₦airaland Forum

Lucifyre:
Man you spout so much dross confidently, "the bible is not a science book" obviously yes, so it shouldn't pretend to be one by telling us how things came about, when much of what it has told us has been proven to be outrightly false. From the creation story of Genesis, to the flood and the exit of the Israelites out of Egypt amongst many others.

Can you show me any source where science claimed the earth was flat?! An obvious lie or just plain myopic ignorance. Instead its the other way round the bible as can even be seen from your verses and has been proven by scholars with examples even sited in the Jewish study bible, always pictured the earth as flat with a circular dome of the firmament or heavens above it which is obviously wrong. The church and bible propagated a lot of erroneous beliefs which science has contradicted again and again.

They even proposed the erroneous belief of geocentricism of which can be seen from the bible with Joshua telling the sun to stand still which makes no sense. They made Gallileo recant his heliocentric model which was right and dealt with him until they were finally made to accept the heliocentric model with their tails between their legs. Science has always proven religion wrong not the other wat round and you obviously can't site any claim science made that the earth is flat. Just your usual ignorant and myopic cope. Educate urself.

So, you don't know that science has long believed that the earth was flat and was supported by 4 elephants? Hahaha? That was where science was before it came to know of recent that the earth is spherical. This is common knowledge now.

Don't worry, I'll soon start a thread that would prove to you that the Bible knows a lot more than science does. Just wait for it. You'll be shattered by the truths that would be revealed from the original Hebrew Bible.

FxMasterz:
Oh dear. Not so. I was going through your threads and found a topic that caught my attention. I saw that the answers to the question you asked were not properly presented, so, I decided to provide the answer. Triggered by what exactly? What did you do to me that could have triggered me?

Yeah right. How convenient.

FxMasterz:
So, you don't know that science has long believed that the earth was flat and was supported by 4 elephants? Hahaha? That was where science was before it came to know of recent that the earth is spherical. This is common knowledge now.

Don't worry, I'll soon start a thread that would prove to you that the Bible knows a lot more than science does. Just wait for it. You'll be shattered by the truths that would be revealed from the original Hebrew Bible.

Man! pls tell me you're having a laugh and been facetious, cause if you're being serious with your first sentence, then Oh dear! I asked for a source and proof that science claimed the earth was flat, you didn't provide the proof but instead substantiated it with an even more ludicrous claim. It's ok, ur hole to dig anyway. Simply provide reputable sources and proofs verifying your claims here. No need for any other thread, thats a silly excuse to run away. Then again its ur usual m.o. "I'll soon start a thread...", i guess i'll be shattered like you shattered atheists in your previous thread. 🤪🤡

Lucifyre:
Comprehension seems to be an issue here 🤦🏽

...So i end with saying again why does Christianity, with its profound theological depth and breadth, divine inspiration lack explicit references to planets and other celestial bodies apart from what was visible to the naked eyes as at then?? Why aren't they featured in the creation story??

Who cannot see that it is because clearly they have no direct relevance to our lives.

Drought in pluto won't change the price of petrol or the melting of Uranus won't stop plantain from ripening tomorrow.

Lucifyre:
Man! pls tell me you're having a laugh and been facetious, cause if you're being serious with your first sentence, then Oh dear! I asked for a source and proof that science claimed the earth was flat, you didn't provide the proof but instead substantiated it with an even more ludicrous claim. It's ok, ur hole to dig anyway. Simply provide reputable sources and proofs verifying your claims here. No need for any other thread, thats a silly excuse to run away. Then again its ur usual m.o. "I'll soon start a thread...", i guess i'll be shattered like you shattered atheists in your previous thread. 🤪🤡

Chai!

It's like asking for a proof that human beings have eyes. Don't tell me you're this ignorant. Who on earth doesn't know that science once believed that the earth was flat. Go and ask your AI and stop disturbing me with unnecessary noise.

Yes now, atheists, including you have not been able to offer any sound argument against my position.

Lucifyre:
Shouldn't the church have known the right reality of things first since it's divinely inspired?? Shouldn't the divinely inspired texts also have featured these later discoveries. So i end with saying again why does Christianity, with its profound theological depth and breadth, divine inspiration lack explicit references to planets and other celestial bodies apart from what was visible to the naked eyes as at then?? Why aren't they featured in the creation story??

The creators of gods have only their own base of knowledge to build from. The people who created that particular god did not know about planets or any other astronomical objects so their god did not “create” them. Compare the ancient lore of the abrahamic religions to the modern lore of Scientology. Because of the relatively expansive knowledge base of the creator of its lore, Scientology includes mention of intergalactic events, aeronautics, hydrogen bombs, and volcanoes.

In short, gods only know what their creators know.

