Deeper Life Pastor Says It's Unbiblical Not To Bear Husband's Name As A Wife - Christianity Etc (3) - Nairaland
Nairaland Forum › Nairaland General › Christianity Etc › Deeper Life Pastor Says It's Unbiblical Not To Bear Husband's Name As A Wife (12544 Views)
| Re: Deeper Life Pastor Says It's Unbiblical Not To Bear Husband's Name As A Wife by Antichristian2: 9:46am On May 04, 2025 |
Agbegbaorogboye:Ask Google! |
| Re: Deeper Life Pastor Says It's Unbiblical Not To Bear Husband's Name As A Wife by OviOrunmila: 10:07am On May 04, 2025 |
Maximus692:Why are you quoting from the Jewish Torah, the Jewish Torah is meant for the people of the Jew, it serves as the guidelines and a custom and traditions to them... They are not Christians, one of the article of faith that convert you to JW, is acceptable to them, which is John 3 Vs 16...... You can pick a law out of thousand just to support you motion and left the other one, if agree to this law I wish you agree to paying if tithe as well....... |
| Re: Deeper Life Pastor Says It's Unbiblical Not To Bear Husband's Name As A Wife by Bentacur007: 10:20am On May 04, 2025 |
nans24:What about smoking you didn’t answer him You are biased |
| Re: Deeper Life Pastor Says It's Unbiblical Not To Bear Husband's Name As A Wife by tosyne2much(m): 10:32am On May 04, 2025 |
Clinching to your husband's surname shows uniformity or togetherness By the way, why would a woman even refuse to bear her husband's surname Oh I forgot feminism has taken over everything lately |
| Re: Deeper Life Pastor Says It's Unbiblical Not To Bear Husband's Name As A Wife by delishpot: 10:40am On May 04, 2025 |
Bible say man go leave papa and mama cling to wife, pastors say wife go leave papa and mama cling to husband. Perverted translators. |
| Re: Deeper Life Pastor Says It's Unbiblical Not To Bear Husband's Name As A Wife by richie240: 11:07am On May 04, 2025 |
Show us just one scripture in d bible that says igbo-smoking/cocaine-sniffing is a sin! Just one please! ![]() nans24: |
| Re: Deeper Life Pastor Says It's Unbiblical Not To Bear Husband's Name As A Wife by NothingDoMe: 11:27am On May 04, 2025 |
nans24:Isaiah 4:1 And in that day seven women shall take hold of one man, saying, We will eat our own bread, and wear our own apparel: only let us be called by thy name, to take away our reproach. |
| Re: Deeper Life Pastor Says It's Unbiblical Not To Bear Husband's Name As A Wife by Dvea(f): 11:34am On May 04, 2025 |
This is untrue. Why do we take our own beliefs and force it on others and then claim it's biblical. In the Bible women were called and linked to their fathers same as sons. You'd see many people in the Bible being referred to as YYYY daughter of YYYY. Biblically linage was paternal so daughters retained their identity to their father not to their husbands. Besides we forget that there is a world beyond West Africa. If he had said its mot right in Ghanaian culture I won't argue but to say it's wrong the whole world over ignores all of the cultures that traditionally requires women to keep their fathers name. Most south east Asian countries like China, Korea, Vietnam have traditional laws where women keep their names. Many European countries have the same law such as Spain, Greece, and France. Even Canada has such a law. We trolly need to stop tagging everything as biblical in a bid to solidify our own opinion. He could have just said I don't think it's right not it's not biblical. |
| Re: Deeper Life Pastor Says It's Unbiblical Not To Bear Husband's Name As A Wife by NothingDoMe: 11:37am On May 04, 2025 |
Dvea:I already quoted Isaiah 4:1. You may counter it with another scripture. |
| Re: Deeper Life Pastor Says It's Unbiblical Not To Bear Husband's Name As A Wife by Dvea(f): 11:39am On May 04, 2025 |
tosyne2much:It's also cultural. You people forget that there is more to this world than Nigeria. There are over 190 countries in this world and all of them have their tradition. You are quick to label it feminism but ignore the fact that many cuktures out there have traditions were women must retain their fathers name. China, Korea, some parts of Canada, Spain, Greece and even France. But no. As long as it's not so in Nigeria then boom they must be feminist. There is more to the world than you know. Just say your culture doesn't support it but don't claim that it's bad or unbiblical when there are several cultures and traditions that allow it. Again the world is too large to judge it by your own standards. |
