₦airaland Forum

helinues:
Decision about Natasha's suspension wasn't made by Akpabio alone but majority of the senators.

Natasha's petition is even yet to be responded to by the Senate, why should they obey such order?

helinues:
Decision about Natasha's suspension wasn't made by Akpabio alone but majority of the senators.

Natasha's petition is even yet to be responded to by the Senate, why should they obey such order?

xpressionx:
This was what I was saying yesterday and one stupid idiot was talking rubbish.

Your disobeyed court order in order to punish someone who broke your laws.

Josephoola:
Wow

Saga16:
Arthur Nzeribe
Nzeribe, a lawmaker from Imo state, was suspended indefinitely in November 2002 by then-Senate President Pius Anyim over allegations of N22 million fraud.

He died in 2022 at the age of 83

Another

The senate suspended Abdul Ningi on Tuesday, March 12, 2024, for three months for alleging that the 2024 budget was padded by N3 trillion. He subsequently resigned as chairman of the Northern Senators Forum (NSF).

xpressionx:
This was what I was saying yesterday and one stupid idiot was talking rubbish.

Your disobeyed court order in order to punish someone who broke your laws.

Buccalcavity2:
You too think about it. How can judiciary stop legislature for deliberating on their internal process, like the house rule. If it's difficult for you, reverse it and see if it makes sense. Can legislators ask court not to pass judgement on a litigation in process?

helinues:
Decision about Natasha's suspension wasn't made by Akpabio alone but majority of the senators.

Natasha's petition is even yet to be responded to by the Senate, why should they obey such order?

xpressionx:
This was what I was saying yesterday and one stupid idiot was talking rubbish.

Your disobeyed court order in order to punish someone who broke your laws.

helinues:
Decision about Natasha's suspension wasn't made by Akpabio alone but majority of the senators.

Natasha's petition is even yet to be responded to by the Senate, why should they obey such order?

Saga16:
Because that was their standing rule.

Their standing rule would determine and not a law court.

In addition, you are buttressing my point.

It is an internal affair by an independent arm of government.

helinues:
Decision about Natasha's suspension wasn't made by Akpabio alone but majority of the senators.

Natasha's petition is even yet to be responded to by the Senate, why should they obey such order?

ChiefJusticeFuc:
The committee was saddled to first and foremost address Natasha's petition that she had officially presented before the Senate.

Stop twisting shit to suit your dunce narrative

mrvitalis:
This boy must have problem comprehending English

There is a court order stopping the sitting of the committee that recommended her suspension..... So how does the above rambling by you excuse that?

helinues:
Decision about Natasha's suspension wasn't made by Akpabio alone but majority of the senators.

Natasha's petition is even yet to be responded to by the Senate, why should they obey such order?

ChiefJusticeFuc:
The judge that gave that court ruling to halt the disciplinary committee that was setup to look into a petition filed by Natasha accusing Akpabio of sexual harrasment will surely face disciplinary action from the NJC.


Justice Ojukwu had earlier ruled on a similar matter brought to her court by a federal legislator challenging the Senate from carrying out a disciplinary hearing that the matter was purely a legislative matter and not a judicious one and had the senator go back to face his peers in the senate.

For those low iQ imbes out there, , note that the disciplinary committee was setup by Akpabio to look into a petition filed by Natasha accusing the SP of sexual harrasment. Natasha then ran to court to stop the committee from inviting her which is only natural to hear first hand from the petitioner .

How can you submit a petition and refuse to honour the invitation of the senate disciplinary committee setup to investigate your claims of sexual harassment?


This is akin to a woman going to the police to report someone of sexually harassing her and then going to get a court order baring the police from inviting her to substantiate your allegations ?


But we know most of you are either raving mad or just low iQ ferets or both.

ChiefJusticeFuc:
The judge that gave that court ruling to halt the disciplinary committee that was setup to look into a petition filed by Natasha accusing Akpabio of sexual harrasment will surely face disciplinary action from the NJC.


Justice Ojukwu had earlier ruled on a similar matter brought to her court by a federal legislator challenging the Senate from carrying out a disciplinary hearing that the matter was purely a legislative matter and not a judicious one and had the senator go back to face his peers in the senate.

For those low iQ imbes out there, , note that the disciplinary committee was setup by Akpabio to look into a petition filed by Natasha accusing the SP of sexual harrasment. Natasha then ran to court to stop the committee from inviting her which is only natural to hear first hand from the petitioner .

How can you submit a petition and refuse to honour the invitation of the senate disciplinary committee setup to investigate your claims of sexual harassment?


This is akin to a woman going to the police to report someone of sexually harassing her and then going to get a court order baring the police from inviting her to substantiate your allegations ?


But we know most of you are either raving mad or just low iQ ferets or both.

histemple:
Natasha filed a petition against Akpabio. How then do you think that a committee set up by the accused (Akpabio) will do justice to the matter.

The honourable thing was for Akpabio to step aside pending the conclusion of such investigation. He cannot be the judge in his own matter.

Gandrova:
You that have high IQ in your anus chooses to support nonsense.
In a saner climes, The S.P would have step aside pending the outcome of the investigation