What Is The Best Way To Explain Trinity Without Limitations? - Christianity Etc - Nairaland
Nairaland Forum › Nairaland General › Christianity Etc › What Is The Best Way To Explain Trinity Without Limitations? (12831 Views)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 21 Reply (Go Down)
| What Is The Best Way To Explain Trinity Without Limitations? by AntiChristian(op): 9:14am On Sep 11, 2024 |
The concept of the Trinity—the Christian doctrine that defines God as one being in three persons: the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit—has been explained through various analogies and theological frameworks. Here’s a summary of some of the best ways it has been explained, along with the corresponding impediments to each explanation: 1.Water Analogy Explanation: Water can exist in three states: liquid, ice, and steam. Each state is fundamentally water yet manifests differently. Impediment: This analogy leans towards modalism, suggesting that God merely changes forms rather than existing simultaneously in three persons. 2.Triangular Analogy Explanation: A triangle has three sides and is one shape. Each side represents a person of the Trinity, unified as one entity. Impediment: This can imply that the persons of the Trinity are merely parts of a whole, which can lead to a misunderstanding of the distinctiveness and co-equality of the three persons. 3.Roles of a Person Analogy Explanation: A person can be a parent, a child, and a sibling simultaneously, showcasing different roles while remaining one person. Impediment: This analogy risks falling into partialism or modalism as well, blurring the lines of individual personhood within the Trinity. 4.Sun Analogy Explanation: The sun represents the Father, its light represents the Son, and heat represents the Holy Spirit. All are aspects of the same source. Impediment: This analogy can imply that the Son and the Holy Spirit are not fully divine as they are merely emanations from the Father. 5. Mathematical Analogy Explanation: Using the equation 1 + 1 + 1 = 1, this analogy emphasizes the unity of the three persons in one essence. Impediment: It can confuse those unfamiliar with advanced mathematics and may not effectively convey the relationship between the three persons. 1+1+1= 3 not 1. 6. The Egg Analogy The egg analogy explains the Trinity using an egg's three parts: shell, egg white, and yolk, which together form one egg. It illustrates unity and distinction. However, it risks partialism, implying each part is only a portion of God, and oversimplifies the complex relationships among the three persons. So what is the best way to explain trinity without embracing modalism, partialism or debasing God from what He is not? 1 Like 1 Share |
| Re: What Is The Best Way To Explain Trinity Without Limitations? by StillDtruth: 10:40am On Sep 11, 2024*. Modified: 4:13pm On Sep 11, 2024 |
AntiChristian:Your problem is that people see Trinity as 1 Person, 3 People instead of understanding the Basis and Substance and Object. Which is there is God, The Greatest and Highest and Holy. He has A Spirit (like us man) hence Holy Spirit. He has A son Who He is Like Himself. Thus, God and Holy Spirit are The Same and 1 Person, while His Son is Another Person. Thus, the concept of trinity is arising out of the Acts of either God Himself or His Spirit or the Acts of His Son. Which means (God + Holy Spirit) is 1 And Jesus Christ, is 1. Therefore trinity is perfectly explained by the Anology of A King and His Son, the Prince and Heir to the Throne. Or by a perfect marriage of a Husband and Wife. Or by a Don Corleone and his son Micheal Corleone. 1 Like |
| Re: What Is The Best Way To Explain Trinity Without Limitations? by AntiChristian(op): 2:03pm On Sep 11, 2024 |
StillDtruth:1. If it is that God has a Spirit called Holy Spirit and Jesus is the son then you are talking about duality not Trinity! 2. And your theory does not explain how the three are coequal and coeternal! The Husband is greater than the wife in marriage! The husband as well as the wife can also initiate divorce in marriage! 3. If God has a spirit, then why is a sin against the Holy Spirit hard to forgive while God forgives all sins due to him? 4. And you mentioned heir to the throne. Do you mean Jesus will take over as God when the original God dies? 4 Likes 1 Share |
| Re: What Is The Best Way To Explain Trinity Without Limitations? by Steep(m): 2:26pm On Sep 11, 2024 |
