₦airaland Forum

Gabrielshow24:
After this, I won't dignify you with a response.
It seems you have selective amnesia and a paragon example of slothful induction!!!
Asking vain questions when your major premise has been dashed!!! The hypocrisy you exhibited today is enough for all to see you have nothing to offer🤨!!!

Ok nah! Ok nah!!

MaxInDHouse:
Ok nah! Ok nah!!

You always knew, how it was going to end 🧐.

What else were you expecting, you are illogical, hypocritical and intellectually dishonest!!! - you will surely be vanquished!!!

And I will continue to expose you and your colleague's hypocrisy 🤤!!!

Gabrielshow24:
After this, I won't dignify you with a response.
It seems you have selective amnesia and you are a paragon example of slothful induction!!!

Asking vain questions when your major premise has been dashed!!! The hypocrisy you exhibited today is enough for all to see you have nothing to offer🤨!!!

So what is the correction to your statement below:

"Doesn't the bible record Ahaziah being both 22 and 42 years old?"

Which one is correct? 22 or 42?
Or do you agree that the bible contradicts?

Ken4Christ:
The errors are trivial. It doesn't change the central message or the fundamental truth. In fact, there are no doctrinal errors but trivial errors based on human limitations and weaknesses.

The only Bible different from every other Bible translation is the New World Translation of the Jehovah Witness. The Jehovah Witness are not Christians. They are anti Christ.

Leave it or take it, the contents of the Bible especially the teachings of our Lord Jesus and His Apostles is what God will use to judge this generation.

okay so how is NWT different and an "antiChrist" bible?

Truthseeker10:
So what is the correction to your statement below:
"Doesn't the bible record Ahaziah being both 22 and 42 years old?"
Which one is correct? 22 or 42?
Or do you agree that the bible contradicts?

They are all running away after insulting the Bible's Author so none of them will answer that question because it's even beyond their grasp!

MaxInDHouse:
They are all running away after insulting the Bible's Author so none of them will answer that question because it's even beyond their grasp!

🤣🤣🤣I dey here for them

doffman:
➜It is very clear and undeniable that the current Bible is corrupted and lot of fabrications and lies have been imported into it . Thank you .

At what point in history were the books in your bible ever not corrupted, and with a lot of these, what do you consider fabrications? Let's start there!

Additionally, given that you consider it currently contaminated and corrupted, why bother reading anything from it?

MaxInDHouse:
They are all running away after insulting the Bible's Author so none of them will answer that question because it's even beyond their grasp!

No one is running away😂😂😂.

They said animals with horns to come forth, your snail is coming out😂😂😂.

Did your people insult God by saying his book had 50,000 errors?😂😂😂

Lack of forethought 🤧.
Never thinks before positing😂😂😂.

Two fools fooling themselves😂😂😂!!!
Bloody hypocrites!!!🥲

Auki:
➜Bible is combinations of Truth and lies

Interesting! So which are the Truths and which are the lies? Were the Truths and lies always there from the beginning or where they introduced at some point by particular individuals?

AbuTwins:
....The topic is not about the Qur'an. Abi you too converted from Islam too like max cos it seems you love the discussion than your own Christian cult.

The quran claims it is connected to and even hails the people of the Book, aka the Scriptures of Israel, so be sure that everything you say regarding the book impacts the quran and all other religions that claim association with the books that are of Israelite Scripture here.

Truthseeker10:
🤣🤣🤣I dey here for them

Ọmọ you get liver o!

MaxInDHouse:
Ọmọ you get liver o!

Dem don run🤣

gohf:
the bible contains that which is true and that which is "false" and "contradictory" because men can make mistakes or intentionally manipulate and lie about certain things. But apart from that, much of it has been kept intact and recorded for the future.

Contradictions can be due to misunderstanding what is actually written in the original Hebrew text and mistakenly translated or taught to be an error. There are some quotes from the NTs that isn't directly as it is in the OT.

