₦airaland Forum

MaxInDHouse:
It's OK i've gotten someone who is learning now so later you and i can continue our child's play! wink

You are the one playing a child's play with you organisation, as the billions of dollars coming into your organisation from those that are gullible will not allow you to tell the truth that Jesus Christ is an invention of the Roman empire.

Dsimmer:
David was a king remember?

Did God suggested kings for Israelites in the first place? 1Samuel 8:7
Who killed Uriah and took his wife?

The Israelites wanted someone who will rule over them with human wisdom not someone who will continue quoting the same laws they were trying to dodge.
That's what they meant when they told Samuel

"give us a king like other nations". 1Samuel 8:5

MaxInDHouse:
Because the Catholic missionaries were wolves in sheep's clothing they pretended to be friends of the people but as times goes by their FRUITS (those they produced through their missionary works) became rulers over the people and these ones now exhibit the real color of their mentors! Matthew 7:15-20

Some missionaries were different from the White colonists. The missionaries built basic amenities while preaching the gospel.

Speaking of the White colonists, while they had their fault but if not for them, the murderous Arab would have wiped out the whole Africa like the Arab wiped out the North Africa.

MindHacker9009:
You are the one playing a child's play with you organisation, as the billions of dollars coming into your organisation from those that are gullible will not allow you to tell the truth that Jesus Christ is an invention of the Roman empire.

OK for now i'm busy!

Dsimmer:
The missionaries were different from the white colonists. The missionaries built basic amenities while preaching the gospel.
Speaking of the white colonists, while they had their fault but if not for them, the murderous Arab would have wiped out the whole Africa like the Arab wiped out the North Africa.

Both of them were POLITICIANS, the colonists disguised using the Bible while the Islamists disguised using the Quran.
Both of them were killers!

MaxInDHouse:
Did God suggested kings for Israelites in the first place? 1Samuel 8:7
Who killed Uriah and took his wife?

The Israelites wanted someone who will rule over them with human wisdom not someone who will continue quoting the same laws they were trying to dodge.
That's what they meant when they told Samuel

"give us a king like other nations". 1Samuel 8:5

God had no problem with David being a King. He only had problem at the fact that he misruled at one point which he paid for it before he was forgiven. As I said, politics is interwoven with the people. It's a position to serve the People and defend the people 📌

Dsimmer:
God had no problem with David being King. He only had problem at the fact that he misruled. As I said, politics is interwoven with the people. It's a position to serve the People.

The truth is that God has never been pleased with any human ruler the one and only human ruler God reserved the seat for is Jesus of Nazareth!

A ruin, a ruin, a ruin I will make it. And it will not belong to anyone until the one who has the legal right comes, and I will give it to him.’ Ezekiel 21:27

God love David because he has a pure heart ever willing to submit himself to God's will. When Saul was the one anointed David feared and respected God's anointing on King Saul just as he later saw Jesus in a vision and referred to Jesus as "Lord" Psalms 110:1

So no human is qualified to rule over mankind except God's only begotten Son Jesus of Nazareth! Matthew 17:5

MaxInDHouse:
Both of them were POLITICIANS, the colonists disguised using the Bible while the Islamists disguised using the Quran.
Both of them were killers!

While some missionaries were interwoven with the White colonists who had their faults, however the White colonists were able to stop the murderous Arab from wiping out Africans like the Arab did to North Africans.

MaxInDHouse:
The truth is that God has never been pleased with any human ruler the one and only human ruler God reserved the seat for is Jesus of Nazareth!

A ruin, a ruin, a ruin I will make it. And it will not belong to anyone until the one who has the legal right comes, and I will give it to him.’ Ezekiel 21:27

God love David because he has a pure heart ever willing to submit himself to God's will. When Saul was the one anointed David feared and respected God's anointing on King Saul just as he later saw Jesus in a vision and referred to Jesus as "Lord" Psalms 110:1

So no human is qualified to rule over mankind except God's only begotten Son Jesus of Nazareth! Matthew 17:5

God elected David himself.

On politics, politics is interwoven with the people. The position is to serve the people as a matter of fact. The problem is the rogue politicians doing otherwise. Politics isn't a career.

MaxInDHouse:
OK for now i'm busy!

You cannot be busy here when this is not your kingdom hall.

Luke 3:11 “If you have two coats, give one away,” he said. “Do the same with your food.”

You are going from house to house for your organisation to make more billions of dollars and not following the teachings of Jesus you claim to be preaching.

Dsimmer:
While some missionaries were interwoven with the white colonists who had their faults, however the white colonists were able to stop the murderous Arab from wiping out Africans like the Arab did to North Africans.