KnownUnknown:
The creators of gods have only their own base of knowledge to build from. The people who created that particular god did not know about planets or any other astronomical objects so their god did not “create” them. Compare the ancient lore of the abrahamic religions to the modern lore of Scientology. Because of the relatively expansive knowledge base of the creator of its lore, Scientology includes mention of intergalactic events, aeronautics, hydrogen bombs, and volcanoes.

In short, gods only know what their creators know.

Agreed. Particularly like the last sentence "gods only know what their creators know"... ...and their creators due to lack of knowledge act and take the place of the creation.

FxMasterz:
Chai!

It's like asking for a proof that human beings have eyes. Don't tell me you're this ignorant. Who on earth doesn't know that science once believed that the earth was flat. Go and ask your AI and stop disturbing me with unnecessary noise.

Yes now, atheists, including you have not been able to offer any sound argument against my position.

Oh my look whose calling someone ignorant, the so called IT specialist that doesn't know what a prompt is, "the defeater of AI", oh least i forget, slayer of atheists, you bro are the epitome of ignorant and irony. One just needs to go through and peruse your comment history to observe for themselves. Knew you were dense right off the bat from my first discussion with you way bk, but i tried to be courteous and simply said "now i understand your level", but u obviously don't deserve any courtesy. You really made me grasp the word dim witted properly, its almost like you are being purposefully obtuse.

According to your moronic analogy, common sense says when someone asks for proof of eyes you point them to the eyes. First of all science doesnt do "belief" that's for religion. I asked for a reputable source for the claim that science proposed the earth was flat and was propped up on four elephants, a daft claim by the way, even a mediocre primary school student wont make, and you gave me an AI response as your reputable source. Lol! You seem to never learn. Same AI that i already told and showed to you, has a caveat of sometimes giving inaccurate info and is also malleable cause its unconfrontational especially around topics of religion and politics. That's the source you could find. See attached screenshot.

And that's not even taking into consideration part of your m.o of side stepping. Even in the source you gave i have to ask in Cersei Lannister's voice "Where are the elephants?" You left that part out just like went on a tangent and side stepped from the contradiction discourse above when you couldn't give a rebuttal. I'll need a more reputable source for the claim you made not one that says contradictory and incorrect info. Also im still waiting for your rebuttal on God changing his mind contradiction which you conveniently side stepped.

You're a joke of a person and a coward. You make me really understand that age is truly nothing but a number. It's no surprise those who identify as atheists here wipe the floor with you theists especially the christains and how many times would i sink it in your limited brain, i'm not an atheist.

Lucifyre:
Oh my look whose calling someone ignorant, the so called IT specialist that doesn't know what a prompt is, "the defeater of AI", oh least i forget, slayer of atheists, you bro are the epitome of ignorant and irony. One just needs to go through and peruse your comment history to observe for themselves. Knew you were dense right off the bat from my first discussion with you way bk, but i tried to be courteous and simply said "now i understand your level", but u obviously don't deserve any courtesy. You really made me grasp the word dim witted properly, its almost like you are being purposefully obtuse.

According to your moronic analogy, common sense says when someone asks for proof of eyes you point them to the eyes. First of all science doesnt do "belief" that's for [/b]religion. I asked for a [b]reputable source for the claim that science proposed the earth was flat and was propped up on four elephants, a daft claim by the way, even a mediocre primary school student wont make, and you gave me an AI response as your reputable source. Lol! You seem to never learn. Same AI that i already told and showed to you, has a caveat of sometimes giving inaccurate info and is also malleable cause its unconfrontational especially around topics of religion and politics. That's the source you could find. See attached screenshot.

And that's not even taking into consideration part of your m.o of side stepping. Even in the source you gave i have to ask in Cersei Lannister's voice "Where are the elephants?" You left that part out just like went on a tangent and side stepped from the contradiction discourse above when you couldn't give a rebuttal. I'll need a more reputable source for the claim you made not one that says contradictory and incorrect info. Also im still waiting for your rebuttal on God changing his mind contradiction which you conveniently side stepped.

You're a joke of a person and a coward. You make me really understand that age is truly nothing but a number. It's no surprise those who identify as atheists here wipe the floor with you theists especially the christains and how many times would i sink it in your limited brain, i'm not an atheist.

smiling.

All the bolded above are your grammatical errors. I don't point out people's errors but you're justo proud. You need to be shown your level. As empty as you are, you shamelessly boast against people who are have very much advanced beyond you. What do you make of yourself by the way? You have not displayed any iota of intelligence since the very first day of my interactions with you. I know you're a witch but a very dense witch for that matter. You have PhD in Vulgarity and empty-headedness. Yet, you think you know better than anyone. Please go back to school and help yourself to some knowledge.

I write in very simple English and use the most comprehensive forms of communication because I want all my readers to grasp my messages. I'm not here to compete with anyone for intelligence or knowledge. I'm here to pass clear, concise and comprehensive messages only.

