₦airaland Forum

frankson1:
This is what you "G&H", according to Natasha, had always wanted. "SUE HER". Since she has been dodging from releasing every evidences, maybe she'd show them to the Judge.

Fg is not akpabio.

Segun198019:
Rest, supportters of oppression. It will reach you one day. Keep having erection on supporting evils. You think everybody is a coward.

Shouldn't y'all be happy that your queen mother now have the opportunity to show the judge all the evidences or isn't what you people had always wanted...I've never seen anyone who wailed continuously

Wahala don dey collect the fourth leg for dis matter.

Make we sit and enjoy the ride.

Newsgeek24:
https://news360ng.com/fg-files-criminal-charges-against-suspended-senator-natasha-akpoti-uduaghan-give-reasons/

iykofias:
FG always attending to stuffs that doesn’t matter

I guess it is more than this. They likely have information to nail her. Remember, Dr. Sandra said she forwarded some incriminating information to the IG based on what Natasha told her particularly about destabilising the government. And Sandra Duru is listed as one of the witnesses

Isn't she wealthy. She should hire "better" private security and stop making baseless claims.

cjudy:
FG wow. The woman really dealt with them

Really?
This is the beginning of the end..

One week, one trouble. Wilson Tagbo dey learn work where this woman dey.

It's funny how you people think. Apkabio is no 3 man in Nigeria and any allegations against him is against the seat he occupies, so the FG is right to represent her sanate president. Let Natasha bring her evidence to court.

phemmyjohnson:
So wait how did FG suddenly start representing apkabio in court 😂.. this country will never cease to amaze me . Knowing you can never win FG in FG owned court . You better give up on this country ! You ! I mean you !

Naturalgbola:
You can't win a war against witches 🧙‍♀️. Women's are at the top of the powers that control the secret places of this world

If they're secret places how did you know when are at the top? 🧐

Ishilove:
One week, one trouble. Wilson Tagbo dey learn work where this woman dey.

One week, one trouble ke? Abeg the FG shouldn't let this slide oh. Let people like her know they just can't make frivolous accusations up, and get away with it.

I on my occasions said that, it is possible that she may not return till she finishes her term.

Is she not a Nigerian citizen?

emkz:
Natashism

Natashism: is an infection whose major symptom is the artistry of prostituting from one controversy to another without following any to the end or supplying evidence on claims made.

Supply evidence in the court of public opinion where trial was initiated by them. They didn't.

File a case in court and present evidence. No.

Okay, file evidence in senate petition. They filed affidavit.

What kind of law are they teaching?

The virus has caused a pandemic of endless drama.

Say NO to possession of Natashism.

All these could not have happened if she had simply moved to her seat.

But without authorization, she went to Interparliamentary Union and claimed to have registered as an independent with the insignia "Nigeria" boldly in front of her. For that alone, she must he punished. Her issue with Akpabio is a separate matter.

If she registered as an independent, she had no right to sit behind the "Nigeria" insignia without authorization. That way, she made herself a representative of the country, whereas she went there to peddle her issue with Akpabio.

That is treason.

Exactly my brother...being worked up over frivolities meanwhile the main problems lingers

ukukaegbu:
This shows that the FG doesn't have work.

She's correct, and Akpabio is not Nigeria, neither is any of them with erect pen is.

Very good.. let her bring evidences of her allegations

Babatunjo:
One thing is sure. She's not coming back to the senate.
Even if it takes INEC rigging, they won't allow her back.

She doesn't know you fight to live another day.

These men she's fighting are mini gods, and they have patriachial mindset.... Woman must not fight and defeat them

Your statement unintentionally reveals the very rot Natasha is challenging—where rigging is normalized, injustice is expected, and patriarchy is defended as strategy. If she is being blocked not through due process, but through manipulation and bias, then her fight is not just valid—it is necessary.

Saying “you fight to live another day” implies silence in the face of oppression. That’s not wisdom, it’s surrender. The fact that you call these men “mini gods” only highlights the dangerous culture of power worship and gender suppression.

