₦airaland Forum

LordAdam16:
Buffoon, this is what happens when an Air Defense SAM takes out an airliner.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ukraine_International_Airlines_Flight_752
And this by the Americans - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran_Air_Flight_655

It destroys the airliner and kills everyone on board.

Any one can speculate but the drones Russia shot down did not crash in Kazakhstan.

And stop typing rubbish!
All three points you just shared are a pile of horsesh*t.

1. The plane crashed in Kazakhstan. Kazakhstan is not militarized.
2. The Ukrainian drones were shot down over Vladikavkaz in North Ossetia and neighboring Ingushetia. Not in Grozny.
3. The plane took a detour for several reasons. One, the authorities in Grozny informed the pilots of fog. That's why they couldn't land in Grozny. GPS jamming does not automatically lead to detours. This is the NYT quoting an aviation journalist who states this



https://www.nytimes.com/2024/12/25/world/europe/kazakhstan-plane-crash.html

An investigation is underway and we'll learn what happened.
While everyone is patient, you and your Siamese id**t are running around prematurely saying reports already suggest the jet was shot down.

Because you both have single digit IQ, you can't even get your theory and the basic facts right.
You're the special kind of cretin who would still fail an exam despite copying from a straight-A student.
How hard is it to wait? Will you atrophy if you wait a few weeks for a definitive official account from the Kazakh authorities?

For the rest of the thread who want clarity on the crash.
The shoot-down theory has its merits.
1. Russia has deployed a new class of Air Defense systems for anti-drone warfare. These systems have smaller warheads that explode in proximity to their targets. When they explode, they release shrapnel.
2. The inward-piercing holes at the rear of the jet are consistent with shrapnel impact.
3. It is speculated that the shrapnels damaged hydraulics and electricals at the rear of the jet that made controlling the jet difficult.

There are lots of questions, which is why every normal person is waiting for an investigation. The jet flew for several more minutes after the accident. They couldn't return to Baku so the pilots made inquiries for any airport close by to make an emergency crash landing. They opted to cross the Caspian Sea to land at a Kazakh airport. And were about a few kilometers out when the crash occurred.

The pilots are heroes.

The rear of the jet is mostly intact, so there'll be definitive conclusion if indeed it was impacted by a Russian system.

-Lord

Just stop typing rubbish, you hear?
Let's address your gibberish one after the other.
1. The plane crashed in Kazakhstan.
Were you blind to the fact that the plane took a significant detour in hundreds of miles? That simply explains why the crash occured in that location. Secondly, will a plane come crashing at to the ground at the point of impact? If definitely would still move some kilometres before crashing.

2. The Ukrainian drones were not shot down at Grozny.
You will have to argue this one with instant news feeds that stated that Grozny was under attack as at the time the plane was attached.

3. The plane took a detour for several reasons.
Are you the pilot? Are you the one to tell us why exactly the plane took a detour? It isn't just a detour, it was a significant detour in the excess of hundreds of miles. It has already been stated that the plane took a detour because of an ongoing attack in Grozny, yet you are trying to turn facts upside down.
There are only two reasons why the plane took a detour.
1. It's destination, Grozny was under attack. (Several news sources already reported it)
2. GPS Jamming
There is nothing in the media to support your ass-pulled tales by moonlight that it could be a fog.
Call me a single digit IQ, I am way better off than you who doesn't even have a brain at all.

Lastly, are you so dumb to see that from the pictures released, the impact showed that the plane was attacked from the outside and NOT from the inside. You are even so dumb that you stated "inward piercing shrapnel". Doesn't that tell you that the attack came from outside and not from the inside? If it came from the engine tank rubbish you are stating, then the shrapnel should have been outward piercing and NOT inward piercing.
That negates the rubbish you are spoofing about an internal engine balderdash.

It's simple. The inward piercing shrapnel us evidence that the plane was attacked from the outside most likely by Russian air defences. That was what led to the oxygen tank explosion. Don't be stupid nigger.

Be here, we will soon see the outcome of the investigation.

Lastly, always try to read and make sense of the rubbish you copy and paste before posting them.

LordAdam16:
Buffoon, this is what happens when an Air Defense SAM takes out an airliner.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ukraine_International_Airlines_Flight_752
And this by the Americans - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran_Air_Flight_655

It destroys the airliner and kills everyone on board.

Any one can speculate but the drones Russia shot down did not crash in Kazakhstan.

And stop typing rubbish!
All three points you just shared are a pile of horsesh*t.