Now, let me educate you and tell you why AI is not nonsense. Infact, AI is not your mate. AI has the ability to conduct research, draw inferences and reach logical conclusions. It's capabilities are far higher than humans'. An AI can write a well researched and complete Ph.D thesis for you even in subjects like mathematics and finish the whole thing in hours. Lol, very ignorant kid. It is far more knowledgeable than any professor out there. If AI says you're not correct, then you're really not correct. Let that sink!

When we say AI, we mean Artificial Intelligence, I know you already know that. But you seem to think that AI produces whatever you prompt it to produce. While that is true to a certain degree, it is not everything you prompt AI to do that it will do. Sometimes it would reject you outright. But, that's not where I am going. I want you to understand that AI is highly intelligent and knowledgeable! You don't even come close.

There are now AI doctors that perform super accurate diagnosis and do better treatments than the best human doctors. The hospitals of the future are AI hospitals. AI is going to take over almost everything. Why? Because it is far more knowledgeable and accurate. An AI is fed with the entire body of knowledge human beings have acquired from ancient past till present. They're by far more intelligent and more knowledgeable than Lucifyre. AI is not your mate baby. That's why AI has been the only one to give me the toughest counterarguments so far regarding the debate of Creationism. Humans don't even come close. All atheists have done so far is to beat around the bush without addressing the real issue. I have to remind them again and again that they're not addressing my points. For now, no atheist have been able to offer any sound rebuttal. They majority of them have avoided the thread like a plague. Not even Lucyfyre could make any intelligent attempt. All what she does on the thread is to curse, curse and curse because she's angry at the fact that atheism is being defeated. A witch will support atheism anyway. Are they not all the preys of her master? She has nothing inside her brains other than curses, yet she wants to disparage AI that is a million times more intelligent and more knowledgeable that her. Isn't that laughable? SMH. If you want to ridicule AI, you should at least show us that you have more upstairs than the AI does!

In spite of the caveat, AI is now being heavily used in research. In the future, AI would be the main Researchers. Not humans. Yes, AI can give wrong answers sometimes, but not in the matters of science and history! These days, people are even using AI to pass exams. I mean any examination whatsoever. AI is not your mate dear.

Science once thought that the earth was flat. The elephants are not the point. That's true also but that earth was flat was what science once thought, is true and have been confirmed by AI. This is common historical fact you'll find in any elementary science textbook. Go and sit down! You can't learn about the history of science without coming across this fact. Shame on you if you don't know this.

There's no one on Nairaland who disparages AI except this ignorant kid. Christians and Atheists have used AI to settle arguments among themselves several times on this platform. You ignorant kid should get yourself educated and stop thinking that the world is still running on analogue.

I spot errors in your writings all the time but I never berate you for them. Very senseless errors I mean, like some of the ones I bolded up there. Learn respectful conversations kid. It's more honorable.

FxMasterz:
smiling.

All the bolded above are your grammatical errors. I don't point out people's errors but you're justo proud. You need to be shown your level. As empty as you are, you shamelessly boast against people who are have very much advanced beyond you. What do you make of yourself by the way? You have not displayed any iota of intelligence since the very first day of my interactions with you. I know you're a witch but a very dense witch for that matter. You have PhD in Vulgarity and empty-headedness. Yet, you think you know better than anyone. Please go back to school and help yourself to some knowledge.

I write in very simple English and use the most comprehensive forms of communication because I want all my readers to grasp my messages. I'm not here to compete with anyone for intelligence or knowledge. I'm here to pass clear, concise and comprehensive messages only.

Now, let me educate you and tell you why AI is not nonsense. Infact, AI is not your mate. AI has the ability to conduct research, draw inferences and reach logical conclusions. It's capabilities are far higher than humans'. An AI can write a well researched and complete Ph.D thesis for you even in subjects like mathematics and finish the whole thing in hours. Lol, very ignorant kid. It is far more knowledgeable than any professor out there. If AI says you're not correct, then you're really not correct. Let that sink!

When we say AI, we mean Artificial Intelligence, I know you already know that. But you seem to think that AI produces whatever you prompt it to produce. While that is true to a certain degree, it is not everything you prompt AI to do that it will do. Sometimes it would reject you outright. But, that's not where I am going. I want you to understand that AI is highly intelligent and knowledgeable! You don't even come close.

