₦airaland Forum

23jerryking:
You won't be asking if you actually read through it, or perhaps you simply couldn't comprehend. That's no fault of mine.

Lawag3:
Hamas houthies Iraq militias are all terrorists groups sponsored by Iran. So yeah Iran sponsors terrorism.

seunny4lif:
The West can’t do shit.
They can’t even handle the 2 most sanctioned countries in the world.
Fake powers.

Iranian supreme leader is the caused of all the dead Iranian scientists and top military.
You negotiable with your enemies with some leverage, USA only respects power. Look at NK, they said nuclear weapons were out of any negotiation with the USA. Its NK only security to stay alive
USA and Isreali knew that the day Iran came out with her nuclear weapons, is the day USA military power ends in that region because Saudi and UAE will get nukes straight from Pak government.
Saudi control Pak and Pak will give them and once that happens, USA is no longer needed.

basilico:
Iran was planning to have 20000 hypersonic missiles purposely for Israel. Which is just above 20000 square kilometers. A hypersonic missile fired for every square kilometer

A leader with such plans would not hesitate to use a nuclear bomb .
Iran should not get any atomic bomb neither should they be allowed any enrichment at all.

MERCHANDISER:
Iran leaders are too weak...No one can mess with NK not even China😀

They frequently throw missles over Japan and South Korea and non of them can retaliate

Lawag3:
Hamas houthies Iraq militias are all terrorists groups sponsored by Iran. So yeah Iran sponsors terrorism.

🇷🇺🇰🇵 First passenger train from Pyongyang to Moscow has departed — an 8-day journey, Russian Railways says.

North Korea and Russia are officially on track! pic.twitter.com/oqsuYnQxiN

— RT (@RT_com) June 17, 2025

Jovi10:
You made an assertion that only countries who her disciplined should be allowed to have nukes. So I was asking you a question, according to you, who are those countries you feel are disciplined enough to possess nukes ?

23jerryking:
And they want such a nation to have nuclear weapons all in the name of equity and fairness. Nah... We can never be equal on certain things.

But US intelligence assessments had reached a different conclusion – not only was Iran not actively pursuing a nuclear weapon, it was also up to three years away from being able to produce and deliver one to a target of its choosing, according to four people familiar with the assessment.

dermmy:
Iran does not need to fire more missiles at this point cause they've decimated some of Israel's air defence systems. If you think they are running out of missiles then you haven't seen anything yet. A country that has stockpiled missiles for decades to compensate for its ageing airforce you think such a country can run out of missiles easily?

Alamkiir:
You have finally pack your load and move to our thread. I hope this permanent

shoodboi2:
Israel says Iran was racing toward a nuclear weapon. US intel says it was years away.

shoodboi2:
No one ever said Iran needs nukes because of "equity and fairness". Stop twisting words around.

Iran needs nukes because it is in the cross hairs of the same nations that have repeatedly attacked and destroyed African, Asian, Latin American, and Middle Eastern countries that are not under their control.

Those nukes will then serve as deterrent to ensure that these Western hawks, along with their little baby, Israel, will not attack Iran. That's why Iran needs nukes, and not due to the flimsy excuse you listed up there.

LordAdam16:
PART 1

For those wondering why Iran reduced the number of missile salvos.
Here are the key points.

1. Iran has sufficiently degraded Israeli Air Defenses. Its missiles can target anywhere in Israel without needing to use a large salvo to overwhelm ADs.

2. Iran now knows it can handle the daily potshots Israel throws at it. Most importantly, despite repeated strikes on Natanz and Fordow, two public cornerstones of the Iranian nuclear program, they're not totally out of commission. Fordow, in particular, has brushed off every attack.

3. The likelihood of the US joining the war has verifiably exceeded 50%, so Iran must prepare for that eventuality. US planes and assets are on the move.

-Lord

shoodboi2:
No one ever said Iran needs nukes because of "equity and fairness". Stop twisting words around.

Iran needs nukes because it is in the cross hairs of the same nations that have repeatedly attacked and destroyed African, Asian, Latin American, and Middle Eastern countries that are not under their control.

Those nukes will then serve as deterrent to ensure that these Western hawks, along with their little baby, Israel, will not attack Iran. That's why Iran needs nukes, and not due to the flimsy excuse you listed up there.

LordAdam16:
PART 2

4. Taken together, it is of no use sending a hundred missile salvo at a time. Iran retains this capacity. Today's Israeli Ministry of Defense briefing acknowledges this. That capability will, thus, be more useful when the US inevitably joins the war. US forces will be dispersed in poorly defended locations and will be a target rich environment. Even older, inaccurate missiles will score hits.

5. This is the most important point. The prime jewel of the US conventional bunker buster ammunition pile is the GBU-57. It's last public penetration rating is 61m. But that was in 2011. A long time ago. Informed sources claim its penetration depth has increased substantially after more recent modifications.

But it is anyone's guess how it will perform when it lands on a Persian mountain. According to IAEA sources, some of Iranian nuclear facilities go as deep as 1000m. We will all be in the front row seat to separate facts from fiction. Some nuclear sites will be taken out. But it is unclear if all can be destroyed. That is an open question in the Pentagon.

-Lord

FoolishBoy419:
Was about to respond to WrriterNG's comment about the pastor when the post disappeared (I know it's you, dear antispambutt). Holiness may not be vulgar but he has no regard for human lives as a result of his religious beliefs on Israel. In my book, people that justify violence with religion are called terrorists.