₦airaland Forum

Asonaijaaso:

If you are as smart as i presume you to be, you would have deciphered that the person with the loudest megaphone decides who would be called the terrorist.
You are here passing judgements with just one side of the fight telling you the story.........lol

Uten9z:
I am not picking side, and I dont condone killing of anyone but I believe in KILL AND BE KILLED.

Asonaijaaso:

The assertion that the Houthis are simply confused, whining religious extremists conveniently playing victim after starting a war lacks the necessary geopolitical depth and moral consistency. To begin with, what the Houthis are doing is not unique—they are asymmetrically retaliating in a world where formal military tools and statehood are luxuries they don’t possess. They aren’t attacking random ships arbitrarily. The majority of their naval operations have targeted vessels they allege are linked to Israel or allies actively participating in the Gaza conflict. You may disagree with their methods, but that’s not terrorism—it’s economic warfare, a tool often used by nations with far more power and legitimacy, including the U.S. and Israel themselves.

Claiming they deserve to be “wiped out” just because they resist reflects the very kind of dehumanization we criticize in acts of terrorism. That logic—obliteration of millions because of political or ideological defiance—is genocidal by every moral and legal definition. Furthermore, when critics say Houthis hide among civilians or whine about airstrikes after firing first, they overlook a critical truth: urban resistance movements don’t have the option of clean battlefields. Yemen’s landscape is made of villages, cities, and people—not military bases. Every state and non-state actor uses propaganda, including Western powers; so when the Houthis publish images of dead children, it’s not just manipulation—it’s documentation, just as Western media showed 9/11, or Ukraine shows the aftermath of Russian strikes.

Mocking their belief in divine justice is not just dismissive—it’s irrelevant to any logical military argument. Millions around the world rely on spiritual frameworks to endure suffering. That doesn’t make their lives expendable. If resistance to perceived genocide justifies their fight, and your solution is to annihilate them completely, then you’re not describing justice—you’re participating in the cycle of terror you claim to oppose.

Asonaijaaso:
Your argument is riddled with inaccuracies and blatant oversimplifications. The Houthis are not simply “terrorists”, they’re a militant group fighting for survival in the face of foreign intervention. Yes, they’ve launched missiles, but you seem to forget that they are up against a military superpower supported by the West. Their actions are not just “random terrorism”, they are a desperate attempt to defend their land and people from being wiped out by foreign-backed aggression.

On the issue of missile launches from civilian areas, it’s not a matter of morality alone—it’s about lack of resources and Yemen’s infrastructure being destroyed. What should they do? Let themselves be wiped out without defending themselves? Your moral superiority is irrelevant if you don’t consider the context of extreme oppression they’re under. They have no other choice but to operate from within civilian areas—this is the tragic reality of a war-torn country.

Calling the Israeli-Palestinian conflict “perceived genocide” is a dangerous distortion of the truth. Thousands of Palestinians have died under Israeli airstrikes, and Gaza is under brutal siege. How do you explain the ongoing suffering of people who can’t even leave their own homes? The “population growth” you cite isn’t an indicator of freedom, but survival amidst systematic oppression. To dismiss their pain because they’re “still alive” is grotesque.

Your call for escalation and violence is irresponsible and ignorant of history. Violence begets violence, and no side wins when civilians on both sides are dying. What’s needed is dialogue, not more destruction. Instead of supporting perpetual war, let’s focus on long-term solutions—something your narrow view completely overlooks. Your stance isn’t helping anyone, it’s just fueling hatred and ignorance.

Ofodirinwa:
The main problem with Donald Trump is he won't shut up and relax. Everyday something new, loud and useless.

madridguy:
Terrorist? Stop the genocide and allow aid into Gaza and the Houthis attacks will stop.

How hard is that to understand.

