osazsky:
u think this is PSG against lens..this is d ucl oga

rest

Why you no quote am since?
Na when game finish you start to dey ask uselèss questions

Goodluck to Harry Kane

boxypane:

Against Dortmund, they were very unlucky. I mean who hits the cross bar 6 times in a match without scoring?

Dembele was celebrating wildly against Barca after all Barca did for him.

PSG fans were insulting Messi and Neymar for destroying their team and setting them back because they thought they were already in the final.

I am very happy Dortmund dumped them out..

spencekat:
Madrid will lift the trophy once again.

No,e go be Germany vs Germany final.

Pacesetter123:

No,e go be Germany vs Germany final.

Just because say una dey beef them say they don too carry champions League no mean say they no go lift am this time around.

ellizy:

Barca no be team, very useless self .. see how Girona beat dem from behind last weekend

idiotss cost me 120k win

So this PSG of a club is in the same class with Arsenal..ooo?
Champion League nah taboo to them.
Local champions wey dem be

Morphinne:

I can’t blame you. You rely on nairaland freebasic for scoreline updates
Match result/scoreline doesn’t always show who the better teams are. If one is to invest in either of the two teams last night, idiots like you will surely go for Dortmund going by the scoreline you see
Who hits the goalpost 6 times in two matches against the same opponents?
PSG needs deliverance and their entire defense line and Donnarumma need to be flushed.

Definitely!! I'll go for a team that gets the job done over two legs than a team that was playing mumuishly until they conceded the second goal. Go and watch the match well. PSG did not make any good chance to equalise the 1-0 deficit until Dortmund scored and went deep. That's the team you're counting goalpost for. Go and waste your money and get premium tears in return!

spencekat:
Just because say una dey beef them say they don too carry champions League no mean say they no go lift am this time around.

I tire oo

Kukutente23:

I tire oo

Na their excuse o. E dey pain sha. Nobody be stop other teams from working hard.

geoworldedu:

Do you think the other five woodworks would have occured if PSG had scored the first woodwork? No, it won't because DORTMUND won't defence as soon as it becomes 1-1. They will go all out and then the chances won't come for PSG. They stayed back because PSG didn't score a goal. If you think I'm lying ask Atletico Madrid. When Dortmund was leading 2-0, they stayed back. When Tico equalised them, they came out and played. Then they scored another two more goals. Aswear, assuming PSG equalised yesterday, you would have seen Dortmund in full force again and the score would have been 3-1 because Dortmund will score again and again.
SE refusal to use Dortmund tactics of defence and then attack cost them the AFCON. Imagine, Ivory Coast equalised them, yet they still kept defending till the end. PSG should be glad they didn't equalise yesterday because if they did, Dortmund would have destroyed them with an attacking football that they don't understand.

@bolded is based on assumption. I hate it when people argue with that word “if”
You will notice I didn’t say PSG would have won if their shots didn’t hit the bar 6 times. You don’t argue using assumptions.
Secondly, my main point is that PSG were the better team last night. A good team wouldn’t be saved by the crossbar 6 times in two games.
I would have agreed with you if PSG attackers’ shot were successfully blocked from getting to the goalkeeper or if they were saved by the goalie. Remember that A.Madrid played this same pattern with Dortmund and I can remember telling people then that Atletico were being lucky because Dortmund played better just the same way Chelsea played better football than City in the FA cup semifinal but still lost to them (though, it was all thanks to English FA, the referee, VAR and hon. Jackson of course )
Atleti started parking the bus in the second half of the game just because they were having a 2-goal lead. Dortmund played really good football but were unlucky that night with 3 woodworks. They had 3 hit-woodworks and I can remember saying it that Madrid’s anti-footballing gameplay would surely backfire in the second leg because it’s just not sustainable.
What I’m saying in essence is that what Borussia played yesterday is not sustainable and I don’t see that as a good tactic (nobody is saying they shouldn’t defend their lead but they failed at it)

Morphinne:

@bolded is based on assumption. I hate it when people argue with that word “if”
You will notice I didn’t say PSG would have won if their shots didn’t hit the bar 6 times. You don’t argue using assumptions.
Secondly, my main point is that PSG were the better team last night. A good team wouldn’t be saved by the crossbar 6 times in two games.
I would have agreed with you if PSG attackers’ shot were successfully blocked from getting to the goalkeeper or if they were saved by the goalie. Remember that A.Madrid played this same pattern with Dortmund and I can remember telling people then that Atletico were being lucky because Dortmund played better just the same way Chelsea played better football than City in the FA cup semifinal but still lost to them (though, it was all thanks to English FA, the referee, VAR and hon. Jackson of course )
Atleti started parking the bus in the second half of the game just because they were having a 2-goal lead. Dortmund played really good football but were unlucky that night with 3 woodworks. They had 3 hit-woodworks and I can remember saying it that Madrid’s anti-footballing gameplay would surely backfire in the second leg because it’s just not sustainable.
What I’m saying in essence is that what Borussia played yesterday is not sustainable and I don’t see that as a good tactic (nobody is saying they shouldn’t defend their lead but they failed at it)

