WorldRichest:
Anybody wey no dey satisfied, make the person go and conduct he own election and transmit it through Heaven

This is not the issue. The real issues are

-Why did INEC lied to Nigeria to acquire #350B of taxpayers funds for a technology that will enhance of electronic transmission of election results only for it to ditch same for manual collation thereby giving rise to manipulation.

-Why will INEC serve or IREV suffered "glitch" only in the presidential election that was conducted the same day as the senate and HORS that went on smoothly.

-Why did the INEC IREV have blurred results, imagine of non-technical staff being uploaded as election results in a serious national exercise like the presidential election yet INEC declared a fraudulent man as president select @ 4am?

-Why has INEC been shamelessly embarrassing itself by rejecting its own duly certified results being used in the electoral disputes as regards same elections conducted by it?

blamingthedevil:
Breaking News.....

The Federal High Court Judge, Justice Abubakar Umar who had earlier issued order to INEC on iREV transmission during the 2023 election has delivered his final judgment. Justice Umar held that INEC has been fully backed by the constitution to determine how it operates including how it transmits or transfers election results to the collation centre.

https://twitter.com/DeeOneAyekooto/status/1688839932964417537

WorldRichest:
Anybody wey no dey satisfied, make the person go and conduct he own election and transmit it through Heaven

yarimo:
Niger republic is available for anyone that is not satisfied with the judgment

TheGoodJoe:
INEC has the right to determine the way it wants to transmit result, and chose to use IREV for verification through the BVAS. After that, INEC put it in its manual that it has chosen to use IREV to verify results. Travelled to London and that using the BVAS/IREV is chosen.

So, no one is arguing that INEC does not have the right to choose how to transmit its result. We are pointing out that INEC chose a process and decided to change it during the election, which marred the process.

Simple Engli9sh.

Penguin2:


Yes!

But ask yourself, can INEC decide to adopt a mode that is not provided for by the law?

Court said INEC can decide how they transmit results but that is not express permission for illegality.

Whatever they are adopting must be according to the provision of the constitution and the Electoral Act.

Get these things into your head.

Spy360:

Excellent 👍🏽

The constitution gave INEC power to choose mode of transmission. The question is what mode did INEC choose?

When we compare all the elections held so far, from Osun to Presidential/NASS to governorship/HOA what mode was adopted?

We discover that BVAS/IREV was used for verification for all except for the presidential election. That's the crux of the matter. Why did IREV fail during the presidential when INEC chose it for transmission?

yarimo:
Niger republic is available for anyone that is not satisfied with the judgment

blamingthedevil:
Breaking News.....

The Federal High Court Judge, Justice Abubakar Umar who had earlier issued order to INEC on iREV transmission during the 2023 election has delivered his final judgment. Justice Umar held that INEC has been fully backed by the constitution to determine how it operates including how it transmits or transfers election results to the collation centre.

https://twitter.com/DeeOneAyekooto/status/1688839932964417537

Ofunaofu:


And what is the Court judgement

garfield1:


Dem never ban you? That question is left for obi to answer and he failed to.the case is dead

TheGoodJoe:
INEC has the right to determine the way it wants to transmit results, and chose to use IREV for verification through the BVAS. After that, INEC put it in its manual that it has chosen to use IREV to verify results. Travelled to London and that using the BVAS/IREV is chosen.

So, no one is arguing that INEC does not have the right to choose how to transmit its results. We are pointing out that INEC chose a process and decided to change it during the election, which marred the process.

Simple English.

garfield1:


The two modes of transmission is manual and electronic.inec can use any as it liked

Kingsmeal:
Una no dey tire to post old news?

All these Ebola kids.

The court only set aside its earlier ruling to the petition filed by Lagos State LP before the guber Election.

Spy360:

INEC chose to use both. One as a verification for the other to avoid election manipulation. But the criminal INEC chairman switched off the server of the presidential to allow Tinubu to rewrite results. The planned heist was a failure and they have been exposed. Both criminals will rot in jail.

I recall why APC was rushing to court to prevent INEC from choosing electronic transmission. APC is a criminal party.

LegendHero:


Speech from INEC president is not the law. He can say they’ll transmit this way and on Election Day, if the server is down or with some glitches, they can default back to other mode. That is why the law give them power.

Burob:
Cry on Wailer, if you no like, go conduct your own election.

Spy360:

It's not about any speech, it's about what is in their guidelines. When the server was down, the sensible thing to do is to cancel the election and order a repeat.

Besides there was no glitch. It's all cooked up by the criminal INEC chairman. Till today they have not told us what was the glitch and what caused it.