₦airaland Forum

Do you?

God doesn't exist, he is just a make belief character. That's my opinion sha

Yes

This is a thought provoking question!

The title GOD means SUPREME BEING so when talking about existence of such a person there is a way to figure it out.
Are you ready to learn?

Which of the gods?

You mean olodumare
Chineke
I do believe in him
The most basic requirement from us is just to honor him in all we do
But unfortunately some have rebelled
We all have freewill though

Wainey:
God doesn't exist, he is just a make belief character. That's my opinion sha

Everything conceptually started as a make belief(hypothesis) but sooner or later this make beliefs became truth(had iota of truth in them). From this we got laws! and axioms which we can't prove but everything else hinges on.

If mathematics, the bedrock of science has axioms that are unprovable then I believe the conceptual equivalent of this results in the belief of God.

So yeah, I believe in God!

I'm Agnostic.

Religion is fraud.

Gabrielshow24:
Everything conceptually started as a make belief(hypothesis) but sooner or later this make beliefs became truth(had iota of truth in them). From this we got laws! and axioms which we can't prove but everything else hinges on.

If mathematics, the bedrock of science has axioms that are unprovable then I believe the conceptual equivalent of this results in the belief of God.

So yeah, I believe in God!

Good evening sir,please help me become a programmer I saw your post,please can I reach u on WhatsApp

Gabrielshow24:
Everything conceptually started as a make belief(hypothesis) but sooner or later this make beliefs became truth(had iota of truth in them). From this we got laws! and axioms which we can't prove but everything else hinges on.

If mathematics, the bedrock of science has axioms that are unprovable then I believe the conceptual equivalent of this results in the belief of God.

So yeah, I believe in God!

So your living is conceptual and a make belief, right?

Is it mathematics and science that made the laws that you should walk with your legs and not on your belly like a snake?

N3TRAL:
I'm Agnostic.

Religion is fraud.

You, man, were first the frauder then you made frauding your religion.

Dtruthspeaker:
So your living is conceptual and a make belief, right?

Is it mathematics and science that made the laws that you should walk with your legs and not on your belly like a snake?

Your question answers you already

YouMess:
Good evening sir,please help me become a programmer I saw your post,please can I reach u on WhatsApp

Yeah

Gabrielshow24:
Your question answers you already

Just say you do not have any reasonable thing to say cos man's living is not a concept nor did science and mathematics make the laws of man's walking

Gabrielshow24:
Yeah

pls quote me your WhatsApp so I can reach out sir

Dtruthspeaker:
Just say you do not have any reasonable thing to say cos man's living is not a concept nor did science and mathematics make the laws of man's walking

Now I see you are not a deep thinker.

You first argument dismisses your conclusion.

Go and read what you wrote previously and think on the logical implications of such statement.

And if you can't grab it then I will explain it to you.

YouMess:
pls quote me your WhatsApp so I can reach out sir

send me a message:
everythinggrand24@gmail.com

Gabrielshow24:
Now I see you are not a deep thinker.

You first argument dismisses your conclusion.

Go and read what you wrote previously and think on the logical implications of such statement.

And if you can't grab it then I will explain it to you.

Since when did a query on your own statement. to wit "So your living is conceptual and a make belief, right?" become an argument?

So explain o, cos i see living people, living, and not cartoon drawings.

Dtruthspeaker:
Since when did a query on your own statement. to wit "So your living is conceptual and a make belief, right?" become an argument?

So explain o, cos i see living people, living, and not cartoon drawings.

Was that what you construed as first argument? 👀

You didn't read it at all.

Science proves the existence of God.
The laws we have come to know, have roots in axioms.

So there are a lot of things that are just are.
Trying to prove their existence is impossible.
But you need their existence to prove all.

Taking the flip side of this to materialism we can induce that God is most likely an axiom that has no proof but all things are proved by him.

Hence me saying make beliefs(hypothesis) is just to show the scientific process in determining laws, nothing more.

Finally, your genetic code contains information that ensures you are not a monkey!

Gabrielshow24:
Was that what you construed as first argument? 👀

You didn't read it at all.

That is my first argument TO YOU, and the others stood on this, so if you have any reasonable thing to say, drop it. if not, rest, my point has already been made and your dodgings just proved you really have nothing valid to say.

Dtruthspeaker:
That is my first argument TO YOU, and the others stood on this, so if you have any reasonable thing to say, drop it. if not, rest, my point has already been made and your dodgings just proved you really have nothing valid to say.

No one is dodging it's a very simple matter.

What you are exhibiting here is straw man fallacy!

You are inferring something from another thing.

Can't context not tell you what the everything there stood for?

The next paragraph or so exemplifies what I mean by the use of the word "everything"

But instead you jump to the literal interpretation of "everything" !

Thinking you have found a golden nugget.
But you just reveal your lack of understanding to the world.

How can you not see what I am passing along?

Perhaps I should start adding a disclaimer saying "for the scientific community only because some elements will interpret it differently"

Infact "everything starts out as an abstraction(concept)
before taking permeating form".

You can't do anything without first conceptualizing it!

How is this not clear to you?

So indeed your life is a physical realization of a conceptualization!

That's why no other figure fits the author of such conceptualization than God!

Gabrielshow24:
No one is dodging it's a very simple matter.

What you are exhibiting here is straw man fallacy!

You are inferring something from another thing.

Can't context not tell you what the everything there stood for?

The next paragraph or so exemplifies what I mean by the use of the word "everything"

But instead you jump to the literal interpretation of "everything" !

Thinking you have found a golden nugget.
But you just reveal your lack of understanding to the world.

How can you not see what I am passing along?

Perhaps I should start adding a disclaimer saying "for the scientific community only because some elements will interpret it differently"

Infact "everything starts out as an abstraction(concept)
before taking permeating form".

You can't do anything without first conceptualizing it!

How is this not clear to you?

So indeed your life is a physical realization of a conceptualization!

That's why no other figure fits the author of such conceptualization than God!

See how you have misled yourself?

My argument and query was on your point of conceptualization/make belief and not on your "everything".

Dtruthspeaker:
See how you have misled yourself?

My argument and query was on your point of conceptualization/make belief and not on your "everything".

🤦