₦airaland Forum

[quote author=Dicoomoba post=134391968][/quote]Am waiting, .....
Abi the thing no gree you write?

writetopoker601:
I know you were born by a prostitute and a drunkard gamblers who raped your stupid mother. I even wonder why am responding to you.

It's not your fault, but Glo that dashed you free data

Mugu

Mention my name for Nairaland I be kind of give away and I’m very sure your mom has entered my DM for help meanwhile she introduced doggy but her pussy was smelling only your ogogoro father can Bleep that Gutter where you come from , but lemme tell you by the power bestowed on us in this federation walai talai hands can touch you anywhere DSS is in our hand and for your information IGP Egbetokun our own so careful infants

writetopoker601:
Am waiting, .....
Abi the thing no gree you write?

Bro I don’t joke walai paste your number

Dicoomoba:
Bro I don’t joke walai paste your number

Was that what took you 2 hours to type?
You must be really sick and mentally unstable at same time.
As if u can do anything, bastard

writetopoker601:
Was that what took you 2 hours to type?
You must be really sick and mentally unstable at same time.
As if u can do anything, bastard

I don’t make mouth just last week here my single brother who happens to be PA to Africa in Osun led DSS to the state and also I posted it here , please if you know your dad and mom is begging before putting food into the table please don’t fight who will eradicate you bye bye

Dicoomoba:
I don’t make mouth just last week here my single brother who happens to be PA to Africa in Osun led DSS to the state and also I posted it here , please if you know your dad and mom is begging before putting food into the table please don’t fight who will eradicate you bye bye

I suspect u must be typing from a psychiatric center, who is interested in your audio mental job

Look at this goat oooo, infact I thought I was initially chatting with a normal idiat, I never you are a nincompoop.

Come to think of it, you said you are a PA to Africa in Osun
Look at this headminer kingpin.
The truth is that you are actually below my level, chatting with you is just belittling myself.

writetopoker601:
Monthly allocation wasn't your initial argument, so do not 🚭 change the goal post in-between the game. You said that Tinubu will declare a military officer over the state. Now you are now changing to allocation issues. Who even told you Rivers is poor and depends solely on Federal allocation

yes and your post confirms it, except u didn't read what you posted.... The governor won't be removed but he will be a ceremonial governor

Judolisco:
yes and your post confirms it, except u didn't read what you posted.... The governor won't be removed but he will be a ceremonial governor

Why are you changing mouth in just few minutes.
Last time you said a military officer will be replaced to fubara.
Now you have change, that fubara will only be a ceremonial governor.

Who is now changing mouth/argument?
Extracting from your two arguments, "is replacing a governor and a ceremonial governor the same?

Some people always have this forgetfulness

salykely:
U seem not to understand that this is an end game for Fubara. The house want to gain his legitimacy by that representation. Once that is done, they will commence impeachment proceedings against him. There is no way he could come up to argue that the house is illegitimate because he can't blow hot and cold.

Supreme Court judgment has already legitimized the House.

They don’t need Fubara’s Budget Presentation to gain legitimacy.

writetopoker601:
Why are you changing mouth in just few minutes.
Last time you said a military officer will be replaced to fubara.
Now you have change, that fubara will only be a ceremonial governor.

Who is now changing mouth/argument?
Extracting from your two arguments, "is replacing a governor and a ceremonial governor the same?

Some people always have this forgetfulness

what's the difference oga... What makes a governor a governor, is it not power? Tinubu can make him powerless

Judolisco:
what's the difference oga... What makes a governor a governor, is it not power? Tinubu can make him powerless

Abegi I don't argue that way.
Infact you win, carry cup

writetopoker601:
Abegi I don't argue that way.
Infact you win, carry cup

all you need to do is to read the AI stuff you posted shikena

helinues:
Toh

This stage should have been avoided by all means but Fubara refused to listen

Annoyingly , those who are pushing him to fight this, fight that are just inconsequential in the scheme of things

This man go and rest already. Fubara is not Ambode.

Kewekubosineh:
Not possible. Except you want replication of Operation Wetie dominant in western region in the '60s.

It's a dangerous gamble that could truncate our nascent democracy.

Jonathan did it to Adamawa state and nothing happens

writetopoker601:
I suspect u must be typing from a psychiatric center, who is interested in your audio mental job

Look at this goat oooo, infact I thought I was initially chatting with a normal idiat, I never you are a nincompoop.

Come to think of it, you said you are a PA to Africa in Osun
Look at this headminer kingpin.
The truth is that you are actually below my level, chatting with you is just belittling myself.

We don’t make mouth we know our level in this federation and there is level to level if they born your papa well show face now let’s see if you get level

fuckJones:
Jonathan did it to Adamawa state and nothing happens

That was different template. Not now please.

chinchum:
Nothing will happen if it is duly justified. Stop twisting logic and law.

Try it na.

Have you read the communique by Ijaw National Council, poising for war if Fubura is impeached.