Nobody is wiping anybody out all they wanted is to dominate (rule) others that's all so if the people subjects themselves to their rules they will not harm them but whoever objects will be killed.

That's exactly what both those colonists did as our traditional rulers tried to maintain their position as supreme rulers over their own people!

MaxInDHouse:
Nobody is wiping anybody out all they wanted is to dominate (rule) others that's all so if the people subjects themselves to their rules they will not harm them but whoever objects will be killed.

That's exactly what both those colonists did as our traditional rulers tried to maintain their position as supreme rulers over their own people!

The white colonists didn't wipe out Africans and eventually left. Can that be said of the Arabs who murdered and wiped out North Africans?

Dsimmer:
The colonists didn't wipe out Africans and eventually left. Can that be said of the Arabs who murdered and wiped out North Africans?

They both came for the same reason to rule if anyone objects that's the one who will die but once you bow to them you become a Muslim and obey their Islamic laws that's all!

MaxInDHouse:
They both came for the same reason to rule if anyone objects that's the one who will die but once you bow to them you become a Muslim and obey their Islamic laws that's all!

Nah, the Arabs simply wiped out North Africans. That's so annoying till now.

If the White colonists were as brutal as the Arabs were doing in the Northern Africa, the core north would have been forced to be Christians like the Arabs were forcing Islam on Africans who had nothing to do with Islam to begin with but for Arabs forcing it on some Africans who became enslaved like the core North who can't reason or some Africans with the ulterior covetous & murderous motives such as the Fulan started doing same while forgetting that the Arabs are only bidding to wipe out all Africans like they already did in North Africa 😒 Heck, the whole of Africans won't even exist today if not for the white colonists, just like North Africans don't exist today after the murderous Arabs wiped them all out.

Dsimmer:
Nah, the Arabs simply wiped out North Africans. That's unforgivable till now.
If the white colonists were as brutal as the Arabs were doing in the Northern Africa, the core north would have been forced to be Christians like the Arabs were forcing Islam on Africans who had nothing to do with Islam to begin with but Arabs forcing it on some Africans who became enslaved or some Africans with the ulterior covetous & murderous motives such as the Fulan started doing same while forgetting that the Arabs are only bidding to wipe out all Africans like they already did in North Africa 😒 Heck, the whole of Africans won't even exist today if not for the white colonists, just like North Africans don't exist today after the murderous Arabs wiped them all out.

Guy you've been thoroughly deceived, nobody is wiping anybody out it's just the rulers that are forcing themselves on the weak ones.

Do you think if you protest against human rule they will spare you?
Ọmọ even if it's your own people from your own village once you protest or object to their rulership the only thing they consider is how many are the protesters?
When they discover you're dispensable they'll wipe out the whole area.

That's politics for you!

MaxInDHouse:
Guy you've been thoroughly deceived, nobody is wiping anybody out it's just the rulers that are forcing themselves on the weak ones.

Do you think if you protest against human rule they will spare you?
Ọmọ even if it's your own people from your own village once you protest or object to their rulership the only thing they consider is how many are the protesters?
When they discover you're dispensable they'll wipe out the whole area.

That's politics for you!

The North Africans were wiped out by Arabs who stole the North African lands. That's the fact staring at everyone's eyes.

Dsimmer:
The North Africans were wiped out by Arabs who stole the North African lands. That's the fact staring at everyone's eyes.

Guy that's a lie!

Protesters were killed and those subjecting to the laws of their invaders lives.

When Israelites were matching towards Canaan they were to wipe out all those people but if some people are ready to abide by the laws Moses gave Israel such ones will be allowed to stay.

That's what politicians are trying to imitate!

MaxInDHouse:
Guy that's a lie!

Protesters were killed and those subjecting to the laws of their invaders lives.

When Israelites were matching towards Canaan they were to wipe out all those people but if some people are ready to abide by the laws Moses gave Israel such ones will be allowed to stay.

That's what politicians are trying to imitate!

What rubbish are you saying exactly? What gives any useless Arabs the right to wipe out Africans? Na craze?

On Israel, even Isreal didn't wipe out the Egyptians in Egypt where they sojourned. They only returned back to Canaan where they came from, prior to their sojourn in Egypt to become African multitudes in Egypt.

Dsimmer:
What rubbish are you saying exactly? What gives any useless Arabs the right to wipe out Africans? Na craze?

On Israel, even Isreal didn't wipe out the Egyptians in Egypt where they sojourned. They only returned back to Canaan where they came from, prior to their sojourn in Egypt to become African multitudes in Egypt.

Yes or No
Did the Israelites wipe out people in Canaan?