1. The plane crashed in Kazakhstan. Kazakhstan is not militarized.
2. The Ukrainian drones were shot down over Vladikavkaz in North Ossetia and neighboring Ingushetia. Not in Grozny.
3. The plane took a detour for several reasons. One, the authorities in Grozny informed the pilots of fog. That's why they couldn't land in Grozny. GPS jamming does not automatically lead to detours. This is the NYT quoting an aviation journalist who states this



https://www.nytimes.com/2024/12/25/world/europe/kazakhstan-plane-crash.html

An investigation is underway and we'll learn what happened.
While everyone is patient, you and your Siamese id**t are running around prematurely saying reports already suggest the jet was shot down.

Because you both have single digit IQ, you can't even get your theory and the basic facts right.
You're the special kind of cretin who would still fail an exam despite copying from a straight-A student.
How hard is it to wait? Will you atrophy if you wait a few weeks for a definitive official account from the Kazakh authorities?

For the rest of the thread who want clarity on the crash.
The shoot-down theory has its merits.
1. Russia has deployed a new class of Air Defense systems for anti-drone warfare. These systems have smaller warheads that explode in proximity to their targets. When they explode, they release shrapnel.
2. The inward-piercing holes at the rear of the jet are consistent with shrapnel impact.
3. It is speculated that the shrapnels damaged hydraulics and electricals at the rear of the jet that made controlling the jet difficult.

There are lots of questions, which is why every normal person is waiting for an investigation. The jet flew for several more minutes after the accident. They couldn't return to Baku so the pilots made inquiries for any airport close by to make an emergency crash landing. They opted to cross the Caspian Sea to land at a Kazakh airport. And were about a few kilometers out when the crash occurred.

The pilots are heroes.

The rear of the jet is mostly intact, so there'll be definitive conclusion if indeed it was impacted by a Russian system.

-Lord

And this nincompoop is still telling me the place was not militarized. Well, feed your eyes.
Your gibberish is as a result of closing your brain to quality info and tagging it western media propaganda. It only damages your brain and makes you more stupid

Simeonjoe1:
Most times airdefenses doesn't work that way. They are not what you see in Hollywood movies, they operate by proximity fuse sending numerous shrapnel of various across a 50m radius.
Those shrapnel hitting engines, fuel areas and others is what is responsible for taking down an areal target.

The holes seen on this plane is consistent with airburst system. This is no engine explosion,
The whole back tail end is covered with hundreds of holes of high penetrating projectiles, and engine damage won't give you that.

My initial position is that a traditional Air Defense SAM will destroy that plane and there'll be no survivors.

We have several instances of that happening.

Instead this plane crossed the Caspian Sea and the pilots were able to correct its gyrations, with great difficulties of course, until they were a few kilometers out from the airport.

The two official statements, which might end up being wrong, are the Russians saying the accident was caused by a bird strike and the Kazakhs saying an oxygen cylinder exploded in the plane.

This is a Russian pilot who landed a plane in a cornfield after a bird strike disabled both engines.
https://www.timesfreepress.com/news/2019/aug/16/russipilot-safely-lands-jetliner-disabled-bir/
And you can use Google to see pictures of planes impacted by bird strike.

Of course, nothing can be ruled out, but you can see why normal people wait for investigations to be concluded.

-Lord

Gbadebo19:
And this nincompoop is still telling me the place was not militarized. Well, feed your eyes.
Your gibberish is as a result of closing your brain to quality info and tagging it western media propaganda. It only damages your brain and makes you more stupid

Gbadebo19:
1. The place where the crash occured was militarized by Russia.

Braindead m*ron!

Compare what you wrote and what is in that screenshot.

I specifically respond to your id**cy.
Stop polluting this thread with your illiteracy.
If you can't comprehend and make silly errors that a K-12 pupil wouldn't make, keep quiet.

-Lord

What up USA evil nato fans

Hope Ukraine is winning and about to take Crimea back lol

Lol

Gbadebo19:
Just stop typing rubbish, you hear?
Let's address your gibberish one after the other.
1. The plane crashed in Kazakhstan.
Were you blind to the fact that the plane took a significant detour in hundreds of miles? That simply explains why the crash occured in that location. Secondly, will a plane come crashing at to the ground at the point of impact? If definitely would still move some kilometres before crashing.

Who put a gun to your head to type that
"The place where the crash occured was militarized by Russia"?

I will repeat this as many times as is necessary.
Stop typing rubbish.
If you can't get basic facts right, stay silent.

2. The Ukrainian drones were not shot down at Grozny.
You will have to argue this one with instant news feeds that stated that Grozny was under attack as at the time the plane was attached.

Where were the drones shot down?
It is a very simple question.

Stop typing rubbish!