His impeachment is invitation to anarchy that may consume all. And may cripple oil production.

writetopoker601:
You guys thinks this is still a military era,vabi


The actions taken by the federal government in Plateau (2004) and Ekiti (2006) were controversial in terms of their legality under the 1999 Constitution of Nigeria. Here’s why:

1. What the Constitution Says About a State of Emergency

Under Section 305 of the 1999 Constitution, the President can declare a state of emergency in a state, but only under specific conditions, such as:

- War, insurrection, or civil unrest that endangers public safety.
- The breakdown of law and order beyond the control of local authorities.
- A natural disaster or other emergencies that require federal intervention.

However, after declaring a state of emergency, the Constitution does not explicitly give the President the power to remove an elected governor. Instead, the governor remains in office, though his powers may be suspended.

2. Controversy Over the Removal of Governors

- In both Plateau and Ekiti, the federal government not only declared a state of emergency but also suspended the governors (Joshua Dariye and Ayo Fayose).
- Legality Issue: There is no clear constitutional provision that allows the President to remove a governor via a state of emergency. The only constitutional ways to remove a governor are:
1. Impeachment by the State House of Assembly (Section 188).
2. Resignation or death of the governor.
3. A court ruling nullifying an election.
- The federal government’s decision to suspend these governors and appoint sole administrators was therefore seen as extra-constitutional (outside the clear provisions of the law).

3. Was It Officially Justified?

- The federal government justified its actions by arguing that the crisis in those states made governance impossible and that decisive intervention was needed.
- However, many legal experts and politicians criticized these moves as political overreach and an abuse of executive power.
- The fact that this practice has not been repeated in later states of emergency (e.g., Borno, Yobe, and Adamawa during the Boko Haram crisis in 2013) suggests that it was not a legally sustainable precedent.

Conclusion

While the federal government carried out these actions and made them "official," they were not clearly legal under the 1999 Constitution. The removal of elected governors through a state of emergency remains a grey area and is widely viewed as unconstitutional.


Mumu idiat, that can't do a common research no be your fault, naa Glo and AI fault
Idiat. Who's the child now, bastard

I don't blame you, but those guys that raped your prostitutional mother who gave birth to you. Mugu

Law is not precise in terms of exactitude.

Bump.

writetopoker601:
Oga such thing can't happen again, then we were close to the military era and Obasanjo was also a military blood.
Now such can not happen, fubara can go to court and file an injunction or stay or order.
You guys think this is military era.

The actions taken by the federal government in Plateau (2004) and Ekiti (2006) were controversial in terms of their legality under the 1999 Constitution of Nigeria. Here’s why:

1. What the Constitution Says About a State of Emergency

Under Section 305 of the 1999 Constitution, the President can declare a state of emergency in a state, but only under specific conditions, such as:

- War, insurrection, or civil unrest that endangers public safety.
- The breakdown of law and order beyond the control of local authorities.
- A natural disaster or other emergencies that require federal intervention.

However, after declaring a state of emergency, the Constitution does not explicitly give the President the power to remove an elected governor. Instead, the governor remains in office, though his powers may be suspended.

2. Controversy Over the Removal of Governors

- In both Plateau and Ekiti, the federal government not only declared a state of emergency but also suspended the governors (Joshua Dariye and Ayo Fayose).
- Legality Issue: There is no clear constitutional provision that allows the President to remove a governor via a state of emergency. The only constitutional ways to remove a governor are:
1. Impeachment by the State House of Assembly (Section 188).
2. Resignation or death of the governor.
3. A court ruling nullifying an election.
- The federal government’s decision to suspend these governors and appoint sole administrators was therefore seen as extra-constitutional (outside the clear provisions of the law).

3. Was It Officially Justified?

- The federal government justified its actions by arguing that the crisis in those states made governance impossible and that decisive intervention was needed.
- However, many legal experts and politicians criticized these moves as political overreach and an abuse of executive power.
- The fact that this practice has not been repeated in later states of emergency (e.g., Borno, Yobe, and Adamawa during the Boko Haram crisis in 2013) suggests that it was not a legally sustainable precedent.

Conclusion

While the federal government carried out these actions and made them "official," they were not clearly legal under the 1999 Constitution. The removal of elected governors through a state of emergency remains a grey area and is widely viewed as unconstitutional.


Mumu idiat, that can't do a common research no be your fault, naa Glo and AI fault
Idiat. Who's the child now, bastard

I don't blame you, but those guys that raped your prostitutional mother who gave birth to you. Mugu

where is this d****e?

writetopoker601:
Why are you changing mouth in just few minutes.
Last time you said a military officer will be replaced to fubara.
Now you have change, that fubara will only be a ceremonial governor.

Who is now changing mouth/argument?
Extracting from your two arguments, "is replacing a governor and a ceremonial governor the same?

Some people always have this forgetfulness

Bro hwf... E happen arbi eno happen?

writetopoker601:
The actions taken by the federal government in Plateau (2004) and Ekiti (2006) were controversial in terms of their legality under the 1999 Constitution of Nigeria. Here’s why:

1. What the Constitution Says About a State of Emergency

Under Section 305 of the 1999 Constitution, the President can declare a state of emergency in a state, but only under specific conditions, such as:

- War, insurrection, or civil unrest that endangers public safety.
- The breakdown of law and order beyond the control of local authorities.
- A natural disaster or other emergencies that require federal intervention.