Mordecai:
Your arguments are very watery. You used the term "perceived genocide" and when I responded, you now turn around to criticize it.
You say that they're firing ballistic missiles from civilian areas due to lack of resources? Does one who lack resources fire ballistic missiles? And try to engage a superior military in a fight, fueled by religious fundamentalism and extremism? There's no morality about it. Morality means prioritizing the life of your people and keeping them safe, not building military bases among them.
Again, if the intent of the West was to wipe them out, it wouldn't take more than a few days of intense bombing. So quit playing the victim.
If the Houthis possessed superior military power, would they spare their opponents the same way? Drop the moral pretensions. The Houthis and their supporters are terrorists. Period.
About the Palestinians being able to leave Gaza - I'd ask you. Even in Nigeria, can a Nigerian just up and cross the border into Cameroon without permission? Does that make Nigeria a prison? Does the walls around Gaza not include Egyptian walls too? Why are the Houthis not targeting Egypt too?
Remember to tell the Houthis anytime they want to attack a ship, or launch a drone or missile, that Violence begets violence.
And you see this war - civilization will win. The Zionists will win. The barbaric terrorists will lose. The Houthis will lose. Just like Hamas and Hezbollah, and Assad have lost. So, your assertion that no side wins is false.
Just wait and see.

Asonaijaaso:
The cycle of violence is exactly what’s happening—“kill or be killed,” a tragic reality for many. And by that logic, anyone who holds that mantra, whether they’re on one side or the other, can be branded a terrorist.Depending on who owns the media.

What’s even more disheartening is the fact that the world’s most powerful superpowers are battling the poorest nations, where the odds are overwhelmingly stacked against them. It’s a completely unbalanced and unfair fight. Yet, the narrative being pushed paints the underdog as the villain, while those with the power are seeking sympathy for their actions.

In this situation, the real question is: who truly deserves our empathy? The wealthy superpowers that play games with the lives of the less fortunate, or the oppressed, who are simply fighting for survival?

Asonaijaaso:
Your argument is based on many misconceptions and oversimplifications that do little to address the complexities of the situation at hand. Let me break this down:
1. Assumption of Religious War:
You’re quick to label the Houthis as extremists and terrorists simply because they are Muslims, but this is a gross oversimplification. The Houthis are fighting a political and territorial battle. This is not some grand Islamic religious war, especially since they have been fighting Saudi Arabia, another Muslim-majority country. This is not a Yoruba vs. Igbo issue, but rather one rooted in regional power struggles, economic exploitation, and historical grievances. If Lagos fought Enugu over unresolved issues, no one would call it a “Yoruba vs. Igbo” war—similarly, the conflict in Yemen is a fight for autonomy and survival, not religious supremacy.
2. Firing Ballistic Missiles from Civilian Areas:
You question the logic of firing ballistic missiles when resources are scarce. But let’s be real: when a group is under siege and outgunned, what do you expect them to do? The Houthis don’t have access to the same level of sophisticated military technology that their adversaries, like Saudi Arabia and the UAE, possess. The fact that they resort to such tactics speaks more to their desperation and survival instincts than to any notion of “fundamentalism.” Morality isn’t about firing missiles; it’s about recognizing that their survival is at stake. They are not fighting for supremacy—they’re fighting for their very existence in the face of overwhelming external aggression. You speak of “prioritizing the life of your people,” but you’re ignoring the fact that they are prioritizing their people by resisting invasion and occupation.
3. “If the West Wanted to Wipe Them Out…”:
The idea that the West could wipe out the Houthis in days is naive and shows your lack of understanding of the complexity of the conflict. The intent of the West has been to undermine and destabilize the region, not to wipe out the Houthis. The Houthis are resilient, and this isn’t a game where one side just folds under a few airstrikes. You claim the Houthis would do the same if they had superior power. But let’s remember: they are not the ones invading foreign countries—they are defending their land from external forces. And let’s not forget: the Houthis are not just “terrorists” because you say so. They’re resistance fighters to foreign intervention, and calling them terrorists simplifies the situation in a way that serves no one’s interests.
4. Gaza and Borders:
Your comparison between Gaza and Nigeria is a weak attempt to undermine the reality of Gaza’s situation. Palestinians don’t just face walls built by Israel—they face a comprehensive blockade that restricts their freedom of movement, commerce, and access to basic needs like food and medicine. To compare this to a border between Nigeria and Cameroon completely misses the point. The Palestinians are trapped, and their situation is far worse than a simple border dispute. The walls around Gaza include Egypt, sure, but they are controlled by Israel. Egypt has its own political reasons for being complicit, but that doesn’t erase the fact that the blockade is largely an Israeli policy. So, let’s not pretend this is as simple as you make it sound.
5. Civilization vs. “Terrorists”:
Your sweeping statement that “civilization will win” and “the Zionists will win” is deeply flawed. The fight isn’t as black and white as you present it. The Houthis and their allies are not terrorists; they are people fighting for self-determination in the face of massive external intervention. Zionism doesn’t represent “civilization”—it represents a political ideology that has led to displacement, violence, and apartheid. You can’t just throw around terms like “civilization” to justify a position without critically examining the oppression and suffering on the other side.

