₦airaland Forum

MaxInDHouse:
NEIGHBOUR is anyone living we must love them as we love ourselves. Mark 12:31

BROTHER is someone to whom we are RELATED it may be through BLOOD, through BUSINESS or through FAITH. Matthew 12:46-50

You are not related to me in any way so you're not my BROTHER but NEIGHBOUR!

DaddyCoool:
He still doesn't get it.
My point is, if you'd be so strict in interpreting the Bible that other believers in Christ are NOT your brothers, then you have to also exclude your blood relatives who are not JW.

DaddyCoool:
And likewise your neighbor can't be everybody. From below "neighbor" has to be limited to those who will be there for you in times of trouble - NOT everybody.

MaxInDHouse:
You're the one worrying yourself when it is as simple as ABC.
Even if i have to relate with someone as my BROTHER it must be someone i know and had dealings with like family or business associate or fellow believer. Such ones i can discuss what is troubling me with not STRANGER like you so that's why you never qualified to be my brother.


The Samaritan made himself neighbour to the Jew they never knew each other from anywhere so he never expected it from him.
That's what Jesus meant by loving your neighbour like yourself {Mark 12:31} this means how you would have loved to be treated but when it comes to BROTHERS in faith Jesus commanded us to have love among ourselves the same kind of love he had for his disciples! John 13:34-35

I know you can't grasp the difference!

The neighbourly love is how i love myself so helping my neighbour may cost my life i have the option to walk away that's what i expected from any stranger but when it comes to my fellow believer i must be willing to die for my brother in faith just as Jesus did. John 15:12-13

Do you get it now?

DaddyCoool:
But how can Jehovah who was ALONE have a son? Have you ever asked yourself that? Can't you see that the "son" can only be part of Jehovah, Jehovah himself?
Your JW Bible (NWT) agrees that "in the beginning was the Word" NOT that "the Word came into being or was created in the beginning". The Word pre-existed the beginning and was ALWAYS with God!

Also, your JW NWT says in Collosians 2:9 "For in Christ lives all the fullness of God in a human body." This is your own JW doctored Bible admitting these o

LordReed:
Again that's your business I stated my criteria very clearly.

LordReed:
Why are you being disingenuous? Did this conversation begin with you claiming it was a miracle or you asking about scientific expertise?

Image123:
We didn't start talking with THIS conversation, did we. We've been talking for years i suppose. i asked you the science angle and your requirements in THIS conversation. i have been telling you about faith and your huge misuse of your faith for years. Your faith is in science, it doesn't have to be limited to this like i always said. It's what i tried explaining to DaddyCoool.

DaddyCoool:
Get what?
I just showed you with verbatim quotations from your JW Bible that strict interpretation means your brothers are ONLY JW! And your neighbor is NOT everybody (or Christ would have simply answered "everybody"}. Instead he gave a long parable to illustrate what neighbor meant.
That's what strict interpretation gets you. Either accept that or admit that the Bible says many things and has to be nuanced in places!

DaddyCoool:
GothamCities, below is my post that shut up
Janosky and MaxInDHouse :

DaddyCoool:
GothamCities, below is my post that shut up
Janosky and MaxInDHouse :

GothamCities:
Lol.

Thanks for shutting them up using their own doctored Bible. They know they have no answers but rather than sit down and examine the falsehoods in their hands, they'll keep going on in their delusions because they want to please the men of their organization and avoid being excommunicated.

Is it not rather good to be excommunicated by man than to to. excommunicated by God?

Image123:
Your criteria was met, i provided your approved scientist to talk on the subject. You refuse to take his talk on the subject but chose to choose other convenient things.

Image123:
We didn't start talking with THIS conversation, did we. We've been talking for years i suppose. i asked you the science angle and your requirements in THIS conversation. i have been telling you about faith and your huge misuse of your faith for years. Your faith is in science, it doesn't have to be limited to this like i always said. It's what i tried explaining to DaddyCoool.

DaddyCoool:
And I accepted your explanation indicating you've lost the scientific argument while conceding I lost the holistic argument. (Holistic includes things science can't explain, things we don't know, things we know wrong, and things we don't know that we don't know)

LordReed:
Then you dismissed even what you brought as scientific evidence in favour of magic.

LordReed:
Well then I am not interested in talking about magic with you. When you have evidence that can be verified let me know.

Image123:
i don't know anything about magic. If you refer to miracles, i did not bring up a discussion on miracles with you, did i? When you have a scientific rebuttal to the link that i gave you, let me know instead of lazy excuses.

Image123:
In the first place, i did not bring it as scientific evidence, i brought the answersingenesis link for your consideration.
https://answersingenesis.org/the-flood/global/evidences-genesis-flood/?srsltid=AfmBOorKOBH3FZYZBvcRrvTVOqMtxhv3_9kLjH5osBXlBGvUOzPDC5Gk

i only added the other link for you to verify your requirements that the writer was indeed a Ph.D in Geology with papers in scientific journals. But you insist on stating it as evidence when i never made it one.
In the second place, i did not dismiss his writings but the rebuttal that you put forth which focused on the Grand Canyon and left every other thing that Snelling mentioned. Snelling's PROPOSING that ice melted is not evidence, is it? Or is a proposal a fact? If you want to talk in terms of science, read the answersingenesis link and fault it scientifically, not all these pussyfooting.

