₦airaland Forum

Natasha Akpoti replies Agbakoba, says only court can assess her case against Akpabio

Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, Kogi central senator, has faulted public comments by Olisa Agbakoba on her case with Senate President Godswill Akpabio.

Agbakoba, a senior advocate of Nigeria (SAN), had written to Akpoti-Uduaghan, demanding a retraction of her sexual harassment allegation against Akpabio.

In the letter dated April 14, Agbakoba, a former president of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA), asked Akpoti-Uduaghan to provide evidence supporting her claim that Akpabio sexually harassed her on December 8, 2023.

Responding in a letter dated April 30, Akpoti-Uduaghan denied receiving any letters from Agbakoba.

“I place it on formal record that no such letters have ever been served upon me by post, courier, or personal delivery,” she wrote.

“The imputation of recalcitrance is therefore inoperative.”

Akpoti-Uduaghan said she had maintained silence out of respect for the doctrine of lis pendens — a legal principle that discourages public commentary on matters before the courts.

She explained that two suits are currently pending: one initiated by Akpabio’s wife at the FCT high court demanding N250 billion in damages, and another filed by her at the federal high court in Abuja, challenging her suspension from the senate.

“While Suit No. FHC/ABJ/CS/384/2025 is unrelated to the sexual harassment allegations I made against the President of the Senate, Suit No. CV/816/2025 is directly related to the allegations of sexual harassment instituted by your client’s spouse, on which issues have been joined,” she said.

“It is improper for any party to make extrajudicial comments.”

She also criticised Agbakoba for what she described as double standard, noting that his client’s legal team had relied on the sub judice rule to block a senate investigation, yet had now resorted to the media to demand answers.

“A litigant may not approbate in the courts and reprobate in the press,” she said.

On her six-month suspension from the senate, Akpoti-Uduaghan accused Akpabio of presiding over his own case and denying her fair hearing, in violation of natural justice principles.

“Nemo judex in causa sua: no one ought to be judge in his own cause,” she wrote.

She also dismissed suggestions that her past interactions with Akpabio amounted to contradictions in her complaint, saying civility should not be mistaken for consent or comfort.

“To do so trivialises a serious concern of sexual harassment, especially in a workplace using a dominant position,” she said.

“The nature of your demand for evidence in this manner, at the instance of your client, simply indicates a broader misconception of what truly amounts to sexual harassment as prescribed in several global protocols.”

Akpoti-Uduaghan maintained that Agbakoba had no legal authority to demand that she substantiate her claims outside the court process.

“A private legal practitioner, however distinguished, is not vested with adjudicatory authority under the Constitution or any statute of the Federal Republic,” she said.

She further urged Agbakoba to advise his client on the implications of presiding over proceedings in which he is personally involved.

“I respectfully invite you to provide your client with a comprehensive advisory that addresses the entirety of the factual matrix,” she wrote.

She restated that her complaint stands as filed.

“I stand by my complaint as lodged on 28th February 2025 and as pleaded in my Defence and Counter-Claim in CV/816/25,” she said.

“This letter is issued solely to correct the public record and to prevent a constructive admission being inferred from silence.”

She asked that any future correspondence be directed through her lawyers.

On Sunday, Akpoti-Uduaghan issued a satirical apology letter to Akpabio on her Facebook page.

In the letter, the senator expressed “deepest sarcasm and utmost theatrical regret” for “the grievous crime of possessing dignity and self-respect” in Akpabio’s presence.

Also she files another suit on sexual allegations....The same allegations that is with no evidence.

Maxymilliano:
Quite funny to see a senior lawyer of Agbakoba's repute asking for evidence when the court is yet to make such declaration

Maxymilliano:
Quite funny to see a senior lawyer of Agbakoba's repute asking for evidence when the court is yet to make such declaration

JASONjnr:
The people encouraging this woman are more evil than her because they're not leading her well....


She files a suit challenging her suspension. First and foremost, the senate would've challenged and revoked her suspension if it was illegal.

Also she files another suit on sexual allegations.....the same allegations that is with no evidence.

JuanDeDios:
Huh? That's not how it works. Mr Agbakoba actually did a good job in his letter to Mrs Uduaghan. It's not every case that is supposed to get to court. If our judicial system was mature, the lawyers for either side will sit and hash out the case, and Mrs Udaughan, seeing how weak the basis for her allegation is, will withdraw it to avoid being sued.

JASONjnr:
The people encouraging this woman are more evil than her because they're not leading her well....


She files a suit challenging her suspension. First and foremost, the senate would've challenged and revoked her suspension if it was illegal.

Also she files another suit on sexual allegations.....the same allegations that is with no evidence.

JuanDeDios:
Huh? That's not how it works. Mr Agbakoba actually did a good job in his letter to Mrs Uduaghan. It's not every case that is supposed to get to court. If our judicial system was mature, the lawyers for either side will sit and hash out the case, and Mrs Udaughan, seeing how weak the basis for her allegation is, will withdraw it to avoid being sued.

Enskynelson:
Has the court asked her to provide evidence and she is unable to? Why did you conclude there is no evidence? If you see her evidence in the public domain, outside the court, people like you who conclude issues without hearing will still say the evidence is fake. For now, Akpabio and Natasha are both not guilty until proven otherwise. So.... Chill.

Wallade:
In her interest, she should have reliable and substantial evidences to prove her case beyond reasonable doubt.

Wallade:
Let me correct or inform you, she never filed the suit of sexual harassment against Apabio till date.

She has only been using the social media to attack and blackmail and malign the person of the Senate President with criminal accusations of sexual harassment.

Does that not worry or baffle you? That till date, she has not been able to Institute a formal case against Apabio in court on the sexial harassment accusations.

It was Apabio's wife that sued her to court on the sexual harassment accusations against her husband and against her marriage and family.

Maxymilliano:
Quite funny to see a senior lawyer of Agbakoba's repute asking for evidence when the court is yet to make such declaration

Enskynelson:
Has the court asked her to provide evidence and she is unable to? Why did you conclude there is no evidence? If you see her evidence in the public domain, outside the court, people like you who conclude issues without hearing will still say the evidence is fake. For now, Akpabio and Natasha are both not guilty until proven otherwise. So.... Chill.

JASONjnr:
Stop defending nonsense..... let her tender her evidence.

Is it too difficult to ask?

She went to social media court to drag a man and after doing the damagez she folded up.