₦airaland Forum

emkz:
I have noticed that everything you comment to support Natasha, you get 2 likes and 2 shares. It seems there is a small team of 2 Nairaland Natasha supporters.

Let me put it here.

(1) Natasha lied against Reno, weaponizing her sexuality. After Reno exposed her, she deleted all evidence of her lies. Someone paid Reno compensation.

Can you dispute that Natasha did not lie against Reno?

(2) When Professor Mgbeke surfaced, Natasha claimed not to have known her. Professor Mgbeke supplied evidence where Natasha spoke like a parrot on heat. Natasha, Oby, Abiola and yourself have not been able to debunk anything she said. Questions for you: Was Oby paid by Natasha to disrupt senate investigations? Was Oby referred to as "useful idiot" by Natasha? Did Natasha describe Nigerians as "gullible and hungry"? Are you gullible and hungry?

(3) Natasha has not supplied evidence. Instead of asking her to supply evidence, you want to dictate the arena.

Tell Natasha that if she lied, the least she owes Nigerians is resigning from the senate.

With her behaviour, she is showing that Yahaya Bello wanted to save Nigeria from her witch-hunt.

Let Natasha supply evidence.

bixton:
In civilized countries where responsible people bring up allegations, they don't just say it in public and stop there. The moment they make it public, they immediately head to the court, file a case against the individual whom they have accused for the alledged crime and summon the person through the court.
But in Nigeria, we have a gathering of comedy folks who claim to be intelligent, educated, smart but they are only that to their like-minded gullible followers.

CreativeOrbit:
Kindly listen to Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan if you continue to request evidence:

Suspended Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan has strongly criticized Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), Olisa Agbakoba, for demanding that she publicly present evidence to substantiate her sexual harassment allegations against Senate President Godswill Akpabio. In a formal letter dated April 30, addressed to Agbakoba’s chambers, she reiterated her resolve to pursue the case through the appropriate judicial channels—specifically, the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory—affirming the veracity of her claims.

Akpoti-Uduaghan firmly rejected Agbakoba’s call for a retraction, asserting that his demand for premature evidence disclosure not only misrepresents standard legal procedures but also disregards established global protocols for handling sexual harassment cases. She emphasized that the evaluation of evidence falls strictly within the purview of the judiciary, not public discourse.

Furthermore, she condemned Agbakoba’s approach as an attempt to undermine due process, warning that any effort to circumvent proper judicial protocol risks eroding the rule of law. She also accused him of engaging in a media campaign aimed at swaying public opinion, stressing that such conduct compromises the integrity of court proceedings. Akpoti-Uduaghan maintained that justice must be pursued within the legal system, not through external pressure or media influence.

CreativeOrbit:
Thank you for sharing your perspective. However, I must respectfully disagree with the assertions made in your message, as they appear to rely on unverified claims and lack substantive evidence. Allow me to address your points systematically:

1. Allegations Regarding Reno Omokri: The claim that Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan lied about Reno Omokri and subsequently deleted evidence is a serious accusation that requires credible proof. Without verifiable documentation or a legal ruling confirming these claims, such statements remain speculative. It is unfair to demand that I dispute an unproven allegation. Instead, the burden of proof lies with those making the claim to provide concrete evidence, such as court documents or public records, rather than relying on social media narratives.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=U9L8BovMqDk
https://www.pulse.ng/articles/news/local/senator-natasha-once-falsely-accused-me-of-sexual-harassment-reno-omokri-2025030209390892527
https://www.facebook.com/omokrireno/posts/throwback-video-of-natasha-akpoti-caught-red-handed-falsely-accusing-me-of-sexua/1155888822999476/
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DG-qanptxU3/
https://www.premiumtimesng.com/news/top-news/780050-how-natasha-accused-me-of-sexual-harassment-reno-omokri.html

