₦airaland Forum

Ohyoudidnt:
What have you shown me? Obviously your understanding and perception is wrong. Definitely shame keeps you from showing what you misunderstood. What truth about Anti-Balaka?
Is Brittanica the custodian of truth?
What is wrong with the other sources that say otherwise?
You cannot escape this, bring other sources that back you and Brittanica up?

Britannica is a very reliable source, very very reliable with the truth. You are not the first person that will condemned anything I broght up from Wikipedia. Your chief slave here on NL, Anti.Christian did the same and I keep his mouth shut for life after using Britannica to nuked him down with the truth

So therefore, according to britanicca, Anti balaka is not a terrorist group

Ohyoudidnt:
So you switch on and off your followship? Do you say your all knowing Jesus didn't adequately prepare or advise you about this?

You don't get it, read this again but this time gently


Should Christians fold their hands while you terrorists slaves and followers of Muhammad keep on sending them to grave untimely because they want to follow the teaching of Jesus Christ?

Just answer YES or NO

Ohyoudidnt:
Who do Christians follow if not Jesus oh you follow Constantine not Jesus.

Christians follow the teaching of Jesus Christ but what I'm asking you is that should they fold their hands while your terrorists continuing sending them to grave all because you want Islamic world under the fact Christians are following the teachings of Jesus Christ that says whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other

Ohyoudidnt:
I believe there was one just last week in Sokoto or so.

Bring it up here let's see with the video on how he was beheaded openly

Ohyoudidnt:
Congressman Scott Perry says so about USAID.

Act like you don't know more so about MK Ultra

You have come again glorifying taqqiya here as usual, nawa ooo

So Scott Perry is an American sponsoring Boko haram in Nigeria right?

Thank your creator that this is NL and not X, I would have tagged Scott Perry to sue you for defamation

AntilsIam:
Britannica is a very reliable source, very very reliable with the truth. You are not the first person that will condemned anything I broght up from Wikipedia. Your chief slave here on NL, Anti.Christian did the same and I keep his mouth shut for life after using Britannica to nuked him down with the truth

So therefore, according to britanicca, Anti balaka is not a terrorist group

You need Brittanica to exactly spell it out? Does it not say the supposed defensive protection of Anti-balaka degenerated into a cycle of violent attacks between Christians and Muslims, even civilians, that left hundreds dead and thousands displaced?

Do you refuse to accept that Muslims
and civilians were killed by Anti-balaka?

Cogent Social Sciences in their academic publication in 2024character them as terrorists.

Jamestown Foundation, in its 2014 report, discusses the Anti-balaka militias' targeting of Muslims, framing their actions within the broader discourse of terrorism

Human Rights Watch highlights the terror inflicted by Anti-balaka militias on Muslim communities, emphasizing the need for international intervention to protect civilians.

What else do you need to know before aggreing they are terrorist.

Ohyoudidnt:
You need Brittanica to exactly spell it out? Does it not say the supposed defensive protection of Anti-balaka degenerated into a cycle of violent attacks between Christians and Muslims, even civilians, that left hundreds dead and thousands displaced?

Do you refuse to accept that Muslims
and civilians were killed by Anti-balaka?

Cogent Social Sciences in their academic publication in 2024character them as terrorists.

Jamestown Foundation, in its 2014 report, discusses the Anti-balaka militias' targeting of Muslims, framing their actions within the broader discourse of terrorism

Human Rights Watch highlights the terror inflicted by Anti-balaka militias on Muslim communities, emphasizing the need for international intervention to protect civilians.

What else do you need to know before aggreing they are terrorist.

Anything outside britanicca on this matter, is a lie

AntilsIam:
Anything outside britanicca on this matter, is a lie

Tied to Colonial slavery or inferiority complex regarding the British?

Ohyoudidnt:
Tied to Colonial slavery or inferiority complex regarding the British?

Tied to Muhammad follower enslaved under the slavery religion of allah

AntilsIam:
You don't get it, read this again but this time gently


Should Christians fold their hands while you terrorists slaves and followers of Muhammad keep on sending them to grave untimely because they want to follow the teaching of Jesus Christ?

