₦airaland Forum

WritterNg:
At the moment the west is scared that the longer the war continues the greater the chances of Russia stumbling into crazy military technology that would shape the future of warfare.

Russia might end up inventing something more serious than nukes, all by mistake.

Remember it was in both World Wars that alot of technologies we use today were invented.

WritterNg:
🇷🇺 🐻 🎸 ❤️ 🇷🇺 ☠️

Lawag3:
Like I don't understand how anyone whould use the block option Opposing views is the spice of life. Imagine this thread was only filled with people I agree with.

I frequent this thread because of people like Jovi10 and Vic2023 with their opinions that reek of ignorance and bias. Their comments are usually comical.


And then there's LordAdam and IMEI and MR GREEN FONT they write beautifully I sometimes envy their write-up it just screams intelligence. And I wonder how can people be this intelligent but ignorant? And then there's the people I mostly agree with. You're more likely to find facts and statements that are very unlikely to be debunk from them unlike the other side.




But all in all I will never use the block option

Gbadebo19:
Funny point. Who in their right senses places their hopes in an after-reaction by so called friends. Which hope are we even talking about? Is there any hope after a nuclear strike on a country like Israel?
We ain't talking about conventional war, we are talking about an annihilation.

Hoaxen:
Your analogy of comparing a smart phone and a calculator has to be the worst analogy I have ever seen.

A more accurate analogy is to compare a sniper rifle (THAAD) to an assault rifle (S-400).
An assault rifle can do everything a handgun, shotgun, machine gun, and sniper can. But it's not more portable than a handgun nor can it deal a wide area damage with one shot like a shotgun nor is it as accurate as a snipper rifle.

The S-400 is a jack of all trades master of nothing type system.

I noticed that someone posted a screenshot. It funny that that person chose to crop the remaining part of the Google search.

Here's the conclusion to my Google search results: "If the primary threat is ballistic missiles, especially those with longer ranges and higher altitudes, THAAD is generally considered the better choice. If a more versatile air defense system capable of engaging a wider range of threats is needed, the S-400 is a strong contender. The best system for a particular situation will depend on the specific threats, operational environment, and other factors."

shoodboi2:
The calculator and smartphone comparison make is more logical and relatable. A sniper rifle and an assault rifle are two very different platforms used by two different sets of people for two very different tasks. They are incomparable. Either will fail where the other excels.

An assault rifle cannot replace a handgun or even a shotgun either. Those have very different roles. It can replace a machine gun on specific cases, but you'll need to replace the magazine with a belt.

As for the calculator-phone comparison, a person who wants to use a calculator can use their phone or a dedicated calculator. But the phones can do other things other than just calculating, which makes them superior. Some calculator apps on phones are even more advanced than advanced scientific calculatiors.

With that in mind, calling the s400 a multipurpose platform is misleading. It is not a multipurpose weapon. It is designed to shoot down ballistic missiles along with cruise missiles and aircrafts, which is normal for those type of weapons.

Cruise missiles and aircrafts share similar tech and work similarly, so anything that can shoot one can shoot down the other.

As for ballistic missiles, anything capable of shooting down a cruise missile and aircraft will shoot down a ballistic missile.

So, it is not the s400 that is multipurpose. It is the THAAD that is inferior. A dedicated anti-ballistic missile platform like THAAD is almost never heard of. Countries almost never develop it.

Instead, they do is to develop a system that shoots down cruise missiles and aircrafts or satellites. Such system can then be used to shoot down ballistic missiles.

Kingsnairaland:
And you expect someone that thinks properly to believe this >

Hoaxen:
Your analogy of comparing a smart phone and a calculator has to be the worst analogy I have ever seen.

A more accurate analogy is to compare a sniper rifle (THAAD) to an assault rifle (S-400).
An assault rifle can do everything a handgun, shotgun, machine gun, and sniper can. But it's not more portable than a handgun nor can it deal a wide area damage with one shot like a shotgun nor is it as accurate as a snipper rifle.

The S-400 is a jack of all trades master of nothing type system.

I noticed that someone posted a screenshot. It funny that that person chose to crop the remaining part of the Google search.

Here's the conclusion to my Google search results: "If the primary threat is ballistic missiles, especially those with longer ranges and higher altitudes, THAAD is generally considered the better choice. If a more versatile air defense system capable of engaging a wider range of threats is needed, the S-400 is a strong contender. The best system for a particular situation will depend on the specific threats, operational environment, and other factors."

Hoaxen:
Your analogy of comparing a smart phone and a calculator has to be the worst analogy I have ever seen.

