₦airaland Forum

Lol….everybody don turn lawyer/judge for nairaland

Udopasa:
Stupid ruling.

The APC candidate who brought the suit isn't a member of NNPP hence lacks the locus to say who's a member or not.

None resignation before contesting should also be a pre election matter outside the purview of a Tribunal

Nah your people gave judgment. Read the judgment before over pouring unnecessary emotions.

soullove1881:
Nah your people gave judgment. Read the judgment before over pouring unnecessary emotions.

can you contradict what I wrote based on judicial precedence?

What's it with "na your people"?

Udopasa:
Stupid ruling.

The APC candidate who brought the suit isn't a member of NNPP hence lacks the locus to say who's a member or not.

None resignation before contesting should also be a pre election matter outside the purview of a Tribunal

Not correct!

It qualifies as post election matter as well if what the APC candidate is questioning is his non qualification and not his candidacy.

CoolAmbience:
Not correct!

It qualifies as post election matter as well if what the APC candidate is questioning is his non qualification and not his candidacy.

From judicial precedence, it's a pre election matter, that shouldn't be entertained by the Tribunal

Udopasa:
From judicial precedence, it's a pre election matter, that shouldn't be entertained by the Tribunal

There have equally been cases where candidates of political parties were ruled against on ground of not being duly nominated.

Infact, in this past election, the tribunal ruled against a lawmaker from the North for not having duly resigned his appointment as a lecturer at BUK before contesting the election. The was filed by a member of another political party.

So, there have also been precedences in the contrary.

Udopasa:
Stupid ruling.

The APC candidate who brought the suit isn't a member of NNPP hence lacks the locus to say who's a member or not.

None resignation before contesting should also be a pre election matter outside the purview of a Tribunal

Usopasa the judge has spoken.
Go to the higher / highest court.
But please save a little money for ur life

CoolAmbience:
There have equally been cases where candidates of political parties were ruled against on ground of not being duly nominated.

Infact, in this past election, the tribunal ruled against a lawmaker from the North for not having duly resigned his appointment as a lecturer at BUK before contesting the election. The was filed by a member of another political party.

So, there have also been precedences in the contrary.

I'm not talking about precedence at the Tribunal level. I'm talking about judicial precedence at the Appeal and Supreme court respectively.

Most of those Tribunal judges are there to cash out knowing that they wouldn't be sanctioned at the end of the day.

atobs4real:
Usopasa the judge has spoken.
Go to the higher / highest court.
But please save a little money for ur life

They will sure appeal the judgment and justice will be served

Udopasa:
I'm not talking about precedence at the Tribunal level. I'm talking about judicial precedence at the Appeal and Supreme court respectively.

Most of those Tribunal judges are there to cash out knowing that they wouldn't be sanctioned at the end of the day.

Ok, I better understand your angle now.