₦airaland Forum

Chai..

The unchallenging environments in Africa is such a disadvantage to rapid evolution of her inhabitants.

By the end, the west who migrated from Africa will still come to save Africa. Hopefully they don’t retract to the old ways due to the unchallenging environments because the first step to evolution comes with your ability to conquer your surroundings.

Botragelad:
Lol. Let's ask Rwanda then!

Oh, they are fine with it of course. Enough cash for life-dictator Paul!

;

Bfly:
The unchallenging environments in Africa is such a disadvantage to rapid evolution of her inhabitants.

In this, you have said so much.

cc: wirinet. I think we once discussed something like this.

Why are u deporting them to Rwanda and not to their country?

Botragelad:
No one is using them as a deportation ground. It's a treaty.
The treaty is an upgrade from the previous memorandum of understanding and aims to address the issues raised by the Supreme Court, which had previously ruled the plans as unlawful.

What the Rwandan government is trying to demonstrate that it is a safe country to send people to, and the treaty includes provisions for the UK to resettle a portion of Rwanda's most vulnerable refugees. Thee treaty specifies that Rwanda will only send people back to the UK if there are issues, with no exhaustive list of reasons provided.

Does this agreement sound forced to you? It's a mutual decision.

are the immigrants from Rwanda? What of d immigrant doesn't want to go to Rwanda?

You supported tinubu and now u don't want to be sent to Rwanda lolz

God1000:
Why Rwanda? Rwandan government shouldn't have accepted such thing from UK

I sincerely don't know how this will benefit Rwanda

it is not free of charge. Nigeria will be better off accepting such than watching Hausa speaking immigrants from West Africa raid our country for free.

OkpaNsukkaisBae:
Does Rwanda share border with UK🇬🇧? Are the illegal immigrants from Rwanda?

Well, the illegal immigrants will kukuma not try it again knowing fully well that they are going to land in Rwanda.

Judolisco:
Why are u deporting them to Rwanda and not to their country?

They can't deport them back to their countries because they claim they were fleeing from persecution in their countries. So the truth is, if you are not safe in your country, any country should be okay for you to live in.

But the Rwanda scheme will not take off because (a) the courts will stop the flights from taking off (b) Labour is set to win the next election and they'll stop the Rwanda deportation

Judolisco:
are the immigrants from Rwanda? What of d immigrant doesn't want to go to Rwanda?

Then F**k the immigrant.
Who sent them to UK before?
UK is tired of illegal immigrants. So any humane punishment to them is ok.

Rwanda should continue playing with its national security, until those migrants decide they want to establish their own country within rwanda.

Botragelad:
No one is using them as a deportation ground. It's a treaty.
The treaty is an upgrade from the previous memorandum of understanding and aims to address the issues raised by the Supreme Court, which had previously ruled the plans as unlawful.

What the Rwandan government is trying to demonstrate that it is a safe country to send people to, and the treaty includes provisions for the UK to resettle a portion of Rwanda's most vulnerable refugees. Thee treaty specifies that Rwanda will only send people back to the UK if there are issues, with no exhaustive list of reasons provided.

Does this agreement sound forced to you? It's a mutual decision.

DeepSight:
Somehow or the other (and I dont know why) this post of yours comes across as sort of school-prefect-ish, talking down at the OP, or voltron-ish, defending the U.K.

There are reasons why the bill was controversial even in the U.K; and you should not pretend not to know them. Primarily, there is a scent of snobbery in the entire idea of off-loading would be illegal immigrants onto a small third world country, no matter how nicely packaged the idea is.

UK has its way of proper immigration.
Follow the way no problem for you. But it is not by force to FORCE yourself into UK.
Hence the Rwanda method.
If you don't want to follow due process, you can always get your own battleship and
invade UK, the same way the colonisers came by ship to invade Africa.
Nothing spoil.

uuzba:
UK has its way of proper immigration.
Follow the way no problem for you. But it is not by force to FORCE yourself into UK.
Hence the Rwanda method.
If you don't want to follow due process, you can always get your own battleship and
invade UK, the same way the colonisers came by ship to invade Africa.
Nothing spoil.

And I will stomp the Nigerian flag onto their soil and shout -
"I do so hereby claim this land, and hereby name it . . . . New-Ojuelegba!"

After all that was how they would stomp their flag onto lands they just arrived in and shout the same thing.

oluwaseyi0:
Rwandans about to start having foreign criminals walking free on their street

What happened to deporting the criminals back to their home country

How is an asylum seeker a criminal? You want people fleeing their home countries where their lives was threatened to be sent back home to same countries?

Rwanda will start receiving Foreign aid, Packages and Special attention from U.K for receiving Illegal Immigrants.

id4sho:
OGA PM hell bent on deportation

JAPA FANS IN NIGERIA
JAPA TO UK ANYHOW AND RWANDA WILL WELCOME YOU

Botragelad:
No one is using them as a deportation ground. It's a treaty.
The treaty is an upgrade from the previous memorandum of understanding and aims to address the issues raised by the Supreme Court, which had previously ruled the plans as unlawful.

