₦airaland Forum

jaephoenix:
This is DTruthSpeaker. He's as smart as a wet loaf

Says the stupid atheist who is more stupid than a dead ostritch

jaephoenix:
This is DTruthSpeaker. He's as smart as a wet loaf

no wonder...

HellVictorinho6:
Show him then

he wont because he cant back his yeye claims (that Mathematics/Psychology is religion or remotely religious)... and sadly, thats how many religious people get brainwashed with foolish nonsense.... because they dont ask the RIGHT QUESTIONS!

its always the same with religious people, simple intelligent questions (aka "how is Mathematics/Psychology religion or remotely religious?" ), the mumu cant even answer, while this is what HE STATED (not me)... here below are all the answers he gave me the minute i ask that question (yet the ignoramus says he already answered the question):

StillDtruth:
If only you knew what religion means, you would have known that mathematics, psychology are also religions.

Odolo, no one asked you whether there are different types of science to explain. The question asked was very clear.

The topic is very clear and it did not say science vs religion.

StillDtruth:
Odolo, 2+2=4 is not mathematics na . Mathematics is bigger than 2 +2=4
And now you.show that you do not know what mathematics means like you do not know what science and religion and co means.

So you have too many you dont knows, so do.the needfull and see if you wont see how you speak unwisely.

Not the question asked. So concretly evidently, you are unable to answer the question asked! So you fail

StillDtruth:
All these are answered if only you will do the needful.

Evidently and concretely, you already dont, know much as proven by your lack of knowledge of mathematics, science religion, etc so go and.first know then you can come back. Eh!

StillDtruth:
How can i keep answering you when it is concretely clear that you don't know?
Go and know first then youcan come back!

NOT A SINGLE ANSWER TO THE QUESTION I ASKED (about the claim HE made that mathematic/psychology is religion)...
the problem with xtianity is that there are too many XTIAN BRAINWASHED OLODOS who speak for your religion, and they are truly yeye ignorant donkeys saying some of the dumbest shiit on earth. no wonder so many people today turn away from religion.

MrBrownJay1:
no wonder...



he wont because he cant back his yeye claims (that Mathematics/Psychology is religion or remotely religious)... and sadly, thats how many religious people get brainwashed with foolish nonsense.... because they dont ask the RIGHT QUESTIONS!

its always the same with religious people, simple intelligent questions (aka "how is Mathematics/Psychology religion or remotely religious?" ), the mumu cant even answer, while this is what HE STATED (not me)... here below are all the answers he gave me the minute i ask that question (yet the ignoramus says he already answered the question):






NOT A SINGLE ANSWER TO THE QUESTION I ASKED (about the claim HE made that mathematic/psychology is religion)...
the problem with xtianity is that there are too many XTIAN BRAINWASHED OLODOS who speak for your religion, and they are truly yeye ignorant donkeys saying some of the dumbest shiit on earth. no wonder so many people today turn away from religion.

What are the boundless quantities being described by singularities?

HellVictorinho6:
What are the boundless quantities being described by singularities?

lol, although irrelevant to the issue at hand... the boundless quantities being described by singularities are the gravitational field strength and scalar invariant curvatures of spacetime (BTW Google is your friend).

MrBrownJay1:
lol, although irrelevant to the issue at hand... the boundless quantities being described by singularities are the gravitational field strength and scalar invariant curvatures of spacetime (BTW Google is your friend).

Anyways

Botragelad also said they dont describe a literal state

Whats literal state?

If literal state also means the material state,does google not say all matter arose from the singularity?



Does it mean the literal state arose from the non literal state/whatever whatever of spacetime which preceded space/time?


Does it also mean spacetime possesses quantities which preceded space/time?


am asking cuz all matter and time are said 2 av come from singularity BUT singularity refers 2 sumtin possessed by space/time tho not literally


and space/time has 2 include all matter and time
so
hows that possible?

MrBrownJay1:
no wonder....

You are just making a racket all because you are embarrased to find that you don't know these simple things.

And instead of you to do the needful amd learn those things which you don't know, you are just making noise embarrassing yourself further. But typical of Africans, you are allergic to learning and reading, you just want to be spoonfed like a baby.

StillDtruth:
You are just making a racket all because you are embarrased to find that you don't know these simple things.

And instead of you to do the needful amd learn those things which you don't know, you are just making noise embarrassing yourself further. But typical of Africans, you are allergic to learning and reading, you just want to be spoonfed like a baby.

are both of u ment?

Having a chat with astrologer can be a fascinating journey into the cosmic tapestry that supposedly weaves our destinies. Whether out of curiosity, seeking guidance, or simply exploring a different perspective on life's events, engaging in a conversation with an astrologer opens up a world where celestial bodies dictate more than just astronomical phenomena.