AntiChristian:It is One God in three persons or three persons in one God. Persons in this context does not mean a human being but rather the self awareness of a being. Each of us as human being only possesses one self awareness in our being but God possesses a triune self awareness. Your being describe what you are, while the awareness of yourself makes you a person. In other words the Trinity is one what and three who's. The bible said God is love, for love to exist there must be a giver and a recipient since God is a trinity he does not depend on his creation to express love. Another example is truth, for truth to be justified there needs to be atleast two persons. Jesus said the father is his witness of the truth of his teachings and he also said that the Holy Spirit would witness for him while he witnessed for the father. 1 Like |
| Re: What Is The Best Way To Explain Trinity Without Limitations? by StillDtruth: 3:07pm On Sep 11, 2024 |
AntiChristian:The concept of trinity is an idea born out of a man's observation of 3 Great Powers and Rulers, Ruling us. Thus, the first observer identified 3 but my re examinarion, i see 2 for The Most High and His Spirit are one and The Same Person. It is His Son, Who is a separate and distinct Personality as we See in Genesis to Revelations. And the idea of the sameness and trinity is born out of their Unity and exercise of similar powers and force as is Written "as i see My Father Do, i do" John 5:19 And you see Jesus show here that The Father and The Holy Spirit are merged and it is He and His Father we see. Same in John 14:23 AntiChristian:The bible shows A Father is greater than the Son that means no co equal, which we See The Father gives Command and The Son sees to it that The Father's Command is Done. It is only God and His Spirit Who are coequal and these 3 as identified are eternal. AntiChristian:Clearly because When The Holy Spirit Moves, Judgment and Law goes forth and like police/army show you, there is no appeal when they have been sent forth. Exodus 23:20/21. AntiChristian:Yes! If and only if God goes Away or Dies as we have which is why the bible called Him a Prince. And i am only using this for explanation and illustration of what we can all see. So don't take it out of hand. However, God is not dying nor going away and Revelation shows us the solution that they have is that They both Rule together, which is what we see even in Genesis! |
| Re: What Is The Best Way To Explain Trinity Without Limitations? by AntiChristian(op): 3:13pm On Sep 11, 2024 |
Steep:This your explanation of the Trinity has several limitations: it ambiguously defines "self-awareness," oversimplifies God's nature as "one what and three who's," and compares divine personhood to human experience. It implies dependency for love, narrows truth to two persons, and lacks scriptural support. Also, it risks misinterpreting the Trinity as hierarchical rather than emphasizing co-equality and co-eternity among the three persons. |
| Re: What Is The Best Way To Explain Trinity Without Limitations? by AntiChristian(op): 3:35pm On Sep 11, 2024 |
Let's pick out the limitations once more according to the Bible! StillDtruth:So in essence the trinity is duality in your own case as the Father and Spirit are together and Jesus is separate! So Agreed you believe in duality not trinity! And your duality makes Jesus lower in hierarchy than the father and Spirit. The bible shows A Father is greater than the Son that means no co equal, which we See The Father gives Command and The Son sees to it that The Father's Command is Done.If only God and the Spirit are coequal then Jesus would be lesser in hierarchy but Jesus once said He and the father are one in John 10:30. He didn't say God and the Holy Spirit are one! You said so! Clearly because When The Holy Spirit Moves, Judgment and Law goes forth and like police/army show you, there is no appeal when they have been sent forth. Exodus 23:20/21.So Holy Spirit doesn't forgive but God does! God is more merciful than Holy Spirit! If the Spirit comes from God or is one with God then shouldn't it be subject to God's authority? Yes! If and only if God goes Away or Dies as we have which is why the bible called Him a Prince. And i am only using this for explanation and illustration of what we can all see. So don't take it out of hand.So God will not die but He has a heir and Prince! God has a son but his son is barren and can't have his own son! So your image of God's Kingdom is just the picture of a King on a throne with his son on his right hand with the God composed of the Father and Spirit. 1 Like |
| Re: What Is The Best Way To Explain Trinity Without Limitations? by Emusan(m): 5:37pm On Sep 11, 2024 |
