₦airaland Forum

MrPresident1:
Whom are you agreeing with? The stories were whitewashed and the original people in them were blacklisted.

Donnie, do you see the wordplay? The stories were white-washed
The original people in them were black-listed

When the Europeans came back with the story of Jesus the Ethiopians did not accept it as they have already accepted the same story from the Roman empire, hence the reason Ethiopia was the only African country that was not colonised.

MrPresident1:
This doesn't look right. They must have heard the gospel in Ethiopia before the Romans took their version there because the Bible says a high ranking eunuch who was Ethiopia's minister of finance, chancellor of the exchequer, secretary of finance, and CBN governor, came from Ethiopia to Jerusalem to worship.

The Ethiopian eunuch who was a high ranking official would have obeyed the command to go into the world and multiply, he would have taken a better message of the gospel to Ethiopia and shared with the nobles and royalty of Ethiopia.

Acts 8:26-28
King James Version
26 And the angel of the Lord spake unto Philip, saying, Arise, and go toward the south unto the way that goeth down from Jerusalem unto Gaza, which is desert.
27 And he arose and went: and, behold, a man of Ethiopia, an eunuch of great authority under Candace queen of the Ethiopians, who had the charge of all her treasure, and had come to Jerusalem for to worship,
28 Was returning, and sitting in his chariot read Esaias the prophet.

In addition, if it was Rome who took Jesus to Ethiopia, then it is a false fake Jesus they took to Ethiopia. The reason is simple, everything from Rome is a lie, Rome will practise and prosper in its falsehoods until the time allocated for it is over.

Daniel 8:12
King James Version
And an host was given him against the daily sacrifice by reason of transgression, and it cast down the truth to the ground; and it practised, and prospered.

Your story has no basis.

MindHacker9009:
When the Europeans came back with the story of Jesus the Ethiopians did not accept it as they have already accepted the same story from the Roman empire, hence the reason Ethiopia was the only African country that was not colonised.

MrPresident1:
Your story has no basis.

The Jesus story was invented by the Roman empire, that's the reason Jesus is a white European.

Even what the Jews know about Jesus is what the Roman empire told them.

The Bible says that you are lying

Is it not true that Rome cast the truth to the ground in 70AD, destroying the temple and dispersing the Jews?

Is it not true that Rome magnified itself against the prince of the host, Jesus Christ?

Did the Bible not say that Rome will practice and prosper until its time is up?

Is it not true that Rome inverted everything and lied about everything? What are you about?

Who is the prince of the host whom Rome magnified itself against?

There is no basis for what you are saying

MindHacker9009:
The Jesus story was invented by the Roman empire, that's the reason Jesus is a white European.

Even what the Jews know about Jesus is what the Roman empire told them.

The Bible says you are the one lying.

Where is Jesus in the Torah. There is only one God in the Torah and no mention of Him having a son with Mary another man's wife. His commandments are that we are to worship him only.

So why did Jesus make his appearance after the Roman empire occupied Israel but as the Jews will not worship the idol image the Roman empire placed in the second Temple, which led to the Jewish revolt and the Roman empire destroying the Second Temple in 70 CE and then inventing a back dated Jesus that predicted the destruction of the second Temple?

MrPresident1:
The Bible says that you are lying

Is it not true that Rome cast the truth to the ground in 70AD, destroying the temple and dispersing the Jews?

Is it not true that Rome magnified itself against the prince of the host, Jesus Christ?

Did the Bible not say that Rome will practice and prosper until its time is up?

Is it not true that Rome inverted everything and lied about everything? What are you about?

Who is the prince of the host whom Rome magnified itself against?

There is no basis for what you are saying

MrPresident1:
What is the connotation for Black in Latin or Aramaic?

There is no glory in being called Black.

Where does this glory come from? What is the glory in being called white?
Go and find out... the name negro began in Spain and it was used to refer to the most noble and respected class of Jews (our people) who ruled Spain and Portugal along with the Moors for 700 years. MOOR is another name used to refer to the dark skinned North Africans who also ruled parts of Europe, including Spain and Portugal, yet due to certain factors in history, the name was and still is respected.
You probably don't know that the Character or reputation of a person or people bearing a name often gives the name its meaning.
Today, no one wants to bear the name Judas, even though the name means LORD, praise, etc.

Our people have fallen from grace and their position at the right hand of their God and rulership over the kingdoms of this world to become servants and slaves. Do you recall that there was a time "jew" was an insult? Like they'll say, "see this jew guy...". But today, it's a respected name because of media propaganda and global politics by the powers that be.

MrPresident1:
Whom are you agreeing with? The stories were whitewashed and the original people in them were blacklisted.

The individual I quoted understands. You can continue with your rhymes.

MindHacker9009:
It was a missionary called Frumentius from the Roman Empire that took the story of Jesus to Ethiopia in the 4th century CE. So the Ethiopians themselves did not see Jesus to know what he looked like.

