₦airaland Forum

ShoeMarket:
I didn't see the kick o.

WriterNig:
The US have a history of switching to the winning side so they can partake in the glory.

Russia won WW2 against Hitler, killing 85% of the Nazis and capturing Hitler's bunker before he shot himself. The US killed only 3% of the Nazis but took all the credit.

In future US history textbooks, they might even claim they backed Russia from the beginning to win against a vicious "monster" Zelensky. They're good at twisting history.

To be an enemy of the US is dangerous but to be a friend is fatal.

The US have only 2 friends, money and interests.

Artscollection:
The dummy just copied some bullshit and be forming Prof. He knows nothing about war 2

stanluiz:
Op, please stop posting fake news!

Where did trump kick him out ?

They only have a heated argument.

WriteerNg:
Major role by contributing less than 10% of the total effort?

If we contribute to buy a company. I bring 80%, you bring 7%. Na you go be majority holder abi?

Na you go be the owner abi?

royalfly:
Why? The Ukraine president is a president, I wonder how the true Ukrainians feel now seeing thier head talked to like this. Can Russian president be talked to like this by Vance, what ever you do in this life, depend on God and yourself, this really hurts, trump is trying to stop a 3rd world war, its there something that is not being said about thus issue. Great America is defending Russia for what exactly, trump and his folks just made it look like they are scared of Russia or they are Russian friends. In my layman opinion zelensky has shown strength and resilience. History will remember this. I pray trump reconsider this issue because most countries will loose trust for America after this. I am for peace but not on this oppressive terms. Is diplomacy about the truth or manipulation.

WriterNig:
@Fox News posted:

smokinloud:
The United States wasn’t merely a “major contributor” to victory in the Second World War—it was the linchpin that stopped the whole bloody mess from tipping into catastrophe. Let’s not indulge the tired cliché that this was all about Hitler, some lone maniac in a bunker. It wasn’t. It was a brutal slugfest between blocs of nations, a clash of ideologies and empires that stretched from the deserts of Africa to the Pacific’s edge. The U.S. didn’t just “destroy Japan”—it shattered an imperial war machine, culminating in the apocalyptic roar of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, leaving Tokyo no choice but surrender. And in North Africa? That was no solo American romp. The British had been grinding down Rommel’s Afrika Korps for years; the U.S. rolled in with Montgomery’s Eighth Army and the Allied juggernaut to finish the job—sand, sweat, and all.[b]
Then there’s the Soviet angle. The U.S. didn’t just toss Stalin a few rifles out of pity—it funneled a torrent of matériel through Lend-Lease: trucks, planes, guns that kept the Red Army from buckling under the Wehrmacht’s boot. Without that, and without the broader Allied effort—Britain’s defiance, America’s industrial might, the sheer bloody-mindedness of the coalition—the war’s ending could’ve been a grim rewrite. To suggest otherwise isn’t just naive; it’s a willful erasure of what held the line against the Axis.
This wasn’t a one-man show, nor a one-nation triumph. It was a collective hammer blow, with America swinging the heaviest fist. Pretending it was less risks turning history into a parlor game—and a dull one at that.
[/b]

WriteerNg:
New front that still couldn't account for more than 10% of the effort?

Is that a even a front?

The Eastern front was the bloodiest and fiercest battle in modern war history.

9ja4live:
Understanding this history like this will help you to understand why there was an agreement that NATO should move east as Germany was made one. The US broke that agreement in 1994. So in this war, the US is the aggressors.

WriterNig:
The US have a history of switching to the winning side so they can partake in the glory.

Russia won WW2 against Hitler, killing 85% of the Nazis and capturing Hitler's bunker before he shot himself. The US killed only 3% of the Nazis but took all the credit.

In future US history textbooks, they might even claim they backed Russia from the beginning to win against a vicious "monster" Zelensky. They're good at twisting history.

To be an enemy of the US is dangerous but to be a friend is fatal.

The US have only 2 friends, money and interests.

smokinloud:
The United States wasn’t merely a “major contributor” to victory in the Second World War—it was the linchpin that stopped the whole bloody mess from tipping into catastrophe. Let’s not indulge the tired cliché that this was all about Hitler, some lone maniac in a bunker. It wasn’t. It was a brutal slugfest between blocs of nations, a clash of ideologies and empires that stretched from the deserts of Africa to the Pacific’s edge. The U.S. didn’t just “destroy Japan”—it shattered an imperial war machine, culminating in the apocalyptic roar of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, leaving Tokyo no choice but surrender. And in North Africa? That was no solo American romp. The British had been grinding down Rommel’s Afrika Korps for years; the U.S. rolled in with Montgomery’s Eighth Army and the Allied juggernaut to finish the job—sand, sweat, and all.[b]
Then there’s the Soviet angle. The U.S. didn’t just toss Stalin a few rifles out of pity—it funneled a torrent of matériel through Lend-Lease: trucks, planes, guns that kept the Red Army from buckling under the Wehrmacht’s boot. Without that, and without the broader Allied effort—Britain’s defiance, America’s industrial might, the sheer bloody-mindedness of the coalition—the war’s ending could’ve been a grim rewrite. To suggest otherwise isn’t just naive; it’s a willful erasure of what held the line against the Axis.
This wasn’t a one-man show, nor a one-nation triumph. It was a collective hammer blow, with America swinging the heaviest fist. Pretending it was less risks turning history into a parlor game—and a dull one at that.

