₦airaland Forum

The IPOB/Osunidiebt banza that deleted my thread on Jewish religious sanction on sleeping with 3yr old Toddlers will live to bury his or her children.

You banned me for using the word "yeast" in another thread but left one BLA mkpirimiri banza cannibal who was openly making terrorist and death threats on our security officers deployed to your banza yeast .

Well, I will let it pass since the idiot olofo Seun has cucked again to you Zionist terrorists.

Back to the topic, which is that , Talmudic satanic Babylonian modern day Judaism explicitly allows for the rape of toddlers (both male and female) as long as they are no less than 3yrs and one day and no more than 8ys.

This is the religion of Satan some of you heathen swines claiming Christians claim are in agreement with the teachings of Christ.

I will be posting Talmudic Rabbinical ramblings to show how depraved and evil Judaism , Jews and the evil state of Pissrael is.

Wicked Fake News

All intimacy is only allowed after Marriage

Christistruth02:
Wicked Fake News

All intimacy is only allowed after Marriage

0su rat.


The Talmud specifically allows for sex with toddlers as old as 3yrs and one day.

According to those sleaze bag rabbis , having sex with a toddler does not harm the hymen as the pedophilles say it will grow back and as such does not amount to defilement.

These your kike rats believe in their own hubris and think that a raped toddler will grow back her hymen and as such no rape was committed.

Fools like you that stupidly support this satanic cult aka Judaism don't even know a grain of it.

Toto don spoil things for dis life abeg....

KwaraRat:
The IPOB/Osunidiebt banza that deleted my thread on Jewish religious sanction on sleeping with 3yr old Toddlers will live to bury his or her children.

You banned me for using the word "yeast" in another thread but left one BLA mkpirimiri banza cannibal who was openly making terrorist and death threats on our security officers deployed to your banza yeast .

Well, I will let it pass since the idiot olofo Seun has cucked again to you Zionist terrorists.

Back to the topic, which is that , Talmudic satanic Babylonian modern day Judaism explicitly allows for the rape of toddlers (both male and female) as long as they are no less than 3yrs and one day and no more than 8ys.

This is the religion of Satan some of you heathen swines claiming Christians claim are in agreement with the teachings of Christ.

I will be posting Talmudic Rabbinical ramblings to show how depraved and evil Judaism , Jews and the evil state of Pissrael is.

Who let the dogs out?

Mods please return this one to where he escaped from.

KwaraRat:
0su rat.


The Talmud specifically allows for sex with toddlers as old as 3yrs and one day.

According to those sleaze bag rabbis , having sex with a toddler does not harm the hymen as the pedophilles say it will grow back and as such does not amount to defilement.

These your kike rats believe in their own hubris and think that a raped toddler will grow back her hymen and as such no rape was committed.

Fools like you that stupidly support this satanic cult aka Judaism don't even know a grain of it.

Still ranting! 😂
The Talmud does not permit or condone sex with minors, including toddlers. This claim is another fabrication with no proof.

Even the Talmud (Sanhedrin 69b-70a, Yevamot 33b, and Niddah 44b) explicitly prohibits sexual relations with minors, stating that such acts are considered a grave sin and a violation of Jewish law. Can you show me where you got yours from?🤷‍♂️

Now, the concept of "hymen regrowth" is a medieval myth with no scientific basis. Modern medicine confirms that hymenal injuries tend to be permanent and can have consequences for survivors of sexual abuse.

Again can you provide proof of your claim?

Botragelad:
Still ranting! 😂
The Talmud does not permit or condone sex with minors, including toddlers. This claim is another fabrication with no proof.

Even the Talmud (Sanhedrin 69b-70a, Yevamot 33b, and Niddah 44b) explicitly prohibits sexual relations with minors, stating that such acts are considered a grave sin and a violation of Jewish law. Can you show me where you got yours from?🤷‍♂️

Now, the concept of "hymen regrowth" is a medieval myth with no scientific basis. Modern medicine confirms that hymenal injuries tend to be permanent and can have consequences for survivors of sexual abuse.

Again can you provide proof of your claim?

0su you lie.

I will let your fellow rats flood here before posting the rabbinical traditions that support sex with toddlers

KwaraRat:
0su you lie.

I will let your fellow rats flood here before posting the rabbinical traditions that support sex with toddlers

Okay. You have no proof to back up your claim. Just another dead thread! 😂

Botragelad:
Okay. You have no proof to back up your claim. Just another dead thread! 😂

I am cooking this thread .

I want you devil advocates out in the open before I post all satanic ramblings from your Talmud .

