ruggedtimi:
no he was in prison for 7years

Leonard Mack, 72, was exonerated after new DNA testing excluded him as the perpetrator.

After 47 years, a New York man has been exonerated after new DNA testing conclusively excluded him as the perpetrator of a 1975 rape.

This is the longest known wrongful conviction in US history to be overturned by DNA evidence.

benjazzy009:
Over seven years spent not 40plus years

Leonard Mack, 72, was exonerated after new DNA testing excluded him as the perpetrator.

After 47 years, a New York man has been exonerated after new DNA testing conclusively excluded him as the perpetrator of a 1975 rape.

This is the longest known wrongful conviction in US history to be overturned by DNA evidence.

Mitsurugi:



He served 7 years plus in prison and that was back in 1976. He's been trying to clear his name since then

Leonard Mack, 72, was exonerated after new DNA testing excluded him as the perpetrator.

After 47 years, a New York man has been exonerated after new DNA testing conclusively excluded him as the perpetrator of a 1975 rape.

This is the longest known wrongful conviction in US history to be overturned by DNA evidence.

madscientist88:
Leonard Mack, 72, was exonerated after new DNA testing excluded him as the perpetrator.

After 47 years, a New York man has been exonerated after new DNA testing conclusively excluded him as the perpetrator of a 1975 rape.

This is the longest known wrongful conviction in US history to be overturned by DNA evidence.

Breathe slowly, go back and read the article again. Comprehensively this time around.

stormborn28:


He spent 7 years + . make unna dey read before commenting

Leonard Mack, 72, was exonerated after new DNA testing excluded him as the perpetrator.

After 47 years, a New York man has been exonerated after new DNA testing conclusively excluded him as the perpetrator of a 1975 rape.

This is the longest known wrongful conviction in US history to be overturned by DNA evidence.

madscientist88:
Leonard Mack, 72, was exonerated after new DNA testing excluded him as the perpetrator.

After 47 years, a New York man has been exonerated after new DNA testing conclusively excluded him as the perpetrator of a 1975 rape.

This is the longest known wrongful conviction in US history to be overturned by DNA evidence.

You stubborn Sha, baba cool down and read the article again. Lol

madscientist88:
Leonard Mack, 72, was exonerated after new DNA testing excluded him as the perpetrator.

After 47 years, a New York man has been exonerated after new DNA testing conclusively excluded him as the perpetrator of a 1975 rape.

This is the longest known wrongful conviction in US history to be overturned by DNA evidence.

Your point exactly?

" Leonard Mack, 72, spent over seven years in prison after being convicted in 1976 for the crime he did not commit."

I'm guessing you tactically avoided quoting this part because it shatters your argument.

Which country or worse still which planet in the solar system sentences a man for 47 years on mere rape conviction.

If you need better clarity of the story...the wrongfully convicted man has been trying to clear his name and expunge the record of conviction from his name ever since he was freed from prison 47 years ago.

Ofunaofu:


He actually spent seven years as was stated in the article

Leonard Mack, 72, spent over seven years in prison after being convicted in 1976 for the crime he did not commit.

All the same, he needs to be compensated

Leonard Mack, 72, was exonerated after new DNA testing excluded him as the perpetrator.

After 47 years, a New York man has been exonerated after new DNA testing conclusively excluded him as the perpetrator of a 1975 rape.

This is the longest known wrongful conviction in US history to be overturned by DNA evidence.
common sense should know that was s typographical error,7years isn't the longest number of years a person has served in prison for wrong conviction,a young man served 22 years and was released in around 2020 when the lady confessed that she lied the state gave him 18 million dollars as compensation,dont just go throwing insults without thinking properly.

madscientist88:
Leonard Mack, 72, was exonerated after new DNA testing excluded him as the perpetrator.

After 47 years, a New York man has been exonerated after new DNA testing conclusively excluded him as the perpetrator of a 1975 rape.

This is the longest known wrongful conviction in US history to be overturned by DNA evidence.
common sense should know that was s typographical error,7years isn't the longest number of years a person has served in prison for wrong conviction,a young man served 22 years and was released in around 2020 when the lady confessed that she lied the state gave him 18 million dollars as compensation,dont just go throwing insults without thinking properly.

Ok

IamMobisola:

A girl was raped but by a different person. Police arrested someone they thought fit the profile but you still somehow blame women😓😓

Didn't you read where the woman misidentify the man as the rapist?

Ofunaofu:


He actually spent seven years as was stated in the article

Leonard Mack, 72, spent over seven years in prison after being convicted in 1976 for the crime he did not commit.