AntiChristian:Well just as you said, it's called ANALOGY for a reason which means human was just trying to use their limited mind to explain Almighty God. No amount of explanation about Trinity can be sufficient for you as you're not seeking the true knowledge. Trinity concept was developed to reconcile the mystery revealed in the scripture which is: The Son is God, The Holy spirit is God and the Father is God but unfortunately you don't believe the whole scripture even though you can cherry pick the part you want. But for education purposes, here is what you're having issue with. All the above analogies only show how ONE THING can co-exist. The closest to Trinity is that of the Sun as both the fire and heat are all CALLED Sun. But to me the perfect analogy for Trinity is this mathematical proportion 1:1:1 = 1 |
| Re: What Is The Best Way To Explain Trinity Without Limitations? by Steep(m): 5:44pm On Sep 11, 2024*. Modified: 6:01pm On Sep 11, 2024 |
AntiChristian:I don't need to write hundreds of pages to define personhood. In the most important description of personhood is ability to self recognize, and also possess cognitive abilities. oversimplifies God's nature as "one what and three who's," and compares divine personhood to human experience.There is no oversimplification there human personhood is a reflection of a greater personhood which is that of God hence man is made in God's image. Why does Allah need men to be his slaves, it means allah is dependent on his creation. It implies dependency for love, narrows truth to two persons, and lacks scriptural support. Also, it risks misinterpreting the Trinity as hierarchical rather than emphasizing co-equality and co-eternity among the three persons.Where did you get "dependency on love" ? Rather love, just as truth are divine attributes, it is self evident that love need atleast two individuals to exist. If I say God is eternal does that mean I said God depends on eternity? And by saying that God is eternal is it not evident that God is uncreated therefore? I didn't even mention any hierarchy, God can be hierarchical in his operations but it does not define God's Triunity of personhood. |
| Re: What Is The Best Way To Explain Trinity Without Limitations? by sonmvayina(m): 6:05pm On Sep 11, 2024 |
That's why it is easier to live Christianity when you start thinking for yourself.. Reason why they start the indoctrination at an early stage.... All these concept in Christianity has always caused division and argument and fighting. Just because they want to control human. So sad. See, it is stated earlier that God is one Deuteronomy 6;4. So if they believe that why create a concept that is difficult to prove. God is the universe it self. We are all in it and it is in us.... Even the Babylonian and Sumerians understood that from the beginning. It was Philo who developed the two gods model which Justin mayter increased to 3...so much nonsense in one religion...hmmm God is one, indivisible creator. Not 3 in one.. It is even stated that in Isaiah 41-47. There is nobody besides him. |
| Re: What Is The Best Way To Explain Trinity Without Limitations? by StillDtruth: 7:00pm On Sep 11, 2024 |
AntiChristian:I repeat, trinity is born out of the observation that 3 Great Authorities exercise Rule over us. So, whether trinity, duality or singlity, it really does not matter. But the bottomline of what we see is the principle of Separation of Powers at play. AntiChristian:Did you see Jesus mention The Holy Spirit as an Authority? No So does that not tell you where The Holy Spirit is coming from? AntiChristian:As you see in Exodus and in John 14:26 The Holy Spirit does not come unless, sent, therefore you see He is under Authority and has a very special Office and Power He Holds! AntiChristian:Do you not know the meaning of an illustration? Obviously, your reasonability quotient for the day is exhausted and your blasphemous madness is returning because you can clearly see that you are going to hellfire. |
| Re: What Is The Best Way To Explain Trinity Without Limitations? by Ojuntana: 2:44pm On Sep 12, 2024 |
AntiChristian:But why should a munafiq who reads his quran where Allah refers to itself as "We" ask questions about the plurality of God in another religion? Allah is "We" like demons called legion in the Bible. "We" is first person plural. How does the munafiq explain this? |
| Re: What Is The Best Way To Explain Trinity Without Limitations? by Kingsempires(m): 3:20pm On Sep 12, 2024 |
All I have to say it ANTI-CHRISTIAN... is nothing but a debator  |
| Re: What Is The Best Way To Explain Trinity Without Limitations? by MaxInDHouse(m): 3:24pm On Sep 12, 2024*. Modified: 9:00am On Sep 15, 2024 |
AntiChristian:Please can you quote or cite a verse where the word TRINITY (highlighted) could be found? Thanks in advance! |
| Re: What Is The Best Way To Explain Trinity Without Limitations? by Kingsempires(m): 3:29pm On Sep 12, 2024 |
MaxInDHouse:you for no come here they go face you now |
| Re: What Is The Best Way To Explain Trinity Without Limitations? by MaxInDHouse(m): 3:40pm On Sep 12, 2024 |
Kingsempires:I only respond to those that worth my response, as for scoffers i will ignore!  |
