₦airaland Forum

helinues:
India and Israel, they always trespass because they are regarded as top countries which can't be questioned.

India started the oppression in Kashmir

Botragelad:
Knew it. Like I’ve said before, you can’t trust Islamists to keep their word. Same story with Hamas on October 7th.

This happens hours after Trump ran his mouth on X. He needs to chill and stop trying to score points off this mess. It was always coming, India’s been hitting terror camps and Pakistan army bases in retaliation, and Pakistan was never just gonna sit there without a show of force.

Now watch, whenever India hits back, the usual hypocrites will flood social media crying ‘war crimes!’ But where were they when Pakistan terrorists were butchering Hindus just for being Hindu?

helinues:
India and Israel, they always trespass because they are regarded as top countries which can't be questioned.

India started the oppression in Kashmir

ElevationD:
Where is the cultural skirmish? Where is the religious skirmish? Where is the twist?

Feel free to educate us please.

Tradepunter2:
China needs to stop arming Pakistan.... They are fueling this conflict and at same time pretending they have no concern

Botragelad:
Haha. You are on my thread. Quit crying if you can't handle the heat.

Haha.‘Occupied’ Kashmir? Again, that's a funny word for a region that signed the instrument of accession (1947), legally joining India and has elected state governments (unlike Pakistan’s Gilgit-Baltistan, run by Islamabad’s army brass). Are you aware that Pakistan literally invaded days after independence.

Ever heard of terrorist lockdowns? When Pakistani proxies like LeT/Jaish flood Kashmir with guns, even schools get shut. India’s supposed to host parties for them?

Sorry, where was the outrage when:
Pakistan ethnic cleansed millions, talking about 3 million of Hindus/Bengalis in 1971?
How did you even manage to Ignore Pakistan’s 1947 invasion, 1965 war, Kargil betrayal?🤷🏼

Islamists can't even take half of what they dish out. Cleansed Hindus, Christians, Jews,etc, but you dare not defend yourself!🤦🏼

Amayanabo01:
make nobody quote you again or the topic is more than your IQ capacity?

helinues:
India and Israel, they always trespass because they are regarded as top countries which can't be questioned.

India started the oppression in Kashmir

Luckysbab:
Educate you? Nope.

Stick with your dogma.

helinues:
India and Israel, they always trespass because they are regarded as top countries which can't be questioned.

India started the oppression in Kashmir

AngelicBeing:
What's your own in this matter

You have started again with your jugunu questions

helinues:
India and Israel, they always trespass because they are regarded as top countries which can't be questioned.

India started the oppression in Kashmir

Botragelad:
Knew it. Like I’ve said before, you can’t trust Islamists to keep their word. Same story with Hamas on October 7th.

This happens hours after Trump ran his mouth on X. He needs to chill and stop trying to score points off this mess. It was always coming, India’s been hitting terror camps and Pakistan army bases in retaliation, and Pakistan was never just gonna sit there without a show of force.

Now watch, whenever India hits back, the usual hypocrites will flood social media crying ‘war crimes!’ But where were they when Pakistan terrorists were butchering Hindus just for being Hindu?

Originalsly:
Does Kashmir belong to India or Pakistan? Does India or Pakistan control Kashmir? ...or is it Kashmir is divided with India in control of one part and Pakistan the other? How can you be explaining and not include these crucial points? A bias person can never set the record straight ... the information he puts out would be to support his view and what is not in support he will suppress. It's like a Tinubu or Obi hater .... he will see and say only negative things... will never be fair or objective.
Kashmir is the contested area claimed by both India and Pakistan. Part is controlled by India and the other part by Pakistan ...but both lay claim to the entire area so there has been a stalemate going on for decades with several flare ups. Like North and South Korea border with a heavy military presence.... the same scenario is at the dividing lines in Kashmir. There had always been flare ups but this one was different. A terrorist group from the Pakistan side attacked a tourist site on the Indian side of Kashmir killing dozens. India's bead of state condemned the attack and blamed it on Pakistan ... claiming the terrorists were sponsored by Pakistan and vowed to retaliate.
Pause. Let's say terrorists from Chad came across the border (we know they do) yesterday and launched an attack in Borno killing dozens. As President ... would you send the NAF to do some bombings in Chad?
Continuing. India's head of state responded by launching attacks in Pakistan. Right there is a violation and can be considered an act of war ..an attack on the country. To this ...Pakistan retaliated by launching a counter attack on India and things escalated.

Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.... respond to the message and not about the messenger who you know nothing about.

Chimarto:
Guy, you have sense but you don't have wisdom. Look at your comment, very bias .

Great0ne1:
Stop responding to that idiot . He expects liberty to kill people from Indian govt, just as the very irresponsible Nigerian govt allow fulani terrorists to continue on there killing spree. When hand touch them, like they did in edo state they start screaming they are hunters.

helinues:
India and Israel, they always trespass because they are regarded as top countries which can't be questioned.

India started the oppression in Kashmir

Wickedlywicked:
Just like you stated above, a biased person will always be biased. I’m not supporting either side but I can remember that India made it clear following the retaliatory attacks that THEY DIDN’T AIM TO CONFRONT PAKISTAN. They made it clear that their attacks were aimed at the terrorists residing there. Do you think the Nigerian army would start directly attacking the Cameroonian military should the later attack boko haram terrorists residing in the sambisa forest?
If truly it wasn’t state-sponsored, highest they (Pakistan) would have done in response would have been to warn India to respect its territorial integrity next time or to prove to the world that THE SITES INDIA STRUCK DIDN’T BELONG TO THE TERRORISTS THEY (INDIANS) WERE LOOKING FOR. You reacting harshly to an attack targeting terrorists shows you know something we don’t know. Pakistan could have as well LIED that the Indian air strikes did hit some of its military men and that would have been a valid point and excuse to attack India back.

ElevationD:
But when you responded to the other guy, I thought that you had something to tell us on the events between the two nations. Should this forum not be for sharing knowledge?

Abi you just dey pose? You no know anything?

lexy2014:
which question are you referring to?

Botragelad:
Knew it. Like I’ve said before, you can’t trust Islamists to keep their word. Same story with Hamas on October 7th.

This happens hours after Trump ran his mouth on X. He needs to chill and stop trying to score points off this mess. It was always coming, India’s been hitting terror camps and Pakistan army bases in retaliation, and Pakistan was never just gonna sit there without a show of force.

Now watch, whenever India hits back, the usual hypocrites will flood social media crying ‘war crimes!’ But where were they when Pakistan terrorists were butchering Hindus just for being Hindu?

Originalsly:
Let me put it another way. If Iran fired missiles into Israel ...Tel Aviv ... hit a few sites and made it clear following the attack that THEY DIDN'T AIM TO CONFRONT ISRAEL but targeted extremists that were responsible for some explosions that killed Iranian civilians. What do you think will be Israel 's response? What do you think should be their response?

Once a country violates another country's airspace and launches an attack in that country .... regardless of explanation... it can be legitimately be seen as an act of war and that country is free to respond as seen fit ... everything is on the table. Since this is the acceptable standard ... then whatever India says doesn't matter ... the action counts.

GreenCovering:
There is always an open wound. Essentially a Hindu ruler, Maharaja Hari Singh, gifted a land of over 70% muslim population to Hindu British India, mostly HIndus, in October 26/27, 1947. Meanwhile, when a similar thing happened earlier when a muslim ruler of an 80% hindu population of Junagadh acceded to Pakistan, British India brought in the military and occupied the region. Eventually a plebiscite was held that returned Junagadh to India. The case of Kashmir remained unresolved because India results to military power whenever the people of Kashmir ask for self determination or when backed by Pakistan to do so.

NOETHNICITY:
That dude quoting upadan claiming to know the genesis of the matter is a Mossad agent

Ask him if India will accept a referendum in the Kashmir region to determine which country they chose to join, supervised by international bodies like the United Nations