Just answer YES or NO

Christians follow the teaching of Jesus Christ but what I'm asking you is that should they fold their hands while your terrorists continuing sending them to grave all because you want Islamic world under the fact Christians are following the teachings of Jesus Christ that says whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other

Jesus by your book offers deep teachings on love, mercy, and forgiveness, indicating that his response would not be one of retribution or retaliation. Instead, he promotes a radical love that goes beyond human hostility, encouraging his followers to bless those who persecute them and to turn the other cheek.

Jesus would likely advocate for embracing forgiveness and reconciliation instead of pursuing vengeance. He would encourage seeking nonviolent solutions to conflicts, emphasizing a faith grounded not in retaliation but in a deep love for everyone, even in the face of persecution.

AntilsIam:
So Scott Perry is an American sponsoring Boko haram in Nigeria right?

Thank your creator that this is NL and not X, I would have tagged Scott Perry to sue you for defamation

I now see why you misconstrued a statement made by me to waving good bye. Did I say Scott Perry claims he sponsors terrorists? Obviously you cannot do any independent research yourself but go on with what you are spoon fed.
The senator points at how USAID is used as cover to promote insurgency which is opposite to aid.

Ohyoudidnt:
I now see why you misconstrued a statement made by me to waving good bye. Did I say Scott Perry claims he sponsors terrorists? Obviously you cannot do any independent research yourself but go on with what you are spoon fed.
The senator points at how USAID is used as cover to promote insurgency which is opposite to aid.

Are you under the demonic spirit of dementia?

You said this:

Ohyoudidnt:
4. Didn't you get the information om one of their spomsors in America?

And I responded by saying:

AntiIslam:
Who? tell us his or her name..

And you responded again with this:

Ohyoudidnt:
Congressman Scott Perry says so about USAID

Act like you don't know more so about MK Ultra

Is that the correct response to give if your brain is working perfectly?

You are a waste of time and energy but I don't blame you anyways, you are showing us the characteristics of a slave allah made you to be

Ohyoudidnt:
Jesus by your book offers deep teachings on love, mercy, and forgiveness, indicating that his response would not be one of retribution or retaliation. Instead, he promotes a radical love that goes beyond human hostility, encouraging his followers to bless those who persecute them and to turn the other cheek.

Jesus would likely advocate for embracing forgiveness and reconciliation instead of pursuing vengeance. He would encourage seeking nonviolent solutions to conflicts, emphasizing a faith grounded not in retaliation but in a deep love for everyone, even in the face of persecution.

I said Just answer YES or NO

How did you escaped from primary school education?

AntilsIam:
Are you under the demonic spirit of dementia?

You said this:



And I responded by saying:




And you responded again with this:



Is that the correct response to give if your brain is working perfectly?

You are a waste of time and energy but I don't blame you anyways, you are showing us the characteristics of a slave allah made you to be

Again you show that your depth of thought is rather shallow.

Did you for a moment look into what Scott Perry said? So you expect me to break everything down to you like a 4 year old?
Really now.

I think the Yoruba's have the adage abo oro ....

AntilsIam:
I said Just answer YES or NO

How did you escaped from primary school education?

Why would you define exactly how I answer a question. I see you are either a corrupt police man or have worked with them writing false statements and forcing innocent people to sign.

AntilsIam:
You don't get it, read this again but this time gently

Should Christians fold their hands while you terrorists slaves and followers of Muhammad keep on sending them to grave untimely because they want to follow the teaching of Jesus Christ?

Just answer YES or NO

How did the apostles who were with Jesus react to persecution?

You are a Sophist, Demagogue.

I hope you are familiar with these words?

AntilsIam:
Anything outside britanicca on this matter, is a lie

Is it not in your Brittanica or you couldn't read that?

https://www.britannica.com/place/Central-African-Republic/The-21st-century


Surely if they follow the advice of Jesus there would have been difference and peace.

