₦airaland Forum

23jerryking:
You think say na coincidence say they get low IQ? Very soft-life loving idiots 😂.

LordAdam16:
]

He is the first 🤡 I'm blocking on NL.

Gracias Seun.

-Lord

shoodboi2:
If you give him a gun and tell him to shoot someone on this thread, it is me he will shoot 😂

Allthelight:
Who was even saying hamas and Hezbollah are not destroyed again?

Even houthis are in trouble.... A war with Iran is more likely hope Iran knows. Why I have said Israel is not Ukrainian..

Israel would have gone for Putin now and worry about the consequences later... Na us go beg them not to go for their nuclear weapons in exchange for more weapons.

shoodboi2:
If you give him a gun and tell him to shoot someone on this thread, it is me he will shoot 😂

FXtrader2025:
I have 8 mentions from him
All deleted 😅😅🤣
Just because I said 2k are taking down 32m in Yemen which we all know is a fact he is been fuming since morning mentioning me back to back
I have blocked the nuisance

Saladdin:

Allthelight:
Why did Ukraine even give up their nuclear weapons very foolish thing to do. That is my problem with pro western governments, has North Korea, Pakistan given up theirs.

Oh well

WritterNg:
⚡Kim Jong-Un has ordered the deployment of North Korean troops to Russia in a show of military support, formally notifying Moscow of the decision.

Blakjewelry:
Israel is just a tool in arsenal of the us, they are very important to USA presence in the middle east but if you think usa will go to war with Russia over Israel then you need to wake up.

shoodboi2:
First things first, your assertion banks on the belief that a country will destroy itself for another country. That is very wrong. No country in the world will throw itself into a meat grinder for another country, unless there is something really serious at stake. And that something is usually an invasion of their own country.

Secondly, I used ally in the same context you did. You referred to Syria and Libya as Russian allies, which is not so in the true sense since there was no agreement recognizing them as allies. But you called them allies. That was the same context in which I used it, so I am kind of surprised that you’re suddenly attacking me for using the word.

Thirdly, the Syrian and Afghanistan armies were both defeated. But how they were defeated is where the difference lies. The Syrian army refused to fight and just walked off the battlefield. Some units fought but with the bulk of the army leaving the battlefield, there was very little they could do. That is a defeat nonetheless and I never said it wasn’t, so I do not know why you are attacking me here either.

In the case of the Afghanistan national army, they fought and were overrun on the battlefield. That too is a defeat.

Lastly, did Russia have any mutual defense agreement with Syria, Libya, Iraq, or even Iran? Nope. There is none. So that beats your argument about them being “allies” out of the water.

To be clear, Russia recently signed a major agreement with Iran but it involves multiple things, including defence. But the defence part of the agreement appears to be minor compared to things like trade and cooperation in other areas.

Blakjewelry:
Everyone uses their brain when necessary, signing a deal which involves direct military intervention is a very risky business especially when it comes to countries which are already in state of war or potential war.

The best you can do is arm your allies, you think the us will risk going to war with China over Taiwan? The best they will do is offer maximum help and nothing more no foot on the ground.

obedience4:
Funny dude..

They are a number of fundamental things that make a country an ally to another....

Gbadebo19:
You sound funny. Except US has no further strategic interest in the middle East, they will go to war with any non ally that attacks Israel.

shoodboi2:
1. We're talking mutual defence treaties and you're talking about a naval base agreement. How do they correlate?

2. The Syrian army left the battlefield, marking their defeat. So how is Russia to be blamed for that? Is Russia supposed to send in own army to fight for Syria while the Syrian army leaves the battlefield?

3. You are the first person I will hear saying the ANA refused to fight. They fought fiercely but were promptly defeated. Some soldiers left the battlefield. But the bulk fought and were either routed after their defeat or surrendered to the Taliban.

4. On Iran, you are on this thread and I believe you have read the many of the shortcomings of Iran here. Russia cannot spoon-feed Iran. You can only help a person that wants to help itself and Iran has not even shown seriousness in protecting itself.

This issue has been discussed here several times and many of us here have blamed Iran for its many avoidable shortcomings.

A mutual defence doesn't mean an external power will carry all your weight. You must carry your weight and then the external power will carry it with you. Iran refuses to carry it's own weight, so you shouldn't expect Russia to carry it for them.

Look at North Korea and look at Iran, and then tell me which one shows more seriousness about its own security. Its obviously North Korea.

5. You trying to make an issue out of Russia not signing a mutual defence treaty with Iran is like me making an issue out of the US and NATO's refusal to sign a mutual defence treaty with Ukraine.

Should I call NATO and the US weak for refusing Ukraine membership? Because that is what your comment insinuates.

Saladdin:
So we both did the same thing

WritterNg:
Those that have blocked him.

Do you still see Gbadebo19's posts?

I want to know how it works.

LordAdam16:
You can't see his posts.
He can't see yours.

But if someone you did not block quotes his post in a comment, you'll see his post as part of the comment.

-Lord

WritterNg:
Block button now available 😁

But I'm never going to use it. Too feminine.