There are now AI doctors that perform super accurate diagnosis and do better treatments than the best human doctors. The hospitals of the future are AI hospitals. AI is going to take over almost everything. Why? Because it is far more knowledgeable and accurate. An AI is fed with the entire body of knowledge human beings have acquired from ancient past till present. They're by far more intelligent and more knowledgeable than Lucifyre. AI is not your mate baby. That's why AI has been the only one to give me the toughest counterarguments so far regarding the debate of Creationism. Humans don't even come close. All atheists have done so far is to beat around the bush without addressing the real issue. I have to remind them again and again that they're not addressing my points. For now, no atheist have been able to offer any sound rebuttal. They majority of them have avoided the thread like a plague. Not even Lucyfyre could make any intelligent attempt. All what she does on the thread is to curse, curse and curse because she's angry at the fact that atheism is being defeated. A witch will support atheism anyway. Are they not all the preys of her master? She has nothing inside her brains other than curses, yet she wants to disparage AI that is a million times more intelligent and more knowledgeable that her. Isn't that laughable? SMH. If you want to ridicule AI, you should at least show us that you have more upstairs than the AI does!

In spite of the caveat, AI is now being heavily used in research. In the future, AI would be the main Researchers. Not humans. Yes, AI can give wrong answers sometimes, but not in the matters of science and history! These days, people are even using AI to pass exams. I mean any examination whatsoever. AI is not your mate dear.

Science once thought that the earth was flat. The elephants are not the point. That's true also but that earth was flat was what science once thought, is true and have been confirmed by AI. This is common historical fact you'll find in any elementary science textbook. Go and sit down! You can't learn about the history of science without coming across this fact. Shame on you if you don't know this.

There's no one on Nairaland who disparages AI except this ignorant kid. Christians and Atheists have used AI to settle arguments among themselves several times on this platform. You ignorant kid should get yourself educated and stop thinking that the world is still running on analogue.

I spot errors in your writings all the time but I never berate you for them. Very senseless errors I mean, like some of the ones I bolded up there. Learn respectful conversations kid. It's more honorable.

Pls keep quiet lousy oaf, creating daft strawman arguments to tangent away from the main point. Ur lame switcheroo gimmicks would only work for those as obtuse as you. Like i told you earlier, you're not as educated as you think you are and what little education you think you got, yeilded very negligible results. Not only are you dense and a coward but also a massive hypocrite who cries foul when the same energy he gave is matched in return. It's not you i feel pity for, its the little ones who'd have to look up to your sorry ass excuse of a person as a role model, especially cause they have no choice in the matter.

Quit the lecturing bullcrap, everyone knows what AI is and its benefits, i basically use it every day at my job as do most, from writing to coding to designing to modelling. So to get lectured by someone who up until a few days ago when he got schooled, didn't even know what a prompt was is hilariously hilarious. That's the lamest attempt at a switcheroo I've witnessed. The issue was never AI but using it as a source/proof especially with its caveat as i've shown repeatedly(with the screenshots) but keeps flying over your empty head like air.

Let me educate ur myopic ass a little. If i make the claim that the church propagated geocentricism over heliocentrism and i'm asked for a reputable source as proof. I don't bring an AI chat or random youtube video or some sketchy site from some random google search or say its basically in every science textbook out there like some retards i know do. I simply drop something like this for them to check out:
When Science and Christianity Meet by David C. Lindberg,
Galileo and the Conflict between Religion and Science by Gregory W. Dawes. Simple! it could be a book, a journal, an article by a respected historian, scholar or scientist.

If you still can't get the gist then you're even more of a buffoon than i thought and that's not an insult. The AI you stupidly cited as your source gave me the opposite response to the same prompt which i attached in my screenshot and u want to use that as proof. Lol! Keep quiet and cite reputable sources since it's so common, and back up ur daft claims or go sit in the corner, sulk and drool like the retarded cunt you were birthed to be. Don't throw stones if you live in a glass house, hypocrite. Civil conversation my ass. Don't expect any better from someone who defers to a thing as dumb as truthspeaker stiildfool, to help him out in a debate he ended up running from like a coward.

FxMasterz:
So, you don't know that science has long believed that the earth was flat and was supported by 4 elephants? Hahaha? That was where science was before it came to know of recent that the earth is spherical. This is common knowledge now.

Don't worry, I'll soon start a thread that would prove to you that the Bible knows a lot more than science does. Just wait for it. You'll be shattered by the truths that would be revealed from the original Hebrew Bible.

Mention the science text that said the earth is flat and is supported by 4 elephants.

Lucifyre:
Pls keep quiet lousy oaf, creating daft strawman arguments to tangent away from the main point. Ur lame switcheroo gimmicks would only work for those as obtuse as you. Like i told you earlier, you're not as educated as you think you are and what little education you think you got, yeilded very negligible results. Not only are you dense and a coward but also a massive hypocrite who cries foul when the same energy he gave is matched in return. It's not you i feel pity for, its the little ones who'd have to look up to your sorry ass excuse of a person as a role model, especially as its not like they had any choice in the matter.

Quit the lecturing bullcrap, everyone knows what AI is and its benefits, i basically use it every day at my job as do most, from writing to coding to designing to modelling. So to get lectured by someone who up until a few days ago when he got schooled, didn't even know what a prompt was is hilariously hilarious. That's the lamest attempt at a switcheroo I've witnessed. The issue was never AI but using it as a source/proof especially with its caveat as i've shown repeatedly(with the screenshots) but keeps flying over your empty head like air.