All the same, he needs to be compensated

he spent 47 years,the person who wrote the article made a mistake,or else 7 years isn't the highest number of years a person has served for wrong conviction,you could easily look it up,its simple logic, read the first lines below:
Leonard Mack, 72, was exonerated after new DNA testing excluded him as the perpetrator.

After 47 years, a New York man has been exonerated after new DNA testing conclusively excluded him as the perpetrator of a 1975 rape.

This is the longest known wrongful conviction in US history to be overturned by DNA evidence.
it says it all.

MrPaul2:

Didn't you read where the woman misidentify the man as the rapist?

A teenage girl was raped twice; We don’t know the trauma and pain she faced during and after the tragedy. She would still be in shock, her mental state would still be confused and would identify anything or anyone that looks identical to the perpetrator. There are a lot of rape victims that actually end up hating “men” as a whole just because of the experience they had.

The police are to blame for not doing a thorough investigation as to ascertain if it was him or not.

fawaz050:


He spent over 7 years in prison not 47. This means the case was proven about 40 years after his release.

now i know the problem of some Nigerians,lol but its all fine,that did the heading say? that did the first three paragraphs say?
below:
Leonard Mack, 72, was exonerated after new DNA testing excluded him as the perpetrator.

After 47 years, a New York man has been exonerated after new DNA testing conclusively excluded him as the perpetrator of a 1975 rape.

This is the longest known wrongful conviction in US history to be overturned by DNA evidence.
so you could figure out that 7years wasnt the longest time ever served by a person in the US with a Google search but you can mention me? you didnt even notice that 7 which was later mentioned was a typographical error? its fine dr smart.

AmazingELixir:




Your point exactly?

" Leonard Mack, 72, spent over seven years in prison after being convicted in 1976 for the crime he did not commit."

I'm guessing you tactically avoided quoting this part because it shatters your argument.

Which country or worse still which planet in the solar system sentences a man for 47 years on mere rape conviction.

If you need better clarity of the story...the wrongfully convicted man has been trying to clear his name and expunge the record of conviction from his name ever since he was freed from prison 47 years ago.

7 years isn't the highest number of years a person has served for wrong conviction in the US do your research,if this article says 47 years its easy to use Google to get your answer you are smart but how can you not figure when there is an error in the article? 7 years are you kidding me? lol its 47years not 7.

madscientist88:
Leonard Mack, 72, was exonerated after new DNA testing excluded him as the perpetrator.

After 47 years, a New York man has been exonerated after new DNA testing conclusively excluded him as the perpetrator of a 1975 rape.

This is the longest known wrongful conviction in US history to be overturned by DNA evidence.

he was in prison for 7yrs and married after for 21yrs in florida. Aftee 47yrs he was exonerated from wrong doing..meaning he has a clear record. So lived in the prison with his wife?

[

sunday1989:
Though Mr Mack had a strong alibi and was wearing different clothes than the suspect, police still arrested him.
Na wah! The hate for black folks is something else. Flip it around and guess if a white man happened to plied that route at that moment, what would happen to him?

Africa failed from the begining of time .

Once a slave is always a slave, they sold their brothers out for penny, and the white man paid to have them , so how do you expect them to ever love you or see you as normal humans being .

Africans behave like the colours of their skins.

No love
No trust
No development
No sincerity
No morales
No conscience
No humanity amongst them all black people ..

A rich land that was given to the evil race...

i

ruggedtimi:
he was in prison for 7yrs and married after for 21yrs in florida. Aftee 47yrs he was exonerated from wrong doing..meaning he has a clear record. So lived in the prison with his wife?

.

madscientist88:
whats your iq score? 7 years isn't the highest number of years a person have spent for wrongful conviction in the USA,if its not 47 then it should be 22 year,the 7 years mentioned was typographical error by the person who wrote the article.

K

madscientist88:
he was in prison for 47 years not 7 years, Google it.the seven years was a typographical erro which is common when writing articles,you should atleast learn to do a research on an article before countering me.

quoting u here base on this thread.

madscientist88:
whats your iq score? 7 years isn't the highest number of years a person have spent for wrongful conviction in the USA,if its not 47 then it should be 22 year,the 7 years mentioned was typographical error by the person who wrote the article.

check ur iq bro

madscientist88:
he was in prison for 47 years not 7 years, Google it.the seven years was a typographical erro which is common when writing articles,you should atleast learn to do a research on an article before countering me.

Today has been a long time coming. I lost seven-and-a-half years of my life in prison for a crime I did not commit and I have lived with this injustice hanging over my head for almost 50 years,” Mack said in a statement provided by the Innocence Project, an organization that works to exonerate people who are wrongfully convicted and brought Mack’s case to the DA. na u knw which kind research u dey research

madscientist88:
7 years isn't the highest number of years a person has served for wrong conviction in the US do your research,if this article says 47 years its easy to use Google to get your answer you are smart but how can you not figure when there is an error in the article? 7 years are you kidding me? lol its 47years not 7.