A more accurate analogy is to compare a sniper rifle (THAAD) to an assault rifle (S-400).
An assault rifle can do everything a handgun, shotgun, machine gun, and sniper can. But it's not more portable than a handgun nor can it deal a wide area damage with one shot like a shotgun nor is it as accurate as a snipper rifle.

The S-400 is a jack of all trades master of nothing type system.

I noticed that someone posted a screenshot. It funny that that person chose to crop the remaining part of the Google search.

Here's the conclusion to my Google search results: "If the primary threat is ballistic missiles, especially those with longer ranges and higher altitudes, THAAD is generally considered the better choice. If a more versatile air defense system capable of engaging a wider range of threats is needed, the S-400 is a strong contender. The best system for a particular situation will depend on the specific threats, operational environment, and other factors."

Hoaxen:
Shoodboi2, here are some specifications I got online:

THAAD: Maximum altitude: 150km, Detection range: 1000km

S-400: Maximum altitude: 60km, Detection range: 600km.

Confirm and see if it's the same.

https://www.jamiiforums.com/threads/dogfight-american-thaad-vs-the-russian-s-400-s-500-air-defense-missile-systems.1752740/

shoodboi2:
The calculator and smartphone comparison make is more logical and relatable. A sniper rifle and an assault rifle are two very different platforms used by two different sets of people for two very different tasks. They are incomparable. Either will fail where the other excels.

An assault rifle cannot replace a handgun or even a shotgun either. Those have very different roles. It can replace a machine gun on specific cases, but you'll need to replace the magazine with a belt.

As for the calculator-phone comparison, a person who wants to use a calculator can use their phone or a dedicated calculator. But the phones can do other things other than just calculating, which makes them superior. Some calculator apps on phones are even more advanced than advanced scientific calculatiors.

With that in mind, calling the s400 a multipurpose platform is misleading. It is not a multipurpose weapon. It is designed to shoot down ballistic missiles along with cruise missiles and aircrafts, which is normal for those type of weapons.

Cruise missiles and aircrafts share similar tech and work similarly, so anything that can shoot one can shoot down the other.

As for ballistic missiles, anything capable of shooting down a cruise missile and aircraft will shoot down a ballistic missile.

So, it is not the s400 that is multipurpose. It is the THAAD that is inferior. A dedicated anti-ballistic missile platform like THAAD is almost never heard of. Countries almost never develop it.

Instead, they do is to develop a system that shoots down cruise missiles and aircrafts or satellites. Such system can then be used to shoot down ballistic missiles.

HolinessForever:
The LORD is bringing His people back to His land:
Data presented at the ISRAELI parliament shows that in 2024 (during war) 32,281 new immigrants from 94 countries moved to ISRAEL.

shoodboi2:
The calculator and smartphone comparison make is more logical and relatable. A sniper rifle and an assault rifle are two very different platforms used by two different sets of people for two very different tasks. They are incomparable. Either will fail where the other excels.

An assault rifle cannot replace a handgun or even a shotgun either. Those have very different roles. It can replace a machine gun on specific cases, but you'll need to replace the magazine with a belt.

As for the calculator-phone comparison, a person who wants to use a calculator can use their phone or a dedicated calculator. But the phones can do other things other than just calculating, which makes them superior. Some calculator apps on phones are even more advanced than advanced scientific calculatiors.

With that in mind, calling the s400 a multipurpose platform is misleading. It is not a multipurpose weapon. It is designed to shoot down ballistic missiles along with cruise missiles and aircrafts, which is normal for those type of weapons.

Cruise missiles and aircrafts share similar tech and work similarly, so anything that can shoot one can shoot down the other.

As for ballistic missiles, anything capable of shooting down a cruise missile and aircraft will shoot down a ballistic missile.

So, it is not the s400 that is multipurpose. It is the THAAD that is inferior. A dedicated anti-ballistic missile platform like THAAD is almost never heard of. Countries almost never develop it.

Instead, they do is to develop a system that shoots down cruise missiles and aircrafts or satellites. Such system can then be used to shoot down ballistic missiles.

Lawag3:
when did trump say so.

Hoaxen:
Shoodboi2, here are some specifications I got online:

THAAD: Maximum altitude: 150km, Detection range: 1000km

S-400: Maximum altitude: 60km, Detection range: 600km.

Confirm and see if it's the same.

https://www.jamiiforums.com/threads/dogfight-american-thaad-vs-the-russian-s-400-s-500-air-defense-missile-systems.1752740/

Godstime001:
For full 2 weeks now i have been reading in peace. No gbadebo, disobedience and thta dynaso gal