Talking about woodwork, it is even called off target. So what the eff about it? When keeper saves it, then it is on target. 6 off target shots is what you are disturbing us about. Lol. The saves made by keeper are even to be talk about than off target shots like woodwork shots. So forget the story. Nobody beats you home and away and you claim it's by luck. That's so funny to say. I maintain, if PSG had equalised with the first woodworks, the other five would not have come because Dortmund would have changed tactics to attacking football, except they want to the unfortunate like the S.E in the final of the just concluded AFCON.

I saw your condemnation of my assumption but I see that you making assumptions of woodworks being goals is also unfounded because if the woodworkers had fired the shots within the net, the keeper could have saved them. But you assumed they will enter the net if they are not striking the wood.

Ade1177:


He was not shit

I watched his game

It's the coach that decided to focus more on handing the ball to dembele

The players kept ignoring the left side and passing everything to dembele to run 🏃‍♂️

I can count how many times he touched the ball and each time he did very well

He was just unlucky hitting the post

Did you see the chances ramos missed and they want to chase Ronaldo away for that boy

Point is
If mbappe is in Madrid even if he has off days
Other 10 players will definitely step up

That's madrid for you

The coach focused on Dembele because he was getting some joy over his marker while Mbappe was basically slowing the game down when he's on the ball.
One of PSG's main problem was that Dembele was crossing towards the deep areas while mbappe was nested on the edge of the box. It led to many crosses that failed to connect. Their best chances were shots from outside the box.
Ramos couldn't do much because crosses were being sent to Mbappe and Dembele not him.
Mbappe was a flop in that match

Ekaka14:

You deservedly have your points but I was more concerned about how Dortmund organized themselves over 2 legs and got the job done...a double over a higher ranked side...PSG
I won't argue about anything else you typed up there...football can draw many thoughts and there's always the element of luck tucked into the overall assessment of a game

Yeah you are right. They were very disciplined and protected their lead and yes, luck is part of football and that’s my point.
I’m just enraged about how some peeps who didn’t watch the match but were following the scoreline on nairaland were saying Dortmund played better. Yes, they produced the desired result but I won’t say they produced the result as a result of their great tactic because they failed. Even FC24 commentator sef go talk say the crossbar becomes the goalkeeper’s best friend when there’s a hit-woodwork
A team conceding 6 hit-crossbars in two matches against the same opponents isn’t tactics but pure luck. I wouldn’t be saying this if it’s was their goalkeeper that was saving all the shots or if PSG forwards were the ones being wasteful as a result of Dortmund’s solid defense and pressure play (though, they were wasteful)
I said this same thing about Atletico Madrid when they played Dortmund in Spain. Atletico Madrid were doing what they are notorious for (bus-parking) when they were 2 goals ahead but were lucky that night.
Two of Dortmund’s shots hit the crossbar and the last one hit the post in the final second of the game.
Yes, luck is part of football but PSG were not lucky (you would understand this better if you’re a punter and were looking for just one goal from PsG last night)
Pesin wey dey find one go con dey hit bar 4 times, no be juju be that?
You will think it’s your village people that are behind it

geoworldedu:
Talking about woodwork, it is even called off target. So what the eff about it? When keeper saves it, then it is on target. 6 off target shots is what you are disturbing us about. Lol. The saves made by keeper are even to be talk about than off target shots like woodwork shots. So forget the story. Nobody beats you home and away and you claim it's by luck. That's so funny to say. I maintain, if PSG had equalised with the first woodworks, the other five would not have come because Dortmund would have changed tactics to attacking football, except they want to the unfortunate like the S.E in the final of the just concluded AFCON.

I saw your condemnation of my assumption but I see that you making assumptions of woodworks being goals is also unfounded because if the woodworkers had fired the shots within the net, the keeper could have saved them. But you assumed they will enter the net if they are not striking the wood.