| Re: What Is The Best Way To Explain Trinity Without Limitations? by Petalss(m): 3:45pm On Sep 12, 2024 |
Ojuntana:In the Qur'an, when Allah uses "We" instead of "I," it does not imply that Allah is more than one. In Arabic, the use of "We" (the royal "We"  is a form of language known as the "majestic plural" or "plural of respect." This is a common linguistic device used to convey power, grandeur, and authority. Many languages, including English, have this feature, where kings, queens, or people of high status sometimes refer to themselves in the plural to express their sovereignty.Here's a famous example from Queen Victoria's writings: "We are not amused." — Queen Victoria (1819-1901) In this quote, Queen Victoria uses the "royal we" to express her displeasure, emphasizing her authority and majesty. This phrase has become iconic and is often referenced or parodied in popular culture. 1 Like |
| Re: What Is The Best Way To Explain Trinity Without Limitations? by Ojuntana: 4:16pm On Sep 12, 2024 |
Petalss:The Qur'an was written in Arabic not English. The use of We in English royalty was to recognise the sovereignty of the English people residing in its royalty. It could also be referred to as "We(England) are not amused". The fallacy in your argument is drawing equivalence between Arabic personification and English when both are not known to share any common linguistic or cultural bond. Is there any example of an Arab sovereign referring to itself as We before Allah in the Qur'an? Same Allah sometimes referred to itself as I when it suited it. As a god that's vehemently sought to establish its monotheistic value, would it not have been better to stick to I instead of We? The God of the Jews never used plural to refer himself in original Greek and Hebrew. If Allah is same as the Jewish God Yahweh, why did he now go and cause confusion in Arabic? |
| Re: What Is The Best Way To Explain Trinity Without Limitations? by TenQ: 4:17pm On Sep 12, 2024*. Modified: 4:52pm On Sep 12, 2024 |
Cc: Qasim6 Simplicity isn't the same as correctness! Taoheed is limited in every sense. There is NOTHING Comparable to YHWH because He alone is Omnipresent, Omniscient and Omnipresent at the same time AntiChristian:I wish this is because you are interim the TRUTH about God but I doubt. Notwithstanding, the conclusion is that 1. Allah is the Name of the God of the Muslims YHWH is the Name of the God of the Jews and Christians AND Allah is NOT YHWH! 2. An analogy is just a parable used to explain that which is complex and complicated with easily grasp illustrations for aiding comprehension of such complexity. 3. Thus, Trinity is defined as this There is Only ONE God whose name is YHWH the creator of the Heavens and the Universe. This God is a SPIRIT and this Infinite Spirit is Called the Holy Spirit who is Omnipresent, Omniscient and Omnipresent and He has revealed Himself as The Father The Word The Holy Spirit 4 a. YHWH the Holy Spirit: This is the INVISIBLE and INFINITE manifestation of God. He is simultaneously everywhere in both the physical and spiritual space and time. b. YHWH the Father: He is the VISIBLE image of the invisible God who presides over the throne in the spiritual space called heaven where Angels and other limited spirit beings dwell. c. YHWH the Word: He is the VISIBLE image of the invisible God who can be anywhere in creation physical and spiritual where the visible and tangible presence of YHWH is required. This Word became Human in Jesus Christ as the Ransom for the sin of humans from the judgement of God with Hell Fire. Just as God can simultaneously and independently hold conversations with every individuals who has ever existed (physical or spiritual), so also God as ONE BEING chose to express Himself as three Persons known on Earth with the nomenclature the Father, the Son (Word) and the Holy Spirit Analogies 1. States of Matter (e.g. H2O) H2O = Water (Liquid) H2O = Ice (Solid) H2O= Steam (Gas) Ice is not Water, Water is not Steam and Steam is not Ice BUT all these Are three states of H2O Note: ICE, WATER and STEAM can simultaneously co-exist as In thermodynamics, the triple point of a substance is the temperature and pressure at which the three phases (gas, liquid, and solid) of that substance coexist in thermodynamic equilibrium. 2. States of humans A human being exist simultaneously as a Trinity of the Body, the Soul and Spirit. YOU = Body (Physical Identity) YOU = Soul (Internal or Personal Identity) YOU = Spirit (Spiritual Identity) But because you do not believe in Trinity, I will just use the Duality of man as an illustration. When your prophet went to Paradise on the Al-Burak, did he truely See Abraham and Moses and Joseph or it was an illusion? When you Muslims die, two angels are expected to ask you three questions of Who is your Lord? What is your Religion? and Who is your Prophet? Will the Angels ask your Physical Body these Questions or they will ask your Soul/Spirit? God YHWH is the Only INFINITE Spirit and Everything in Existence exists INSIDE Him. Nothing exists Outside Him. But, God YHWH can also simultaneously be within His creations. If you cannot understand these simple illustrations, you are a lost case. Questions: 1. Is Allah a Spirit? 