| Re: Deeper Life Pastor Says It's Unbiblical Not To Bear Husband's Name As A Wife by Agbegbaorogboye: 11:48am On May 04, 2025 |
| Re: Deeper Life Pastor Says It's Unbiblical Not To Bear Husband's Name As A Wife by bentenny(m): 11:53am On May 04, 2025 |
The moment you get married and ur wife refuses to adopt your surname,just know that that is the beginning of your problems! In a nutshell,she doesn't rate or respect you! |
| Re: Deeper Life Pastor Says It's Unbiblical Not To Bear Husband's Name As A Wife by MasterTeeUSA: 11:57am On May 04, 2025 |
Do you know why Blacks in the US have White People Last Name? Descendants of slaves...so slaves were made to take the last name of their slave masters. Old things have passed away..Behold a new thing You can use the same logic because when you marry, you are now one and the same..My argument is ...if you cannot replace your father's name with his...at least add his name to your fathers'. It still shows however that you want to be identified as the daughter of ...... not as the wife of ..... so you don't plan to leave the old for the new. Then why marry a man you cannot give your all too? That's a question to ponder over. Convenience maybe? Children maybe? Just to fulfill society's righteousness? LordReed: |
| Re: Deeper Life Pastor Says It's Unbiblical Not To Bear Husband's Name As A Wife by wany(f): 12:00pm On May 04, 2025 |
Vulcan24:Your wife na 2yr old baby ,she crave for the guy gbola and got served which she enjoyed,so wetin concern me surname. The married women enjoying different gbola outside their marriage are they not bearing their husbands name ,dey play ![]() |
| Re: Deeper Life Pastor Says It's Unbiblical Not To Bear Husband's Name As A Wife by wany(f): 12:02pm On May 04, 2025 |
bentenny:Respect shouldn't come in.you are not a demi God. ![]() |
| Re: Deeper Life Pastor Says It's Unbiblical Not To Bear Husband's Name As A Wife by Satya1: 12:02pm On May 04, 2025 |
For those who doubt him: Why is "man" at the end of "woman"? |
| Re: Deeper Life Pastor Says It's Unbiblical Not To Bear Husband's Name As A Wife by Dvea(f): 12:04pm On May 04, 2025 |
NothingDoMe:The translation I have of Isaiah 4:1 is When that time comes, seven women will grab hold of one man and say, please let us call you our husband.... It did not say let us take your name. That is simply a translation issue. Calling your husband doesn't mean taking your husband's name. To my point biblically people were called by either their fathers name or their location... Mary of Magdala, or Jesus's of Nazareth. If you want a verse then 2nd Samuel 11: 3 Bathsheba was called the daughter of Eliam even though she was married to King David. A whole King. Back to your point. Isish was foretelling the destruction and exile of the isrealities due to their sin and the punishments they will have. Men will die in war and women will have no men to marry. That passage had nothing to do with the normal lives of people. So why do people like you take Bible verses out of context and use it to back up your point. The Bible is a history book with events that led to and away from everything. You are using a passage that foretold a punishment that happened even before Christ as your yardstick. And the translation of the passage isn't even the same through out all Bible versions. Do you see how problematic you people are. That's why a pastor can come and tell you things like this and you'll clap your hands and say ride on. Back again to my point that you so conveniently ignored. What about traditional customs that do not allow women take their husband's name. Are they all sinners because you want to claim it's not Biblical? The world is bigger than your own beliefs and cultures in Nigeria. Learn about other customs and stop trying to use the Bible to back up your private opinions. Because if I want to, I can also claim the Bible says men who have properties are all bad and doomed to die.... Isaiah 5: 8 |
| Re: Deeper Life Pastor Says It's Unbiblical Not To Bear Husband's Name As A Wife by justmondris: 12:18pm On May 04, 2025 |
Why did you marry if you don't want to bear your husband's name? |
| Re: Deeper Life Pastor Says It's Unbiblical Not To Bear Husband's Name As A Wife by MaxInDHouse(m): 12:34pm On May 04, 2025 |
OviOrunmila:Laws given to Israel was to help them as a nation but it further helps Christians to know how we can continue serving the same God without confusion. The tithe has a purpose which has been accomplished but after the system of worship for which it was established has ended the law of tithe is no more useful for God's people today. Thank you! |
