₦airaland Forum

Gabrielshow24:
What's good for the goose is good for the gander. So far your name was not mentioned in the bible, then it's not worth knowing!

Ara ìjà leyín wà jàre!

Gabrielshow24:
Why then the previous elusion?😂😂😂

Any other names found outside God's word belongs to demons that's why God didn't mention it in his word! 2Timothy 3:16

Truthseeker10:
So why was "The God" not put in the king James version?

Ask KJV translator not me and not only KJV most translations too didn't have it

Even if it was put, are you saying that "THE GOD" appears in the Diagram that i showed you and that it only refers to The Father?

The God didn't appear in your diagram.

Stop lying.

If you agree that the Diagram has only one "GOD" as nature, where did you see "GOD" as person in the Diagram?

You posted that pic and asked me do I agree with it?

Which I said YES!

Your next question was [b]How can The word(God) be with(God)?

Which I used the case of the first Male & Female to explain WHY THE WORD GOD CAN BE WITH GOD.

Are we discussing the diagram?

because I never said the diagram has TWO GOD

as a person.

MaxInDHouse:
Diversion!

Only Michael and Gabriel are names God revealed to mankind among all His angels!

The same way God didn't reveal Max as one of the christians in the bible🤨 but you exist😂😂😂.

MaxInDHouse:
Any other names found outside God's word belongs to demons that's why God didn't mention it in his word! 2Timothy 3:16

Yours also🙃!!!
You just confirmed StillDtruth allusions!

Max is a demon😂😂😂

Gabrielshow24:
The same way God didn't reveal Max as one of the christians in the bible🤨 but you exist😂😂😂.

So those ones you mentioned came into existence after the Bible shey?

MaxInDHouse:
Perfectly but then we must stick to the names mentioned in God's word!

You haven't answered my question.

Doe that mean the rest of the Angels don't have name?

Gabrielshow24:
Yours also🙃!!!
You just confirmed StillDtruth allusions!
Max is a demon😂😂😂

Ara ìjà leyín wà jọ̀ọ́!

Emusan:
You haven't answered my question.
Doe that mean the rest of the Angels don't have name?

Does that mean God can reveal names of His spirit sons to you through magic practicers?

MaxInDHouse:
So those ones you mentioned came into existence after the Bible shey?

😂😂😂You never can tell, probably they engaged with God in that period and were not part of the first set🙃

MaxInDHouse:
Do you want to agree with what God's word revealed or magical books?

I agreed with God's word that says there are legions of Angels which I know they all have names.

Do you agree?

MaxInDHouse:
Does that mean God can reveal names of His spirit sons to you through magic practicers?

You haven't answered my question.

Do the legions of Angels have name or not?

MaxInDHouse:
Does that mean God can reveal names of His spirit sons to you through magic practicers?

😂😂😂Your foolishness is seeping out little by little becoming apparently visible for the world to see!!!

How then were these ones revealed?

Gabrielshow24:
😂😂😂You never can tell, probably they engaged with God in that period and were not part of the first set🙃

I can tell!

God never revealed their names in His word!

Emusan:
I agreed with God's word that says there are legions of Angels which I know they all have names.
Do you agree?

Of course i agree but God only revealed TWO just TWO names in His word which means that's all He wants us to know!

Emusan:
Ask KJV translator not me and not only KJV most translations too didn't have it

You claim king James version did not use The God because of Grammatical accuracy. So why are you now adding "The God" to that verse. Are you not causing a Grammatical error?

The God didn't appear in your diagram.

Stop lying.

I never said it did. I was only asking a question.

You posted that pic and asked me do I agree with it?

Which I said YES!

Your next question was How can The word(God) be with(God)?

Which I used the case of the first Male & Female to explain WHY THE WORD GOD CAN BE WITH GOD.

Are we discussing the diagram?

because I never said the diagram has TWO GOD

as a person.

