₦airaland Forum

SINisSIN:
😁😁Ned Nwoko calling his lawyer right away😀 see format.

Well, if she is smart, she will get all the properties and still remarry if she wants. Smart lawyers will help her.

Oloki:
LoL!

Old men marrying young ladies are wising up. How can a woman not up to 50yrs not think of remarrying? Even 50+ still marry.

Anyway, the condition is for her to marry from the late husband's kinsman.... She should work towards that

ufotunang:
.the will is also against servicing........🙄

pocohantas:
Nothing surprising, Ishi. Majority of these trophy and polygamous wives have nothing to their names. I said it a few days ago in my d-post.

SINisSIN:
😁😁Ned Nwoko calling his lawyer right away😀 see format.

Well, if she is smart, she will get all the properties and still remarry if she wants. Smart lawyers will help her.

Mrfixitt:
Since she has kids for him then no need to get married again. Enjoy the wealth and take care of your children.

Houseofglam7:
Their business.
Their business
Their business
Their business

Chilipepper:
https://thewillnews.com/iwuanyanwus-will-released-family-settled/

SINisSIN:
😁😁Ned Nwoko calling his lawyer right away😀 see format.

Well, if she is smart, she will get all the properties and still remarry if she wants. Smart lawyers will help her.

Samantha125:
A kid, not kids... What if she wants to have more children?

Musty112:
Expecting a woman not to marry when she is arguably around her age of sexual peak is punishment. Besides without other further provision in the will, this condition can easily be overcome

OctavianAC:
Contribute and put in your input. What if this this kind of thing happens to you or someone around you tomorrow? What will you say?

nwokorozion:
Sexual pleasure can not be compared to all what you are thinking.

I hope you are not trying to tell us that Bianca hasn't had sex since the ojukwu left this world

Houseofglam7:
I’d say the same damn thing;
Their business
Their business
Their business
Their business

tunapawizzy:
Your assumption that a billionaire cannot be a weak man is a flawed and narrow view of mental and emotional strength. Strenth is not monolithic, it is weak to equate strength with only material or business suceess. You romaticize wealth a lot and this will have a negative effect on the quality of your mind. An example of that effect is you overlooking weakness in humans because someone is a billionaire. Everyone billionaires include, has vulnerabilities. Your belief that wealth inoculates someone from weakness is not only false but shallow.

On chronic bachelor point, it is very interesting that you assume life experience begins at the altar. Explains why your thinking never left the reception hall. Your fixation on my marital status to express your opinion says more about your limitations than my perspective. That I dont use marriage as a crutch for weak arguments does not mean I am a bachelor anyways

ledaman:
If you are truly married from your write up, you wouldn't have said he was a weak man.
Probably his tradition or culture forbids his wife to get married to someone else.
Or probably the new chap my inherit his properties these are assumptions.
The bone of contention is the weakness you highlighted.
It's a farse.

Harddiskng:
What is this one chatting. That man even in death is dictating his dos and don’ts. In death he is still a man, and hin full ground

I see it from the perspective that rightfully everything the man owns and his transferring to his wife should belong to the child they had.

If she remarries all these asset would disappear.

Hence his clause for her not to remarry or she loses them. Cuz in such an even the child would hardly ever be able to lay claim to these assets. Wise man if you ask me

Fcwilly:
Not possible jooooor, no one can enforce such a law.

tunapawizzy:
Marriage is not a blueprint for formation of opinion on issues — different persons different lenses, that is by the way.

But do you not see that the man’s attempt is ultimately futile? I’m not condemning his motivation — it’s natural for any man, myself included, to want his wealth preserved for his biological children. That’s completely valid. But let’s not pretend that preventing remarriage will prevent the transfer of assets. A woman doesn’t need to remarry to share resources with whoever she’s intimately involved with.

And if mistrust is the core of it, then there’s a bigger issue: Why stay with someone you don’t trust? Why leave anything for her in the first place if you believe she’s a threat to your legacy? That kind of mindset says more about the man than it does about her.”

If he believes she deserves something out of gratitude or respect, then he should will it to her accordingly — and let it rest. Even bad spouses are sometimes ‘paid off’ — a house, some money, and a goodbye, just for peace of mind. But to give with one hand and obsess over control with the other? That’s not strength. A man trying to dictate from the grave isn't strong — he’s unsettled. If his child’s future truly mattered, he’d structure his estate to protect the child directly, not hold the woman hostage with conditions. This isn’t foresight, it’s fear dressed in ego. Let’s not confuse paranoia with legacy planning.

The man is/was a billionaire, he most likely hhas/had sound lawyers, his lawyers know this is not the efficient way to protect legacy. This move is to control something else, not legacy. He basically wants to control how the woman will use her kitty even while he is gone and he is putting an incentive on that-the assets willed to the woman. It is as simple as that.

Blitzking:
She fit use profit buy house for her new man dey form widow dey go. Make the man dey chill for mansion as their ipirh spot.

PlasmaTV:
Dear child, exercise some level of wisdom when speaking on a public platform. I'm not your father's mate.

Cheers

Factcheck0001:
then she will forfeit d properties here n go n marry d new man