Judaism is satanism.

Let me park here for awhile.

KwaraRat:
0su rat.


The Talmud specifically allows for sex with toddlers as old as 3yrs and one day.

According to those sleaze bag rabbis , having sex with a toddler does not harm the hymen as the pedophilles say it will grow back and as such does not amount to defilement.

These your kike rats believe in their own hubris and think that a raped toddler will grow back her hymen and as such no rape was committed.

Fools like you that stupidly support this satanic cult aka Judaism don't even know a grain of it.

Fake News
.Read your Bible!!!
Children and the elderly are protected specially

Christistruth02:
Fake News
.Read your Bible!!!
Children and the elderly are protected specially

Which Bible ?

You think these Satanists hold the old Testament in any regards beyond as a historical book?

Their real books are the Babylonian Talmud, Zohar and Kabbala.


Ignorance is a disease

KwaraRat:
The IPOB/Osunidiebt banza that deleted my thread on Jewish religious sanction on sleeping with 3yr old Toddlers will live to bury his or her children.

You banned me for using the word "yeast" in another thread but left one BLA mkpirimiri banza cannibal who was openly making terrorist and death threats on our security officers deployed to your banza yeast .

Well, I will let it pass since the idiot olofo Seun has cucked again to you Zionist terrorists.

Back to the topic, which is that , Talmudic satanic Babylonian modern day Judaism explicitly allows for the rape of toddlers (both male and female) as long as they are no less than 3yrs and one day and no more than 8ys.

This is the religion of Satan some of you heathen swines claiming Christians claim are in agreement with the teachings of Christ.

I will be posting Talmudic Rabbinical ramblings to show how depraved and evil Judaism , Jews and the evil state of Pissrael is.

---

---

---

MuttleyLaff:
What Jerómejnr said didnt deem commenting on, as everyone knows the Talmud isnt God inspired
- at least, not if we're going by 2 Timothy 3:16 guideline
Anyway, trawl through my past posts, to see what my take is on the Talmud is
(e.g. use the search tool with search word muttleylaff+talmud)

Better still, saving you the time & effort, you should be able to pick out my view on the Talmud from the below snippet touching on another subject

- SNIPPET -

(4) The Oral Law of the Jews (later written as the Talmud)
- the interpretation of Moses' Law by the Scribes and Pharisees.

It is followed by the Orthodox Jews to this day as of equal authority to the Bible.

They falsely claimed it was passed down from Moses by word of mouth.
Jesus clashed with Pharisees over this law. He rejected it and came against it's legalistic spirit (Matt15:3, Mark7:3).

Now when 1 Cor 14:34,35 refers to a law of silence for women, it couldn't be:
(1) because there's no such law in the Old-Testament and he would say 'it is written';
neither is it found in the Gospels (2).
Neither is it (3) because it is clearly a pre-existing law.
Therefore by a process of elimination it must be (4) The Jewish Oral Law (the laws of the Pharisees)

This is confirmed by the phrase: 'As also SAYS the Law.' - a reference to the ORAL law rather than the WRITTEN law (scripture).
(see also Matt 5:21,27,31, 33,38,43)

Also, we know this because it agrees completely with the Talmud and applies to Orthodox synagogues today. The service is for men only. Women are discouraged from even learning, but are sometimes allowed to watch from the gallery, for their place is at home not with things too high for them! And it would be shameful for them to speak in a meeting.

TALMUDIC QUOTES illustrate this:
A Jewish Prayer:'Praise God He hasn't created me a gentile, a woman or an ignorant man.'
'The woman, says the law, is in all things inferior to the man.'
Only men could speak in public (Beraktoth 4,36; Mishnah Aboth 1,5)
No woman could give a testimony or conduct business. (Mishnah Shabbath 4,1)

Women were viewed with disregard and repression, and the Talmud contains many distasteful insults of women's character. They were to be avoided. They were not required to know or fulfil the law and so few were learned.

One said: 'May the words of the Torah be burned rather than be given to women.'
In public worship they were segregated and silenced and so had to ask questions of their husbands at home.

Clearly the writer of 1 Cor 14:34,35 reflected this Pharisaical attitude to women and used this Jewish Law to support his views.

So why would Paul say something that stands in contradiction to the immediate context and the rest of the New Testament? Why would he establish this teaching on Jewish Laws that elsewhere, both he and Jesus rejected?