I clearly said that if the Diagram says that God is the Father, the son and the Holy Spirit, How can John 1:1 say that the word is God and is with God. You are claiming that with God is actually with THE GOD But was not used that way because of Grammatical accuracy. You also claimed that THE God refers to the Father IN John 1:1 after claiming that The Word "God" is generic and can refer to the three individual in the Diagram. So where did you get The God as Only The Father in John 1:1?

MaxInDHouse:
So those ones you mentioned came into existence after the Bible shey?

Also it doesn't matter, your name is not mentioned in the bible as far as I am concerned by your own logic, you're a demon!!!

I shouldn't even bother knowing your name, it's demonic.

Gabrielshow24:
😂😂😂Your foolishness is seeping out little by little becoming apparently visible for the world to see!!!
How then were these ones revealed?

They are DEMONS who have rebelled against God's orders, angels don't reveal their names to anyone unless God permitted them! Genesis 32:29

Gabrielshow24:
Also it doesn't matter, your name is not mentioned in the bible as far as I am concerned by your own logic, you're a demon!!!
I shouldn't even bother knowing your name, it's demonic.

Ara ìjà leyín wà jọ̀ọ́!

Emusan:
You haven't answered my question.

Do the legions of Angels have name or not?

As regards the other fool, he is intentionally looking at interpretations that favors is own narrative so that he can ask questions and think he is wise!!!

It's evident even from the diagram that the Father is not the son(Word of God) likewise the Holyspirit

But for the sake of his own narrative he assumes that God(as an identity) is the same as the three!!!

Making God look like someone having a personality disorder!!!

He turns his blind eye to the fact that the God you allude to is "the concept of nature"!!!

And the diagram is better interpreted as The Father is God, the son is God, the spirit is God where each are not the same! 🙃

But for the sake of his mischievousness he says God is Father, son, Spirit implying an identity.

He's a fool!!!

MaxInDHouse:
They are DEMONS who have rebelled against God's orders, angels shouldn't reveal their names to anyone unless God permitted them! Genesis 32:29

Another assumption,
Where is the law written that they shouldn't?

Now the burden of proof is on you🙃

Truthseeker10:
You claim king James version did not use The God because of Grammatical accuracy. So why are you now adding "The God" to that verse. Are you not causing a Grammatical error?

Yes! KJV didn't use and I'm not causing any grammatical error because I'm just elucidate more for clarification and I didn't add.

The fact, is there's is The in front of the God.

I never said it did. I was only asking a question

Then stay on the lane.

I clearly said that if the Diagram says that God is the Father, the son and the Holy Spirit, How can John 1:1 say that the word is God and is with God.

Yes! Which is the reason I used that illustration of the first male and female.

You are claiming that with God is actually with THE GOD But was not used that way because of Grammatical accuracy.

Yes! It's in the original Greek.

And that to show you that the God is of two different backgrounds not the same thing.

You also claimed that THE God refers to the Father IN John 1:1 after claiming that The Word "God" is generic and can refer to the three individual in the Diagram.

Yes! because that makes the first God to be a PERSON the word can't be with NON Existing thing.

So where did you get The God as Only The Father in John 1:1?

The original Greek.

Check it and stop going in round

Gabrielshow24:
Another assumption,
Where is the law written that they shouldn't?
Now the burden of proof is on you🙃

You guys just read you don't study God's word so all these will be strange to you.

MaxInDHouse:
You guys just read you don't study God's word so all these will be strange to you.

Bring proof Ozuor!!!

óti fénù kò

Emusan:
Yes! KJV didn't use and I'm not causing any grammatical error because I'm just elucidate more for clarification and I didn't add.

You claimed Kjv did not use it because of Grammatical accuracy. Are you now saying that using "The God" in John 1:1 is a Grammatical error?

Yes! Which is the reason I used that illustration of the first male and female.



Yes! It's in the original Greek.

And that to show you that the God is of two different backgrounds not the same thing.



Yes! because that makes the first God to be a PERSON the word can't be with NON Existing thing.



The original Greek.