| Re: Deeper Life Pastor Says It's Unbiblical Not To Bear Husband's Name As A Wife by NothingDoMe: 12:36pm On May 04, 2025 |
Dvea:1. Which translation of Isaiah 4:1 are you using? 2. 2nd Samuel 11:3 David sent and inquired after the woman. One said, "Isn't this Bathsheba, the daughter of Eliam, the wife of Uriah the Hittite?" You are misquoting scripture to prove your point. She wasn't David's wife at this point. As you can clearly read she was called Uriah's wife. 3. It seems your thoughts on this matter are somewhat disorganized, making a substantive response or debate challenging. Summarise your thoughts with straightforward points. Let's focus on one discussion at a time. We should stick to our initial debate on what the Bible says about name change. We can then move on to cultural discussions afterward. |
| Re: Deeper Life Pastor Says It's Unbiblical Not To Bear Husband's Name As A Wife by Dada4me: 12:37pm On May 04, 2025 |
nans24:Listen to what the pastor said, then you will see the answer. |
| Re: Deeper Life Pastor Says It's Unbiblical Not To Bear Husband's Name As A Wife by LordReed(m): 1:06pm On May 04, 2025 |
MasterTeeUSA:Hold up. You are using slavery as an argument for why a wife should take her husband's name? Do you not see how problematic your argument is? Is the wife a slave? Why would you even attempt to use slavery to support your argument? Holy Andromeda! |
| Re: Deeper Life Pastor Says It's Unbiblical Not To Bear Husband's Name As A Wife by rabzy: 1:36pm On May 04, 2025 |
We should be careful to superimpose the realities of our times with what was obtainable centuries or millenniums ago. In times past most people live in small villages and they know each other very well. There was no need to have surnames attached to your name. The differentiation between two individuals bearing the same name can be by occupation eg Joseph the carpenter, Daniel the prophet, Joseph of Arimathea, Jesus of Nazareth, Lydia the purple maker, Priscilla and Aquila Philo of Alexandria etc. people don't refer to each other by names and surnames neither do they have a need to fill forms which will require you to write a first name and surname. All these because a norm hundreds of years later. Surnames as we know them today did not exist among the Jews of Bible times. The Westminster Dictionary of the Bible (1944), page 418, states: “Surnames were lacking among the Hebrews; persons were designated by adding to the personal name the name of their city, as Jesus of Nazareth, Joseph of Arimathaea, Mary Magdalene, Nahum the Elkoshite; or by a statement of their descent, as Simon son of Jonah; by their disposition, trade, or other characteristic, as Simon Peter, Nathan the prophet, Joseph the carpenter, Matthew the publican, Simon the Zealot, and Dionysius the Areopagite.” On this point the Encyclopedia Americana, 1942 edition, has this to say under “Names”: “Neither the Hebrews, Egyptians, Assyrians, Babylonians, Persians nor Greeks had surnames; and in the earliest period of their history the same may be said of the Romans.” (Vol. 19, p. 685) This source continues to show that our present system of surnames came only centuries later. All of which shows that the Bible characters did not have first names as we view them today. It was the custom of that day. |
| Re: Deeper Life Pastor Says It's Unbiblical Not To Bear Husband's Name As A Wife by rabzy: 1:57pm On May 04, 2025 |
Many famous women in the Roman world were not called by their husbands name but were given other designations to differentiate them. Aggripina the elder - wife of a Caesar Aggripina the younger Livia Drusilla Cornelia Africana Cleopatra Julia Major Julia Minor Lydia Major Lydia Minor Fulvia Julia domna All the women in the bible were never called by a first name and surname. A number of them is by their place of birth, occupation etc. so it would be wrong to categorically state that it is a sin not to bear a husband's name as a surname when the practice is not even known that time. For me it is preferable for it to be so, there is a reason why for thousands of years it was not so and then later the idea of first name and surname were adopted for both men and women. If a husband mis agreeable for his wife to bear another name while he bears a different name in this world where name and surname mismatch can cause a lot of confusion and mixup, then that is fine. There is no reason to think anyone is committing a sin for doing that. |