2. If Allah is one and he is above his throne which is above the seven heavens, can Allah also be below his throne without leaving his throne? 3. Can Allah enter his creations without ceasing to be Allah? 4. Is Allah Omnipotent, Omniscient and Omnipresent ? The doctrine of Taoheed unfortunately limits Allah such that he is neither Omnipotent nor Omniscient nor Omnipresent YHWH is Unlike ANYTHING in creation because He is Omnipresent, Omnipotent and Omniscient AND nothing in creation is close to this. YHWH is the Only Being who can be simultaneously ANYWHERE and EVERYWHERE at the same time. 1 Like |
| Re: What Is The Best Way To Explain Trinity Without Limitations? by Petalss(m): 4:22pm On Sep 12, 2024 |
Ojuntana: |
| Re: What Is The Best Way To Explain Trinity Without Limitations? by TenQ: 4:30pm On Sep 12, 2024 |
Ojuntana:Was this the lie you were fed or that Allah is actually a unification of Deitys or what do you think AHAD means? |
| Re: What Is The Best Way To Explain Trinity Without Limitations? by Qasim6(m): 4:37pm On Sep 12, 2024*. Modified: 6:43pm On Sep 12, 2024 |
AntiChristian:What we can all agree as human being is trinity is not something that can be explained logically. Just like the concept of Jesus being fully man and fully God. The reason why I am of the opinion that Christianity as a religion is 100% faith and 0% common sense because you are not going to be needing your common sense to accept Christianity, it is just going to be lot of emotional preaching like "God love us so much, he became flesh to die for our sins", "I saw Jesus in my dream" and the likes.. because the evidence of this triune God is find wanting and not clearly stated in the Bible. 1 Like |
| Re: What Is The Best Way To Explain Trinity Without Limitations? by Petalss(m): 4:46pm On Sep 12, 2024 |
Ojuntana:Wow, just wow. It seems you're a linguistic scholar to determine which languages are permitted to use the Majestic Pronoun. So, the English language can have the Majestic Plural 'We,' but the Arabic language cannot? When the Queen was talking, she was not referencing the whole of England, she was speaking for herself. Examples of "We" in the Quran: "We created the heavens and the earth..." (Quran 25:2) "We sent Noah to his people..." (Quran 7:59) "We gave Moses the Book..." (Quran 2:87) Examples of "I" in the Quran: "I am Allah, there is no god but Me..." (Quran 20:14) "I created you from a single soul..." (Quran 39:6) "I am the One who forgives..." (Quran 7:155) Thus, Allah uses both "We" and "I" based on the context to express different aspects of His relationship with creation. The use of "We" highlights His majesty and power, while "I" emphasizes a direct, personal connection. 1 Like |
| Re: What Is The Best Way To Explain Trinity Without Limitations? by AntiChristian(op): 4:48pm On Sep 12, 2024 |
MaxInDHouse:Of course it is clear that doesn't exist! |
| Re: What Is The Best Way To Explain Trinity Without Limitations? by MaxInDHouse(m): 4:50pm On Sep 12, 2024 |
Qasim6:Well that's not Christianity but Trinity forced on religionists claiming Christians. As for true Christianity adherents must preach and TEACH what they believe from house to house and door to door according to the man Jesus who is called Christ {Matthew 10:11-13} so if it's mysterious how in the world will Jesus send people out to go and convince normal people to believe in something that's incomprehensible like Trinity? |
| Re: What Is The Best Way To Explain Trinity Without Limitations? by MaxInDHouse(m): 4:53pm On Sep 12, 2024 |
AntiChristian:Good! So it's not from Jesus of Nazareth who sent his disciples to go out preaching and TEACHING what they can convince sane people to believe! Matthew 28:19-20 |
| Re: What Is The Best Way To Explain Trinity Without Limitations? by TenQ: 4:58pm On Sep 12, 2024 |
Qasim6:Is Allah a Spirit? No! Is Allah a Father? No! Is Allah Omnipotent, Omnipresent and Omniscient? No! Allah is NOT the God of Abraham, Moses and David thus It's of no wonder that Allah is just as complex like Iblis in description (very simple to describe). 1 Like |
| Re: What Is The Best Way To Explain Trinity Without Limitations? by Petalss(m): 5:17pm On Sep 12, 2024 |
TenQ:Let us set aside the Islamic perspective, as an Arab Christian, what should I traditionally call God in my language? |