Check it and stop going in round

You mean the original Greek says "The God" is "the Father" in John 1:1 according to you? What is the Greek word for "The father" and what is the Greek word for "The God"?

Are you now saying that the greek word rendered "THE God" cannot be used for "The Son" And "The Holy Spirit" in John 1:1?

Gabrielshow24:
Bring proof Ozuor!!!
óti fénù kò

If you want to learn more ask for a free home Bible study with Jehovah's Witnesses it won't cost you anything.

At least you have learned today that the names of angels mentioned in God's word is just two:

MICHAEL and GABRIEL

I think that's enough for today!

Truthseeker10:
You claimed Kjv did not use it because of Grammatical accuracy. Are you now saying that using "The God" in John 1:1 is a Grammatical error?

You're just confusing yourself

My point using The God is when you try to equate my illustration of MAN to be both NATURE and NO PERSON.

I just showed you that the first God in John 1:1 is a PERSON because of the definite article THE.

which make it different from the second God which the word IS.

Do you agree that the word can be WITH GOD when He's also God?

You mean the original Greek says "The God" is "the Father" in John 1:1 according to you?

No! I said the first God which the word was with shows it's a PERSON.

What is the Greek word for "The father" and what is the Greek word for "The God"?

You have Google, Don t you?

Are you now saying that the greek word rendered "THE God" cannot be used for "The Son" And The Holy Spirit in John 1:1?

The Greek word used in John 1:1 at the second part shows God which the word was with is different from the God which the was IS.

That's my point about the "The God"

That should be clear by now

Gabrielshow24:
As regards the other fool, he is intentionally looking at interpretations that favors is own narrative so that he can ask questions and think he is wise!!!

It's evident even from the diagram that the Father is not the son(Word of God) likewise the Holyspirit

But for the sake of his own narrative he assumes that God(as an identity) is the same as the three!!!

Making God look like someone having a personality disorder!!!

He turns his blind eye to the fact that the God you allude to is "the concept of nature"!!!

And the diagram is better interpreted as The Father is God, the son is God, the spirit is God where each are not the same! 🙃

But for the sake of his mischievousness he says God is Father, son, Spirit implying an identity.

He's a fool!!!

I know how to deal with him even if he changed moniker

Emusan:
You're just confusing yourself

My point using The God is when you try to equate my illustration of MAN to be both NATURE and NO PERSON.

I just showed you that the first God in John 1:1 is a PERSON because of the definite article THE.

which make it different from the second God which the word IS.

Do you agree that the word can be WITH GOD when It's also God?

So why are you limiting this person to the father instead of the three persons in the Trinity?

No! I said the first God which the word was with shows it's a PERSON.



You have Google, Don t you?



The Greek word used in John 1:1 at the second part shows God which the word was with if different from the God which the was IS.

That's my point about the "The God"

That should be clear by now

So are you denying that you did not claim definitely that "THE GOD" referred to "The Father" in John 1:1 instead of the three persons in the Trinity?

Truthseeker10:
So why are you limiting this person to the father instead of the three persons in the Trinity?




So are you denying that you did not claim definitely that "THE GOD" referred to "The Father" in John 1:1 instead of the three persons in the Trinity?

Answer my question first

Emusan:
Answer my question first

Oga the word can be with "the God". the question now is who is "The God"In John 1:1? You claimed it was the Father out of all the three person in the Trinity? Where did you see The Father in John 1:1?

So are you denying that you did not claim definitely that "THE GOD" referred to "The Father" in John 1:1 instead of the three persons in the Trinity?

MaxInDHouse:
If you want to learn more ask for a free home Bible study with Jehovah's Witnesses it won't cost you anything.

At least you have learned today that the names of angels mentioned in God's word is just two:

MICHAEL and GABRIEL

I think that's enough for today!

Olodo, who no sabi before😂😂😂.
Bring proof of the law that says Angels should not dispose of their names!!!

You go just dey write rubbish 🤧.
No dey think at all.
Now bring proof🙃

We are waiting!
Na you go show us where to bury you 🤤