Spot on

Morphinne:

Yeah you are right. They were very disciplined and protected their lead and yes, luck is part of football and that’s my point.
I’m just enraged about how some peeps who didn’t watch the match but were following the scoreline on nairaland were saying Dortmund played better. Yes, they produced the desired result but I won’t say they produced the result as a result of their great tactic because they failed. Even FC24 commentator sef go talk say the crossbar becomes the goalkeeper’s best friend when there’s a hit-woodwork
A team conceding 6 hit-crossbars in two matches against the same opponents isn’t tactics but pure luck. I wouldn’t be saying this if it’s was their goalkeeper that was saving all the shots or if PSG forwards were the ones being wasteful as a result of Dortmund’s solid defense and pressure play (though, they were wasteful)
I said this same thing about Atletico Madrid when they played Dortmund in Spain. Atletico Madrid were doing what they are notorious for when they were 2 goals ahead but were lucky that night.
Two of Dortmund’s shots hit the crossbar and the last one hit the post in the final second of the game.
Yes, luck is part of football but PSG were not lucky (you would understand this better if you’re a punter and were looking for just one goal from PsG last night)
Pesin wey dey find one go con dey hit bar 4 times, no be juju be that?
You will think it’s your village people that are behind it

Maybe they are hitting the goalposts because Dortmund has blocked every chance of the ball hitting target 🤷‍♂️

geoworldedu:
Talking about woodwork, it is even called off target. So what the eff about it? When keeper saves it, then it is on target. 6 off target shots is what you are disturbing us about. Lol. The saves made by keeper are even to be talk about than off target shots like woodwork shots. So forget the story. Nobody beats you home and away and you claim it's by luck. That's so funny to say. I maintain, if PSG had equalised with the first woodworks, the other five would not have come because Dortmund would have changed tactics to attacking football, except they want to the unfortunate like the S.E in the final of the just concluded AFCON.

I saw your condemnation of my assumption but I see that you making assumptions of woodworks being goals is also unfounded because if the woodworkers had fired the shots within the net, the keeper could have saved them. But you assumed they will enter the net if they are not striking the wood.

@bolded are you being sarcastic or what?
You mean the goalkeeper would have saved the shots if they didn’t hit the goalpost?
No vex, I should have assumed that the balls would bounce back to the goalkeepers arms instead of entering the net since the goalkeeper is the flash. How una dey take dey reason at times?
How does that sound to you baby girl?
Now, I understand. You eventually proved my suspicion right that nairaland freebasic is your source
Have a nice day

Kukutente23:

Maybe they are hitting the goalposts because Dortmund has blocked every chance of the ball hitting target 🤷‍♂️

I love this but no, good defense wouldn’t give you the chance to even shoot at all and if you are able to, it would land softly in the hands of the goalkeeper. They were only able to block like 9 out of over 20 shots played by PSG. Also, if you watched the match, you would know that Dortmund’s defense line wasn’t really solid but PSG wwere unlucky, wasteful and have a horrible defense line and goalkeeper.

Kukutente23:

The coach focused on Dembele because he was getting some joy over his marker while Mbappe was basically slowing the game down when he's on the ball.
One of PSG's main problem was that Dembele was crossing towards the deep areas while mbappe was nested on the edge of the box. It led to many crosses that failed to connect. Their best chances were shots from outside the box.
Ramos couldn't do much because crosses were being sent to Mbappe and Dembele not him.
Mbappe was a flop in that match

The real flop

Was ramos

With missing 4 big chances

Ade1177:


The real flop

Was ramos

With missing 4 big chances

And to think this same guy was being compared to Ronaldo in the WC is more than ridiculous. That loss was proudly sponsored by Ramos, Donnarumma and Dembele

Morphinne:

I love this but no, good defense wouldn’t give you the chance to even shoot at all and if you are able to, it would land softly in the hands of the goalkeeper. They were only able to block like 9 out of over 20 shots played by PSG. Also, if you watched the match, you would know that Dortmund’s defense line wasn’t really solid but PSG wwere unlucky, wasteful and have a horrible defense line and goalkeeper.

But you do know that shots that hit the goalpost are counted as off-targets right?

Morphinne:

@bolded are you being sarcastic or what?
You mean the goalkeeper would have saved the shots if they didn’t hit the goalpost?
No vex, I should have assumed that the balls would bounce back to the goalkeepers arms instead of entering the net since the goalkeeper is the flash. How una dey take dey reason at times?
How does that sound to you baby girl?
Now, I understand. You eventually proved my suspicion right that nairaland freebasic is your source
Have a nice day

if the balls are not hitting the crossbars, pls tell me where they will go. They would have come lower for the keeper's hands to touch, isn't it? That's why the keeper could have saved them. But they were too high for the keeper's reach or too far from his reach. If they come closer to his reach, they won't strike the crossbar and he would have caught them. If you don't understand my grammar let me use Mathematics to explain them. A particular football was shot towards the keeper. The keeper stretched to 3.2m but his hand could not touch it. The 3.2m already covered all the surface of the post, but the ball went farther at 3.4m. Instead of saying that PSG nearly scored the ball, I am seeing it from the angle that they nearly had a shot on target because if the ball had come 0.2m closer to the keeper, the keeper could catch it. So next time, tell PSG to be more accurate because nearly cannot kill a bird and nearly that involved woodwork is not almost a goal but almost a 'shot on target' because the keeper could have caught it.

Look at the picture below. Will you tell me that if the ball that hit the crossbar and ricocheted away had come a bit lower, the keeper wouldn't have saved it?