You must be kidding, He was born among them. His story was known in the Nile valley and the region of today's Ethiopia. Even the earliest Romans were black North Africans, but you do not know. He was not a global Lord, as he was repackaged to be in Christianity.
The idea of the Christ is more ancient than Egypt, Greece, and even Roman civilizations. He was called the SUN of Righteousness, whom our ancestors had known thousands of years before any of the above-named civilizations began.

donnie:
The Romans of today are not the original writers. Before the Renaissance of 1400s, all images and representations of the Christ, the saints, the church etc were of black people. Ethiopian bible which is the oldest still has those black depictions of Christ the apostles and the prophets. It is not an argument but a statement of fact. I will simply state the fact anytime any day

However, I agree we should leave their Jesus and religion for them, even though they all originated from our land. We should rather be mindful our ourselves and of our Fathers (ancestors).

Granted. Jesus is "made in Rome"
Whether Romans where black or white is not really my concern. It is still the same old worship of mother(Lucifer ) and her son.
Why should I partake in it.

donnie:
You must be kidding, He was born among them. His story was known in the Nile valley and the region of today's Ethiopia. Even the earliest Romans were black North Africans, but you do not know. He was not a global Lord, as he was repackaged to be in Christianity.
The idea of the Christ is more ancient than Egypt, Greece, and even Roman civilizations. He was called the SUN of Righteousness, whom our ancestors had known thousands of years before any of the above-named civilizations began.

What the Ethiopians know about Jesus is what the Roman empire told them. But the Egyptians had their own messiah before the Romans invented their own Jesus christ. Here is an artifact from the Egyptians.

Jesus is the Torah. Jesus is the Law of Moses

MindHacker9009:
The Bible says you are the one lying.

Where is Jesus in the Torah. There is only one God in the Torah and no mention of Him having a son with Mary another man's wife. His commandments are that we are to worship him only.

So why did Jesus make his appearance after the Roman empire occupied Israel but as the Jews will not worship the idol image the Roman empire placed in the second Temple, which led to the Jewish revolt and the Roman empire destroying the Second Temple in 70 CE and then inventing a back dated Jesus that predicted the destruction of the second Temple?

The term Negro is of Latin origin and it was adopted into spanish. When the Moors ruled the world, they were not black mentally or spiritually.

Being dark skinned is not the same as being black. And being white skinned is not the same as being white. White or Black is a spiritual state, white is glory, black is servitude

donnie:
Where does this glory come from? What is the glory in being called white?
Go and find out... the name negro began in Spain and it was used to refer to the most noble and respected class of Jews (our people) who ruled Spain and Portugal along with the Moors for 700 years. MOOR is another name used to refer to the dark skinned North Africans who also ruled parts of Europe, including Spain and Portugal, yet due to certain factors in history, the name was and still is respected.
You probably don't know that the Character or reputation of a person or people bearing a name often gives the name its meaning.
Today, no one wants to bear the name Judas, even though the name means LORD, praise, etc.

Our people have fallen from grace and their position at the right hand of their God and rulership over the kingdoms of this world to become servants and slaves. Do you recall that there was a time "jew" was an insult? Like they'll say, "see this jew guy...". But today, it's a respected name because of media propaganda and global politics by the powers that be.

There is an agenda to create confusion on this thread, this is why they are lying and saying all kinds of nonsense. Stay with me

Black and white is a dichotomy created by Rome, Latin is the language of Rome, in Latin, anything called black is of a low spiritual state and anything called white is of a high spiritual state

Anything Rome labels black is useless.

It was never so simplistic as to be a matter of skin colour. Empirical evidence shows you that the nation of Whites are the prosperous developed nations. The nations of Blacks are the poorest most underdeveloped nations.

MrPresident1:
The term Negro is of Latin origin and it was adopted into spanish. When the Moors ruled the world, they were not black mentally or spiritually.

Being dark skinned is not the same as being black. And being white skinned is not the same as being white. White or Black is a spiritual state, white is glory, black is servitude

Keep fighting with that modern fake language they call English

MrPresident1:
The term Negro is of Latin origin and it was adopted into spanish. When the Moors ruled the world, they were not black mentally or spiritually.

Being dark skinned is not the same as being black. And being white skinned is not the same as being white. White or Black is a spiritual state, white is glory, black is servitude

Who told you that? Your ancestors or the white man? Even in bible days, you could not enter the temple with pale skin. There is a difference between the color black and darkness (spiritual). Even spiritual darkness may be positive or negative, depending on the context. This is too high for a Eurocentric mind to grasp. Before day comes night. The Earth is often referred to as black. The Earth is where life springs up from. Put a seed in the earth, and it dies and life springs forth. The blacker the earth, the more fertile. The earth is like a woman's womb, which is a dark place. From her womb proceeds life.

MrPresident1:
There is an agenda to create confusion on this thread, this is why they are lying and saying all kinds of nonsense. Stay with me

Black and white is a dichotomy created by Rome, Latin is the language of Rome, in Latin, anything called black is of a low spiritual state and anything called white is of a high spiritual state

Anything Rome labels black is useless.