3. The plane took a detour for several reasons.
Are you the pilot? Are you the one to tell us why exactly the plane took a detour? It isn't just a detour, it was a significant detour in the excess of hundreds of miles. It has already been stated that the plane took a detour because of an ongoing attack in Grozny, yet you are trying to turn facts upside down.
There are only two reasons why the plane took a detour.
1. It's destination, Grozny was under attack. (Several news sources already reported it)
2. GPS Jamming
There is nothing in the media to support your ass-pulled tales by moonlight that it could be a fog.
Call me a single digit IQ, I am way better off than you who doesn't even have a brain at all.

See, you are very MAD.

The plane had to divert from its original route because of heavy fog in Grozny, its intended destination, and make an emergency landing.

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/12/26/why-did-an-azerbaijan-airline-plane-crash-in-kazakhstan-what-we-know

You think everyone is as ret**ded as you are to make factually untrue statements without credible sources.

Lastly, are you so dumb to see that from the pictures released, the impact showed that the plane was attacked from the outside and NOT from the inside. You are even so dumb that you stated "inward piercing shrapnel". Doesn't that tell you that the attack came from outside and not from the inside? If it came from the engine tank rubbish you are stating, then the shrapnel should have been outward piercing and NOT inward piercing.
That negates the rubbish you are spoofing about an internal engine balderdash.

It's simple. The inward piercing shrapnel us evidence that the plane was attacked from the outside most likely by Russian air defences. That was what led to the oxygen tank explosion. Don't be stupid.

Be here, we will soon see the outcome of the investigation.

Lastly, always try to read and make sense of the rubbish you copy and paste before posting them.

My positions on this accident have emerged from the preliminary official correspondences from the Russian and Kazakhstan authorities.
My opposition has been to the factually untrue statements you id**ts have been making.

This is my comment responding to Simeon that started this exchange.

LordAdam16:
Read what you wrote and assess if you're okay upstairs.

Seriously, do it.

After typing crap, you end with "it's early".
Why are exposing your id**cy when you know it is too early and we should wait for full investigation.
Are you trying to win "Id**t of the Year" award before the year wraps up.

-Lord

After meandering, you've also arrived at "we will soon see the outcome of the investigation".

Meanwhile you went off the deep end because you initially had a problem with me saying we should all wait for the outcome of an investigation.

F**L!

-Lord

LordAdam16:
Braindead m*ron!

Compare what you wrote and what is in that screenshot.

I specifically respond to your id**cy.
Stop polluting this thread with your illiteracy.
If you can't comprehend and make silly errors that a K-12 pupil wouldn't make, keep quiet.

-Lord

You are a big idiot. At your age, we need to be teaching you to read beyond the lines.
At your age, we need to be teaching you to read and understand statements in context.
You are really a lunatic.
So, if it was written that the place where the crash occured was militarized by Russia, you are so stupid to translate it to mean the exact point where the plane crash landed? You really need someone to tell you that it was referring to the point where the plane got hit?
For the sake of wherever you might need it, if you attend a legal proceeding, I am telling you for free on here that that plane crashed the moment it was hit
Why?
The probability that it was going to survive the hit was non existent.
Same way as if someone consumes poison somewhere else and dies in your house. It doesn't make you the killer
Your thinking is typical of the average street Nigerian that lacks education cos every thing suggests you are the killer.
Same thing in this situation. The plane crashed the moment it was hit cos it was going to crash nevertheless, it doesn't matter the miles it travelled before finally hitting the ground.
Oh My God!!! And you really claim to have any IQ at all? No wonder, your fellow folks argue legal provisions here like they are reading a comprehension passage. For the sake of education, did you really go to school?
You are dumb, aswearugad.
If I knew your brain was like this, I wouldn't have typed it that way, I would have come down to your decimal point 3 decimal point IQ level.
Sorry, it was my mistake. I really went too much above your level.
Lastly, you talk of official correspondence, how many western official correspondence have you dissed here classifying it as propaganda. Mad goat!!!

LordAdam16:
Who put a gun to your head to type that
"The place where the crash occured was militarized by Russia"?

I will repeat this as many times as is necessary.
Stop typing rubbish.
If you can't get basic facts right, stay silent.



Where were the drones shot down?
It is a very simple question.

Stop typing rubbish!



See, you are very MAD.


https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/12/26/why-did-an-azerbaijan-airline-plane-crash-in-kazakhstan-what-we-know

You think everyone is as ret**ded as you are to make factually untrue statements without credible sources.



My positions on this accident have emerged from the preliminary official correspondences from the Russian and Kazakhstan authorities.
My opposition has been to the factually untrue statements you id**ts have been making.

This is my comment responding to Simeon that started this exchange.



After meandering, you've also arrived at "we will soon see the outcome of the investigation".

