₦airaland Forum

Vl3ly:
I'm not asking for screenshots,give me the link
Don't give me quora link ,bcs ...........

Young man I don't have time for unprofiitless debates,
I am done with the Sub agruement

https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/weapons/a34483004/worlds-most-dangerous-submarines-ranked/

obedience4:
How did France nationalised dose mines??
How did China nationalised projects it's built in Africa,
Did the Chinese not took over Uganda airport after failure of paying debts.

Do you know how many local business have been taken over by forgien power, through deals and loans

Try not to sound intelligently stupid when corrected.

Contracts have clauses, especially those dealing with debts, and when those terms are broken by one party failing to meets its obligation, the other party activates the clauses in order to try and get it money back.

Contractual clauses are not nationalization. You don't nationalize what is not in your territory.

China didn't nationalize that airport. The take over is simply a contractual clause in dealing with the host nation that was too desperate and foolish to accept the inclusion of such clauses.

Accept your wrong and move on.

lanre316:
🤣

Vawulence for vawulence

Meaning if the West wants go burn down the world, let's assist them in doing it faster

Procashtips:
Meaning if the West wants go burn down the world, let's assist them in doing it faster

Mutually Assured Destruction - Let all of us become MAD together 😁

usmanpogo:
Appleyard just corrected you, you can't nationalize a company outside your territory, you keep using the word "nationalize" in the wrong context.

The transfer of a company (private) to the
Government (public) is the simplest definition.

In this context, if France did "nationalize" those mines as you've stated then it'll no longer be the property of Niger.

As regards the Chinese taking over projects in Uganda or other African countries, I believe those projects fall under the purview of the private sector.
I believe there are certain clauses that allows a foreign company to take over projects in the private sector of another country, I'm certain this is not the first time these things happen. I'm certain these countries have legal advisers, the question is, are there any discrepancies prior to the take over ? Certain conditions has to be meet before a take over could happen.

He love to live in his alternate world of reality. I'm not quoting him hereafter.

Appleyard:
Try not to sound intelligently stupid when corrected.

Contracts have clauses, especially those dealing with debts, and when those terms are broken by one party failing to meets its obligation, the other party activates the clauses in order to try and get it money back.

Contractual clauses are not nationalization. You don't nationalize what is not in your territory.

China didn't nationalize that airport. The take over is simply a contractual clause in dealing with the host nation that was too desperate and foolish to accept the inclusion of such clauses.

Accept your wrong and move on.

Are we debating contracts and clauses and agreements.??
Before nationalization takes place something has to have taken place
Are you aware of the contracts, deals, agreement, clauses, between Russia and dose African countries.
Can you tell us the details of the agreement?
Do you think big countries come and tell you to your face they want your natural resources.
There is always a deal in place, which they know you won't be able to meet.

what is nationalization??
transfer of a major branch of industry or commerce to state ownership or control

In the case of the Uganda airport, is China not a state, dose China not control the airport?
Dose China not have ownership to it?
Nationalization dose not have to been a territory you control or administer, it's all about control and ownership


Let me quote from this article
https://asia.nikkei.com/Opinion/China-s-expensive-bet-on-Africa-has-failed

China's commercial activities in Africa, such as investments, infrastructure projects and bank lending, have long attracted scrutiny and criticism. Critics have accused Beijing of practicing a new form of economic colonialism to gain control of the continent's valuable natural resources by luring unsuspecting African nations into so-called debt traps

Any means use by a forgien power to get the control and ownership is simply nationalization

Obedience40:
Young man I don't have time for unprofiitless debates,
I am done with the Sub agruement

https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/weapons/a34483004/worlds-most-dangerous-submarines-ranked/

This also My proof
https://gitnux.org/worlds-most-powerful-submarine/

Vl3ly:
This also My proof
https://gitnux.org/worlds-most-powerful-submarine/

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ohio-class_submarine

And

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Borei-class_submarine

Both are nuclear powered subs, compare both and see

Google is USA tool

Just like

yandex is Russia tool

Look at what yandex said

The Russian nuclear submarine Dmitry Donskoy is the most powerful submarine in the world.

It was designed to carry 20 RSM-52 intercontinental ballistic missiles capable of holding nuclear warheads.

It’s also armed with 22 anti-submarine missiles and torpedoes of varying types.


Who has the largest nuclear submarine fleet in the world?

