₦airaland Forum

Boomark:
I want to use this opportunity to call for a bible challenge on Trinity. I want to prove to the whole world that trinity is a false doctrine from the antichrist and not the will of God. The challenge will actually expose those who have been believing a lie and are subtly opposing Christ. I call on trinitarians to nominate any person who you feel is capable.

This place will be used as the discussion platform. Apart from the contestants and referee, no post will be allowed in the main challenge thread until it is over and a winner emerge.

If no one turns up to challenge me, then it will be obvious that trinity doctrine is truly a false doctrine. By then, I will fly around with the name of Jehovah God like a bird with ten thousand wings. And you will also know the I am Boomark of God.

So if you feel you are capable and not scared, take up the challenge. You people are plenty so I believe you won't disappoint your belief. The challenge will start on Wednesday 30th July 2025, that is next week.

These are the guidelines which will be copied to the main challenge thread.


Bible Challenge Topic: The Father is One God over all Vs Trinity.

Participants:
Boomark [The Father is One God over all]

And

Name [Trinity- define it]

Duration: Till the last claim

Bible Versions:
Any version allowed. Each participant must state the version used when quoting scripture.

Challenge Rules:

Rule 1: The Bible Alone
Only the Bible will be used as authority. Each person must prove their claim with scripture. No assuming or borrowing anything from science, commentaries, traditions, creeds, etc.

Rule 2: Context Always
Verses must be explained in their immediate and full context. Never isolate a verse to prove a point.

Rule 3: Equal Turns
Each person gets the same number of responses per point/claim. Till any exhaust their claim.

Rule 4: Respect and Clarity
Use respectful language. Focus on proving truth, not mocking.

Rule 5: One Topic at a Time
The challenge or claim must be focused on proving or disproving the Trinity. Do not bring in unrelated topics (e.g., Sabbath, tithing, etc.).

Rule 6: ChatGPT for scoring
This will be used to determine claims and rebuttal that are in context and in line with the scripture. So no one will keep insisting on a claim or rebuttal that is out of point. No partialty.

Daily Challenge Format

Claim and rebuttal/support will be rotated in turn between Mr A and Mr B. And it must not exceed 24 hrs after it has been made, else, +10 point will be awarded to the opponent of the one who refused to respond.

Mr A will make his claim in favour or against trinity with one or more scriptures.

Mr B will either support or offer a rebuttal to his claim with scripture.

Note: Always remember the add, Do you agree? after each claim.

Make your presentation in this format:

Claim:

Key verses:

Or

Rebuttal:

Key verses:


SCORING

The admin or marker we choose will add our claim and rebuttal into this scoring prompt and paste into ChatGPT after each round of your Bible challenge:


Topic: The Father is one God over all or Trinity?

CLAIM:
[Paste your full message here]


REBUTTAL:
[Paste their full message here]

✅ Instructions:
Please analyze both responses and score this round based on:

1. Who used scripture more clearly and accurately?

2. Did either person use scripture out of context?

3. Did either side prove or avoid the point?

4. Who followed the challenge rules more closely?

5. Which response was closer to the truth based on the Bible alone?

Then give:

A brief summary

A winner for this round (if clear)


AWARDING POINTS

Successful claim = 10 points

Successful rebuttal = 10 points

Any out of point claim = - 5 points, + 5 to opponent

Any out of point rebuttal = - 5 points, + 5 to opponent

Claim without a counter or rebuttal will be regarded as successful after 24 hours.

If one of the participants has exhausted his claim, the one who still have claims will continue to make claims while the opponent has the right to rebuttal or support and points will be awarded accordingly.


Round 1, 2, 3, etc.

Boomark score:

Mr Trinity score:

Let's make clear the will of God.

I would have engaged you dear, but I don't have that time. But I can discuss this subject with you gradually on the other thread. Debate does take time.

Sand2022:
I would have engaged you dear, but I don't have that time. But I can discuss this subject with you gradually on the other thread. Debate does take time.

No problem. We have Started already

Boomark:
https://www.nairaland.com/8486945/bible-challenge-trinity-boomark-image123



This is the link for the bible challenge discussion


Image123, your turn

Oh my goodness, i have a thread that bears my name! lolz. Okay oh.

To be clear though, how does it go, is it claim from A and a rebuttal from B, then a claim from B and a rebuttal from A, or it's a continuous claim from A and rebuttal from B?

Image123:
Oh my goodness, i have a thread that bears my name! lolz. Okay oh.

To be clear though, how does it go, is it claim from A and a rebuttal from B, then a claim from B and a rebuttal from A, or it's a continuous claim from A and rebuttal from B?

Yes to the bolded.

After your rebuttal or acceptance of my claim. You will then make your own claim for me to counter or accept. Just like that

Dtruthspeaker:
You can say that again

Janosky:
Your Man made invention is not holy scriptures.

ok no problem anything else

Boomark:


If not that you and Kingsempires are afraid, I would have loved to see all the bible quotes and logical explanation you can give.

I am here, not afraid of your questions 😐

Kingsempires:
I am here, not afraid of your questions 😐

Since I was asking for a challenger you didn't take it. Now we have started already.

