₦airaland Forum

Why did the pop refuse a kiss on the hand by black bishops

michlins:
Christ didn't start any church from the time he lived and to die.

I said "founded Christianity".

alpharoyalty:
It depicts the crucifixion of Peter, the first leader of the church

Certainly not Catholic church

Dtruthspeaker:
It is a Lie!

That one na your business

End time pope

BlackyOne:
That one na your business

Na all our business make person no dey Lie to us.

Dtruthspeaker:
I said "founded Christianity".

all religions on earth are founded by men including Christianity. Christ came and showed humans his way but didn't found any religion.

If Christ wanted to start a relationship or "found" one, he wouldn't be going to synagogue to teach and pray but start it distinctively

michlins:
all religions on earth are founded by men including Christianity. Christ came and showed humans his way but didn't found any religion.

If Christ wanted to start a relationship or "found" one, he wouldn't be going to synagogue to teach and pray but start it distinctively

Firstly, Christ is not a man.

Secondly, since there are people who dutifully followed The Way Christ had showed and directed, then, Christ has founded a religion.

Then, everyone knows that the synagogue is a representative of the place of the Ark of the Covenant and Temple of God which Solomon first built. All of which belong to Christ. So going there is Him going to His "Office".

Dtruthspeaker:
Firstly, Christ is not a man.

Secondly, since there are people who dutifully followed The Way Christ had showed and directed, then, Christ has founded a religion.

Then, everyone knows that the synagogue is a representative of the place of the Ark of the Covenant and Temple of God which Solomon first built. All of which belong to Christ. So going there is Him going to His "Office".

council of nicea was where Christianity started

michlins:
council of nicea was where Christianity started

You are just changing post up and down and moving from one issue to another.

The Council of nicea is a religion based organ formed by the Roman rulers for the Roman rulers aims and purposes.

Meanwhile Christianity was a minute Jewish sect. So the Romans have no business with it.

If anything the Romans arrested and hotly prosecuted them. So, they have no right to claim what is not theirs and that which they even despised and sought to silence.

Meanwhile, Christianity was already formed and spreading even before the Roman rulers formed their nicea convention.

So, you see the Romans are thieves and interlopers.

Dtruthspeaker:
You are just changing post up and down and moving from one issue to another.

The Council of nicea is a religion based organ formed by the Roman rulers for the Roman rulers aims and purposes.

Meanwhile Christianity was a minute Jewish sect. So the Romans have no business with it.

If anything the Romans arrested and hotly prosecuted them. So, they have no right to claim what is not theirs and that which they even despised and sought to silence.

Meanwhile, Christianity was already formed and spreading even before the Romans rulers formed their nicea convention.

So, you see the Romans and are thieves and interlopers.

there was no formal religion called Christianity prior to the council. Everything and everyone who heard about Christ were gathering and doing their own thing. Some were following Paul and others were following Peter and other apostles.

It wasn't until the council that everything was ratified as a religious sect

michlins:
there was no formal religion called Christianity prior to the council. Everything and everyone who heard about Christ were gathering and doing their own thing. Some were following Paul and others were following Peter and other apostles.

It wasn't until the council that everything was ratified as a religious sect

No religious sect was formal when they started.

And Christianity had already spread to Ethiopia and all the banks of East and northern Africa even before the nicea convention was put together.

Dtruthspeaker:
No religious sect was formal when they started.

And Christianity had already spread to Ethiopia and all the banks of East and northern Africa even before the nicea convention was put together.

all those times,it was still an off wing of Judaism even though Jewish people didn't accept them. It wasn't until Romans needed the sect for conquest did they formally adapt it to a standalone religious group

michlins:
all those times,it was still an off wing of Judaism even though Jewish people didn't accept them. It wasn't until Romans needed the sect for conquest did they formally adapt it to a standalone religious group

1) Read your bible. Judahism is idol worship. So Christianity is not an off shoot of it. It is separate and distinct from them. And that is why they conspired to murder Christ.

2) Then go read your history again. The Romans had already conquered whatever land they held first but Christianity was already there.

And if you read you would see that the Romans were losing power and control over those territories because of their evil governance. And because of their use Christian Power and principles, they set up what we now know as the Roman Catholic church who had set up schools and hospitals in those territories which catered to the people before the Roman collapse.

And when the Roman power collapsed the Power shifted to the priests in control of those areas. And the Romans funded them and used them to continue controlling and exploiting those areas.

And Christianity is not interested in acquiring Power nor controlling people nor exploiting people.

The Romans are Pagans which is why you see that their church called Catholic, is pagany.

So you see, Catholicism is not Christianity

https://www.nairaland.com/8347687/it-roman-catholics-pagans-ruled#134228523

Dtruthspeaker:
1) Read your bible. Judahism is idol worship. So Christianity is not an off shoot of it. It is separate and distinct from them. And that is why they conspired to murder Christ.

2) Then go read your history again. The Romans had already conquered whatever land they held first but Christianity was already there.

And if you read you would see that the Romans were losing power and control over those territories because of their evil governance. And because of their use Christian Power and principles, they set up what we now know as the Roman Catholic church who had set up schools and hospitals in those territories which catered to the people before the Roman collapse.

And when the Roman power collapsed the Power shifted to the priests in control of those areas. And the Romans funded them and used them to continue controlling and exploiting those areas.

And Christianity is not interested in acquiring Power nor controlling people nor exploiting people.

The Romans are Pagans which is why you see that their church called Catholic, is pagany.

So you see, Catholicism is not Christianity

https://www.nairaland.com/8347687/it-roman-catholics-pagans-ruled#134228523

for this same religion Jesus worshipped and prayed with?

All in the name of painting Catholic Church evil, you called the same religion Jesus worshipped from birth to death pagan worshippers. Same people who you call their God (God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob)

Same God is what you call paganism

michlins:
for this same religion Jesus worshipped and prayed with?

All in the name of painting Catholic Church evil, you called the same religion Jesus worshipped from birth to death pagan worshippers. Same people who you call their God (God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob)

Same God is what you call paganism

The thread shows that I have already drawn the distinction between Christianity and Catholicism. A distinction which the whole world sees and have also pointed out.

And this threads clearly shows that Christianity had no lawful connection with Romans who are known to be pagans as is clearly shown in their own duplication and depiction of Christianity via their paganous Catholicism.

Exactly how someone has just done a church that is both Christian and Islamic.