My good friend let's try not to generalize, the specifics of this article talks about wrongful conviction on rape charge and the sentencing thereof,

This article is very explicit were it stated the man served over 7years, if his sentence was reduced by way or parole or good behaviour that ain't important here.

What is clear is that from 1976 to date, 2023 is 47 years and there is no way the man could have been in prison all that while because it contradicts the 7 years incarceration captured in the article and no country sentences a rape convict for as much as 47 years.

Perhaps there's a point you're trying to make which as it is I don't understand, or are trying to say the article is wrong?

.

madscientist88:
whats your iq score? 7 years isn't the highest number of years a person have spent for wrongful conviction in the USA,if its not 47 then it should be 22 year,the 7 years mentioned was typographical error by the person who wrote the article.
check ur iq bro
madscientist88:
he was in prison for 47 years not 7 years, Google it.the seven years was a typographical erro which is common when writing articles,you should atleast learn to do a research on an article before countering me AmazingELixir

.

ruggedtimi:
check ur iq bro[b]Today has been a long time coming. I lost seven-and-a-half years of my life in prison for a crime I did not commit and I have lived with this injustice hanging over my head for almost 50 years,” Mack said in a statement provided by the Innocence Project, an organization that works to exonerate people who are wrongfully convicted and brought Mack’s case to the DA.[/b] na u knw which kind research u dey research

Can't believe I actually have to explain this to you people.

47 years was the longest someone has stayed before his wrongful conviction was overturned!!!

The 47 years has nothing to do with the number of years he served which was 7 years!!
There is NO typographical error!!!

DaddyCoool:
.



Can't believe I actually have to explain this to you people.

47 years was the longest someone has stayed before his wrongful conviction was overturned!!!

The 47 years has nothing to do with the number of years he served which was 7 years!!
There is NO typographical error!!!

this is not funny i take full responsibility for this i am sorry i misinterpreted.the article.

AmazingELixir:


My good friend let's try not to generalize, the specifics of this article talks about wrongful conviction on rape charge and the sentencing thereof,

This article is very explicit were it stated the man served over 7years, if his sentence was reduced by way or parole or good behaviour that ain't important here.

What is clear is that from 1976 to date, 2023 is 47 years and there is no way the man could have been in prison all that while because it contradicts the 7 years incarceration captured in the article and no country sentences a rape convict for as much as 47 years.

Perhaps there's a point you're trying to make which as it is I don't understand, or are trying to say the article is wrong?

yeah its my mistake i have since taken down the comment.

DaddyCoool:
.



Can't believe I actually have to explain this to you people.

47 years was the longest someone has stayed before his wrongful conviction was overturned!!!

The 47 years has nothing to do with the number of years he served which was 7 years!!
There is NO typographical error!!!

i dey correct the mads....

AmazingELixir:




Your point exactly?

" Leonard Mack, 72, spent over seven years in prison after being convicted in 1976 for the crime he did not commit."

I'm guessing you tactically avoided quoting this part because it shatters your argument.

Which country or worse still which planet in the solar system sentences a man for 47 years on mere rape conviction.

If you need better clarity of the story...the wrongfully convicted man has been trying to clear his name and expunge the record of conviction from his name ever since he was freed from prison 47 years ago.

Funny u, wat of R kelly convicted for 30 yrs cos of child ponography

madscientist88:
yeah its my mistake i have since taken down the comment.

LOLZ.
I say the apology post as the first comment and i was like "what did this person do?"
Then i saw your initial comment from other people quoting you. It didn't look like it had wronged anybody.
Now getting to this page. Guuyyyy... You nearly fall hand o.

9182736455O1999:

LOLZ.
I say the apology post as the first comment and i was like "what did this person do?"
Then i saw your initial comment from other people quoting you. It didn't look like it had wronged anybody.
Now getting to this page. Guuyyyy... You nearly fall hand o.

well i guess having a high IQ isnt a reason not to make mistakes as the one i did,my mistake was i misinterpreted the word conviction for incarceration,due to the multiple law violations involved in the crime,i had though he had been locked up for 47 years due to the number of crimes and sentences combined,on a second thought i read the article on Google and then that was when i was sure he was locked up for just 7 years and not 47 years as i have thought,these things do happen time to time, but i had to apologize to people ive talked down to, I've learned my lesson, which is not to always have the last opinion on a matter.still i am KAZEL.

Judiciary system have to live up to ot name. Nobody should be falsely accused of the crime they didn't commit