₦airaland Forum

frisky2good:
Many people here don't know that the lawyer is trying to show the judge that the plaintiff is not credible. If he lied about his education, who knows what else he lied about? I am not saying the fraud did not happen but a judge relies on testimonies and evidences. That is why you see that symbol of justice is a blindfolded lady with a scale in one hand and a sword in the other hand. Lady justice does not witness the event. She only hears from those involved, weighs your version against your opponents version and delivers justice with the sword. Once a judge begins to see you as a liar, then you are not a credible witness.

Brilliant perspective and analogy. God bless you

brain54:
You are just speaking big grammar...

You too obviously didn't read!

Those claims and documents presented by the defense attorney are subject to investigation.

The defense attorney didn't serve those documents on the prosecution to enable them prepare a defense on those claims or documents. It was deliberate and that was why the judge insisted that such documents should be served on the the prosecution legal counsel.

We shall see how it ends

Morbeta11:
https://www.vanguardngr.com/2025/05/p-square-peter-okoye-lied-about-education-royalties-bank-access-lawyer-tells-court/

Useless entities. What does diverted money has to do with graduating from a university ? He only wants to divert the attention of the honourable judge away from the real issue. One wants to outsmart the others . Let him apologize and settle it in house .

My thoughts exactly.. leaving the substance to attack the shadow .. Jude,give him "him" Money. Period!!

LuQuLuQu:
Wetin consign education consign him money?

Abeg gee am him money joor

yeye family

Strategic...Going After Credibility...

LuQuLuQu:
Wetin consign education consign him money?

Abeg gee am him money joor

Don't mind the lawyer, it will only be mportant when it comes to Tinubu's certificate.

If the testimony is not relevant, the plaintiff's lawyer wouldn't have called for it.

Wallade:
Even if the lawyer is able to discredit the witness, the hard facts(documented evidence, bank account transactions) and confession of Jude are very significant to his conviction..

Jude already confessed.

The company he registered to divert the funds has been proven to be owned by Jude and his wife.

There are little or no evidence that Peter got any share from the funds diverted.

There is no document, hard copy, that shows that Peter consented to the divertion of funds.

Jude is criminally indicted here. In fact, his wife can also be indicted during questioning but she can only save herself by claiming to be unaware of the activities of the company as she held the shares in proxy for her husband. She would have to claim her husband runs the company fully and absolutely, without her input.

LuQuLuQu:
Wetin consign education consign him money?

Abeg gee am him money joor

The Law doesn't see things that way dear. The law see it as; if he can lie about his education, then his words shouldn't be trusted, he would also lie that Jude took his money. Law is often turned to stand by it's head by lawyers.

Lawyers will stand before the Judge of the universe (The Creator) and give account of all their lies and maniputions

Invest4growth:
How does being a graduate.relate to misappropriating funds? This will not make the judge to fault the evidences of peter. Putting it out here is to intimidate Peter. Is Bill Gates a graduate yet counting billions and employing thousands globally. What of Zuckerberg? So because Peter is not a graduate therefore judge must steal his money? What is the connection ?

He lied not having access to the account while he withdrew money from the account equally, again you don't lie under oath, it is a crime

MrPresident1:
Dem no get elders for their family ne? If you brother chop your money, no be on top him family him go spend am? If na outsider wey get power pass you nko, wetin you go do?

Dat him family no be your blood?

Even if you are angry, temper rage with commonsense and let your family leadership and community leaders settle for you and accept their final decision.

Change ur mentality! E dey better to involve police to calm things down, get justice in court and most importantly, to protect your peace than to exchange blows. .

MrPresident1:
Dem no get elders for their family ne? If you brother chop your money, no be on top him family him go spend am? If na outsider wey get power pass you nko, wetin you go do?

Dat him family no be your blood?

Even if you are angry, temper rage with commonsense and let your family leadership and community leaders settle for you and accept their final decision.

Mumu talk a thief is a thief

frisky2good:
If the testimony is not relevant, the plaintiff's lawyer wouldn't have called for it.

Assuming the defense attorney was able to prove that he was not a graduate of University of Abuja.

You need to prove that Peter was paid all his dues from funds diverted to the company of Jude and his wife.

You must prove that Peter consented to the divertion of the funds of PSquare into Jude and his wife's account.

You must prove that Jude and his wife establishment of that company and divertion of the funds of PSquare into the account of that company was not an illegality, fraudulent diversion of funds, theft and criminal.

It is more important for the defense attorney to prove those to the judge than the less significant matter of School he attended and graduated from. Moreover, during cross examination, he indicted that he didn't say he graduated from University of Abuja; that he only attended the university.

LuQuLuQu:
Wetin consign education consign him money?

Abeg gee am him money joor

They are trying to prove that if he can lie about that which can be verified, he may be lying about other things

To the semi-illiterate community of Nairaland, who always complain that 2 paragraphs article is too long to read, in court the first thing a lawyer will scrutinize anywhere in the world is your credibility .

Your post reminded me of that very first thing I was told in school when I made an obviously ignorant common sense statement, Law is NOT common sense and law is not 2+2=4. Whatever you make out it is up to you. It was both enlightening and liberating

Wallade:
Assuming the defense attorney was able to prove that he was not a graduate of University of Abuja.