Somebody said that the reason why PSG hit the crossbars all the time is that Dortmund defended so well that there wasn't any available space to play the ball into the net than the crossbar. That's how good Dortmund's defence was over the two legs

edenex:


idiotss cost me 120k win

I swear the cost me more bro..
I've been planning my finances because na X2 I stake na to just see say dem eventually lose...

Morphinne:

I love this but no, good defense wouldn’t give you the chance to even shoot at all and if you are able to, it would land softly in the hands of the goalkeeper. They were only able to block like 9 out of over 20 shots played by PSG. Also, if you watched the match, you would know that Dortmund’s defense line wasn’t really solid but PSG wwere unlucky, wasteful and have a horrible defense line and goalkeeper.

If PSG had good chances to shoot, won't their shots be on target? The fact that their shots were hitting the goalposts shows they never had good sights on goal but were just trying their luck with speculative shots.
Dortmund did not concede any meaningful chance to PSG until they scored. Go and watch the match again.

Ade1177:


The real flop

Was ramos

With missing 4 big chances

4 big chances? Where and where? Seems you didn't see Mbappe's chance that hit the top of the goalpost. That was PSG'S best chance and he managed to hit it over the bar from close range. It bears close resemblance with KDB's miss.
Mbappe should have scored twice yesterday. They were not even feeding Ramos. Anytime they attempted to feed him, the crosses were too close to the keeper.

Kukutente23:

4 big chances? Where and where? Seems you didn't see Mbappe's chance that hit the top of the goalpost. That was PSG'S best chance and he managed to hit it over the bar from close range. It bears close resemblance with KDB's miss.
Mbappe should have scored twice yesterday. They were not even feeding Ramos. Anytime they attempted to feed him, the crosses were too close to the keeper.

Maybe it's another match you watch o

Because mbappe played well

80% of psg attack was directed to Dembele

At a point I was wondering why the coach gave that narrative to the players

Then last game mbappe was playing 9 and was marked out

I sha know
If mbappe signs for Madrid
He'll be way more dangerous with the players surrounding him

Just like Ronaldo moving to Madrid turned him to another beast entirely

Ade1177:


Maybe it's another match you watch o

Because mbappe played well

80% of psg attack was directed to Dembele

At a point I was wondering why the coach gave that narrative to the players

Then last game mbappe was playing 9 and was marked out

I sha know
If mbappe signs for Madrid
He'll be way more dangerous with the players surrounding him

Just like Ronaldo moving to Madrid turned him to another beast entirely

Ronaldo won UCL with man utd before moving to Madrid. He did not go trophy hunting.

Mbappe missed the best chance PSG had in the match. He was also slowing the attack down reason the left channel was preferred.

He was the biggest flop of the game

geoworldedu:
The ball was a red card, wasn't it? And they lost the penalty they played as a result. They should have scored if they were not fouled that led to the red card. Arsenal is not ripe for EPL let alone UCL. They need a decade more to grow up together

I dey talk of RVP red card…

IamtheTruth1:


I dey talk of RVP red card…

Okay, that was a quarter final game or so. The referee should be questioned on why he did that. I was supporting barca that day but I was angry at the red card then too. But even if Arsenal went through then, they will still end up not winning the UCL. Chelsea suffered similar fate in the hands of Barca in 2009, but after then they won two UCLs. Arsenal should have won at least one after then, but they are not just good enough for European tourney. See how they lost heavily to Chelsea in the Europa league final, but come to FA final, they will win.

geoworldedu:
Okay, that was a quarter final game or so. The referee should be questioned on why he did that. I was supporting barca that day but I was angry at the red card then too. But even if Arsenal went through then, they will still end up not winning the UCL. Chelsea suffered similar fate in the hands of Barca in 2009, but after then they won two UCLs. Arsenal should have won at least one after then, but they are not just good enough for European tourney. See how they lost heavily to Chelsea in the Europa league final, but come to FA final, they will win.

Everything after ur but no dey enter my head

Shame no dey catch u? Go and look at the squad Emery took to That final. Sokratis, Luis, Pepe… which other useless player can I remember now…

Ehmmm kolasinac. Very useless team

IamtheTruth1:



Everything after ur but no dey enter my head

lol
You don't want me to catch cruise with your darling Arsenal

geoworldedu:
Okay, that was a quarter final game or so. The referee should be questioned on why he did that. I was supporting barca that day but I was angry at the red card then too. But even if Arsenal went through then, they will still end up not winning the UCL. Chelsea suffered similar fate in the hands of Barca in 2009, but after then they won two UCLs. Arsenal should have won at least one after then, but they are not just good enough for European tourney. See how they lost heavily to Chelsea in the Europa league final, but come to FA final, they will win.

Chelsea kept the same team and even added quad depth more. Arteta couldn’t keep the same team hence why