The United States of America has by far the largest nuclear-powered fleet worldwide.

engineerine.com

seunny4lif:
People in prison, 2023:

🇻🇦 Vatican: 0
🇱🇮 Liechtenstein: 12
🇲🇨 Monaco: 13
🇸🇨 Seychelles: 285
🇱🇺 Luxembourg: 548
🇫🇮 Finland: 2,743
🇳🇴 Norway: 3,304
🇩🇰 Denmark: 4,227
🇨🇭 Switzerland: 6,316
🇸🇪 Sweden: 7,607
🇦🇹 Austria: 8,132
🇦🇪 UAE: 9,862
🇳🇱 Netherlands: 10,542
🇧🇪 Belgium: 10,808
🇬🇷 Greece: 11,001
🇸🇬 Singapore: 11,198
🇵🇹 Portugal: 11,603
🇵🇦 Panama: 18,942
🇮🇱 Israel: 19,376
🇦🇫 Afghanistan: 28,240
🇻🇪 Venezuela: 37,543
🇨🇦 Canada: 38,570
🇦🇺 Australia: 42,909
🇯🇵 Japan: 47,064
🇰🇷 South Korea: 53,920
🇮🇹 Italy: 53,930
🇪🇸 Spain: 55,433
🇩🇪 Germany: 58,004
🇫🇷 France: 62,991
🇸🇦 Saudi Arabia: 68,056
🇳🇬 Nigeria: 68,556
🇵🇱 Poland: 71,907
🇵🇰 Pakistan: 82,139
🇧🇩 Bangladesh: 83,107
🇦🇷 Argentina: 109,405
🇪🇬 Egypt: 120,000
🇿🇦 South Africa: 147,922
🇮🇷 Iran: 189,000
🇲🇽 Mexico: 220,866
🇮🇩 Indonesia: 266,259
🇹🇷 Turkey: 291,198
🇹🇭 Thailand: 309,282
🇷🇺 Russia: 471,490
🇮🇳 India: 554,034
🇧🇷 Brazil: 811,707
🇨🇳 China: 1,690,000
🇺🇸 USA: 2,068,800

China has X3 of USA population and worst is even South Africa that has less population of Nigeria

And the US is the land of the free shey?

lanre316:
Mutually Assured Destruction - Let all of us become MAD together 😁

Mad o

Vl3ly:
🇵🇸⚡🇮🇱 Israeli army announced that a soldier was killed and 2 others were injured in a tunnel explosion in Rafah.

According to israel, less than 300 soldiers have been killed

The reality is that the israeli army isn't very good in combat... they're technologically advanced and have many weapons of war, but they're not very capable in a battle sense

Kingsnairaland:
Google is USA tool

Just like

yandex is Russia tool

Look at what yandex said

The Russian nuclear submarine Dmitry Donskoy is the most powerful submarine in the world.

It was designed to carry 20 RSM-52 intercontinental ballistic missiles capable of holding nuclear warheads.

It’s also armed with 22 anti-submarine missiles and torpedoes of varying types.


Who has the largest nuclear submarine fleet in the world?

The United States of America has by far the largest nuclear-powered fleet worldwide.

engineerine.com

A Soviet era sub, which has been decommission is the most powerful sub

This junk isn't even the most powerful in the Russia fleet

IMEI:
You mean they waged an armed struggle for 20years, losing so many of their men and winning on their own terms, just for them to bend over when they gained power?

I'll only be dumb when you become smart

Mgbeke feeling funky?

What is the results of their struggle for 20 years .. Isolation and kowtowing to those they fight for acceptance. Fool stop

obedience4:
You should keep of things like this so you don't get burnt, like your fellow propaganda merchant

You ask a question who has the most powerful submarines?? And then you listed the five best ATTACK Subs according to you thou

The question you should be asking is are ATTACK submarines the most POWERFUL subs ??

In the classes of Subs ATTACK submarines are the listed just under the midget subs

This are the classes of Subs
Ballistic missile submarines.
Cruise missile submarines.
Nuclear-powered attack submarines.
Non-nuclear attack submarines with air-independent propulsion (AIP)
Diesel-electric attack submarines.
Midget submarines.

Young man how can a ATTACK sub be more powerful than a BALLISTIC MISSILE sub, capable of delivering nuclear warheads ?

They rate subs on it stealthy capabilities,
And stealthy capabilities comes from what
propulsion systems it uses, because that determines it level of sound detection and detectability

Some are diesel powered
Some are electrical powered.
Why some are nuclear powered

And I can gladly announced that all USA navy subs,are all nuclear powered subs

Russia may have the best ATTACK submarines, still debatable, we can agure this all day long,, but ATTACK Subs are not the most powerful subs

The USA have the most powerful SUb ever built, the USN Ohio-class Subs are the most powerful subs ever built,with 20 trident missiles capable of delivering nuclear warheads

in conclusion THE USA have the most POWERFUL submarines fleet in the world

School the dumb propaganda carrier

WriteerNg:
⚡Vladimir Putin:

"Russia will supply its long-range weapons to regions of the world, from where there will be sensitive attacks on countries supplying weapons to Ukraine."

