₦airaland Forum

Ikaeniyan0:
I do not agree with Falana on this issue because Natasha accused the senate president of wanting to assassinate her. It's a very serious allegation against the senate president, an allegation that can put a dent on the government.

Ikaeniyan0:
I do not agree with Falana on this issue because Natasha accused the senate president of wanting to assassinate her. It's a very serious allegation against the senate president, an allegation that can put a dent on the government.

crossfm:
Hehehe.

FG is now Akpabio through and through

OLAADEGBU:
NigerianTribune

He argued that the attempt to criminalise criticism of public office holders is not only outdated but unlawful under Nigeria’s democratic framework.

Ikaeniyan0:
I do not agree with Falana on this issue because Natasha accused the senate president of wanting to assassinate her. It's a very serious allegation against the senate president, an allegation that can put a dent on the government.

enambobo:
Natasha don finally shut up. Since she's been ranting up and down. As FG sue am she lock up. That's how to discipline a spoilt child.

NwokoloOwa:
I think Falana is just been clever by half, and it so unfortunate.

He never mentioned the issue of plot of assassination presented by Natasha against the Senate President which is a very weighty one.

Falana just sidestepped this criminal allegation by Natasha and chose to yarn nonsense.

CreativeOrbit:
So Natasha speaking her truth bothers you that much? Good—it means she struck a nerve. You’re out here cheering like a coward because she went quiet, not realizing that silence isn’t surrender—it’s strategy.

Calling her a ‘spoilt child’ only exposes your weak, bitter ego. She spoke louder, clearer, and braver than you ever could, and all you could do was whine from the sidelines like a pressed spectator.

The fact that you think state intimidation equals discipline says everything about your twisted mindset. She’s not the one being disciplined—you’re just scared of what happens when women like her speak without fear.

Enjoy your little victory lap while it lasts. You’ll be choking on your words the moment she speaks again.

Misterone:
Oga sir! Only the government have the powers to charge someone for a criminal case. An individual cannot do that. What the individual does is to write a petition or make a complain to the law enforcement agency concern. The agency does it's investigation and takes the case to court.

muyico:
This man done lost his value! I respect him no more, he supposed to set aside

enambobo:
Just like your mentor Natasha, you lack emotional intelligence. Just look at how triggered you were by my brief comment. Ranting all about and using abusive words instead of having a constructive reply.
You and your mentor should go proof your case in court and stop causing a nuisance in the social space. Stop laying baseless accusations on people in the guise of freedom of speech. Now crawl back to your hole.

CreativeOrbit:
Your entire argument collapses under the weight of its own ignorance. If you’re so quick to dismiss someone’s value, it says far more about your lack of discernment than their worth.

Stepping aside? No—men of substance don’t retreat because the uninformed demand it. They stand firm while critics like you drown in shallow opinions. Go read for Ur family and parent at home, I gat no time to read Ur trash

You’ve forfeited respect, not him. Come back when you have an actual case instead of emotional tantrums.

Validated:
Go and sit down. Decree 4 was abrogated since 1985, you are here supporting those planning to re-enact same 40 years after. If anyone feels that his or her person was defamed, that person should file a LIBELOUS suit in court, not the FG overreaching themselves.
I am even worried that the AGF, who is a SAN does not know this.

CreativeOrbit:
Oga, before you come online to regurgitate half-digested legal basics, get your facts straight. Yes, only the government can formally charge someone with a criminal case, but you're conveniently skipping the first and most crucial step—the petition. And guess what? Natasha was the first to submit a formal petition to the IGP. She followed due process to the letter, which is more than can be said for the political hypocrites scrambling to cover tracks.

Your statement reads like someone trying to sound informed while missing the entire point. Individuals can't prosecute, yes—but they initiate the process. Natasha didn't just make noise—she took legal action. So don’t lecture us like you’ve uncovered some grand truth. What you’re doing is downplaying the lawful steps she already took, all because it doesn’t fit your biased narrative. Either you’re being willfully ignorant, or you’re just echoing noise with zero comprehension. Pick one.

Wallade:
Old age is negatively affecting Falana

Misterone:
Are you the police officer that Natasha submitted the petition to? Also, from the write up, it was clearly stated that the allegation of organ trafficking and murder attempt has been investigated and found to be false, hence the charge of criminal defamation. So how do you know that the police has not treated your so called petition!

CreativeOrbit:
No, I am not the police officer. And frankly, your attempt to sidestep the core issue with that irrelevant question only reveals your lack of comprehension—or worse, your deliberate attempt to mislead.

You claim the allegations were 'investigated and found to be false.' By whom? When? Where is the independent, publicly verifiable report? Or are you just parroting what you were told without a shred of critical thought? Because in any credible legal system, an investigation's conclusion isn't declared through hearsay or vague write-ups—it's documented and open to scrutiny.

And for your information, if a petition has been properly treated, there is a paper trail. There is acknowledgment, follow-up, and transparency. None of which has been evident in this case. So unless you're in possession of official documents to prove otherwise, you’re just speculating—loudly and ignorantly.

Next time you try to lecture anyone about the status of a petition, bring facts. Not assumptions, not biased conclusions—facts. Until then, save your empty declarations. They carry no weight.