Let me educate ur myopic ass a little. If i make the claim that the church propagated geocentricism over heliocentrism and i'm asked for a reputable source as proof. I don't bring an AI chat or random youtube video or some sketchy site from some random google search or say its basically in every science textbook out there like some retards i know do. I simply drop something like this for them to check out:
When Science and Christianity Meet by David C. Lindberg,
Galileo and the Conflict between Religion and Science by Gregory W. Dawes. Simple! it could be a book, a journal, an article by a respected historian, scholar or scientist.

If you still can't get the gist then you're even more of a buffoon than i thought and that's not an insult. The AI you stupidly cited as your source gave me the opposite response to the same prompt which i attached in my screenshot and u want to use that as proof. Lol! Keep quiet and cite reputable sources since it's so common, and back up ur daft claims or go sit in the corner, sulk and drool like a retarded cunt. Don't throw stones if you live in a glass house, hypocrite. Civil conversation my ass. Don't expect any better from someone who defers to a thing as dumb as truthspeaker stiildfool, to help him out in a debate he ended up running from like a coward.

I think you must be daft to even think I don't know what a prompt is. Lol. It's your audacity for me! So, you're the one to teach me what a prompt is even when I know what Prompt Engineering is. Perhaps you've never even heard of prompt engineering before. You arrogant little brat.

So, you use AI everyday even for writing and coding but cry foul and disparage AI because I used it here for one of my posts. Can't you see how pathetic you are? Your hypocrisy stinks to the high heavens.

You better tell the world that you asked the AI to reoeat what you've fed into it before it spewed that nonsense you claimed as contradictory. Someone who cannot draft a single grammatically sound post is trying to call herself somebody. Your low IQ is something your parents must have been worrying about. There's no single intelligence in any of your writings so far. You reason like a cock and yet consider yourself an intelligent kid. SMH. By my antecedents, both in Academia and outside of it, I'm not your equal. You can only brag and curse because that's all you know to do.

I have brought you evidence of ancient scientific belief that the world was flat - from Wikipedia and Britannica. What the world knew in those days was the product of the science of those days. They held on to that belief until empirical evidence disproved it. Before these times, as far as the days of Job, the Bible already confirmed that the earth was spherical.

Cosmology is a branch of science. And according to ancient cosmology, especially the near eastern cosmology, the earth was flat. This remained undisputed until Pythagoras, a Greek philosopher developed an hypothesis to disprove the notion in the 6th century BC.

You lying stinking brat, I never asked StillDtruth to help me out in any debate. Can you show the proof? Can you also prove that I ran away from that debate? You filthy thing!

I only enlisted StillDtruth to help me spot broken rules in the opponent's argument. Stinking brat said I asked him to help me out in a debate. And that was because he himself alerted me to the fact that the opponent was not a fair debater. Prove otherwise, you stinking blockhead.

Can you now also prove that I ran away from the said debate? I have been replying all mentions on the debate till the last mention yesternight. As for the fellow whom you said I ran away from, I was the one who mentioned her last, and up till today she has not replied since many days ago. So, who ran away? You useless, lying demon and damned little witch.

FxMasterz:
I think you must be daft to even think I don't know what a prompt is. Lol. It's your audacity for me! So, you're the one to teach me what a prompt is even when I know what Prompt Engineering is. Perhaps you've never even heard of prompt engineering before. You arrogant little brat.

So, you use AI everyday even for writing and coding but cry foul and disparage AI because I used it here for one of my posts. Can't you see how pathetic you are? Your hypocrisy stinks to the high heavens.

You better tell the world that you asked the AI to reoeat what you've fed into it before it spewed that nonsense you claimed as contradictory. Someone who cannot draft a single grammatically sound post is trying to call herself somebody. Your low IQ is something your parents must have been worrying about. There's no single intelligence in any of your writings so far. You reason like a cock and yet consider yourself an intelligent kid. SMH. By my antecedents, both in Academia and outside of it, I'm not your equal. You can only brag and curse because that's all you know to do.

I have brought you evidence of ancient scientific belief that the world was flat - from Wikipedia and Britannica. What the world knew in those days was the product of the science of those days. They held on to that belief until empirical evidence disproved it. Before these times, as far as the days of Job, the Bible already confirmed that the earth was spherical.

Cosmology is a branch of science. And according to ancient cosmology, especially the near eastern cosmology, the earth was flat. This remained undisputed until Pythagoras, a Greek philosopher developed an hypothesis to disprove the notion in the 6th century BC.

You lying stinking brat, I never asked StillDtruth to help me out in any debate. Can you show the proof? Can you also prove that I ran away from that debate? You filthy thing!