A society that punishes women for daring to stand up is not stable—it is stagnant. And history has shown time and again: those who resist, even when the odds are against them, are the ones who truly shape the future.

So what concern federal government in this matter

ezra1990:
Is she not a Nigerian citizen?

There are limitations to the rights of a citizen.
What she did amounted to a criminal breach. To summarize, I asked Grok to synthesize the punishment for what she did in selected countries. Please do the same yourself.

Unauthorized attendance at an Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU) meeting could lead to the following punishments in the listed countries, based on parliamentary and criminal laws:

China: Imprisonment (up to 7 years for impersonation/forgery), fines, Party expulsion.
Indonesia: Up to 6 years in prison (impersonation), parliamentary suspension, fines.
United States: Up to 1 year (contempt of Congress) or 3 years (impersonation), fines.
Great Britain: Contempt of Parliament (reprimand, rare imprisonment), up to 7 years (fraud).
Saudi Arabia: Imprisonment, fines, corporal punishment, ban from public office.
Japan: Up to 3 years (impersonation), parliamentary censure, fines.
Canada: Contempt (reprimand, rare imprisonment), up to 5 years (impersonation).
Germany: Up to 1 year (impersonation), parliamentary sanctions, fines.
Qatar: Up to 3 years (impersonation/fraud), fines, deportation (non-citizens).
Penalties vary by context; MPs face parliamentary discipline, while non-MPs face criminal charges. Specific cases may alter outcomes.

Natasha can be further punished for contempt of parliament and national security breach. She admitted herself that she was suspended and was there illegally.

She went about things the wrong way. We did everything to help, but she allowed her emotions and quest for vengeance ruin her case.

For your information, even Akpabio himself cannot represent Nigeria at that level without authorization from Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Any speech he'd present must be vetted because it would be seen as Nigeria's position. Even the president's speech would be vetted by Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

Natasha ruined things up. But she is not above the law.

Bluezy13:
What if this woman did not react to the issue of change of seat in the Chambers, all these wouldn't have happened and who knows, she might have climbed a step higher in her political endeavors.

What if?

It will still happen, she and her group have a mission. The issue of the seat was just a chance to strike.

emkz:
Natashism

Natashism: is an infection whose major symptom is the artistry of prostituting from one controversy to another without following any to the end or supplying evidence on claims made.

Supply evidence in the court of public opinion where trial was initiated by them. They didn't.

File a case in court and present evidence. No.

Okay, file evidence in senate petition. They filed affidavit.

What kind of law are they teaching?

The virus has caused a pandemic of endless drama.

Say NO to possession of Natashism.

All these could not have happened if she had simply moved to her seat.

But without authorization, she went to Interparliamentary Union and claimed to have registered as an independent with the insignia "Nigeria" boldly in front of her. For that alone, she must he punished. Her issue with Akpabio is a separate matter.

If she registered as an independent, she had no right to sit behind the "Nigeria" insignia without authorization. That way, she made herself a representative of the country, whereas she went there to peddle her issue with Akpabio.

That is treason.

Your rant is loud, but empty of legal substance. Let's dissect your emotional outburst with some logic.

You label “Natasha” as an “infection,” as though women standing up to entrenched power structures is a disease. That metaphor alone exposes your misogynistic bias masquerading as political critique. You say she moves from controversy to controversy — yet you fail to recognize that the controversies exist because corruption and impunity are systemic, not because she invented them.

Let’s address your key claims:

"She didn’t supply evidence in court of public opinion."
The court of public opinion isn’t governed by legal standards. It's governed by perception and open discourse. If you disagree, challenge her claims with facts, not slurs. She made her position clear — refute it on substance, not rhetoric.

"She didn’t file a court case."
That’s because she doesn’t have to — not all political truths require a courtroom to be validated. Whistleblowers expose rot not by dragging every scandal to court, but by speaking out. If her words are false, sue her for defamation. Until then, your complaint is just noise.

"Filed affidavit instead of evidence."
An affidavit is a legal document, recognized by the court. If you have counter-evidence, file your own. Don't whine about process when you're not participating in it.