Your argument is rooted in reductive thinking, and it seems like you’re desperate to fit this conflict into a simple narrative of good versus evil. It doesn’t work that way. The reality is far more complex, and if you truly want to understand this, you need to step back and examine the history, the geopolitical dynamics, and the human suffering that fuels this resistance. The Houthis and the Palestinians are not terrorists—they are people fighting for their lives and sovereignty. So, before you go around calling them “terrorists,” maybe take a hard look at who the true oppressors are in these situations.

madridguy:
Terrorist? Stop the genocide and allow aid into Gaza and the Houthis attacks will stop.

How hard is that to understand.

Asonaijaaso:

The assertion that the Houthis are simply confused, whining religious extremists conveniently playing victim after starting a war lacks the necessary geopolitical depth and moral consistency. To begin with, what the Houthis are doing is not unique—they are asymmetrically retaliating in a world where formal military tools and statehood are luxuries they don’t possess. They aren’t attacking random ships arbitrarily. The majority of their naval operations have targeted vessels they allege are linked to Israel or allies actively participating in the Gaza conflict. You may disagree with their methods, but that’s not terrorism—it’s economic warfare, a tool often used by nations with far more power and legitimacy, including the U.S. and Israel themselves.

Claiming they deserve to be “wiped out” just because they resist reflects the very kind of dehumanization we criticize in acts of terrorism. That logic—obliteration of millions because of political or ideological defiance—is genocidal by every moral and legal definition. Furthermore, when critics say Houthis hide among civilians or whine about airstrikes after firing first, they overlook a critical truth: urban resistance movements don’t have the option of clean battlefields. Yemen’s landscape is made of villages, cities, and people—not military bases. Every state and non-state actor uses propaganda, including Western powers; so when the Houthis publish images of dead children, it’s not just manipulation—it’s documentation, just as Western media showed 9/11, or Ukraine shows the aftermath of Russian strikes.

Mocking their belief in divine justice is not just dismissive—it’s irrelevant to any logical military argument. Millions around the world rely on spiritual frameworks to endure suffering. That doesn’t make their lives expendable. If resistance to perceived genocide justifies their fight, and your solution is to annihilate them completely, then you’re not describing justice—you’re participating in the cycle of terror you claim to oppose.

Claiming they deserve to be “wiped out” just because they resist reflects the very kind of dehumanization we criticize in acts of terrorism. That logic—obliteration of millions because of political or ideological defiance—is genocidal by every moral and legal definition.

Botragelad:
It's pretty funny how confused Islamic terrorists are. These same Houthis have been attacking US, Israel ships and random vessels passing through the Red Sea, claiming it's because they have ties to Israel. For months, they've been spewing propaganda and religious nonsense noise. But when they get hit back, they suddenly start whining to the media.

