₦airaland Forum

Believeintruth:
Wait bros how did he change his direction? You people are too filled with hate. You wish emilokan is untainted as PO so that you can effectively market him, so that is why you just make up stories against him.

LegendHero:
Define illegality again for me.

The court already ruled and the woman has possession of the property. So why would Obi even go to another person property illegally to do useless video?

If na USA, he could get shooott for trespassing.

workchopNG:
Even so, does that justify the illegal demolition of someone's property?

It's always a joke when you're not involved, when it touches you, that's when you'll cry foul.

aswani:
There was nothing illegal about it, she has a court order for possession of her land.

The people that illegally built on the land and ignored various court requests to turn up in court to present their case should have removed their illegal property brick by brick if they didn't want the owner to demolish it prior to doing what else she wanted with it.

Hopefully, they will show their face one day and she will be able to send the bill from the caterpillar and other machinery used to demolish their property to them for reimbursement.

Goosethetruth:
It is now you know they need further investigation.....
Peter Obi has always been a crafty and manipulative liar.
Watching Peter Obi's lamentation video yesterday it was obvious that the court suit Number was boldly written on the outside fence in red paint. However Obi and his followers like you decided to turn a blind eye to this.

1 The bonafide landlady Mrs Olorunlogbon has a court judgement allowing her to take possession of her property.
2 Mrs Olorunlogbon has a certificate of occupancy for the property.
3. Peter Obi's faceless brother has refused to attend court proceedings.
4. Peter Obi's faceless brother was invited to the Police zone 2 Onikan office over this issue but he refused to appear.
5. According to Mrs Olorunlogbon,Peter Obi has turned himself into Very Dark Man number 2 and is available for hire to carryout media charades to seek social media validation. If this is true it is very shameful that a presidential candidate would turn himself into a gun for hire and lie shamelessly that the party to the court case was his brother. Does this brother not have a name?

SonofElElyonRet:
https://www.nairaland.com/8460921/peter-obis-brother-heads-court

Goosethetruth:
So why the media circus when they should have done this from the beginning?
Peter Obi is a cunning ,conniving manipulative liar.
He knows social media is not a court but was trying to play the victim card while waving his tribal IPOB flag as usual.

wirinet:
Which various requests did they ignore? Did dey even address the suit to anyone? You mean the complainant did not even bother to inquire the identity of the persons allegedly squatting on her land since 2013, and the courts decided to give a judgement against unknown persons. Also the clerks of the court and the process server served notices to unknown persons. Furthermore, the police decides to arrest unknown persons for trespass.
Tribalism kills sense of reasoning.

SonofElElyonRet:
Try to be objective. It's not in all cases that you must oppose your opponent. I don't believe in an Obi presidency but I won't let that becloud my sense of judgement.. read the story in the link

Goosethetruth:
Obi is not my opponent. My grouse is his pretentious squeaky clean personae when he is actually a repackaged devil.
Social media space is not a court of law. Bringing a case with a valid court proceeding is a charade and contempt of court.
Obi and his proxy brother have finally decided to do the proper and right thing I rest my case.

aswani:
Haven't you seen the information put out by the lady?

They refused to be around to identify themselves or go to the court so quite rightly, the subpoena can be served to either The occupant or Unknown.

Once the court notice is placed on the door or even a tree on the property, that is reasonable notice. If the squatters decide to ignore it, on their head be it.

By the way, you would have noticed there was no one around to be bulldozed alongside the property which suggests they knew when the bulldozers were coming (anytime after the final possession order court judgement) and sensibly packed out and ran off by then. So no one was arrested for trespass or whatever.

You are right in your last paragraph, tribalism kills people's sense of reasoning, no wonder Peter Obi immediately carried his camera man to the scene.

wirinet:
What do you mean by "they refused to be around to identify themselves"? You mean you can report a case of trespass to the police, file a case in court, obtain a judgement, and execute the judgement all without interacting with the accused. Its even more absurd when you consider that we are talking about a property, with security and other workers working or residing there. No evidence of letters addressed to anybody in the property. Just evidence of subsituted service to an anonymous person or entity.

wirinet:
What do you mean by "they refused to be around to identify themselves"? You mean you can report a case of trespass to the police, file a case in court, obtain a judgement, and execute the judgement all without interacting with the accused. Its even more absurd when you consider that we are talking about a property, with security and other workers working or residing there. No evidence of letters addressed to anybody in the property. Just evidence of subsituted service to an anonymous person or entity.

wirinet:
This is precisely why Nigeria continues to sink deeper into chaos—its people have lost their sense of decency, natural justice, and truth. We now glorify lies, deceit, cheating, and a “might is right” mentality.

In the United States, no court delivers judgments based on deceitful technicalities. No court would pass judgment without hearing from both parties. No court would rule against an accused person whose identity remains anonymous. In the U.S., everyone is entitled to their day in court—that is the standard of justice.

In this matter, we’re dealing with a property ownership dispute, not merely an issue of trespass. The accused has constructed a building and lived on the disputed land for years—possibly decades. Winning possession in the court of first instance does not automatically mean the case is closed. The law permits appeals all the way to the Supreme Court.

So, what happens if the accused eventually overturns the High Court judgment in a higher court? Will those who rushed to enforce a flawed decision be held accountable?

One can only hope that someday, those enabling such injustices will experience what it feels like to have a court judgment passed against them in absentia.

aswani:
They were aware of the proceedings, knowing fully well that they were wrong, they decided to, sensibly I guess, not involve themselves with the court proceedings or allow themselves to be named.

As soon as they saw the court order, which would have been posted on the building, they packed their stuff and left.

No one can force you to divulge your name, apart from the police, and as you know this is a civil matter.

wirinet:
And you are knew all these details because?

You said they saw a court order of possession and then decided to pack their loads and leave. Does that even make sense. Mind you the court order never specified demolition, it specifically instructed peaceful possession.

DomPerignon:
Lolz


What is peaceful possession?


The woman wants every trace of the now evicted squatters off her land.

The court HSS ruled that it is her land have given their verdict to evict the squatters and their belongings off her property.

Did she send Obi to build on her land ?

wirinet:
And you are knew all these details because?

You said they saw a court order of possession and then decided to pack their loads and leave. Does that even make sense. Mind you the court order never specified demolition, it specifically instructed peaceful possession.