I only enlisted StillDtruth to help me spot broken rules in the opponent's argument. Stinking brat said I asked him to help me out in a debate. And that was because he himself alerted me to the fact that the opponent was not a fair debater. Prove otherwise, you stinking blockhead.

Can you now also prove that I ran away from the said debate? I have been replying all mentions on the debate till the last mention yesternight. As for the fellow whom you said I ran away from, I was the one who mentioned her last, and up till today she has not replied since many days ago. So, who ran away? You useless, lying demon and damned little witch.

Is this you bruhh?!!! 🤣🤣🤣🤣
With ur Antecedents in Academia... i can see that 🤡
See who i dey even follow argue... Did you even read what you cited or are you too daft to see it. A fool at 40, man...

Lucifyre:
Is this you bruhh?!!! 🤣🤣🤣🤣
With ur Antecedents in Academia... i can see that 🤡
See who i dey even follow argue... Did you even read what you cited or are you too daft to see it. A fool at 40, man...

That statement is absolutely correct. I didn't use prompt in my debate.

FxMasterz:
That statement is absolutely correct. I didn't use prompt in my debate.

He said it again 🤣🤣🤣🤣

What a mor.on!! He still doesn't get it. I didn't drink Fanta, i only drank Soda..🤡🤡🤡

Lucifyre:
He said it again 🤣🤣🤣🤣

What a mor.on!! He still doesn't get it. I didn't drink Fanta, i only drank Soda..🤡🤡🤡

What a blockhead!

FxMasterz:
What a blockhead!

This is fun. The fvcking irony. Can you in short clear n concise terms say why i'm the blockhead and not you sir?;🥺

Lucifyre:
This is fun. The fvcking irony. Can you in short clear n concise terms say why i'm the blockhead and not you sir?;🥺

Of course you are. Without understanding my context, you can't jump into conclusions!

Lucifyre:
Oh my look whose calling someone ignorant, the so called IT specialist that doesn't know what a prompt is, "the defeater of AI", oh least i forget, slayer of atheists, you bro are the epitome of ignorant and irony. One just needs to go through and peruse your comment history to observe for themselves. Knew you were dense right off the bat from my first discussion with you way bk, but i tried to be courteous and simply said "now i understand your level", but u obviously don't deserve any courtesy. You really made me grasp the word dim witted properly, its almost like you are being purposefully obtuse.

According to your moronic analogy, common sense says when someone asks for proof of eyes you point them to the eyes. First of all science doesnt do "belief" that's for religion. I asked for a reputable source for the claim that science proposed the earth was flat and was propped up on four elephants, a daft claim by the way, even a mediocre primary school student wont make, and you gave me an AI response as your reputable source. Lol! You seem to never learn. Same AI that i already told and showed to you, has a caveat of sometimes giving inaccurate info and is also malleable cause its unconfrontational especially around topics of religion and politics. That's the source you could find. See attached screenshot.

And that's not even taking into consideration part of your m.o of side stepping. Even in the source you gave i have to ask in Cersei Lannister's voice "Where are the elephants?" You left that part out just like went on a tangent and side stepped from the contradiction discourse above when you couldn't give a rebuttal. I'll need a more reputable source for the claim you made not one that says contradictory and incorrect info. Also im still waiting for your rebuttal on God changing his mind contradiction which you conveniently side stepped.

You're a joke of a person and a coward. You make me really understand that age is truly nothing but a number. It's no surprise those who identify as atheists here wipe the floor with you theists especially the christains and how many times would i sink it in your limited brain, i'm not an atheist.

You can see that these chatbots are just regurgitating the Eurocentric nonsense they been trained on with monsensical colonialist phrases like “the Middle East”, “near Eastern”, “far eastern” and the absurdity of equating the Hebrews with the Mesopotamians and Egyptians.

KnownUnknown:
You can see that these chatbots are just regurgitating the Eurocentric nonsense they been trained on with monsensical colonialist phrases like “the Middle East”, “near Eastern”, “far eastern” and the absurdity of equating the Hebrews with the Mesopotamians and Egyptians.

It's something else man. That's what I'm trying to drill into this numb skull why he can't use it as proof.

FxMasterz:
Of course you are. Without understanding my context, you can't jump into conclusions!

Now let me show you why you're a mor.on, i even gave you analogies, didn't even know you were that dumb not to even get it. You're an expert in mental gymnastics so I'd like to see how u'd spin this one. How can you say you didn't use a prompt when a prompt is the text input or query you gave the AI model to elicit a response. What kind of daft IT specialist makes such a basic mess up and insists on it. Nah... Who even calls themselves an 'IT Specialist'. Typical theist, loud and empty, no suprise you don't know how stupid it sounds to say you defeated AI and i'm sure as fvck your comprehension skills are terrible with the posts to support your claim. Go sit in the corner abeg, you are not it.

