₦airaland Forum

Adebisi444:
Let me say this... because all countries are sovereign states doesn't mean all of them should own nukes without bn checkmate. Agreed USA is forming super power by becoming world police but it's necessary...if all countries get nukes, it will end this world quickly because there's no way human beings will not fight or raise wars. They will nuke themselves and it will affect everyone... especially if terrorists country fighting for religion get hold of it. So in the process of USA forming super power, she protecting herselves and the rest of the countries. If one country is not satisfied or feel she too can become super power to control the world..last last they will nuke the world. Human beings are always looking for a way to scatter things

Masterviolence:
Took the whole day to leave the ground.

I spilled my drink.

ariesbull:
That missile is a REAL game-changer. As there are NO air-defence systems that can stop it, each US aircraft carrier GROUP (the basis of US military muscle across the world) can be taken out with ONE missile!!!

That missile is a hypersonic glide missile, that Russia has been developing the technology for since the 60s. The munition is an explosive metal (Altex?) which is a refinement of something the Germans invented in the 80s. Russia has also developed the hi-tec materials for it to be able to handle the temperatures, stresses, etc involved at Mach 10+.

Some years ago, China tested a hypersonic glide missile that circled the globe then deployed multiple warheads. The Americans shit themselves! It seems Russia and China may have been co-operating on this for years. This one missile makes ATACMS and Storm Shadow look primitive!
What would happen if China, Iran and North Korea all had them?[i][/i]

FoolishBoy419:
So what makes USA, a warmongering state, qualified to possess nuclear weapons while Gambia is not?

YouCantStopTheH:
In his comments, Bayraktar pointed to a previous waiver granted to Ankara when Washington had sanctioned Iran in 2012. At the time, the sanctions against Tehran included a clause that allowed the US President to issue a special exemption if an oil-importing country faced “exceptional circumstances” that made it impossible to reduce Iranian oil imports. Bayraktar has argued that Türkiye now needs a similar waiver for Gazprombank in order to secure its supply of natural gas.

Lawag3:
A ceasefire agreement is different from withdrawing from a war because you are losing.


If an agreement is reached in Ukraine and Russia agrees with it an withdraw do not mean that it lost the war.


The fact that Hezbollah clearly said no agreement will be reached with Israel unless a ceasefire deal is made in Gaza should tell you who won the War.


Hezbollah is feeling the losses and has thrown Hamas under the bus.


Hamas is now on their own.

Allthelight:
Hezbollah firing the missiles they didn't fire throughout the war

Allthelight:
your Hezbollah should better reject that deal ooh for the respect of their former boss

You called him a hero

Allthelight:
Lolz they want Hezbollah completely gone

I don't think Hezbollah will accept the deal but If they do.

Their political power will be reduced in Lebanon they are already struggling to maintain power

FoolishBoy419:
So what makes USA, a warmongering state, qualified to possess nuclear weapons while Gambia is not?

Vic2023:
it is advisable to stick to names calling as the other guy said

Hezbollah dieing politically? Hezbollah consist of almost ⅔ of Lebanon voters, the most highest voter in last election

Adebisi444:
I don't want to believe that Palestine are facing genocide from Israel. It's war you wanna fight before you invade Israel and killed lot and still capture for hostages. That's not friendly at all. Palestine want war and they have seen it.

Vic2023:
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 werey
@ the bold
Ok the withdrawal of Russia from Ukraine through negotiations mean,it wins the war? Despite losing billions of dollars number of soldiers and civilians?
What did Ukraine lose as a loser?

Vic2023:
olodo which missile?