Ok answer this one and don't run or disappear.

See here and answer this with options A or B copied out as your answer. Follow this instruction. You can add your own statement after. If you reject Both A and B or run away then you have rejected Christ's word.

John 17:3 NIrV
[3] And what is eternal life? It is knowing you, the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom you have sent.

Revelation 3:12 NIV
[12] The one who is victorious I will make a pillar in the temple of my God. Never again will they leave it. I will write on them the name of my God and the name of the city of my God, the new Jerusalem, which is coming down out of heaven from my God; and I will also write on them my new name.


1. From the scriptures above, do you believe and accept that the Father is the only true God and that the Father is the God of Jesus Christ as Jesus said?

Option:

A. I believe and accept

B. I don't believe and I reject it because he is not correct


Remember to follow instruction and copy out your answer from the given options.

Kingsempires:
I am here, not afraid of your questions 😐

Don't mind him, he is targeting modalist! His thesis is against that. We are not modalist so he has nothing against us! Even if he tried, he will refute himself.

His perception of trinity is based on Modalism. That's why he can't negate the Godship of Jesus but affirm it. He is only showing the obvious from the scripture. If he is to do so well, he knows what he must do. He must negate the Godship of Jesus, but since hasn't done this. He targets modalist; nothing more, nothing less.

Gabrielshow24:
Don't mind him, he is targeting modalist! His thesis is against that. We are not modalist so he has nothing against us! Even if he tried, he will refute himself.

His perception of trinity is based on Modalism. That's why he can't negate the Godship of Jesus but affirm it. He is only showing the obvious from the scripture. If he is to do so well, he knows what he must do. He must negate the Godship of Jesus, but since hasn't done this. He targets modalist; nothing more, nothing less.

Please allow the guy to answer the question you couldn't answer. The words of Jesus Christ which you tag as falsehood shows you are antichrist. You are still yet to show me what is the false dichotomy in what Christ said.

See it here again if you are not afraid also. Your out of point answer is very funny.

https://www.nairaland.com/8473507/one-god-father-trinity-false/16#136226478

Boomark:
Please allow the guy to answer the question you couldn't answer. The words of Jesus Christ which you tag as falsehood shows you are antichrist. You are still yet to show me what is the false dichotomy in what Christ said.

See it here again if you are not afraid also. Your out of point answer is very funny.

https://www.nairaland.com/8473507/one-god-father-trinity-false/16#136226478

😂No one takes you seriously. You don't even know what you set out to disprove. With all your glib points, you have in no way negated trinity. Your skewed perception shows you target modalists.

Please, educate yourself about what a false dichotomy is and stop wasting everybody's time!

See intellectually dishonesty, na you make claim against trinity, you no define wetin you make claim about. You dey mandate your opposition to define it. 😂

Image123 and fxmasters, you are both wasting your time. That guy is impervious to reason, scripture and logic! You should have seen that from the get go. To him, proving Jesus Christ has a God negates trinity 😂. That's why we have concluded in other threads that he is only attacking modalists or sabellians!

Likewise remember this parable:
"The child that will know book, it's from infancy that we know".

Irrespective, more grease to the elbow for your patience 🤨. God bless you both.

Gabrielshow24:
See intellectually dishonesty, na you make claim against trinity, you no define wetin you make claim about. You dey mandate your opposition to define it. 😂

Image123 and fxmasters, you are both wasting your time. That guy is impervious to reason, scripture and logic! You should have seen that from the get go. To him, proving Jesus Christ has a God negates trinity 😂. That's why we have concluded in other threads that he is only attacking modalists or sabellians!

Likewise remember this parable:
"The child that will know book, it's from infancy that we know".

Irrespective, more grease to the elbow for your patience 🤨. God bless you both.

Just a honest question

Are u a polytheist?

Qasim6:
Just a honest question

Are u a polytheist?

Does my write-up convey such message? 🤨

.

Gabrielshow24:
Does my write-up convey such message? 🤨

Seems you believe

-Jesus is God in some way
-The Father is God
-Jesus a God also have a God which is the father
And They both deserve to be worshipped

Or am I mistaken?

Round 1 result is out


https://www.nairaland.com/8486945/bible-challenge-trinity-boomark-image123#136298876

Gabrielshow24:
😂No one takes you seriously. You don't even know what you set out to disprove. With all your glib points, you have in no way negated trinity. Your skewed perception shows you target modalists.

Please, educate yourself about what a false dichotomy is and stop wasting everybody's time!

You should start telling us why you said that what Jesus said is a false dichotomy.

If you want use AI define it. That is what you said against the Lord. You people don't know what you are doing.

Gabrielshow24:
See intellectually dishonesty, na you make claim against trinity, you no define wetin you make claim about. You dey mandate your opposition to define it. 😂

Image123 and fxmasters, you are both wasting your time. That guy is impervious to reason, scripture and logic! You should have seen that from the get go. To him, proving Jesus Christ has a God negates trinity 😂. That's why we have concluded in other threads that he is only attacking modalists or sabellians!

Likewise remember this parable:
"The child that will know book, it's from infancy that we know".