Image123:
Nonetheless, i will give you links to his works published in a scientific journal, although i know your rigmarole.
https://www.researchgate.net/scientific-contributions/Andrew-A-Snelling-2009962514

MaxInDHouse:
Continue deceiving yourself!

GothamCities:
You can't say that to someone who is a living proof of the God he serves.

LordReed:
LoLz. Says the guy who dismissed the very thing he linked to. Find someone else who wants to discuss magic or miracles with you, I am not interested.

MaxInDHouse:
Someone who can't point to one single fellow as his fellow believer instead after few conversation he'll turn to arguments, abuses, insults and curses all in the name of the same Jesus you all call your Lord!

Is that not why you are all ashamed of your churches but pointing at the only religion whose members are united in faith?

LordReed:
LoLz. When you have scientific journals you want to discuss lemme know.

BTW why are you lying? This is what you said when you posted the researchgate link:

Where in it do you say you are posting it to verify his credentials? Nah, you were hoping I would be as disingenuous as you and not read anything.

Pussyfooting lazy arse here is you.

GothamCities:
Where are the curses, abuses, etc you're ascribing to me?

GothamCities:
Lol.

Thanks for shutting them up using their own doctored Bible. They know they have no answers but rather than sit down and examine the falsehoods in their hands, they'll keep going on in their delusions because they want to please the men of their organization and avoid being excommunicated.

Is it not rather good to be excommunicated by man than to be excommunicated by God?

DaddyCoool:
But how can Jehovah who was ALONE have a son? Have you ever asked yourself that? Can't you see that the "son" can only be part of Jehovah, Jehovah himself?
Your JW Bible (NWT) agrees that "in the beginning was the Word" NOT "the Word came into being or was created in the beginning". The Word pre-existed the beginning and was ALWAYS with God!

Also, your JW NWT says in Collosians 2:9 "For in Christ lives all the fullness of God in a human body." This is your own JW doctored Bible admitting these o

gohf:
You are always feeling wise in your folly.
But how can Jehovah who was ALONE have a son?
So how can Jehovah who according to you was alone create the whole universe?

I don't agree with JW but your error is also glaring

DaddyCoool:
Father, forgive him, for he knows not what he's doing

Theos ("God" ) is not in the Greek manuscript of 1 Timothy 3:16.
Your Trinitarian mentors smuggled,ADDED "God" into that verse 16.
Go & verify that fact to cure your delusion.

Colossians 2:9 "fullness of deity" meaning "fullness of a god".
In Greek language deity means "a god. ".
Did Colossians 2:9 say "fullness of God Almighty?"

Not at all.

Madam, go and educate yourself.
Stop deceiving yourself spilling GIBBERISH.

GothamCities:
Did I ever claim to worship 2 persons? Bring the evidence from my conversations.

GothamCities:
GothamCities:
He (Jesus) is the Aloha and Omega, just as Jehovah Himself.
He is the Beginning and the Ending, just as Jehovah Himself. He (Jehovah) is the Everlasting Father just as Jesus Himself".
.

GothamCities confirms worshipping Jesus as he worshipping Jehovah.
GothamCities worshipping 2 persons.

DaddyCoool:
But how can Jehovah who was ALONE have a son? Have you ever asked yourself that? Can't you see that the "son" can only be part of Jehovah, Jehovah himself?

DaddyCoool:
Your JW Bible (NWT) agrees that "in the beginning was the Word" NOT "the Word came into being or was created in the beginning". The Word pre-existed the beginning and was ALWAYS with God!

DaddyCoool:
Also, your JW NWT says in Collosians 2:9 "For in Christ lives all the fullness of God in a human body." This is your own JW doctored Bible admitting these o

DaddyCoool:
He still doesn't get it.
My point is, if you'd be so strict in interpreting the Bible that other believers in Christ are NOT your brothers, then you have to also exclude your blood relatives who are not JW.

And likewise your neighbor can't be everybody. From below "neighbor" has to be limited to those who will be there for you in times of trouble - NOT everybody.

THIS IS WHO IS YOUR BROTHER!
47  So someone said to him: “Look! Your mother and your brothers are standing outside, seeking to speak to you.” 48  In reply he said to the one who spoke to him: “Who is my mother, and who are my brothers?” 49  And extending his hand toward his disciples, he said: “Look! My mother and my brothers!+ 50  For whoever does the will of my Father who is in heaven, that one is my brother and sister and mother.”

AND THIS IS WHO IS YOUR NEIGHBOR!
29  But wanting to prove himself righteous, the man said to Jesus: “Who really is my neighbor?” 30  In reply Jesus said: “A man was going down from Jerusalem to Jerʹi·cho and fell victim to robbers, who stripped him, beat him, and went off, leaving him half-dead. 31  Now by coincidence a priest was going down on that road, but when he saw him, he passed by on the opposite side. 32  Likewise, a Levite, when he came to the place and saw him, passed by on the opposite side. 33  But a certain Sa·marʹi·tani traveling the road came upon him, and at seeing him, he was moved with pity. 34  So he approached him and bandaged his wounds, pouring oil and wine on them. ..
Who of these three seems to you to have made himself neighbor to the man who fell victim to the robbers?” 37  He said: “The one who acted mercifully toward him.”

MaxInDHouse:
Suit yourself, i'm not your brother, i can't be your brother and i can never ever be your brother o!