Foolish Putin should supply the weapons. Then let the West supply to the many separatist regions of Russia. Especially the Muslim regions. And watch Russia implode from within. Idiot Putin. Fool Stop!!! 😹😹😹

Today is the 80th anniversary of D-Day, also known as the Normandy landings.

On Tuesday, 6 June 1944, as the Germans made in roads during World World II, the Allied forces (those opposed to Germany and its supporters) carried out the largest seaborne invasion in history. This invasion began the liberation of France and paved the way for the defeat of Adolf Hitler.

There are many lessons form the Normandy landings including how building organizational structure that empowers people builds motivation as well as the importance of cultivating diverse teams and breaking down silos. I recommend Cornelius Ryan's 1959 book, The Longest Day, for some real life lessons from this extraordinary event.

One of the things I found most fascinating about that event is the person of General Dwight D. Eisenhower who later went on to be the President of the United States. Eisenhower was the commander of the Allied forces.

Weather conditions before June 6 were unsuitable and therefore victory was uncertain, but postponing the landings would not have been ideal either since it may give an edge to the German forces. So Eisenhower decided to go ahead.

To bolster the troops, he gave the famous speech in which he explained to them, "The eyes of the world are upon you."

Less known is an alternative speech Eisenhower wrote in case the invasion was repelled. In four short sentences, it went,

"Our landings in the Cherbourg-Havre area have failed to gain a satisfactory foothold and I have withdrawn the troops. My decision to attack at this time and place was based upon the best information available. The troops, the air, and the Navy did all that Bravery and devotion to duty could do. If any blame or fault attaches to the attempt it is mine alone."
- - -

Leadership matters.

DYSTOPIANMUSE ARDENT SUPPORTER OF THE WEST!!!

SAY NO TO MARXISTS!!!!

SAY NO TO DICTATORS!!!

SAY NO TO CLOWNS!!!!

WriteerNg:
⚡Apparently 55 year-old Minuteman III missiles count as "hypersonic weapons" now lol


😂 🤣 😂 🤡 🤡 🇺🇸 🤡 🤡 😂 🤣 😂

US military power is all about hype

@Regex

Fourth time is the charm.
SpaceX Starship completes test successfully. 👌🔥🍾

-Lord

DystopianMuse:
Today is the 80th anniversary of D-Day, also known as the Normandy landings.

On Tuesday, 6 June 1944, as the Germans made in roads during World World II, the Allied forces (those opposed to Germany and its supporters) carried out the largest seaborne invasion in history. This invasion began the liberation of France and paved the way for the defeat of Adolf Hitler.

There are many lessons form the Normandy landings including how building organizational structure that empowers people builds motivation as well as the importance of cultivating diverse teams and breaking down silos. I recommend Cornelius Ryan's 1959 book, The Longest Day, for some real life lessons from this extraordinary event.

One of the things I found most fascinating about that event is the person of General Dwight D. Eisenhower who later went on to be the President of the United States. Eisenhower was the commander of the Allied forces.

Weather conditions before June 6 were unsuitable and therefore victory was uncertain, but postponing the landings would not have been ideal either since it may give an edge to the German forces. So Eisenhower decided to go ahead.

To bolster the troops, he gave the famous speech in which he explained to them, "The eyes of the world are upon you."

Less known is an alternative speech Eisenhower wrote in case the invasion was repelled. In four short sentences, it went,

"Our landings in the Cherbourg-Havre area have failed to gain a satisfactory foothold and I have withdrawn the troops. My decision to attack at this time and place was based upon the best information available. The troops, the air, and the Navy did all that Bravery and devotion to duty could do. If any blame or fault attaches to the attempt it is mine alone."
- - -

Leadership matters.

What a well thought and detailed write up
Bravo👏

DystopianMuse:
Mgbeke feeling funky?

What is the results of their struggle for 20 years .. Isolation and kowtowing to those they fight for acceptance. Fool stop

Lick your wounds...the west lost, the Taliban won

What wasn't achieved on the battlefield, won't be gotten through lesser means

The west is declining irreversibly, Afghanistan was a failure, they should try to maintain their loosening grip on the world for as long as they can