But the one true consistent thing in the Bible is God said and His intent, from beginning to the end of it. That's asides the recorded speeches of men and the like.

I agree that there are some things that are not true in the Bible like some of the sayings of Jobs friends which God later tells them to repent from. Showing that the purpose of God is true and consistent revealing who He is and what He is going to do and what He expects.

So can you tell us the contradictions of the bible?

Truthseeker10:
Dem don run🤣

How can someone say the only evidence he or she has to present regarding the authenticity of his God is contradictory yet continue speaking under scrutiny?

MaxInDHouse:
How can someone say the only evidence he or she has to present regarding the authenticity of his God is contradictory yet continue speaking under scrutiny?

Straw man fallacy 😂😂😂.

Even the blind can see I didn't say that!!!
You were attacking tctrills because you thought you could mock him, but now all can see you are the hypocrite and fool.

Your so called organization alludes to the bible having 50,000 ERRORS😂😂😂...

Someone should help me tell them; whether translational or contradictory, ERROR IS ERROR!!!

Your so called translational error is one of the notable causes of the contradiction of ahaziah's age🤨...

What else do you have to say?
Nothing😂😂😂.
With that other fool, truthseeker10, displaying his hypocrisy for all to see😂😂😂 now asking vain questions.

Medicine after death🤣🤣🤣

Gabrielshow24:
Straw man fallacy 😂😂😂.
Even the blind can see I didn't say that!!!
You were attacking tctrills because you thought you could mock him, but now all can see you are the hypocrite and fool. Your so called organization alludes to the bible having 50,000 ERRORS😂😂😂... Someone should help me tell them; whether translational or contradictory, ERROR IS ERROR!!! Your so called translational error is one of the notable causes of the contradiction of ahaziah's age🤨... What else do you have to say?
Nothing😂😂😂.With that other fool, truthseeker10, displaying his hypocrisy for all to see😂😂😂 now asking vain questions. Medicine after death🤣🤣🤣

Can you quote your god?

Remember you must not use the Bible o because that book is CONTRADICTORY and FULL OF ERRORS!

So pastor Gabriel what says your god?

Truthseeker10:
So can you tell us the contradictions of the bible?

there was one someone asked here on Nairaland about the wives of Esau, which he felt was a contradiction due to interpretation till I clarified it. Because to him the names mentioned previously were different from the ones mentioned after.

There was another about the name of the Messiah in Isaiah 7, where the Septuagint and Masoretic translations were different in interpretation and gave different meaning of the text.

There is also Job's friends like I mentioned.

Then there are some records which are said to have been added or edited which makes the Jewish calendar of in 5,000 something something meanwhile it should be 6,000 something something.


Erm which one again, can I remember now self, any ALL the ones you will find even online are like I said due to translation or misinterpretion of the text, or misunderstanding. I think there was one about king reign duration or age, and another about the names of priests and the like, some say this some say that. And this issue is usually associated with the Ezra-Nehemiah returnees record and book they are said to have written chronicles, 🤔


Honestly apart from all this, none of what is recorded as what God said was debated to be contradictory or false.

Then when we look at the new testament, where more examples are, we have Matthews few quotes that are not directly referenced, but not contradictory. Same with author of Hebrews mentioned the altar of incense at the most holy place inside of holy place

And other minor errors which most don't take seriously because it's like they were writing it from memory and what they had been taught by the teachers of the law.

Then the differences in the gospel accounts, as well, which shows Luke actually did his own research and didn't copy Matthew, Mark probably wrote what Peter and co remembered and human memory isn't as strong as we want it to be. Then Matthew who may have kept notes as a tax collector wrote his gospel account. Now some parts of Mark were said to be added later on, that's the ending part and the story of woman caught in adultery in John was said not to be in some gospels.

The Father word and holy Ghost are one in 1 John was actually proven by much scholars to be added to the original texts.


Erm what else, ah forgive if I too don't remember all of them but the truth still stands the test of all this

Truthseeker10:
So what translation has the statement that you made below?