What the Rwandan government is trying to demonstrate that it is a safe country to send people to, and the treaty includes provisions for the UK to resettle a portion of Rwanda's most vulnerable refugees. Thee treaty specifies that Rwanda will only send people back to the UK if there are issues, with no exhaustive list of reasons provided.

Does this agreement sound forced to you? It's a mutual decision.

At the end of the day,Rwanda makes millions of pounds out of the deal, Rwanda will have more money to eat Fufu, Posho, Matoke, Groundnut soup, African tea, beef 🍖, chicken etc

l have visited Rwanda although a safe place but economically a dead country, taxes are high, economic activities are at a slow progress, you are monitored by Kagame boys , purchasing power of citizens are poor / low , l wonder how the refugees will integrate into Rwanda because Rwandese citizens are literally Refugees under the draconian Pharoah called Kagame, if you misbehave in Rwanda, Kagame will flog you will Koboko laden with chilly pepper 🌶️


The gif Below awaits all refugees and Stubborn Rwandese citizens in Rwanda

Serious wahala for those that don’t have valid visa ….UK govt knows how to fling out all those non valid residents. Oga oooo

Judolisco:
are the immigrants from Rwanda? What of d immigrant doesn't want to go to Rwanda?

Then they can go back to their country. Rwanda is getting paid for it by UK government. Very soon some African leaders will queue up to allow the west use their country. Money talks

YoshihideSuga:
UK initiated this scheme, then Denmark followed suit. One thing is clear, Paul Kagame has played his cards so well. The West approves of his "dictatorial" leadership.

Him dey kampe! Nothing dey happen.

One guy was speaking grammar up there...this one you have mentioned is the real reason/benefit that is in it for Rwanda. People should forget payment or no payment. Kigame is doing this to continue enjoying his 'immunity' and protection from the West

God1000:
Why Rwanda? Rwandan government shouldn't have accepted such thing from UK

I sincerely don't know how this will benefit Rwanda

You guys don't understand the agreement. According to the agreement. They won't live in Rwanda. Instead of the UK having to process their asylum claims. It will be processed in Rwanda. If successful, they will return to UK. If not Rwandan government will then decide whether to keep them or deport them.

In summary, they're outsourcing asylum considerations to Rwanda who will be paid for it.

makaveli902:
Rwanda will start receiving Foreign aid, Packages and Special attention from U.K for receiving Illegal Immigrants.

There is a big gain in it for Rwanda. They have been receiving foreign aids in torrents. That is why most international conferences are being held there. FIFA, for example has a lot of projects there of recent.

God1000:
Why Rwanda? Rwandan government shouldn't have accepted such thing from UK

I sincerely don't know how this will benefit Rwanda

Its Business, Rwanda already received billions for it already

makaveli902:
Rwanda will start receiving Foreign aid, Packages and Special attention from U.K for receiving Illegal Immigrants.

There is a big gain in it for Rwanda. They have been receiving foreign aids in torrents. That is why most international conferences are being held there. FIFA, for example has a lot of projects there of recent.[code][/code]

mysticwarrior:
It's stupid for Rwanda to allowed their country to be used as deportation ground for illegal immigrants.

Didn't Rwanda volunteer? I also think it's stupid but who knows the politics in play here

JohnBullMySon:
You guys don't understand the agreement. According to the agreement. They won't live in Rwanda. Instead of the UK having to process their asylum claims. It will be processed in Rwanda. If successful, they will return to UK. If not Rwandan government will then decide whether to keep them or deport them.

In summary, they're outsourcing asylum considerations to Rwanda who will be paid for it.

Most people commenting are not even following the issue.
Don't be surprised most commenting here are just getting to know about it for the first time. But of course, they must comment for the sake of it.

Botragelad:
What is the nature of your inquiry, or is the content of the preceding post unclear to you? Surely you are the original poster?🤷‍♂️

In the event that the matter is not apparent to you, the post discusses the United Kingdom's strategy to repatriate certain migrants to Rwanda, which forms part of a broader initiative to curb unlawful immigration Following an extensive period of legislative debate, the UK Parliament has ratified a bill sanctioning these expulsions.

Prime Minister Rishi Sunak has been a staunch advocate for this bill, asserting its necessity to halt the influx of migrants traversing the English Channel in diminutive vessels.
The stance of Rwanda on this matter is secondary; the primary concern of the UK government is that this policy will serve to regulate immigration.

What the post says is the policy is designed not solely for the regulation of immigration but also to safeguard individuals by deterring them from embarking on hazardous voyages orchestrated by criminal syndicates.

The Rwandan government on the other hand has stated that it is important for the partnership to adhere to international law standards and has taken objection to being labeled as unsafe. The British government's funding is expected to ensure that asylum seekers sent to Kigali are well taken care of.

It's like an opportunity for Rwanda to strengthen bilateral relations with the UK, receive financial aid, and enhance its international standing by participating in a solution to a global challenge. Rwanda is simply asking for it. Lol

But EU human rights organization against the deportation, hence she is suing UK government over this issue. Which means not internationally accepted.

Rwanda is okay.