Timoleon:
Naa🤥. I’m ALWAYS skeptical about headlines so I don’t form opinions until I read the body and understand the various play on words used by the writer. More often than not, journalists have a narrative in which they want you to buy. I task it upon myself to check in the facts of the discourse.

correctguy101:



Kudos to you brother for not being as lazy as us ancestors..

Ah, and it's great knowing we still have people like yourself who recognize the underhanded joke the media sometimes pull with their catchy headlines. They sometimes do same with the information they display, one could be misled if not careful.

Greetings and goodnight

AllenSpencer:
Russia and Soviet Union bombers 🤣🤣🤣

If you defect Soviet Union artillery’s from Russian military, Kenya will easily defeat Russia!

So much of old junks in the military!

Even the nuclear bombs they boast of, are mostly that of the defunct Soviet Union that are not even guaranteed to detonate

gigabyte13:
Russia sef don dey find trouble
Shey dey accuse the US of being the trouble maker
They are now practicing what they preach against.....
Everywhere go soon scatter now
No be every country be Ukraine

Emeskhalifa:
Na God dey protect Naija airspace

seunlayi:


NAF, are you up to this task? [left][/left]

Leave Russia, ECOWAS will deal with them

baike:
If them won start. the world war3. make them start am me I don tire for 9ja

sweetgala:


Okay....
In the last few years how many times has a bomber entered the NATO airspaces requiring a deployment of interceptors.
The Japanese are having to sent interceptors multiple times monthly.

Bomber are still the most dangerous item in many air forces globally.
It keeps most of these countries honest.

Like I said you only need one bomber to make it through to take out a capital city.
Bombers dominated the skies during WWII any future global conflicts would also be dependent on bombers

I don't think the Russians have enough bombers to be risking them when other assets would do.

Yes bombers are exposed to being attacked that's why they needed escorts, but you fail to respect them at your peril

akwesenana:

What's good boss?
Would you mind if we connected on Whatsapp?
I'd like you to teach me about Amazon KDP.

seunny4lif:
USA don’t use bombers to enter contested airspace.

For your information, Russia have more bombers in use than USA.
They learnt that in Vietnam where USA lost more bombers in their history apart from WW2.

obedience4:


If it were a war scenario, those bombers you said will be shot down,
Note they didn't enter NATO air space,
Before you get to a country airspace, there is the ADIZ air defence identification zone, no Russia plane has ever gotten pass there,
If a plane get pasa the zone it is brought down.
Am not downplaying the role of a bomber all I am saying is that a slow moving bomber will be useless in today's type of warfare, expect you are facing a country without a decent air defence system.

The russia newest fighter jets the SU 34 , they are called fighter bomber jets, because they also have the ability to Carry air to ground payload, you can't be more wiser than the military planners in Moscow to incorporate a fighter jets with bombers ability.
The USA f35 also has the same qualities
The China jH7 is also a fighter bomber
Military planners know that you need a bomber that is fast and have flexible movement like a normal jets to be able to hit targets what are well guarded.

If Russia were to bomb this ahit hole Nigeria,
They don't need a su35.the slow moving Tupolev can do the needful, will the USA use a fast moving f35 ti bomber Nigeria
When they can use the b51

SuperOnyi:







Ok...

So you still have that number?

akwesenana:

I guess I lost it.
Can you send me a message @ 081xxxxxxxx?
Hope you don't mind.

obedience4:


If it were a war scenario, those bombers you said will be shot down,
Note they didn't enter NATO air space,
Before you get to a country airspace, there is the ADIZ air defence identification zone, no Russia plane has ever gotten pass there,
If a plane get pasa the zone it is brought down.

What happened to the US air defence identification zone when a Chinese spy balloon violated the American Airspace?
what took the US so long to Identify the flying object before it was downed?

Am not downplaying the role of a bomber all I am saying is that a slow moving bomber will be useless in today's type of warfare, expect you are facing a country without a decent air defence system.

That Chinese balloon was a slow moving object, had it been it was laced with explosive projectiles it would have wrecked havoc on the US before it was intercepted. Judging by your claims above does it mean that the US is without a decent Air defence system, after they failed to quickly identify and downed a slow moving balloon?

Fabrice07:
Dem for do small dogfight 😌

obedience4:


Sometimes I wanna ignore you guys but it just hard.
Do you know the attitude of the air balloon
And besides NORAD tracked the balloon all the way form Canada before it even entered the USA territory, and it was agreed by the president to allow it to safety moved towards the Atlantic before it was safely brought down to prevent falling debris from causing damage.
A simple Google search will search will save you from[b] this nonsense you wrote.[/b]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2023_Chinese_balloon_incident

obedience4:



Lol, what will you use to compare the f22 raptor in Russian airfoce inventory

mysticwarrior:


It still doesn't change the fact that if that balloon was armed with concealed missiles, it would have caused damaged because the delayed in bringing it down would have given it all the time it needed to strike it's target and accomplished it's supposed mission.

Making and expressing your points without lacing it with abusive words wouldn't have discredited your write-up, but rather it would have demonstrated a sense of maturity from you, please try to be matured, no offense directed and no offense should be taken.

Nduxx:

Su-57

Emeskhalifa:
Na God dey protect Naija airspace

obedience4:



An aircraft that is still in testing stage
An aircraft that haven't been integrated into the Russian air force
An aircraft that was model after the same f22 raptor

Nduxx:

What Bro please do your research still in testing stages my foot

Btw: You know that fifth generation fighter in Top Gun Maverick. That was a reference to the SU-57

obedience4:



Just Google SU 57 you will have your proof


Modify

Let me help you sir https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sukhoi_Su-57

Nduxx:

I think you didn't read this. It entered into service in 2020, read bro read

Norwichsailor:

B51 and tupolev for small Nigeria
U wan wipe us extinct?
Doubt we have any air defence system capable of picking off these advanced bombers, best would be dog fights and ofcourse our jets definitely can't climb higher than these bombers. They'd just bomb us into submission
Read about the B2. They say if you can see it, it was never meant for you

Nduxx:

Su-57

sweetgala:


F22 and F35s are a waste of money and are just a PR asset at this stage. In a real scenario they can't perform like the other assets eg F16s and F18s.
Each one needs a special hangar with HVAC to maintain the integrity of the stealth technology.

obedience4:



The Chinese newest bomber the H6 is even a low budget knockoff of the Russian Tupolev
Bombers are risky they are heavy slow,
Easy target for any country with a decent air defence system.
No sensible country invest in bombers

Segun2222:
they should have invested in a multipurpose craft liie the gripens and typhoons

Segun2222:
waste of money but china and Russia followed suit and eded up with a 4.5th gen embarrassment especially the su 57 project that was abandoned at least china saw theirs through