"Doesn't the bible record Ahaziah being both 22 and 42 years old?"

Which is correct, is it 22 years old or 42 years old?

lol so you even know this one and you are asking me


By the way, why are you people arguing if there are contradictions or if contradictions are errors.

Like if there is an original text and later copies deviate from it, that's a contradiction and an error, be it by coping or by interpreting. And usually when it doesn't align with what God has been saying and revealing. Infact this later one is one of the main reasons some books are not in the Tanakh even though some claim they are from God, books like Enoch. And even that book quoted in the bible, Jasher, it's a wonderful read as well but it's also record which may have been twerked by some people over time, who knows. But the main consistency and purpose of the scriptures which is to reveal Christ and call men to repentance has served it's purpose and that's why Jesus gave us the Holy Spirit to teach us, and not a book

gohf:
lol so you even know this one and you are asking me


By the way, why are you people arguing if there are contradictions or if contradictions are errors.

Like if there is an original text and later copies deviate from it, that's a contradiction and an error, be it by coping or by interpreting. And usually when it doesn't align with what God has been saying and revealing. Infact this later one is one of the main reasons some books are not in the Tanakh even though some claim they are from God, books like Enoch. And even that book quoted in the bible, Jasher, it's a wonderful read as well but it's also record which may have been twerked by some people over time, who knows. But the main consistency and purpose of the scriptures which is to reveal Christ and call men to repentance has served it's purpose and that's why Jesus gave us the Holy Spirit to teach us, and not a book

Kindly tell us the contradictions in the original text.

gohf:
there was one someone asked here on Nairaland about the wives of Esau, which he felt was a contradiction due to interpretation till I clarified it. Because to him the names mentioned previously were different from the ones mentioned after.

There was another about the name of the Messiah in Isaiah 7, where the Septuagint and Masoretic translations were different in interpretation and gave different meaning of the text.

There is also Job's friends like I mentioned.

Then there are some records which are said to have been added or edited which makes the Jewish calendar of in 5,000 something something meanwhile it should be 6,000 something something.


Erm which one again, can I remember now self, any ALL the ones you will find even online are like I said due to translation or misinterpretion of the text, or misunderstanding. I think there was one about king reign duration or age, and another about the names of priests and the like, some say this some say that. And this issue is usually associated with the Ezra-Nehemiah returnees record and book they are said to have written chronicles, 🤔


Honestly apart from all this, none of what is recorded as what God said was debated to be contradictory or false.

Then when we look at the new testament, where more examples are, we have Matthews few quotes that are not directly referenced, but not contradictory. Same with author of Hebrews mentioned the altar of incense at the most holy place inside of holy place

And other minor errors which most don't take seriously because it's like they were writing it from memory and what they had been taught by the teachers of the law.

Then the differences in the gospel accounts, as well, which shows Luke actually did his own research and didn't copy Matthew, Mark probably wrote what Peter and co remembered and human memory isn't as strong as we want it to be. Then Matthew who may have kept notes as a tax collector wrote his gospel account. Now some parts of Mark were said to be added later on, that's the ending part and the story of woman caught in adultery in John was said not to be in some gospels.

The Father word and holy Ghost are one in 1 John was actually proven by much scholars to be added to the original texts.


Erm what else, ah forgive if I too don't remember all of them but the truth still stands the test of all this

Oga we are not talking about translators errors or additions. Do you agree that the bible contradicts itself? Yes or no?

MaxInDHouse:
How can someone say the only evidence he or she has to present regarding the authenticity of his God is contradictory yet continue speaking under scrutiny?

That is the common sense that is lacking.

Gabrielshow24:
Straw man fallacy 😂😂😂.

Even the blind can see I didn't say that!!!
You were attacking tctrills because you thought you could mock him, but now all can see you are the hypocrite and fool.

Your so called organization alludes to the bible having 50,000 ERRORS😂😂😂...

Someone should help me tell them; whether translational or contradictory, ERROR IS ERROR!!!