| Re: What Is The Best Way To Explain Trinity Without Limitations? by Qasim6(m): 5:18pm On Sep 12, 2024 |
TenQ:Keep running helter skelter. Even the Jews you Christians claim you worship the same YHWH with. They disagree with you on the concept of God. Their view on YHWH is closer to our view on Allah Their view on God as echad is the same as our view of ahad So where do you Christians get your own YHWH and your echad (compound one) from? from Iblis? |
| Re: What Is The Best Way To Explain Trinity Without Limitations? by AntiChristian(op): 5:24pm On Sep 12, 2024 |
TenQ:Who is defining it? Show us where it is defined explicitly? 4Saying that YHWH is the Father, Word, and Holy Spirit has limitations, including: Oversimplification: It reduces the complexity of the Trinity, obscuring the distinct roles of each person. Misunderstanding Personhood: It conflates the individuality of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, undermining their unique identities. Biblical Context: It neglects the distinct roles outlined in Scripture, misrepresenting their interactions. Historical Theology: It diverges from traditional Christian creeds that affirm the co-equality and co-eternity of the three persons. God cannot die! YHWH the word died! If all of them are co-equal Jesus won't be acting like a messenger to the father! Just as God can simultaneously and independently hold conversations with every individuals who has ever existed (physical or spiritual), so also God as ONE BEING chose to express Himself as three Persons known on Earth with the nomenclature the Father, the Son (Word) and the Holy SpiritHolding conversations with humans is different from existing as three different persons with different identities and persons! Stop the confusion! AnalogiesHere are the limitations this poses! 1. You oversimplified God to be just three reversible identities like steam, water and Ice! The triple point simplifies the complex nature of the Trinity by reducing it to three states of the same substance, rather than three distinct persons coexisting in one divine essence. 2. Your Water analogy has no Personhood. While it clear the father is not equal to the son while the son is not equal to the spirit. They all have different roles according to your Bible! Steam = Water = Ice! 3. Each of your Trinitarian Gods have different roles which your water analogy cannot depict! 4. And you mentioning the triple point of water represents a static case unlike the Trinitarian case that is dynamic involving continuous interactions among the parts! For example, Jesus said by himself he can do nothing! In triple point, Is water dependent on Ice to exist in that state? 2. States of humans1. This presents trinity as though the components Gods exist as one entity! Each of the human body component never exists on its own to make a complete human! They must exist together. Is this same for the trinity? When Jesus died was his father still God? 2. It also presents us with hierarchical wahala. The body, Spirit and Soul are not co-equal! Are your Gods similar? 3. The state of a human body, soul and spirit can change over time! Does the trinity change likewise? 4. The analogy does not adequately capture the relational dynamics among the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, as the human components do not interact in the same profound way that the divine persons do. |
| Re: What Is The Best Way To Explain Trinity Without Limitations? by AntiChristian(op): 5:30pm On Sep 12, 2024 |
Emusan:As regards the Sun's heat, that's not sun! The analogy of the Sun, where fire and heat are all called Sun, is limited because it implies the modes of existence rather than distinct persons. It fails to represent the co-equality and relational dynamics of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, leading to potential misunderstandings of the Trinity. As regards Mathematical Proportion! That one implies uniformity! Using the mathematical proportion 1:1:1 = 1 as an analogy for the Trinity is limited because it suggests a numerical equality that may imply uniformity rather than distinct personhood. This oversimplification fails to capture the unique identities and relational aspects of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit within the Trinity according to your Bible! |
| Re: What Is The Best Way To Explain Trinity Without Limitations? by AntiChristian(op): 5:31pm On Sep 12, 2024 |
Kingsempires:Which one be debater now? |
I'm Beginning To Reason With Jehovah Witness On Their Stand Concerning Trinity • The Trinity Doctrine Is a False doctrine and it is Unbiblical. • Please I Need Trinitarians To Explain Hebrews 1:1-3 For Me • 2 • 3 • 4
Jesus Said • Chicken With Four Legs: Evidence Of Juju? • Is It Necessary To Baptize Again After Changing Church?