The simple answer is these verses are not Paul's teaching!
Paul's letters are written in response church situations. 1 Corinthians is the most responsive of them all. Paul had received reports about what was going on (1:11, 5:1, 6:1,8 ), and the church had sent a letter to Paul with many questions (7:1,8,10,12,25; 8:1,4; 12:1; 16:1). There was disunity (1:10-12,3:3). In particular there were 2 groups of people saved from different backgrounds disputing -Jews who tended toward legalism, and Greeks who tended toward license. Paul goes through the issues and questions raised one by one.

Examples of when Paul is clearly responding to what one group has said are 6:15-20 (Greeks); 9:1-11; 11:1-16 (Jews) and 15:12,35,36.

Sometimes he refers what they are saying and then he answers them -e.g.1 Cor 4:8: 'You are already full! You are already rich! You have reigned as kings without us.' (this is what some of them had claimed) --'and indeed I wish you did reign, that we might also reign with you.' (Paul's answer - see also 4:10)

Sometimes he even quotes what they say and then answers them. The problem is that there are no punctuation or quote marks in the Greek and the translators often miss them out.

Some examples of this, are when he responds to the 'loose' Greeks as in 6:12,13:
(You say) 'All things are lawful for me.'
(I Paul) say: 'but all things are not helpful.'
(You say) 'All things are lawful for me.'
(I Paul) say: 'but I will not be brought under the power of any.'
(You say) 'Food is for the stomach and the stomach for foods.'
(I Paul) say: 'but God will destroy both it and them.'
We see the same in 10:23,24.

In questions about idols Paul challenges those who pride themselves in their knowledge but who do not hold it in love. (8:1-3) 8:4: 'We know that -'an idol is nothing in the world and that there is but one God' (again he quotes their words (their knowledge) before he answers as confirmed in v10,11.

Other examples are when he responds to the 'legalistic Jews', 7:1:
'Now concerning what you wrote to me,
(some of you said) 'It is good for a man not to touch a woman.'
(But I Paul say) 'Nevertheless because of sexual immorality, let each man have his own wife...'

Now we can understand what is happening in 1 Cor 14:34,35.
Paul is quoting what some Jewish converts to Christ, had written in a letter to Paul, complaining about women being involved in church services. Although they were saved they were used to male-dominated synagogue - worship and so found the equality of women in church life hard to take.

They were saying: 'Paul, these women are prophesying, praying out loud, speaking in tongues. The Oral law says it's shameful for a woman to speak in public. Tell them to shut-up!'

So as Paul is teaching on every member participating in church services, it is the natural place for him to deal with their objection. So he quotes what they say: 'Let your women keep silent in the churches, for it is not permitted for them to speak; but they are commanded to be under obedience, as the law also says. And if they want to learn something, let them ask their own husbands at home, for it is shameful for women to speak in church' (v34,35)

Then he answers them: 'What, came the word of God out from you? or came it to you only? If any think himself a prophet, or spiritual, let him acknowledge that the things I write to you (not the Talmud) are the commandments of the Lord (the true authority) But if any (choose to be) be ignorant, let him be ignorant.' (v36-38) Paul replies by asserting his apostolic authority above the Talmud.

This also explains why these verses come out of the blue, interrupting the flow of thought, which is picked up again in v39,40: 'Therefore brethren,covet to prophesy and do not forbid to speak with tongues.'

The placement of v34,35 in the passage as a clear interruption and marked contrast to what Paul is teaching, serves to separate them from Paul's own views.

We conclude that Paul isn't silencing women, rather the opposite!

Those who are too quick to agree with v34,35 have unwittingly submitted to an unchristian pharisaical spirit

- /SNIPPET -

Bottom line, the Talmud is to the Bible, what the Hadith is to the Quran.
Enough said

https://www.nairaland.com/newpost?topic=2552459&post=37449163
Religion / Re: Scriptural Proof God Wants Us Wealthy. by MuttleyLaff: 8:01am On Aug 29, 2015

Shouting into the wind
Poster who lie to self, and believe own lies are unable to recognise truth, even if truth perches on the nose bridge

cc: Christistruth02, Zooposki, Botragelad, Elusive001, illicit

_{Personal text: Jesus is not a theologian. He is God who told stories.}

NNTR:

---

---

---

Shouting into the wind
Poster who lie to self, and believe own lies are unable to recognise truth, even if truth perches on the nose bridge

cc: Christistruth02, Zooposki, Botragelad, Elusive001, illicit

_{Personal text: Jesus is not a theologian. He is God who told stories.}

kike rat

That's all on this talk?
Someone sent me the Avodah Zarah 37a today and I was shocked to the bones

Whatever happened to the OP?