Ohyoudidnt:
Is it not in your Brittanica or you couldn't read that?

https://www.britannica.com/place/Central-African-Republic/The-21st-century


Surely if they follow the advice of Jesus there would have been difference and peace.

Sebi you are not blind to see where it says to protect themselves against the mainly Muslim rebels

Slave, anti balaka is not a terrorist group for protecting themselves against your seleka terrorists attack

Ohyoudidnt:
How did the apostles who were with Jesus react to persecution?

You are a Sophist, Demagogue.

I hope you are familiar with these words?

Persecution is different from terrorism, your brain ought to have tell you this before now


Apostles were killed because they refused to denial Jesus Christ..

Your seleka are killing Christians simply because they want power, simply because they want a Muslim as president. This is different from persecution.

Slave, at this your age I don't think I have to be telling you this if your medulla oblongata is not faulty

AntilsIam:
Persecution is different from terrorism, your brain ought to have tell you this before now


Apostles were killed because they refused to denial Jesus Christ..

Your seleka are killing Christians simply because they want power, simply because they want a Muslim as president. This is different from persecution.

Slave, at this your age I don't think I have to be telling you this if your medulla oblongata is not faulty

Like a knee jerk and without reasoning you just type or vomit thrash. So the apostles of Jesus were not terrorized by the existing government?

The Christians defended themselves to the extent of becoming the aggressors themselves isn't it? Did the Séléka not form due to their earlier oppression by Christians and the president?

When one side reacts it's fine but not the other? Indeed you're an Ogre of bias

AntilsIam:
Sebi you are not blind to see where it says to protect themselves against the mainly Muslim rebels

Slave, anti balaka is not a terrorist group for protecting themselves against your seleka terrorists attack

They protected themselves to the extent of sending Muslims into exile?

Super protector indeed. How do you reason? From your reverse or what?

You Christians and westerners can continue your bias, injustice and deceit very clearly the truth is getting revealed

Ohyoudidnt:
Again you show that your depth of thought is rather shallow.

Did you for a moment look into what Scott Perry said? So you expect me to break everything down to you like a 4 year old?
Really now.

I think the Yoruba's have the adage abo oro ....



Why would you define exactly how I answer a question. I see you are either a corrupt police man or have worked with them writing false statements and forcing innocent people to sign.

The option says YES or NO, why are so stewpid like this to follow simple instruction

Ohyoudidnt:
They protected themselves to the extent of sending Muslims into exile?

Is that according to your stewpidity? Or you read that from britanicca

Ohyoudidnt:
Super protector indeed. How do you reason? From your reverse or what?

It is from your anus you do reason. They protected themselves against your seleka that waged war against them. I don't know maybe you are expecting them to fold their hands while watching your brothers and daddies in seleka sending them to grave

Ohyoudidnt:
You Christians and westerners can continue your bias, injustice and deceit very clearly the truth is getting revealed

Ahahahaha you called it bias, when Hamas attacked Israel on October 7th, your Arab nations didn't called it bias or act of terrorism. But when IDF give them back what Hamas asked for, you slaves called it genocide, bias, terrorism, etc NO BE TODAY NAH, YOU MUST TALK AND REASON FROM YOUR ANUS AS A SLAVE ANYWAYS

AntilsIam:
Is that according to your stewpidity? Or you read that from britanicca

Britannica’s emphasis on historical context mainly from an academic position, it overlooks the significance of Anti-balaka's violent methods but as I show you they gloss over.
You myopically ignore or don't understand which in turn degenerated into a cycle of violent attacks between Christians and Muslims

Various other sources provide detailed accounts of the mass exodus of Muslims from the Central African Republic (CAR) which Brittanica doesn't include for whatever reason.

During the civil war, anti-Balaka militias specifically targeted Muslim civilians, resulting in widespread forced displacement. In 2014, Amnesty International documented several massacres carried out by the anti-Balaka against Muslim civilians, which compelled thousands of Muslims to escape the country.

