₦airaland Forum

Kingsnairaland:
First my dear Open your mind to see your horizon so

By the way
Georgia's independence is tied to it not joining nato and if you think otherwise then go put them in nato lol since you have more sense than UK USA evil nato alliance that ran away from Georgia's. Lol

Next
No one that thinks properly is learning any thing from you here because you failed to think rationally about this political situation

Now

it common senses analysis to know Mexico should not dream about joining Russia military pact or hosting Russia nuke

So your lamentations holds no water

If Mexico decides to join Russia military cult and host Russia nukes you will see me here condemning mother Russia and Mexico

That is the difference between me and you or you and I.

I think logically and spiritually while you think based on who you prefer to win not minding if they are right or wrong.

usmanpogo:
It's impossible for Mexico to enter a military alliance with Russia due to the Monroe doctrine and the Roosevelt corollary to the Monroe's doctrine.

The doctrine puts all of the western hemisphere under the sphere of the US influence.

"""Theodore Roosevelt added the Roosevelt Corollary to the Monroe Doctrine in 1904, which stated that in cases of flagrant and chronic wrongdoing by a Latin American country, the United States could intervene in that country’s internal affairs""""

WrriterNg:
Cc Appleyard, BoldBrainz, Ghostagain, LordAdam16, Masterviolence, Regex, Shoodboi2, MILLE, Usmanpogo

What are your thoughts on this?

Vl3ly:
🇺🇸🇫🇷🇸🇾⚡- US, French and Kurdish delegations have also arrived in Damascus, joining the Turkish delegation that arrived earlier.

Gbadebo19:
Could you please say more about this Monroe doctrine and Roosevelt corollary? Probably a link to an article or anything else. I have never heard anything like this before 😃
And for how long could this Monroe doctrine be binding seeing that all these countries are now sovereign states.

Vic2023:
⚡️Turkish Defense: Our country is taking preventive measures against terrorist groups seeking to achieve gains by exploiting the situation that poses a threat to the security of Syria and our region.

[G&T]

Masterviolence:
Throughout my extensive years of geopolitical analysis, I have observed that we are currently in a transitional phase where those in power increasingly conceal critical information from the public. This has left many analysts appearing uninformed or, at worst, misguided.

One topic that has long intrigued me is Russia's involvement in Syria. Opinions on this issue vary widely. Some argue that as a global superpower, Russia’s presence in Syria is a strategic necessity on the geopolitical chessboard. Others claim that Russia’s intervention was a direct response to an invitation from Syria’s legitimate president, making their involvement both necessary and justifiable.

However, contrary to these narratives, I believe Russia’s primary motive was the preservation of Assad’s regime but not at it own detriment. Instead, it appears Russia’s role was constrained by the immense resources required to counter the opposing forces’ momentum and strategic preparedness. Turkey, often identified as the main backer of the so-called "moderate rebels," is merely one piece of the puzzle. The real orchestrator behind the attempted destabilization of Assad’s regime, in my view, is the United States. Turkey acts as the visible enabler, but the U.S. remains the mastermind. I am confident that Ukraine is also intricately linked to this larger geopolitical strategy.

Although Russia is currently entangled in the conflict in Ukraine, it still retains the resources to support Syria against the "moderate rebels." Yet, recent developments suggest that Assad himself may have conceded his position. Recognizing the corruption within his regime and the futility of further bloodshed, he seemingly opted to relinquish power. The circumstances surrounding the Syrian army's rapid collapse where a force of over 200,000 was defeated by fewer than 50,000 rebels in just ten days are telling. The manner of their retreat, leaving behind ammunition, air defense systems, tanks, and even basic military equipment such as AK-47s and uniforms, suggests either a lack of will to fight or direct orders to stand down. Assad’s refusal to accept reinforcements from allies like Iraq, Iran, and Hezbollah who were the main ground forces while Russia was playing the role of air force in 2015 further supports this theory.

The ousting of Assad appears to be a calculated move by the U.S. to stretch Russia’s military resources thin. However, Russia has not taken the bait, likely drawing lessons from the Soviet Union’s costly invasion of Afghanistan. What we are witnessing is a strategic chess game, with the U.S. and Russia actively countering each other’s global influence. For instance, just as Russia played a role in reducing U.S. and French influence in Niger, the U.S. appears determined to diminish Russia's presence in Syria and around the world.

Despite these efforts, Russia’s sustained position in Syria undermines the U.S.’s strategy. By avoiding the diversion of resources from Ukraine or Africa, Russia has maintained its influence in the region. Should the "moderate rebels" eventually turn against their backers, a scenario that seems plausible, Russia would likely remain in Syria, observing the fallout with minimal engagement.

Looking ahead, I predict that Africa will become the next major theater for regime change efforts. The geopolitical chessboard is shifting, and we are merely witnessing the opening moves.
Bookmark this prediction: the U.S will orchestrate a regime change on those Russia backed military jutas in Africa using the countries opposition forces to fight.
It does matter if they.are terrorist.
"When the U.S wants something, they'll try every means possible even if it means sleeping with the devil.