MaxInDHouse:
Yes or No
Did the Israelites wipe out people in Canaan?

No. Canaan was where the few of them came from before becoming black African multitudes in Egypt after several centuries. They simply returned back. In fact, the Egyptians called them the Cananites because they were Africans in looks and came from Canaan. They simply returned back.

The useless Arabs wiped out Egyptians!

Dsimmer:
No. Canaan was where the few of them came from before becoming black African multitudes in Egypt after several centuries. They simply returned back. In fact, the Egyptians called them the Cananites because they were Africans in looks and came from Canaan. They simply returned back.

The useless Arabs wiped out Egyptians!

Now i know you're just dodging the truth the Bible said God commanded Israel to wipe out Canaanites!

That's what politicians think they're imitating.

MaxInDHouse:
Now i know you're just dodging the truth the Bible said God commanded Israel to wipe out Canaanites!

That's what politicians think they're imitating.

What nonsense are you saying exactly? They came from Canaan to begin with and looked like Cananites. Thus the reason why the Egyptians called them the Cananites. Then, they became several multitudes of black Africans in Egypt after several centuries of sojourning in black Egypt land. When the Egyptians sent them packing, they returned back to Canaan where they came from. So what are you saying exactly? why didn't they wipe out the Egyptians for example?

Useless Arabs wiped out the Egyptians!

Dsimmer:
What nonsense are you saying exactly? They came from Canaan to begin with and looked like Cananites. Thus the reason why the Egyptians called them the Cananites. Then, they became several multitudes of black Africans in Egypt after several centuries of sojourning in black Egypt land. When the Egyptians sent them packing, they returned back to Canaan where they came from. So what are you saying exactly? why didn't they wipe out the Egyptians for example?
Useless Arabs wiped out the Egyptians!

If you believe some people just wake up one day and started thinking of how to wipe away others then that's your own cup of coffee what people do is to dominate or enslave others not wipe them out.

As for the laws Jesus emphasized on Loving God and neighbour it has nothing to do with the laws given to Israelites because the nations Israelites wiped out of Canaan were NEIGHBOURS back then!

MaxInDHouse:
If you believe some people just wake up one day and started thinking of how to wipe away others then that's your own cup of coffee what people do is to dominate or enslave others not wipe them out.

As for the laws Jesus emphasized on Loving God and neighbour it has nothing to do with the laws given to Israelites because the nations Israelites wiped out of Canaan were NEIGHBOURS back then!

It was useless Arabs who did that in North Africa by murdering North Africans while stealing the land of the North Africa 😒.

On the laws, it's simply the 10 commandments simplified into two which is love God and love your neighbor. These are moral ethic codes anyway. Nothing bad in it.

On the rich being asked to help the poor which are the needy and old, it's simply an act of kindness. For example, The purpose of the ministries is to help the poor in a few way they can ((which is an act of kindness) and to enlighten, apart from preaching the gospel. That was what the missionaries were doing. Some of the missionaries would even build basic amenities. Question is if these missionaries are building basic amenities for the people, what stop the politicians who are put in the position to serve and defend the people from doing even more? 🤔

Dsimmer:
if these missionaries are building basic amenities for the people, what stop the politicians who are put in the position to serve and defend the people from doing even more? 🤔

Those missionaries are wolves in sheep's clothing so their fruit which are the politicians fully exhibited what is in the hearts of their forerunners. Matthew 7:15-20

MaxInDHouse:
Those missionaries are wolves in sheep's clothing so their fruit which are the politicians fully exhibited what is in the hearts of their forerunners. Matthew 7:15-20

They're not. They had their goods and the bad. The bad were the colonists who eventually left.. the good was the fact that they brought some enlightenment, basic amenities while defending the country against Arabs who murdered North Africans and stole North Africa.

While the White colonists had their fault considering they colonized Africans however they were still better than the murderous Arabs who murdered North Africans and stole the North African lands. I found Islam faulty on that premises, even as the aim of Arabs is to wipe out Africans and the world at large, like they wiped out the Northern Africans for example 🙄

In fact, I find Islam faulty in several ways, starting with Mohammad who fabricated gibberish about the Jews, different from the original. Or the fact that the Arabs stole North Africa lands after murdering the Northern Africans. Not to mention Mohammad's perverted acts and terrorism. Heck, it was the fact that he was a perverted Criminal who see greediness in everything that he ended up turning the gospel into Terrorism after his wife's cousin who was a Christian preached the gospel to him while he also incorporated the moon worship of the Arab meteorite stone idol deity into it. Because of his greed, he ended up turning the gospel into terrorism and started terrorising to steal people's land for Arabs who had wanted to continue such acts until they were dealt with by the Europeans.