Once more I ask you about the credibility of Amnesty international? Don't you regard their views regarding matters about Nigeria the country you more likely originate from as credible?

AntilsIam:
Ahahahaha you called it bias, when Hamas attacked Israel on October 7th, your Arab nations didn't called it bias or act of terrorism. But when IDF give them back what Hamas asked for, you slaves called it genocide, bias, terrorism, etc NO BE TODAY NAH, YOU MUST TALK AND REASON FROM YOUR ANUS AS A SLAVE ANYWAYS

Very limited and childish of you to ignore historical precedents.

This military action of Hamas was a reaction to years of systemic oppression that Palestinians have endured under Israeli rule.

Many view this military action as a reaction to what they see as decades of systemic oppression experienced by Palestinians under Israeli control.

Perhaps you should start from 1917.

Ohyoudidnt:
Very limited and childish of you to ignore historical precedents.

Your childish brain ought to have tell you to go back to history b4 vomiting thrash

Ohyoudidnt:
This military action of Hamas was a reaction to years of systemic oppression that Palestinians have endured under Israeli rule.


Many view this military action as a reaction to what they see as decades of systemic oppression experienced by Palestinians under Israeli control.

Perhaps you should start from 1917.

It is the same history I'll use to nuke you as usual. Read about Balfour Declaration, you'll see who started the war sebi you no wan get sense nii

Ohyoudidnt:
Britannica’s emphasis on historical context mainly from an academic position, it overlooks the significance of Anti-balaka's violent methods but as I show you they gloss over.
You myopically ignore or don't understand which in turn degenerated into a cycle of violent attacks between Christians and Muslims

Various other sources provide detailed accounts of the mass exodus of Muslims from the Central African Republic (CAR) which Brittanica doesn't include for whatever reason.

During the civil war, anti-Balaka militias specifically targeted Muslim civilians, resulting in widespread forced displacement. In 2014, Amnesty International documented several massacres carried out by the anti-Balaka against Muslim civilians, which compelled thousands of Muslims to escape the country.

Once more I ask you about the credibility of Amnesty international? Don't you regard their views regarding matters about Nigeria the country you more likely originate from as credible?

Seleka started this conflict, Anti balaka is not a terrorist group pls take note of that.

Anti balaka was created to defend themselves against your seleka that are waging war on them

AntilsIam:
Your childish brain ought to have tell you to go back to history b4 vomiting thrash

It is the same history I'll use to nuke you as usual. Read about Balfour Declaration, you'll see who started the war sebi you no wan get sense nii

Nice that you yourself bring up the Balfour declaration. Can it be analyzed to understand how it is part of this many decades or over a century long wars?

The Balfour Declaration, issued on November 2, 1917, a statement from the British government that expressed support for the establishment of a national home for the Jewish people, the Israelites in Palestine. It was directed to Lord Rothschild, a prominent figure in the British Jewish community, and was signed by Arthur Balfour, the British Foreign Secretary. The Rothschild family is a wealthy Ashkenazi Jewish noble banking family originally from Frankfurt. They are the most famous of all European banking dynasties, which for some 200 years exerted great influence on the economic and, indirectly, the political history of Europe.

The Balfour declaration overlooked the following aspects:

1- The declaration was not solely about supporting Jewish aspirations; it was also influenced by Britain's geopolitical goals. The British aimed to secure Jewish backing, especially from influential Jewish communities in the U.S. and Russia, to keep them engaged in World War I.

2 - Britain sought to maintain control over Palestine, a crucial area near the Suez Canal, essential for their empire and trade routes to India.

3. It lies in contradictions to other Promises like the promise Britain had assured the Arabs of their independence in return for their assistance in combating the Ottoman Empire through the McMahon-Hussein Correspondence (1915-1916). Also at the same time, in the Sykes-Picot Agreement of 1916, Britain and France secretly plotted to partition the Middle East between themselves.

4 - Palestinian Arabs were overlooked as the declaration mentioned that nothing should prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, yet it did not guarantee any political rights for the Arab majority. At that time, Arabs constituted over 90% of Palestine's population.