Meanwhile you went off the deep end because you initially had a problem with me saying we should all wait for the outcome of an investigation.

F**L!

-Lord

As for calling me a fool, I will like to tell you for free that not everyone is a replica of your family members. Direct your problems to them.
You even said I make factually untrue statement without credible sources? How foolish can you be? Everything I wrote initially was from Yahoonews. But since you were stupid enough to skip it, it ain't my problem.
And speaking of credible sources, you are really stupid to call AL Jazeera a credible source of news. 🤡🤡🤡🤡
You are free to read again if you have a brain.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/azerbaijan-airlines-crash-sparks-speculation-200517076.html

WriteerNg:
⚡The damaged Azerbaijan Airlines plane was denied landing at Russian airports despite pilots’ emergency requests and was directed to fly over the Caspian Sea toward Aktau, Kazakhstan.

Its GPS navigation systems were jammed throughout the flight.

By Who?
You don't want to tell me the GPS navigation systems were jammed before the flight?

Gbadebo19:
Just stop typing rubbish, you hear?
Let's address your gibberish one after the other.
1. The plane crashed in Kazakhstan.
Were you blind to the fact that the plane took a significant detour in hundreds of miles? That simply explains why the crash occured in that location. Secondly, will a plane come crashing at to the ground at the point of impact? If definitely would still move some kilometres before crashing.

2. The Ukrainian drones were not shot down at Grozny.
You will have to argue this one with instant news feeds that stated that Grozny was under attack as at the time the plane was attached.

3. The plane took a detour for several reasons.
Are you the pilot? Are you the one to tell us why exactly the plane took a detour? It isn't just a detour, it was a significant detour in the excess of hundreds of miles. It has already been stated that the plane took a detour because of an ongoing attack in Grozny, yet you are trying to turn facts upside down.
There are only two reasons why the plane took a detour.
1. It's destination, Grozny was under attack. (Several news sources already reported it)
2. GPS Jamming
There is nothing in the media to support your ass-pulled tales by moonlight that it could be a fog.
Call me a single digit IQ, I am way better off than you who doesn't even have a brain at all.

Lastly, are you so dumb to see that from the pictures released, the impact showed that the plane was attacked from the outside and NOT from the inside. You are even so dumb that you stated "inward piercing shrapnel". Doesn't that tell you that the attack came from outside and not from the inside? If it came from the engine tank rubbish you are stating, then the shrapnel should have been outward piercing and NOT inward piercing.
That negates the rubbish you are spoofing about an internal engine balderdash.

It's simple. The inward piercing shrapnel us evidence that the plane was attacked from the outside most likely by Russian air defences. That was what led to the oxygen tank explosion. Don't be stupid nigger.

Be here, we will soon see the outcome of the investigation.

Lastly, always try to read and make sense of the rubbish you copy and paste before posting them.

Let just wait for the investigation report

So, where is that deranged and mad goat called LordAdam16?
Come out!!!!!
Weyrey!!!
Running your mouth like as if you have an atom of intelligence.
Quoting Aljazeera for me. A whole me? It took me over 3 years to know Al Jazeera for who they were.
One slowpoke is here telling me he read some stupid official correspondence.
Now, between me and you, who is the one with a 4 decimal point IQ?
Very Annoying Mad Goat
Weyrey!!!!
Let today be the last time you will ever engage me on this thread. I can't stoop so low to your level of unreasonability

Confirmed by Euro News.

See full report here:

https://www.euronews.com/2024/12/26/exclusive-preliminary-investigation-confirms-russian-missile-over-grozny-caused-aktau-cras

You can't analyze a very simple incident to notice that the impact of a shrapnel was inward piercing. What else suggests that the attack came from the outside? and NOT from any oxygen tank explosion. You come online and type gibberish and you believe you can educate people like us?
This is just a very simple case a detective would easily solve.
You really are annoying!!!!
Another Idiot cut to size
Mtcheeeew

Gbadebo19:
So, where is that deranged and mad goat called LordAdam16?
Come out!!!!!
Weyrey!!!
Running your mouth like as if you have an atom of intelligence.
Quoting Aljazeera for me. A whole me? It took me over 3 years to know Al Jazeera for who they were.
One slowpoke is here telling me he read some stupid official correspondence.
Now, between me and you, who is the one with a 4 decimal point IQ?
Very Annoying Mad Goat
Weyrey!!!!
Let today be the last time you will ever engage me on this thread. I can't stoop so low to your level of unreasonability

Confirmed by Euro News.

See full report here:

https://www.euronews.com/2024/12/26/exclusive-preliminary-investigation-confirms-russian-missile-over-grozny-caused-aktau-cras

True