Your so called translational error is one of the notable causes of the contradiction of ahaziah's age🤨...

What else do you have to say?
Nothing😂😂😂.
With that other fool, truthseeker10, displaying his hypocrisy for all to see😂😂😂 now asking vain questions.

Medicine after death🤣🤣🤣

So what translation has the statement that you made below?

"Doesn't the bible record Ahaziah being both 22 and 42 years old?"

Which is correct, is it 22 years old or 42 years old?

Truthseeker10:
Oga we are not talking about translators errors or additions. Do you agree that the bible contradicts itself? Yes or no?

are you okay?
Isn't this what you asked?

Truthseeker10:
So can you tell us the contradictions of the bible?

It's not your fault you don't worth been answered, isn't the only thing you deserve questions?

Is disrespect something you grew up with or that's how you were brought up?

Or please calmly this nonsense response you gave here?

Truthseeker10:
Kindly tell us the contradictions in the original text.

Do you think you deserve an answer?

Is it that you don't read or there's something wrong with you that you usually ask the same questions even when you have been answered already?


Guy all is well with you, or were you just impatient?

gohf:
are you okay?
Isn't this what you asked?


It's not your fault you don't worth been answered, isn't the only thing you deserve questions?

Is disrespect something you grew up with or that's how you were brought up?

Or please calmly this nonsense response you gave here?

You need sleep

gohf:
Do you think you deserve an answer?

Is it that you don't read or there's something wrong with you that you usually ask the same questions even when you have been answered already?


Guy all is well with you, or were you just impatient?

You need sleep

gohf:
lol so you even know this one and you are asking me


By the way, why are you people arguing if there are contradictions or if contradictions are errors.

Like if there is an original text and later copies deviate from it, that's a contradiction and an error, be it by coping or by interpreting. And usually when it doesn't align with what God has been saying and revealing. Infact this later one is one of the main reasons some books are not in the Tanakh even though some claim they are from God, books like Enoch. And even that book quoted in the bible, Jasher, it's a wonderful read as well but it's also record which may have been twerked by some people over time, who knows. But the main consistency and purpose of the scriptures which is to reveal Christ and call men to repentance has served it's purpose and that's why Jesus gave us the Holy Spirit to teach us, and not a book

Thanks for your write-up.
But they still won't get it🤧.

They're a lost cause😂😂😂.

One will tire your soul by asking the same questions over and over again bringing shame to Aristotle in his grave😂😂😂.

A wise procedure in the hands of a fool turns into madness🤣🤣🤣.

That's what you are seeing!!! 😂😂😂

The other can't logically infer aright, even if you give him A => A he will still say A => C😂😂😂

They are indeed Jehovah's witnesses 😂😂😂.

Truthseeker10:
That is the common sense that is lacking.

Surely common sense is lacking in false religion.
Because the only evidence any believer has today is the scriptures, you can't point to God or ask God to speak so that others can hear him so if the only proof you have as authenticity is contradictory then what is left of this so called "God"?

Ọmọ what someone philosophers said is true about these religionists o:

Edmond and Jules de Goncourt, collaborating French writers of the 19th century, wrote: “If there is a God, atheism must strike Him as less of an insult than religion.”

It’s not true or false, it’s bullshit.

Kobojunkie:
The quran claims it is connected to and even hails the people of the Book, aka the Scriptures of Israel, so be sure that everything you say regarding the book impacts the quran and all other religions that claim association with the books that are of Israelite Scripture here.

Never mind! We understand the context of the Qur'an than you. Saying whatever we say doesn't affect the Qur'an as Allah says in the same Qur'an that those earlier scriptures have been corrupted!

gohf:
okay so how is NWT different and an "antiChrist" bible?

The NWT rendered John 1:1 different from every other translation. Every other translation says 'and the Word was God. But the NWT says. 'and the Word was a god, as in small letter 'g'. They deny the deity of Christ which every other translation affirms.

They also deny the existence of literal hell. And so many other things time would not permit me to mention here.