5- The Balfour Declaration regarded Palestine as a territory open for international negotiation, disregarding the desires of the native Palestinian population in their Colonial mindset. This attitude mirrored the colonial mindset of the period, where European powers made decisions for other regions without their consent.

6. The declaration set the stage for future conflicts, as it resulted in increased Jewish immigration into the region.

Ohyoudidnt:
Nice that you yourself bring up the Balfour declaration. Can it be analyzed to understand how it is part of this many decades or over a century long wars?

The Balfour Declaration, issued on November 2, 1917, a statement from the British government that expressed support for the establishment of a national home for the Jewish people, the Israelites in Palestine. It was directed to Lord Rothschild, a prominent figure in the British Jewish community, and was signed by Arthur Balfour, the British Foreign Secretary. The Rothschild family is a wealthy Ashkenazi Jewish noble banking family originally from Frankfurt. They are the most famous of all European banking dynasties, which for some 200 years exerted great influence on the economic and, indirectly, the political history of Europe.

The Balfour declaration overlooked the following aspects:

1- The declaration was not solely about supporting Jewish aspirations; it was also influenced by Britain's geopolitical goals. The British aimed to secure Jewish backing, especially from influential Jewish communities in the U.S. and Russia, to keep them engaged in World War I.

2 - Britain sought to maintain control over Palestine, a crucial area near the Suez Canal, essential for their empire and trade routes to India.

3. It lies in contradictions to other Promises like the promise Britain had assured the Arabs of their independence in return for their assistance in combating the Ottoman Empire through the McMahon-Hussein Correspondence (1915-1916). Also at the same time, in the Sykes-Picot Agreement of 1916, Britain and France secretly plotted to partition the Middle East between themselves.

4 - Palestinian Arabs were overlooked as the declaration mentioned that nothing should prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, yet it did not guarantee any political rights for the Arab majority. At that time, Arabs constituted over 90% of Palestine's population.

5- The Balfour Declaration regarded Palestine as a territory open for international negotiation, disregarding the desires of the native Palestinian population in their Colonial mindset. This attitude mirrored the colonial mindset of the period, where European powers made decisions for other regions without their consent.

6. The declaration set the stage for future conflicts, as it resulted in increased Jewish immigration into the region.

So who first attack each other?

AntilsIam:
Seleka started this conflict, Anti balaka is not a terrorist group pls take note of that.

Anti balaka was created to defend themselves against your seleka that are waging war on them

So the Séléka seeing to a change of government that was partial an irresponsible was them starting conflict as the Anti-Balaka originated a strong and violent response to this?

Ohyoudidnt:
So the Séléka seeing to a change of government that was partial an irresponsible was them starting conflict as the Anti-Balaka originated a strong and violent response to this?

So anti balaka should fold their hands watching your people in seleka sending them to grave?

AntilsIam:
So anti balaka should fold their hands watching your people in seleka sending them to grave?

Did Anti-Balaka explore more effective means to stop the killing?
No, they themselves become worse killers.

Amnesty International and the International criminal court documented serious crimes committed by the Anti-Balaka militia in the Central African Republic (CAR).
The Anti-Balaka became infamous for committing massacres, ethnic cleansing, and war crimes, particularly against the Muslim population and suspected Seleka supporters.

Patrice-Edouard Ngaïssona; the most senior leader and the "National General Coordinator" of the Anti-Balaka in Central African Republic (CAR), is documented as responsible for crimes committed in various locations in the CAR, including Bangui, Bossangoa, the Lobaye Prefecture, Yaloké, Gaga, Bossemptélé, Boda, Carnot and Berberati, between at least 5 December 2013 and at least December 2014, as follows:

1. Crimes against humanity;murder and attempted murder, extermination, deportation or forcible transfer of population, imprisonment or other severe deprivation of physical liberty, torture, rape and attempted rape, persecution and other inhumane acts; and

2. War crimes; murder and attempted murder, torture, cruel treatment, mutilation, outrages upon personal dignity, intentionally directing attacks against the civilian population, intentionally directing attacks against buildings dedicated to religion, pillaging, rape and attempted rape, enlistment of children under the age of 15 years and their use to participate actively in hostilities, displacement of the civilian population and destruction of the property of an adversary.