Watch, they'll start screaming 'genocide' and releasing photos of women and children. If they really cared about civilians, they wouldn't have started the attack in the first place. You can't attack my people and ships, then tell me when to stop. I can defend myself, and that's not aggression. That's the classic trait of Islamic terrorists, attack, get retaliated against, then play the victim.
They really think their deity will save them from Israel or US airstrikes! Well, it won't. If the Houthi part of Yemen gets leveled today, that'd be a win for humanity.

madridguy:
Israel stopped food from entering Gaza in violation of the ceasefire conditions. The Houthis have declared a blockade on Israel in return.

Why is America fighting Israel’s wars?i think Trump is also making the same mistake Biden made too.

Let wait for the Houthis response.

lexy2014:
Are Houthis "millions"?

is the word genocide used to describe the targeting of armed groups or for defenceless civilians?

Botragelad:
Mordecai, it's quite clear that the guy you're engaging with can't express himself! I mean, who on earth would bother copying answers without even taking the trouble to verify the utter rubbish they're pasting?
The parts he's copied aren't even remotely relevant to your original point, nor do they address the concerns you've raised. It's amusing, really, to see someone so utterly devoid of independent thought!😂😂

Originalsly:
What's the difference between a terrorist and a freedom fighter? If the Fumani herdsmen invade and occupy your ancestral land ... and you decide to attack them by any means necessary .... poisoning their cows ... shooting them with home made guns etc .... my question to you ... should you be labeled a terrorist? If the herdsmen counter attack ... shooting some of your family members with AKs etc .... would it be right for someone to say you got what you deserve because you should not have attacked the herdsmen?

If you can ...put your emotions in check and post a direct answer to the two questions based on the scenario.

I dare you. It is your right to pretend you didn't read this ... or choose not to respond. I'll understand.

@ topic. Another proxy war loading. The Houthis is not the target .... it's Iran. It's not the US that wants a war with Iran .. it's Israel. Israel controls the US and gets them to fight their wars.

I suggest you search You Tube for Why are we fighting Netanyahu's War? by Professor Jeffrey Sachs . FYI ..Sachs has a history of being directly involved in crucial government to government negotiations and discussions. This is the most I can do ...share a source of information that is likely off your grid....and hopefully you can have a wider perspective of what is really happening in that part of the world

Asonaijaaso:
Akin to say the Qur’an teaches only war is like saying Shakespeare only wrote about murder because of Macbeth. It betrays not just a lack of scholarship, but a shallow understanding of literature, history, and faith. The Qur’an is one of the most recited, memorized, and analyzed books in human civilization—rich in legal philosophy, ethics, poetry, science, mercy, and spiritual introspection. It’s responsible for inspiring centuries of architecture, mathematics, medicine, and governance that helped build what you now call modern civilization. If you think Muslims are always the first to attack, you may want to check your history books—not the headlines written by people profiting off perpetual war.

Ironically, many of the same governments retaliating are the ones who trained, armed, or funded the very groups they now claim to defend the world from. It’s not just short-sighted to paint a billion people with one brush—it’s dangerously lazy.

So before throwing stones from a house built on drone strikes and propaganda, maybe open a book. Preferably not just one with pictures.

Asonaijaaso:
First you accused me falsely of being a BOT now you are following me around reading all my comments.
Dont piggyback on other peoples questions, feel free to express yourself and ask your own questions.
Thanks for being fan 😂😂😂😂 !!!

Uten9z:
Don't change my Narrative, what I said was KILL AND BE KILLED.
not Kill or be KIlled, this is an unequivocal statement that need not to be contradicted in your political balancing of line actions.

Make I tell you no empathy for the wicked for as long as he justifies and continues in his understanding.

The violence taketh it (peace) by force.
Only a stronger man can bind the strong and take away its prey.

No entity should nurse and live on etio-religious logics such as sociopathic behaviours that needs to be wade off or set aside as prio-civic actions, that most practitioners have of course voided and peacefully benefit other glorified ways.


But for the rest that are ocultic and expect that after calculated bloodsheds, no one have the rights to challenge it acts and beliefs for its superiomacy of practice that's wrong.
When they act and the action is retaliated they cried fawl and what empathy did they deserve, is it that they dont know they were weak and suppressed before that?.

