be sentence to a very long term. Others would have sentence him first to a psychiatric hospital and if confirmed well, he will be sentence to death

Majesty7:


Park far. You are not different. Just a forum where we discuss and argue diligently. In reality, you might not be up to my least employee.

Mr. Smart keep enjoying your folly in your virtual world.

Bye

Majesty7:


Park far. You are not different. Just a forum where we discuss and argue diligently. In reality, you might not be up to my least employee.

Mr. Smart keep enjoying your folly in your virtual world.

Bye