Lastly, there's no brothel in heaven like the perverted criminal Mohammad thought.

On Christianity, the 10 commandments are simply moral ethic codes, summarized into two which is, love God and love your neighbor. They're simply moral ethic code. Nothing bad in it. On the rich being asked to help the poor (the old and needy), it's simply an act of kindness. For example, The purpose of the ministries is to help the poor in a few way they can ((which is an act of kindness) and to enlighten/educate, apart from preaching the gospel. That was what the missionaries were doing. Some are even building basic amenities for the people. In fact, this is a call to the politicians who are put into the position to serve and defend the people to do even more because if these missionaries are building basic amenities, what stops the politicians? 🤔

On Yoruba religion, I find Yoruba religion (IFA) quite interesting though and when one see how accurate IFA is about the concept of the things which formed the world which is light (Obatala) and matter (Oduduwa), It's interesting. It just require an enlightened person to interpret it. For example, the Orishas and ebo are symbolism.

So IFA is quite interesting, informative and intelligent. Its belief is in one's supreme God, called Olorun Olodumare. And then, there are the Orishas which more or less represent intelligence and creative talents embedded within humans which allign with the cosmos that formed the world. I find IFA interesting in the fact that it entails a lot of things which includes science, technology, creativity, medicinal plants etc, which also entailing the history of the Yoruba race. There's also the corresponding astrology/astronomy in it. In fact, knowing one's personality and talents are what these Orishas represent. For example, Orisha Ogun represent iron, metallurgy, mechanical engines/engineers, automobiles and transport wares, chemical industries, warrior, military and defence wares etc. Orisha Oko represent Agriculture and agro industries. Orisha Sango represent commerce, industrialization, civilization, Electricity/electrical engineering, warrior etc. And so-on 📌 It's fascinating.

Celebrating these Orishas which are also the Yoruba ancestors are rather celebrating the historical facts of these ancestors who previously lived as these orishas and also a constant reminder to bring forth one's intelligence and creative talents which are the orishas embedded within humans like the ancestors had done.

MaxInDHouse:
Those missionaries are wolves in sheep's clothing so their fruit which are the politicians fully exhibited what is in the hearts of their forerunners. Matthew 7:15-20

Same thing you are doing going from house to house for your organisation to make more billions of dollars and not following the teachings of Jesus you claim to be preaching.

Luke 3:11 “If you have two coats, give one away,” he said. “Do the same with your food.”

Jesus Christ did not have an organisation with billions of dollars.

Dsimmer:
They're not. They had their goods and the bad. The bad were the colonists who eventually left.

Those colonists are still the ones ruling till now don't be deceived!

The missionaries came to establish the colonists the missionaries with the face of sheep while the colonists are the wolves.

If anyone hurt those missionaries the colonists will wipe out their tribe completely!

MindHacker9009:
Same thing you are doing going from house to house for your organisation to make more billions of dollars and not following the teachings of Jesus you claim to be preaching.

Luke 3:11 “If you have two coats, give one away,” he said. “Do the same with your food.”

Jesus Christ did not have an organisation with billions of dollars.

It's like you just love arguing blindly but i will ignore you for now!

MaxInDHouse:
Those colonists are still the ones ruling till now don't be deceived!

The missionaries came to establish the colonists the missionaries with the face of sheep while the colonists are the wolves.

If anyone hurt those missionaries the colonists will wipe out their tribe completely!

How are the White colonists still ruling? 🤔

Are they the politicians who failed to build basic amenities and industries which also includes large scale mechanized farming in combination with agro industries?

Heck, the White colonists allowed a good federalism system before they left. But what happened after they left? Our true federalism was destroyed by Nigerians, the Easterners to be precise.

Dsimmer:
How are the White colonists still ruling? 🤔
Are they the politicians who failed to build basic amenities and industries which also includes large scale mechanized farming in combination with agro industries?
Heck, the White colonists allowed a good federalism system before they left. But what happened after they left? Our true federalism was destroyed by Nigerians, the Easterners to be precise.

What is Federalism?

Guy the colonists are still ruling indirectly by establishing the system of government that you can't survive without them having to interfere in your rulership!

MaxInDHouse:
What is Federalism?

Guy the colonists are still ruling indirectly by establishing the system of government that you can't survive without them having to interfere in your rulership!

You didn't know about our true federalism?

No white colonists is ruling the country. It's not the white colonists that asked the politicians not to invest in basic amenities and industrialization for the people. As I said already, I see no reason why the politicians which include governors, senators, house of representatives can't invest in large scale mechanized farming in combination with agro industrialization in their states.