AntilsIam:
So who first attack each other?

The Balfour declaration was in 1917?

The British were fighting the Ottoman empire between 1914 and 1918. They saw use in increasing their strength with the Israelite jews.

Note that from the late seventeenth century the British inacted violence in the Mediterranean following the establishment of the colony at Tangiers in 1661, with naval wars against the Ottoman autonomous regencies of Tripoli (1674-6) and Algiers (1677-83).

So who started the aggression?

Ohyoudidnt:
The Balfour declaration was in 1917?

The British were fighting the Ottoman empire between 1914 and 1918. They saw use in increasing their strength with the Israelite jews.

Note that from the late seventeenth century the British inacted violence in the Mediterranean following the establishment of the colony at Tangiers in 1661, with naval wars against the Ottoman autonomous regencies of Tripoli (1674-6) and Algiers (1677-83).

So who started the aggression?

Shey Israel is now British? Who first attack each other between Israel and Palestine


NOTE: You're free to glorify taqqiya but be mindful of which taqqiya to be adopted

I've gotten many evidences for you on this sha be mindful of your taqqiya I won't say more than that

Ohyoudidnt:
Did Anti-Balaka explore more effective means to stop the killing?
No, they themselves become worse killers.

Amnesty International and the International criminal court documented serious crimes committed by the Anti-Balaka militia in the Central African Republic (CAR).
The Anti-Balaka became infamous for committing massacres, ethnic cleansing, and war crimes, particularly against the Muslim population and suspected Seleka supporters.

Patrice-Edouard Ngaïssona; the most senior leader and the "National General Coordinator" of the Anti-Balaka in Central African Republic (CAR), is documented as responsible for crimes committed in various locations in the CAR, including Bangui, Bossangoa, the Lobaye Prefecture, Yaloké, Gaga, Bossemptélé, Boda, Carnot and Berberati, between at least 5 December 2013 and at least December 2014, as follows:

1. Crimes against humanity;murder and attempted murder, extermination, deportation or forcible transfer of population, imprisonment or other severe deprivation of physical liberty, torture, rape and attempted rape, persecution and other inhumane acts; and

2. War crimes; murder and attempted murder, torture, cruel treatment, mutilation, outrages upon personal dignity, intentionally directing attacks against the civilian population, intentionally directing attacks against buildings dedicated to religion, pillaging, rape and attempted rape, enlistment of children under the age of 15 years and their use to participate actively in hostilities, displacement of the civilian population and destruction of the property of an adversary.

Had it been your people in seleka didn't attacked or wage war against peace loving people, would there be anything called Anti balaka?

Hamas asked for war on Oct 7th, IDF gave them what they asked for. Will you blame IDF for this? Did you expect IDF to fold their hands watching your daddies in Hamas sending them to grave? To whom brain is given, sense is expected

AntilsIam:
Shey Israel is now British? Who first attack each other between Israel and Palestine


NOTE: You're free to glorify taqqiya but be mindful of which taqqiya to be adopted

I've gotten many evidences for you on this sha be mindful of your taqqiya I won't say more than that

Can you disprove that the The Balfour Declaration was issued by Arthur Balfour, the British Foreign Secretary, on November 2, 1917?


Yes or No and go on to explain your position.

AntilsIam:
Had it been your people in seleka didn't attacked or wage war against peace loving people, would there be anything called Anti balaka?

Hamas asked for war on Oct 7th, IDF gave them what they asked for. Will you blame IDF for this? Did you expect IDF to fold their hands watching your daddies in Hamas sending them to grave? To whom brain is given, sense is expected

Is it a lie that Anti-balaka reacted to the coup removing Bozize by adopting violence?

Perhaps you can prove Patrice-Edouard Ngaïssona was discharged and acquitted of all charges.