"She sat behind the Nigeria insignia."
That is protocol-level drama — not treason. If someone appearing under Nigeria's banner at a parliamentary event without 'authorization' qualifies as treason, then most Nigerian politicians should be in cuffs for how they’ve represented this country abroad — with lies, mismanagement, and theft. She didn’t sell state secrets, she gave a speech.

"She must be punished."
This obsession with punishment reeks of authoritarian thinking. You want to silence dissent, not debate it. That's not patriotism. It’s fear.

You ask what kind of law is being taught? Hopefully one that teaches that truth, not submission, is the foundation of justice — and that authority must be questioned, not blindly obeyed.

You call it a "pandemic of endless drama." No — it’s a reckoning. And it’s long overdue.

JetApartment

emkz:
There are limitations to the rights of a citizen.
What she did amounted to a criminal breach. To summarize, I asked Grok to synthesize the punishment for what she did in selected countries. Please do the same yourself.



Natasha can be further punished for contempt of parliament and national security breach. She admitted herself that she was suspended and was there illegally.

She went about things the wrong way. We did everything to help, but she allowed her emotions and quest for vengeance ruin her case.

For your information, even Akpabio himself cannot represent Nigeria at that level without authorization from Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Any speech he'd present must be vetted because it would be seen as Nigeria's position. Even the president's speech would be vetted by Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

Natasha ruined things up. But she is not above the law.

Your argument is a masterclass in selective outrage and political gaslighting. Let’s unpack it.

Yes—citizens’ rights have limits. But those limits do NOT include silencing dissent, punishing whistleblowers, or shielding corrupt institutions from exposure. What Natasha did was courageous. What your institutions are doing is cowardly.

Calling it a “criminal breach” or “national security issue” is laughable. That’s not law—it’s fear disguised as protocol. If your so-called democracy can’t handle criticism, then it’s not a democracy—it’s a dictatorship in a suit.

You say she was there "illegally"? She was there morally. And she stood where none of you dared to—with truth.

Let’s be honest: You didn’t help her. You tried to bury her. She didn’t act out of vengeance. She acted out of frustration after being ignored, attacked, and suspended for demanding accountability.

And don’t throw Akpabio or presidential speech vetting into this—it’s a weak comparison. She wasn’t there on a diplomatic mission. She wasn’t representing your corrupt government. She represented citizens failed by that government.

So no—Natasha didn’t ruin anything. She exposed everything.

And yes, she’s not above the law. But neither are those trying so hard to silence her.

JetApartment

CivicGuardian:
Your argument is a masterclass in selective outrage and political gaslighting. Let’s unpack it.

Yes—citizens’ rights have limits. But those limits do NOT include silencing dissent, punishing whistleblowers, or shielding corrupt institutions from exposure. What Natasha did was courageous. What your institutions are doing is cowardly.

Calling it a “criminal breach” or “national security issue” is laughable. That’s not law—it’s fear disguised as protocol. If your so-called democracy can’t handle criticism, then it’s not a democracy—it’s a dictatorship in a suit.

You say she was there "illegally"? She was there morally. And she stood where none of you dared to—with truth.

Let’s be honest: You didn’t help her. You tried to bury her. She didn’t act out of vengeance. She acted out of frustration after being ignored, attacked, and suspended for demanding accountability.

And don’t throw Akpabio or presidential speech vetting into this—it’s a weak comparison. She wasn’t there on a diplomatic mission. She wasn’t representing your corrupt government. She represented citizens failed by that government.

So no—Natasha didn’t ruin anything. She exposed everything.

And yes, she’s not above the law. But neither are those trying so hard to silence her.

JetApartment

I have taken down four of your comrades who may be the same individual desperately defending what is indefensible.

I sent your other colleagues to the block industry.

Until your heroine of lies, deceit and manipulations supply evidence, I cannot read your tainted submissions.

Happy blocking.

When the block period expires, I'd block you again.

phemmyjohnson:
So wait how did FG suddenly start representing apkabio in court 😂.. this country will never cease to amaze me . Knowing you can never win FG in FG owned court . You better give up on this country ! You ! I mean you !

Who controls the security Architect of the country.