2. Claims Regarding Professor Mgbeke and Others: Your reliance on Professor Mgbeke’s allegations is equally flimsy. You cite supposed evidence of Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan’s conduct but fail to produce any tangible proof, such as recordings, emails, or sworn testimonies. The inflammatory phrases you use—“parrot on heat,” “useful idiot,” and claims of derogatory remarks about Nigerians—are not only unprofessional but also irrelevant without substantiation. Your questions about payments to Oby or descriptions of Nigerians as “gullible and hungry” are speculative and lack any foundation. I will not dignify such unfounded provocations with a response beyond this: provide evidence or cease spreading these falsehoods.
But Natasha's grievous allegations are true? Supply evidence, and she supplied affidavit while she sent two aspiring thugs to disrupt senate hearing. Neither her or her thugs has denied. She even boasted in the audio recordings that she sent them to disrupt the hearing.
3. Demand for Evidence and Resignation: Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan, like any public official, should be held accountable based on verifiable evidence. However, demanding her resignation without presenting credible proof of wrongdoing is premature and unfair. The assertion that she must “supply evidence” in response to unspecified allegations is vague and shifts the burden of proof inappropriately. Additionally, the reference to Yahaya Bello “saving Nigeria” from a “witch-hunt” is a subjective opinion that lacks context or evidence and does not contribute to a constructive dialogue.
It is the evidence we have been asking her for. Not supplying evidence is evidence of wrong doing and a lack of credibility. Your kind asking Akpabio to resign based on unsubstantiated allegations reeks of double standards.
Your comment about likes and shares on my posts is a distraction and irrelevant to the truth. Social media metrics do not validate or invalidate facts, and such remarks only weaken your position.

I challenge you to produce verifiable evidence to support your claims. Until you do, your accusations are nothing more than noise, and I will continue to support Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan against such unfounded attacks. Engage in fact-based discourse or refrain from spreading misinformation.
Support Natasha all you want, as it is obvious both of you were cut from the same cloth.

jaxxy:
present evidence were and to whom? Akpabio should defend him sef or sue her.

She already narrated incidents with descriptions and timeliness yet to be disputed.

Sandra said Natasha confessed to her but no evidence of confession anywhere.

bixton:
(1) Is Sen. Natasha the one that will take the case to the Court especially the HC since she is the one who is dragging the name of the SP ?

(2) Or Sen. Natasha wants the SP to drag her to court where she will formally present her evidence?

CreativeOrbit:
Calling for accountability from public officials, including Senator Akpabio, is a legitimate and essential civic responsibility.

In any democratic society, the public has not only the right but also the duty to question and scrutinize those in positions of power—especially when serious allegations have been raised, whether these allegations have been fully substantiated or are still under investigation.

Upholding transparency and demanding integrity from leaders should not be misconstrued as bias, but rather recognized as a cornerstone of good governance and the rule of law.

Thewesterner:
The Same way she narrated what happened between her and Reno Omokri with descriptions and timeliness? And all turned out to be false? Are you people being real?

Some of you lot are Evil and will do worst when in position of power.

bixton:
You will only succeed in dribbling yourself and just as Sen. Natasha you will not respond to the direct questions asked.
I guess you'll respond only in court.

CreativeOrbit:
Accusations—no matter how strongly worded—do not become facts without due process and credible, independently verified evidence. Allegations, affidavits, and selectively circulated recordings should not substitute for impartial investigation. Asserting guilt based on hearsay or unverified claims undermines the principles of fairness and justice. If there is genuine concern for truth, then the appropriate legal channels should be allowed to do their work without prejudgment or inflammatory language.

Your assertion is both misleading and unfounded. The absence of presented evidence does not, in itself, constitute evidence of wrongdoing—it is a logical fallacy to presume guilt from silence or delay. Furthermore, calling for accountability from public officials, including Akpabio, is a legitimate civic action when serious allegations arise, whether substantiated or under investigation. To dismiss such concerns as "double standards" ignores the principle of equal scrutiny and the public’s right to demand transparency from those in power. Let us remain focused on facts and uphold due process, rather than resorting to sweeping generalizations or baseless accusations.