However, after declaring a state of emergency, the Constitution does not explicitly give the President the power to remove an elected governor. Instead, the governor remains in office, though his powers may be suspended.

2. Controversy Over the Removal of Governors

- In both Plateau and Ekiti, the federal government not only declared a state of emergency but also suspended the governors (Joshua Dariye and Ayo Fayose).
- Legality Issue: There is no clear constitutional provision that allows the President to remove a governor via a state of emergency. The only constitutional ways to remove a governor are:
1. Impeachment by the State House of Assembly (Section 188).
2. Resignation or death of the governor.
3. A court ruling nullifying an election.
- The federal government’s decision to suspend these governors and appoint sole administrators was therefore seen as extra-constitutional (outside the clear provisions of the law).

3. Was It Officially Justified?

- The federal government justified its actions by arguing that the crisis in those states made governance impossible and that decisive intervention was needed.
- However, many legal experts and politicians criticized these moves as political overreach and an abuse of executive power.
- The fact that this practice has not been repeated in later states of emergency (e.g., Borno, Yobe, and Adamawa during the Boko Haram crisis in 2013) suggests that it was not a legally sustainable precedent.

Conclusion

While the federal government carried out these actions and made them "official," they were not clearly legal under the 1999 Constitution. The removal of elected governors through a state of emergency remains a grey area and is widely viewed as unconstitutional.


Mumu idiat, that can't do a common research no be your fault, naa Glo and AI fault
Idiat. Who's the child now, bastard

I don't blame you, but those guys that raped your prostitutional mother who gave birth to you. Mugu

Isn't this brag too much for a copy and paste that you didn't even read?? I was impressed from the thought of you been the one writing those by yourself until I saw the nonsense you wrote to insult!! It takes one to be a child of a prostitute to recognize another, to h*ll with your drunken master father that copulate with a reckless Oscroh like your mother who produce a nitwit like you. Go and copy again, Fool!!!

Kewekubosineh:
Not possible. Except you want replication of Operation Wetie dominant in western region in the '60s.

It's a dangerous gamble that could truncate our nascent democracy.

how far,

writetopoker601:
Oga relax, you people and this your state of emergency, who is afraid of it


Oga such thing can't happen again, then we were close to the military era and Obasanjo was also a military blood.
Now such can not happen, fubara can go to court and file an injunction or stay or order.
You guys think this is military era.

The actions taken by the federal government in Plateau (2004) and Ekiti (2006) were controversial in terms of their legality under the 1999 Constitution of Nigeria. Here’s why:

1. What the Constitution Says About a State of Emergency

Under Section 305 of the 1999 Constitution, the President can declare a state of emergency in a state, but only under specific conditions, such as:

- War, insurrection, or civil unrest that endangers public safety.
- The breakdown of law and order beyond the control of local authorities.
- A natural disaster or other emergencies that require federal intervention.

However, after declaring a state of emergency, the Constitution does not explicitly give the President the power to remove an elected governor. Instead, the governor remains in office, though his powers may be suspended.

2. Controversy Over the Removal of Governors

- In both Plateau and Ekiti, the federal government not only declared a state of emergency but also suspended the governors (Joshua Dariye and Ayo Fayose).
- Legality Issue: There is no clear constitutional provision that allows the President to remove a governor via a state of emergency. The only constitutional ways to remove a governor are:
1. Impeachment by the State House of Assembly (Section 188).
2. Resignation or death of the governor.
3. A court ruling nullifying an election.
- The federal government’s decision to suspend these governors and appoint sole administrators was therefore seen as extra-constitutional (outside the clear provisions of the law).

3. Was It Officially Justified?

- The federal government justified its actions by arguing that the crisis in those states made governance impossible and that decisive intervention was needed.
- However, many legal experts and politicians criticized these moves as political overreach and an abuse of executive power.
- The fact that this practice has not been repeated in later states of emergency (e.g., Borno, Yobe, and Adamawa during the Boko Haram crisis in 2013) suggests that it was not a legally sustainable precedent.

Conclusion

While the federal government carried out these actions and made them "official," they were not clearly legal under the 1999 Constitution. The removal of elected governors through a state of emergency remains a grey area and is widely viewed as unconstitutional.


Mugu

who is the real mugu now?

Sundaymessi:
Some of you can be a very big joke. No state of emergency can make you to remove an elected governor. The governor got his mandate the same way Tinubu got his mandate.

how far Mr Man?

writetopoker601:
Brigadier general from your village abi?

Where has that happened before

it happens in River state

fuckJones:
how far,

You may be right in your assertion. But it's too early to jubilate.

Anything could happen any moment from now. The political climate in Rivers State still cloudy.

writetopoker601:
Brigadier general from your village abi?

Where has that happened before

It has happened what do you have to say now?