It was never so simplistic as to be a matter of skin colour. Empirical evidence shows you that the nation of Whites are the prosperous developed nations. The nations of Blacks are the poorest most underdeveloped nations.

You are still tied to Latin, Rome, and English because you are still bound by Babylon. What nonsense empirical evidence? Would you have said so if we lived in a time when black Africans ruled southern Europe from 700 to 1492 AD? Would you have said so if you lived in the time when dark skinned Africans colonized and civilized Egypt? Or when they built the Akkadian, Roman, and Greek civilizations?

MrPresident1:
There is an agenda to create confusion on this thread, this is why they are lying and saying all kinds of nonsense. Stay with me

I see a lot of nonsense you put out here on NL, I only decided to reply to you this time. We learn to unlearn... no need holding onto stuff that has been proven to be untrue.

MindHacker9009:
What the Ethiopians know about Jesus is what the Roman empire told them. But the Egyptians had their own messiah before the Romans invented their own Jesus christ. Here is an artifact from the Egyptians.

You're correct, but the civilization known today as Egypt was built by black people from our land. Our people took civilization there. The name for the saviour was stolen from my people. The so-called Aramaic name Isho, which was later translated as Yahusha or Yeshua in Hebrew and Jesus in Latin, is from my hometown. The name Isho is the name we call God in my dialect.

The ancient name for Egypt is Kemet. My tribe is called Nkem. They say Kemet means black land, but it's a lie. Like many other ancient civilizations, they either do not know the meaning or they hide the meaning. Nkem means circumcision. Kemet is Nkem land- the land of circumcision

sonmvayina:
Granted. Jesus is "made in Rome"
Whether Romans where black or white is not really my concern. It is still the same old worship of mother(Lucifer ) and her son.
Why should I partake in it.

Na you sabi...Do you know who biblical Lucifer is? Are you connected to your ancestors? So, who or what do you worship?

Its alright. Embrace your blackness with pride, wear it like a garland around your neck

Blackman

donnie:
Who told you that? Your ancestors or the white man? Even in bible days, you could not enter the temple with pale skin. There is a difference between the color black and darkness (spiritual). Even spiritual darkness may be positive or negative, depending on the context. This is too high for a Eurocentric mind to grasp. Before day comes night. The Earth is often referred to as black. The Earth is where life springs up from. Put a seed in the earth, and it dies and life springs forth. The blacker the earth, the more fertile. The earth is like a woman's womb, which is a dark place. From her womb proceeds life.

Wear blackness like a garland around your neck.

Such a beautiful garland blackman. Solid Blackman. Solid black

donnie:
You are still tied to Latin, Rome, and English because you are still bound by Babylon. What nonsense empirical evidence? Would you have said so if we lived in a time when black Africans ruled southern Europe from 700 to 1492 AD? Would you have said so if you lived in the time when dark skinned Africans colonized and civilized Egypt? Or when they built the Akkadian, Roman, and Greek civilizations?

I see a lot of nonsense you put out here on NL, I only decided to reply to you this time. We learn to unlearn... no need holding onto stuff that has been proven to be untrue.

MrPresident1:
Its alright. Embrace your blackness with pride, wear it like a garland around your neck

Blackman

Song of Solomon 1:5

We will exult and rejoice in you; we will extol your love more than wine; rightly do they love you. 5 I am black and beautiful, O daughters of Jerusalem, like the tents of Kedar, like the curtains of Solomon.

donnie:
Na you sabi...Do you know who biblical Lucifer is? Are you connected to your ancestors? So, who or what do you worship?

Lucifer is the "So called" queen of heaven
And Mary is the queen of heaven. So by inference..Mary is Lucifer.

The biblical Lucifer is Inanna.

I don't worship anything. I only follow the laws of existence....

Not yet, I will soon do that, that is the next thing for me

Yes! You are a proud black man.

See your verse 6

Song of Solomon 1:4-6
King James Version
6 Look not upon me, because I am black, because the sun hath looked upon me: my mother's children were angry with me; they made me the keeper of the vineyards; but mine own vineyard have I not kept.

donnie:
Song of Solomon 1:5

We will exult and rejoice in you; we will extol your love more than wine; rightly do they love you. 5 I am black and beautiful, O daughters of Jerusalem, like the tents of Kedar, like the curtains of Solomon.

[quote author=donnie post=135481011][/quote]Why don't you unfollow me

We have nothing in common, you don't believe in what I teach, I find yours ridiculous, you don't like me, I don't like you , we don't like the same things, there is apparently no basis for you following me

I unfollowed you a long time ago

There is a difference between edification and spiritual pollution. No one should confuse one for the other.

Lol! Both of you are cut from the same cloth. Lol.

This thread is for the most spiritually astute.

It is confusion for the unlearned and unlettered