You need to prove that Peter was paid all his dues from funds diverted to the company of Jude and his wife.

You must prove that Peter consented to the divertion of the funds of PSquare into Jude and his wife's account.

You must prove that Jude and his wife establishment of that company and divertion of the funds of PSquare into the account of that company was not an illegality, fraudulent diversion of funds, theft and criminal.

It is more important for the defense attorney to prove those to the judge than the less significant matter of School he attended and graduated from. Moreover, during cross examination, he indicted that he didn't say he graduated from University of Abuja; that he only attended the university.

If Diddy was a broke man, will your gold digger Cassie answer his hello?

She stayed for the money and went through whatever it was in exchange for the big girl life.
Besides, the freak offs you read about, so many people out there freak offs are worse than Diddy's own.

If you talk about Diddy being an abuser then I understand but even at that, Cassie should have taken him to court instead of collecting $20 million.

saphiere:
How many of you are following Diddy's trial? Men are totally beasts.

Shikena:
Your post reminded me of that very first thing I was told in school when I made an obviously ignorant common sense statement, Law is NOT common sense and law is not 2+2=4. Whatever you make out it is up to you. It was both enlightening and liberating

So, define law as you understand it.

Tell me the law, as defined by you, doesn't agree with my positions earlier.

Invest4growth:
How does being a graduate.relate to misappropriating funds? This will not make the judge to fault the evidences of peter. Putting it out here is to intimidate Peter. Is Bill Gates a graduate yet counting billions and employing thousands globally. What of Zuckerberg? So because Peter is not a graduate therefore judge must steal his money? What is the connection ?

If you read a little further you will see that Peter has no credible evidence to back up his claims rather Jude has all the evidence to back up his claims, read

I did not define law, if you are interested in that go ahead as there is a whole world of resources at your fingertips via your phone. I only gave you a valuable tip about legal process that may serve as compass in your quest

Wallade:
So, define law as you understand it.

Tell me the law, as defined by you, doesn't agree with my positions earlier.

Shikena:
I did not define law, if you are interested in that go ahead as there is a whole world of resources at your fingertips via your phone. I only gave you a valuable tip that may serve as compass in your quest

In other words, you don't understand law, since you can't define it, not even in your own understanding.

Here you are, trying to give advice and share compass on legal issues.

How ridiculous! You are like a blind man trying to lead others, both blind and informed.

Another common sense 2+2 conclusion
that is laughable in law .

Wallade:
In other words, you don't understand law, since you can't define it, not even in your own understanding.

Here you are, trying to give advice and share compass on legal issues.

How ridiculous!

billyG:
What consign education with Money been stolen those withdrawal shown are not enough are just few sharing when d going was good years back,let d lawyer show d court the 2021,2022,2023,2024 and 2025 signatories and remittances to Peter's account.

Peter said Jude is the sole signatory to the said company's account, but it turned out that Jude is category A signatory while Paul and Peter are category B signatories. So yeah in law Peter lied.

OgaRico:
If Diddy was a broke man, will your gold digger Cassie answer his hello?

She stayed for the money and went through whatever it was in exchange for the big girl life.
Besides, the freak offs you read about, so many people out there freak offs are worse than Diddy's own.

If you talk about Diddy being an abuser then I understand but even at that, Cassie should have taken him to court instead of collecting $20 million.

Diddy and all the men in the world are demons

Shikena:
Another common sense 2+2 conclusion
that is laughable in law .

So says laymen. I understand your predicament.

Enjoy your day.

Ciao.

saphiere:
Diddy and all the men in the world are demons

I wonder wetin men do you...



Must have been terrible!
🤔

Wallade:
Assuming the defense attorney was able to prove that he was not a graduate of University of Abuja.

You need to prove that Peter was paid all his dues from funds diverted to the company of Jude and his wife.

You must prove that Peter consented to the divertion of the funds of PSquare into Jude and his wife's account.

You must prove that Jude and his wife establishment of that company and divertion of the funds of PSquare into the account of that company was not an illegality, fraudulent diversion of funds, theft and criminal.

It is more important for the defense attorney to prove those to the judge than the less significant matter of School he attended and graduated from. Moreover, during cross examination, he indicted that he didn't say he graduated from University of Abuja; that he only attended the university.

According to the post Peter's claim that he was not aware of the company was false, he also claimed that Jude is the sole signatory but it turned out PETER is a category B signatory to the same account and has personally made withdrawals from the said account.
With those inconsistency a good lawyer will turn the case against Peter.
I studied business law as a borrowed course in school in 2002, so from experience I think Jude have a very good case.
Both men are guilty of the same offense.

Including your father first, brothers, extended male family members and even the brothers and father of your lesbian partners are all demons too.

saphiere:
Diddy and all the men in the world are demons

Two guys wey knack nonsense comot from her body later dump her go follow younger girls nai she wan die of bitterness.
Leave her be, she go later turn very dirty evening newspaper las las.

brain54:
I wonder wetin men do you...



Must have been terrible!
🤔

Is this matter about his education?
Or about jude cheating him ?
He is not the first artist to dop out of school .