Lucifyre:
Now let me show you why you're a mor.on, i even gave you analogies, didn't even know you were that dumb not to even get it. You're an expert in mental gymnastics so I'd like to see how u'd spin this one. How can you say you didn't use a prompt when a prompt is the text input or query you gave the AI model to elicit a response. What kind of daft IT specialist makes such a basic mess up and insists on it. Nah... Who even calls themselves an 'IT Specialist'. Typical theist, loud and empty, no suprise you don't know how stupid it sounds to say you defeated AI and i'm sure as fvck your comprehension skills are terrible with the posts to support your claim. Go sit in the corner abeg, you are not it.

You're a blockhead. Do I even need to clarify myself to an empty head like yours?

There was a mention to which I supplied two responses - two responses for the same mention. I already know they you've sacrificed your brains to Satan, so there's nothing inside it other than sand.

Two responses were given to the same mention. AI was used to fine-tune one, while the other was not fine-tuned.

How can any sane person not see that, and then report mischievously that I used AI? Is that not extreme stupidity?

You disgusting moronic filthy witch.

FxMasterz:
You're a blockhead. Do I even need to clarify myself to an empty head like yours?

There was a mention to which I supplied two responses - two responses for the same mention. I already know they you've sacrificed your brains to Satan, so there's nothing inside it other than sand.

Two responses were given to the same mention. AI was used to fine-tune one, while the other was not fine-tuned.

How can any sane person not see that, and then report mischievously that I used AI? Is that not extreme stupidity?

🤡
Ur kids would be embarrassed to call you their father outside. What a clown. Goes down swinging and swimming in his own shit. Absolutely no shame. Clown indeed.

Lucifyre:
🤡
Ur kids would be embarrassed to call you their father outside. What a clown.

You slowpoke!

Your parents are already tired of trying to help your empty head. Your low IQ must have been an embarrassment to your family. And you're not even ashamed. SMH.

FxMasterz:
You slowpoke!

Your parents are already tired of trying to help your empty head. Your low IQ must have been an embarrassment to your family. And you're not even ashamed. SMH.

How ironic.
What happens during show and tell day in ur kids schools? When they ask you what you do, do you tell them you're an IT specialist😏. What do you tell them your job revolves around? I'm sure the kids and their mom won't even let you know about it, so you don't disgrace em like you doing here, having been a fool at 40 and all, since it's foolishness for life. How sad 🥺. My spells must certainly be working then for your christ like virtues to have disappeared into thin air and devolved into slinging with an 'atheist'. What would Jesus do?! Damn, last i checked you were even a pastor in winners, couldn't even practice what you so hardly defend. As hypocritical, daft and useless as your specialist skills. Get your act together before the kids drop you from the pedestal they put you on. That's if their mom doesn't leave you first, you know she's thinking about it having to deal with an oaf, day in day out. I'ld like to hear you preach Jesus from that mouth 🤣 Agbaya.

Lucifyre:
How ironic.
What happens during show and tell day in ur kids schools? When they ask you what you do, do you tell them you're an IT specialist😏. What do you tell them your job revolves around? I'm sure the kids and their mom won't even let you know about it, so you don't disgrace em like you doing here, having been a fool at 40 and all, since it's foolishness for life. How sad 🥺. My spells must certainly be working then for your christ like virtues to have disappeared into thin air and devolved into slinging with an 'atheist'. What would Jesus do?! Damn, last i checked you were even a pastor in winners, couldn't even practice what you so hardly defend. As hypocritical, daft and useless as your specialist skills. Get your act together before the kids drop you from the pedestal they put you on. That's if their mom doesn't leave you first, you know she's thinking about it having to deal with an oaf, day in day out. I'ld like to hear you preach Jesus from that mouth 🤣 Agbaya.

You think I'll read all these useless texts from an empty head? I have better things to do with my time!

That will be tantamount to diversion!

The Author has a purpose for which the Bible was written it has little to do with science, economy, commerce, geography, mathematics and other subject matters.
So little is mentioned about all these but when it comes to the main theme of the Bible it carries all from the beginning until now:
GOVERNMENT

How did humans get here?
Why do innocent people suffer?
Why wars when everyone want peace?
What happens to us when we die?
What will happen to our planet in the future?
How can we cope with life's anxieties?
What about our love life?
How can we raise well meaning children?
How do we live peacefully with neighbors?
Why is human government cruel?
Who is behind human government?