| Re: Deeper Life Pastor Says It's Unbiblical Not To Bear Husband's Name As A Wife by bukatyne(f): 2:15pm On May 04, 2025 |
LordIsaac:You claim to be a Christian yet think that adultery (that is a grave sin) is a worthy threat for a woman asking for proof that not taking up a husband's surname is sin. So in summary, if a woman does take your surname (assumed to be a sin), you will commit adultery (a grave sin). What Church do you attend? |
| Re: Deeper Life Pastor Says It's Unbiblical Not To Bear Husband's Name As A Wife by Antichristian2: 2:18pm On May 04, 2025 |
Agbegbaorogboye:A foolish question requires a similar answer! |
| Re: Deeper Life Pastor Says It's Unbiblical Not To Bear Husband's Name As A Wife by bukatyne(f): 2:19pm On May 04, 2025 |
delishpot: ![]() |
| Re: Deeper Life Pastor Says It's Unbiblical Not To Bear Husband's Name As A Wife by bentenny(m): 3:05pm On May 04, 2025 |
wany:It's not by force and I'm not God let alone a demi who made man the head over the wife! The surname you are bearing belongs to your father! The day your father handed you over to your husband,he instantly transferred his core responsibility to your husband,hence the change of surname! However,If you cannot change ur surname,then do not consider marrying him as you obviously do not respect him let alone honour him! |
| Re: Deeper Life Pastor Says It's Unbiblical Not To Bear Husband's Name As A Wife by Abee79(m): 5:07pm On May 04, 2025 |
Everyone, know God for yourself O! |
| Re: Deeper Life Pastor Says It's Unbiblical Not To Bear Husband's Name As A Wife by bixton(m): 6:18pm On May 04, 2025 |
richie240:Is igbo smoking/cocaine sniffing good ? James 4.17 - Therefore, to him who knows to do good and does not do it, to him it is sin. |
| Re: Deeper Life Pastor Says It's Unbiblical Not To Bear Husband's Name As A Wife by Dvea(f): 6:56pm On May 04, 2025 |
NothingDoMe:There is nothing unclear about my point. But I'll accord you your choice and stick to biblical claims The passage you quoted was specifically a foretelling of the punishment isreal was going to face for thier disobedience. Men will die in war and women will have no husband's to marry. It had nothing to do with women taking their husband's name. The Good News Bible doesn't even translate it as just let us take your name. It translates it as let's just call you our husband. And as I stated when you read the Bible you cannot just pick and choose passages that suit you. The Bible is a history book and something led to and away from something. Isaiah 4 had nothing to do with taking a man's name or that there is a scarcity of men or that a good wife takes a man's name. There is nothing about that in the Bible. Isaiah was a prophet who condemned the peoples evil and foretold the fall and rise of the isrealities. Particularly chapter 4 is a continuation of chapter 3 not a standalone story. And chapter 3 spoke of God's punishment on the men of Isreal and generally the people. Chapter 3 is about the chaos God will bring on them. The sentence you so conveniently quoted began on chapter 3 and was a warning to the evil ways of the women and what punishment God was going to met on them. If the men die in war then of course there will be none to marry them. Chapter 4 verse 2 till then end was then a restoration promise from God. All of these things already happened to isreal they already experienced that. The prophesy came through and went on. So why are you holding onto that as a fact that the Bible says a woman needs to take her husband's name when the entire story was about something completely different and in a situation of chaos for the isrealities? Again GNB doesn't even translate it as taking his name. It simply says let's call you husband. Going to the passage I quoted 2nd Samuel 11: 3 she was first referred to by her father's name before her husband. In today's world that would be keeping your fathers name and then adding on your husband's. If taking the man's name was so important then they would have simply referred to her as the wife of... There is no Biblical claims for the pastors point and simply he could have simply said he doesn't think it's right not trying to twist the Bible to fit thier own opinion. |
"I Want To Marry A Rich Nigerian Man" - Black American Female Pastor Says • It's Unbiblical To Pray To Jesus - Reno Omokri • The Trinity Doctrine Is a False doctrine and it is Unbiblical. • 2 • 3 • 4
Why I Left The Jehovah's Witnesses • It's Christmas Eve! Share Your Experience So Far • Should Religion Matter Above Love In Choosing A Life Partner?