I support individuals based on principles, not personal affiliations. If being aligned with integrity and fairness is what you refer to as being 'cut from the same cloth,' then I accept that without hesitation. However, I find it unfortunate that rather than addressing the issue at hand, you've resorted to veiled personal remarks. Let's aim to keep this discussion constructive and focused.

emkz:
"Selectively circulated recordings". Oya deny the authenticity.

Let me address you as Natasha 2.0.

Natasha 2.0, you did not counter any point I raised. You have not countered Professor Mgbeke sensibly.

From the get go, we asked Natasha 1.0 to go to court. But she preferred the court of public opinion to get fame. Now that they have defeated her in her turf, you now want to decide the arena for the fight. Can you see how unstable your positions are?

You accepted being cut from the same cloth. Her dossier is in the public domain and so is yours.

jaxxy:
So did akpabio say she wasn't in his house at the said time with the other guests? Whatever transpired there is up to them to prove right or wrong and that why we say sue her to court.

Reno said he sued her and didn't sue again cos some elders begged him. There no evidence of any sue or court documents or named elders to back up his claim tho.

Thewesterner:
You are not getting it...

MY question is why did Natasha accused Reno Omokri over something that NEVER happened? Since you were defending her by saying she has provided "descriptions and timelines" in Akpabio case.

Why didn't the "descriptions and timelines" she provided in Reno's case check out?

CreativeOrbit:
Ah, the usual noise—long on drama, short on substance. “Selectively circulated recordings”? That’s your best shot? You’re desperately clinging to doctored clips like a drowning man grabs debris. Deny the authenticity? Absolutely—because fabrications deserve nothing but rejection. Try again.

And don’t flatter yourself by calling me Natasha 2.0. Unlike you, I don’t deal in recycled nonsense and tired smear tactics. You said I didn’t counter your points? Maybe because there was nothing worth countering—just hollow rants dressed up as arguments.

As for Professor Mgbeke, her clown show collapsed under its own contradictions. You called for court? Good. Then why are you now obsessed with the court of public opinion? Because that’s the only place your cheap theatrics get attention.

You talk of instability? Look in the mirror. You lot switch tones and targets more often than a weathervane in a storm. Her dossier is out? So is yours. And if we’re cut from the same cloth, then I guess that makes you the rag.

emkz:
Fallacy or ad hominem. A tactic used by gaslightersSince you can't attack the substance, attack the person.

You asked me for evidence, I supplied evidence. You could not debunk the evidence.

You cannot refute Professor Mgbeke's evidence, so you attack her.

The person who brought this matter to the public and even went on a fruitless international media tour is now saying she is tired of the public court because they are defeating her in the public court. That is cowardice.

Neither you nor Natasha can shift the arena to avoid scrutiny.

CreativeOrbit:
Your self-righteous tantrum is laughable. You throw around "fallacy" and "gaslighting" like buzzwords hoping they’ll stick, but all you’ve proven is that you can’t handle pushback. You didn’t present evidence—you paraded biased drivel wrapped in self-delusion and expected it to pass unchallenged. And no, questioning the credibility of your so-called “Professor Mgbeke” isn’t ad hominem when her entire narrative is built on conjecture and shaky credentials. If you put a clown in a lab coat, it’s still a clown.

You’re desperate to keep this circus in the "public court" because that’s where gossip thrives and facts die. When people start asking for real proof, you panic and scream “cowardice.” But the truth is, your sideshow only survives in echo chambers.

Nobody’s avoiding scrutiny—we’re demanding real scrutiny, not the kangaroo court of your imagination. You don’t want facts, you want drama. And when the spotlight shifts to expose your weak foundations, suddenly everyone else is “shifting arenas”? Pathetic.

emkz:
Until Natasha supplies evidence, you are disturbing Nairaland with your puerility.

CreativeOrbit:
Keep my name out of your ignorant mouth unless you're ready to match facts with intellect. Your attempt to sound superior reeks of desperation and irrelevance.

I don't need Natasha's 'evidence' to expose your shallow thinking—your arrogance already does that.

If you’re so rattled by what I post, scroll past or stay silent. Don’t mistake your noise for logic—this is Nairaland, not your echo chamber.