The Author of the Bible claims He is God who created all things so as the SUPREME BEING it's peace and security that matters most to him but as for other subjects He has given us the privilege to figure out all of that when He said:

“Be fruitful and become many, fill the earth and subdue it, and have in subjection the fish of the sea and the flying creatures of the heavens and every living creature that is moving on the earth.” Genesis 1:28

Humans will forever continue to discover more and more things as long as we live! Ecclesiastes 3:11

Lucifyre:
In the vast expanse of Christian scriptures, amidst the intricate narratives of creation, prophecy, and salvation, there exists a notable absence – the explicit mention of planets. While the Bible which was divinely inspired to the extents of crafting how everything came to be, the celestial bodies known as planets are conspicuously absent from its pages. Why is that?? Why does Christianity, with its profound theological depth and breadth, lack explicit references to planets? which God also created by the way.

From the Genesis account of creation to the apocalyptic visions of Revelation, the Bible unfolds a narrative that delves into the depths of human existence and the divine plan. Yet, amidst this exploration of the cosmos, planets as astronomical entities remain notably unaddressed. The creation story doesn't tell us when any of the planets where created or why. If it was divinely inspired wouldn't it have featured basicallly how and what time God created the planets?? maybe even the asteroids and black holes. But all these are noticeably absent all through despite the divine inspiration.

The absence stands in contrast to other religious traditions, some even older, where planets, play significant roles in cosmological narratives and religious symbolism. I Was recently reading a version of the sumerian recently, about the aliens( Enllil, Enki) from the planet Nibiru it got me thinking. Even in Greek mythology, planets are personified as gods and goddesses governing various aspects of existence. So once again why does Christianity, with its profound theological depth and breadth, divine inspiration lack explicit references to planets?

Maybe there are theological reasons which could answer this but i very much doubt it. My pov?! These people where simply limited by what they knew and saw at the time and crafted a narrative around it. Heck the writers of the story of babel believed they could use their limited technology at the time to build a tower and it'll reach God. We've built way taller structures and that's putting it lightly and we still haven't reached the skies. Heck we've even travelled past the skies using other means and found way more phenomenal stuff like planets, asteroids, blackholes, solar systems that they couldn't comprehend then due to obvious limitations ergo they weren't part of the narrative or story. If divinely inspired, these limitations ought not to exist and these phenomenons ought to have been added to the creation story. Or maybe there's a theological pov, but i doubt it.

Why the doubt?! Because even when men of science without divine inspiration found out these phenomenons and proposed their theories (heliocentricity) which later became fact, the divinely inspired church which ought to have known by the divine fought against it with its own, now proven wrong theory (geocentricism, where they believed the sun stood still). Even going as far as persecuting and forcing those who found the truth of what we now know today to recant their theories. This was until they finally admitted they were wrong and accepted fact.

Shouldn't the church have known the right reality of things first since it's divinely inspired?? Shouldn't the divinely inspired texts also have featured these later discoveries. So i end with saying again why does Christianity, with its profound theological depth and breadth, divine inspiration lack explicit references to planets and other celestial bodies apart from what was visible to the naked eyes as at then?? Why aren't they featured in the creation story??

Of what significance is the existence of planets outer space to the gospel of eternal life?

In all it relevance, scriptural idea states that Adam and Eve sinned and death came to man. But Christ resurrected to restore eternal life back to man.

How does the existence of planets come in here?

FxMasterz:
You think I'll read all these useless texts from an empty head? I have better things to do with my time!

🤫

paxonel:
Of what significance is the existence of planets outer space to the gospel of eternal life?

In all it relevance, scriptural idea states that Adam and Eve sinned and death came to man. But Christ resurrected to restore eternal life back to man.

How does the existence of planets come in here?

Its obvious you just read the headline and not the write up , quite typical.

MaxInDHouse:
That will be tantamount to diversion!

The Author has a purpose for which the Bible was written it has little to do with science, economy, commerce, geography, mathematics and other subject matters.
So little is mentioned about all these but when it comes to the main theme of the Bible it carries all from the beginning until now:
GOVERNMENT

How did humans get here?
Why do innocent people suffer?
Why wars when everyone want peace?
What happens to us when we die?
What will happen to our planet in the future?
How can we cope with life's anxieties?
What about our love life?
How can we raise well meaning children?
How do we live peacefully with neighbors?
Why is human government cruel?
Who is behind human government?

The Author of the Bible claims He is God who created all things so as the SUPREME BEING it's peace and security that matters most to him but as for other subjects He has given us the privilege to figure out all of that when He said:

“Be fruitful and become many, fill the earth and subdue it, and have in subjection the fish of the sea and the flying creatures of the heavens and every living creature that is moving on the earth.” Genesis 1:28

Humans will forever continue to discover more and more things as long as we live! Ecclesiastes 3:11

.

And how does this address anything.

Lucifyre:
.
And how does this address anything.

It does!

If you're asked to use what you experienced in life to teach your child will you go into academics or what the child needed to start his own carrier in life?
It's only when you want your child to practice your profession that you must teach him what has to do with your profession but if not then all the child needs from you is fatherly care.
That's what the Bible is all about it's not a SCIENCE TEXTBOOK!