Adebisi444:
Let me say this... because all countries are sovereign states doesn't mean all of them should own nukes without bn checkmate. Agreed USA is forming super power by becoming world police but it's necessary...if all countries get nukes, it will end this world quickly because there's no way human beings will not fight or raise wars. They will nuke themselves and it will affect everyone... especially if terrorists country fighting for religion get hold of it. So in the process of USA forming super power, she protecting herselves and the rest of the countries. If one country is not satisfied or feel she too can become super power to control the world..last last they will nuke the world. Human beings are always looking for a way to scatter things

IMEI:
My thoughts on the Hezbollah/israel ceasefire:

Since October 7, the biggest winner has been Iran

Iran has been able to establish it can seriously damage israel, as demonstrated by the missile salvos that penetrated it's multi-layered and multi-national air defenses. This will prove a deterrence and tilts the balance of power in it's favour

Hezbollah, Iran's ally, has shown it can hold israel hostage by clearing out northern israel. This is a major weak point that is open to Iran's exploitation, i.e. Iran effectively has leverage

That being said, Hezbollah was forced to accept a ceasefire. Why?
(1)The kill count from airstrikes and the toll on Lebanon as a whole
(2) the fact that Hezbollah unilaterally and without National endorsement entered into conflict against Israel
(3) the pager attacks and blindsided killings of its leadership,
(4) the very poor state of Lebanon's economy
(5) participation in the Syrian war which thins them out etc.
put a lot of pressure on them both internally and externally, especially from fellow Lebanese who were being bombed

israel also needed a ceasefire:
(1) because of the fighting in Gaza which they were unprepared for and as a result of, were already stretched thin
(2) the strains on Israel's economy
(3) the growing threat of an unpredictable regional war
(4) growing isolation of israel on the world stage
(5) mounting losses and growing war weariness at home
(6) growing cracks within the political establishment
(7) a growing rift between netanyahu and his allies on one side and the security establishment on the other
( 8 ) growing internal opposition to israel's war strategy
(9) prolonged captivity of captives etc.
netanyahu needed a reprieve via a ceasefire

The deal fails to secure Hezbollah's disarmament, as well as disbandment and also fails to ensure Hezbollah's supply routes are closed and cutoff. This effectively guarantees they remain a potent threat to israel despite a withdrawal from Southern Lebanon. This is because they still remain the most powerful armed force in the country and their pulling away from israel's northern border is dependent on their good faith and not because they're overpowered

Contrary to what many think, this won't change the dynamics in Gaza and wider Palestine much. israel's northern borders will be heavily guarded and this will exhaust resources, though not like in active confrontation. The Gaza genocide will continue, as well as the occupation in the West Bank, but now that a ceasefire has been reached, there'll be more urgency to bring the battles in Gaza to a close. This is because the longer the Gaza battles go on, the higher the risk of a second front opening against israel, as was the case with Hezbollah, the tit for tat with Iran, cross border attacks from Jordan and Egypt etc.

Whichever way you look at this, israel's weakness has been exposed to the world and especially to the Middle East. Their biggest achievements have been mass murder and destruction, their combat showing however, has been quite underwhelming

Furthermore, israel has ensured and continues to ensure, that widespread hostility and rejection of it remains in the region for decades to come and with changing global dynamics being fomented by the steady decline of the West, chiefly America, this could spell doom for them in the long run, especially if the Middle East comes under the control of popular governments

netanyahu was right about one thing though, the security situation has changed in the region. It may not be exactly as he envisaged though, because the jury is out on what the future portends for the zionist project and the signs don't look good.

Adebisi444:
I don't want to believe that Palestine are facing genocide from Israel. It's war you wanna fight before you invade Israel and killed lot and still capture for hostages. That's not friendly at all. Palestine want war and they have seen it.

Adebisi444:
I see... they didn't hate the country that enslaved their forefathers. They always angry with America..they have their reasons anyway.

Adebisi444:
See the way you narrated it as if you were there fighting with them or they call you to explain to you.

jjj37:
QAnother mental patient on the roam above. Ignore his tongue rattling

WrriterNg:
Good question 🤜🏻🤛🏻

Ghostagain:
The only country to ever nuke an other one is the USA itself.
The USA is responsible for funding and training ben Laden and his men in order to have them fight a religious terrorist war. The USA still funds and trains terrorists today in places like Syria. The USA used Isis against Russia recently, Israel had been giving medical care to Isis terrorists in syria.

The USA is not protecting the world and nobody asked for USA's protection, the USA is enslaving the world. Countries like China and Russia which are much older than the USA and which have a history of fighting invaders will never let the USA enslave them.

Allthelight:
you guys will cry