Artscollection:
Prior to america joining the war on a combat level,they where supplying the allied forces amunitions including ussr, the same trick they are using in Ukraine vs Russia war infact they where almost the lifeline of the allied forces in terms of the amount of weapon they supplied. They weakened the nazis as well with bombardment.the fact that they didn't loose more men doesn't translate to their level of involvement.

JimD:
The catastrophy is Trump and his vice addressing the Ukrainian president with no empathy. NATO countries like Canada, Germany, and France still send money to Ukraine (about 50 billion euros last year) and military equipment. It's true that the U.S. is Ukraine's backbone ($183 billion in support since 2022).

But aside from NATO's support, Ukraine's just going to have to ramp up it's own internal economic systems.

With how Trump is playing it, the U.S. is going to lose influence on both sides. Because now Putin doesn't respect him. And he might come for Alaska soon.

Artscollection:
Please help me explain to this dude that america stopped ww2

rollywise:
Continuos talks like these is why they are withdrawing all aids and support from noisy under developed countries like your Nigeria. They keep giving like they are savior of the world yet no appreciation. Everyone thinks they give cuz they wanna take. Well they say they ain't giving shit no more and boom our drugs are suddenly on the high side, that's if certain drugs would still be available in the market. We claim to know too much

Hezzyluv:
@Kick,
It's media that would cause the next world war.

WriteerNg:
And I ask again. What was the percentage of material the US supplied to Russia?

Now compare it to the amount Russia expended, then you'll see how ignorant you sound.

Saying alot without saying nothing.

At the end 7% is 7%.

stanluiz:
Op, please stop posting fake news!

Where did trump kick him out ?

They only have a heated argument.

royalfly:
Why? The Ukraine president is a president, I wonder how the true Ukrainians feel now seeing thier head talked to like this. Can Russian president be talked to like this by Vance, what ever you do in this life, depend on God and yourself, this really hurts, trump is trying to stop a 3rd world war, its there something that is not being said about thus issue. Great America is defending Russia for what exactly, trump and his folks just made it
look like they are scared of Russia or they are Russian friends. In my layman opinion zelensky has shown strength and resilience. History will remember this. I pray trump
reconsider this issue because most countries will loose trust for America after this. I am for peace but not on this oppressive terms. Is diplomacy about the truth or manipulation.

WriterNig:
@Fox News posted:

royalfly:
Why? The Ukraine president is a president, I wonder how the true Ukrainians feel now seeing thier head talked to like this. Can Russian president be talked to like this by Vance, what ever you do in this life, depend on God and yourself, this really hurts, trump is trying to stop a 3rd world war, its there something that is not being said about thus issue. Great America is defending Russia for what exactly, trump and his folks just made it look like they are scared of Russia or they are Russian friends. In my layman opinion zelensky has shown strength and resilience. History will remember this. I pray trump reconsider this issue because most countries will loose trust for America after this. I am for peace but not on this oppressive terms. Is diplomacy about the truth or manipulation.

seunmsg:
I watched the video of the intense and very disrespectful exchange between Trump, Vance and Zelensky and I felt very very bad for Zelensky and Ukraine. Trump literally told him to shut up and accept whatever deal they are offering him.

Again, I think it’s time for EU leaders to reassess their position in NATO and relationship with both America and Russia. With what America is doing to Ukraine, I really don’t think there is any benefit for Europe’s continued loyalty to America and NATO. It’s time to restart a friendly relationship with Russia and discard NATO. Ukraine is learning this is a very hard way.


EU and America pushed Ukraine into this war. Now, after over a million deaths and half of Ukraine destroyed, American is demanding for almost all of Ukraine’s natural resources in exchange for their continued support. So, what exactly is Ukraine getting from the war?

Rhassidy360:
Just be unavailable it will safe u alot. Stupid man run go American wetin u expect before. Them come put am for middle.

NOETHNICITY:
Ukraine doesn’t need to invade Russia, but the moment Zelensky decided to join NATO and bring all the fire power of NATO to Russian door step, he overstepped his bounds

Guestmale:
Shame on Europe.

stanluiz:
Can Trump and his idiotic Vp call Vance talk to Putin like that ? No

They asslick Putin ass and say it is so sweet.

lagbajaoke:
The Fear of ww3 is The best way to Respect Russia and Allies.. Americans knew it Trump is a smart man.. Russia and China are loaded with Deadly weapons that will destroye Nato 100 times over

smokinloud:
It's not a new thing that the world is at dying minutes.
Matthew 5:9
[9]Blessed are the peacemakers: for they shall be called the children of God.
TRUMP is avoiding world war and the only way he can achieve his goal is by dealing with, or bullying his own brother ( Zelensky, Ukraine and the entire West). Putin will die and it'll be hard to find a replacement for him in that aggressive temperament. Russia don't have anything to cause havoc in the world except his alliance strength and TRUMP knows this. Russia is a socialist country in disguise. Australia is richer than Russia.