Isn't this reason of dominant, and self prioritizing that forced Hitler to want to eradicate the Jaws once at time because of Jealousy?,so let it not be another person's turn.

If everyone should follow that parthen, the world is doom, because every other religion was once a conquest before modern civilisation.

Botragelad:
Who accused you of being a bot? 😂
Malali, you are on my thread. Lol

Botragelad:
Sources;
https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/trump-launches-strikes-against-yemens-houthis-warns-iran-2025-03-15/

Asonaijaaso:

We meet again Botragelad.
I am here exposing your falsifications of facts.
One post at a time.😂

Asonaijaaso:
The Houthis view themselves not as rogue actors, but as guardians of Islamic solidarity—particularly when Arab regimes normalize ties with Israel while Gaza burns. From their perspective:
• Moral Obligation: They believe silence = complicity. To them, defending Palestine is not an option but the right thing to do.
• Pan-Islamic Resistance: They see Gaza as part of a broader Ummah under siege, aligning themselves with a resistance axis (Iran, Hezbollah, Hamas).
• Asymmetric Deterrence: With no air force or navy, Houthis use Red Sea disruption as non-lethal pressure—targeting commerce, not civilians.
• Neglected Frontline: With other Arab states muzzled or pacified, the Houthis claim the mantle of active resistance left behind by wealthier nations.
• Martyrdom Culture: Their ideology romanticizes standing with the oppressed—Palestinians symbolize that to them.

Asonaijaaso:
You are desperate to call it ethno-religious
Forgetting the houthi's are at war with Saudi Arabia as well.
Your grasp of this resistance is warped ....i dont think you can objectively think outside emotional religiosity as to why the Houthi's are resisting the largest armed forces in the world

Asonaijaaso:
Figurative and literal are 2 different contexts.
Who is counting, to 1 million to make it a genocide. Do you want to volunteer and go there and count ?
Gaza also started with we will remove hamas and leave, 2 years later more innocent people are dead than hamas operatives.
And Hamas is still alive and a lot of unrelated people have been genocided

Claiming they deserve to be “wiped out” just because they resist reflects the very kind of dehumanization we criticize in acts of terrorism. That logic—obliteration of millions because of political or ideological defiance—is genocidal by every moral and legal definition.

xeju:
So all the missiles the houthis have fired to Israel is targeted at commerce abi. Slowly Allah by himself naim dey punish una with violence & endless wars

Botragelad:
When did Israel ever do any of that?

Are you quite certain you're remembering things correctly? I distinctly recall it was Hamas and the so-called Palestinians who brought this upon themselves on October 7. One would think it's only reasonable for Israel to take defensive measures, wouldn't you agree? Are yoy suggesting Israel should simply tolerate such attacks?

Uten9z:
Why are the fighting the war war that isn't there's, where are they getting arms and sponsorship, why are they attacking innocent people, why are they fighting non radicalised Muslims?.
My answer to all this is one:Terahn
What is your answer?

Originalsly:
There seems to be a comprehension problem ... or you mistakenly quoted me. Your response has absolutely nothing to do with my comment you quoted.

Botragelad:
It's pretty funny how confused Islamic terrorists are. These same Houthis have been attacking US, Israel ships and random vessels passing through the Red Sea, claiming it's because they have ties to Israel. For months, they've been spewing propaganda and religious nonsense noise. But when they get hit back, they suddenly start whining to the media.

Watch, they'll start screaming 'genocide' and releasing photos of women and children. If they really cared about civilians, they wouldn't have started the attack in the first place. You can't attack my people and ships, then tell me when to stop. I can defend myself, and that's not aggression. That's the classic trait of Islamic terrorists, attack, get retaliated against, then play the victim.
They really think their deity will save them from Israel or US airstrikes! Well, it won't. If the Houthi part of Yemen gets leveled today, that'd be a win for humanity.