Irrespective, more grease to the elbow for your patience 🤨. God bless you both.

You were so afraid to take up the challenge because you knew you always talk out of point. Yout reason is fashioned to speak against Christ. And you want me to join you and reason like antichrist.

I reject and bind.

You were caught red handed speaking against Christ. Bankrolled by false doctrines.

Boomark:
You should start telling us why you said that what Jesus said is a false dichotomy.

If you want use AI define it. That is what you said against the Lord. You people don't know what you are doing.

For the umpteenth time, drawing straws won't help you. If you don't know what "false dichotomy" entails, that's your fault not ours but you can't stoop so low and be this petty to say that I called God's word "false dichotomy" 😂. Your brain on aestivation is very conspicuous 😂.

As usual you have nothing but falsehood to peddle around. The same way you claimed I lied until screenshots defeated you, likewise here also. Lying blatantly!

Boomark:
You were so afraid to take up the challenge because you knew you always talk out of point. Yout reason is fashioned to speak against Christ. And you want me to join you and reason like antichrist.

I reject and bind.

You were caught red handed speaking against Christ. Bankrolled by false doctrines.

😅I caught you severally, red handed and pants down, on your differing understanding of scripture. From this:

Boomark:
The share of Jesus in God's glory doesn't make his equal to his God. The eyes of God has glory, his arm, his breath, his feet, his hair and everything about him. His word also has glory. Non these things I mentioned is equal to God himself. The God that made his word to become flesh can also make his eyes to become flesh. They all belongs to God the Father. Christ belongs to God.

John 1:1
The word was God. This doesn't mean the word is God the Father

To this:

Boomark:
They have failed with their equality antichrist doctrine. Tricks by satan to insult the only true God. They think they are doing Jesus a favour by making him equal to his God

his below response includes his Angelic gaffe, along with him giving expostulations to dismiss the modalist view, also he acknowledges the Spirit is God's power, hence nothing God can do that his Spirit can't😅, but we know from his write-up he has a compositional God 😂, one that is different from our God. Perhaps, he has Allah in mind!

Boomark:
God is one and he is the Father. One person who has eyes, legs mouth, hands, etc. and has the power to create anything. From his mouth he speaks and whatever he says is his word (word of God because it belongs to God). Jesus (word of God) belongs to God. Things were created through this word which God speaks. His word was later made flesh.

God has been speaking and his word has been with him from the beginning, John 1:1. His word is not him from hair to toe but just what he says.

Angels have been seeing God's face in heaven. But they (angels) only started seeing Jesus when the word of God was made flesh.

Just like our power is in our hands. The spirit of God is his power. It belongs to God.

Luke 1:35 HCSB
[35] The angel replied to her: “The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you. Therefore, the holy One to be born will be called the Son of God.

Acts 1:8 HCSB
[8] But you will receive power when the Holy Spirit has come on you, and you will be My witnesses in Jerusalem, in all Judea and Samaria, and to the ends of the earth.”

God has the power to also make his eyes to become flesh. So no one should say his eyes is God himself. The same thing goes with his word.

Look at the below response 😂, it's so funny, how someone can unwittingly refute himself.
Someone should kindly explain to him, why "God" and "God almighty" are essentially the same! His straw in the form of Moses is also far fetched 😂!

Boomark:
Moses is god and Moses is god almighty are not the same thing.

But if the 2 persons are not the same person then anyone can say, "Moses is god but not god almighty." When we know the 2 persons we are talking about.

Have you seen that your ignorance is at the peak because you don't understand English. Special waec exam centres have done a lot of damage to people.

Someone said, "Jesus IS a God but NOT God Almighty and NOT his EQUAL" and you twisted that statement to be "Jesus IS NOT God." What then happened to the first part which says Jesus is a God. You don't know the work of BUT in a sentence.

Bros apart from being a l'iar, you also don't understand simple english. Your Ignorance at the peak. You are not fit to teach anything because you cannot understand simple english.

What I wrote indicates that they are 2 different persons. Instead l'ying just because you don't understand english.

What I wrote is very clear in the picture.

This below is another proof that he targets modalists. His entire thesis indicates he has the perception of trinity as God being the Father,Son and the Holy Spirit are modes. A modalist or sabellian view contests that God existed as modes or nodes with each node: The Father, Son and the Holy Spirit being the same person. Thus when God was in heaven, he was called, the Father when he was on Earth, the Son and finally, the Holy Spirit.😅

This is what he aims to disprove!

Boomark:
That you agreed that Jesus is not the same person as the Father is all we needed to confirm that I am correct. The Disciples didn't see God the Father himself when Jesus made that statement.

Can someone kindly tell him that the bolded below is not a suitable reconciliation in academia? 😂
The other bolded parts are indications that his arguments are against modalists! He has a skewed perception hence the refusal to define the term "trinity" as people will latch on to his misconceptions.

Boomark:
Answer to your question.

Jesus is not the author of confusion. He also said this below about God who he calls the Father.

John 6:46 NIV
[46] No one has seen the Father except the one who is from God; only he has seen the Father.

From every other scripture we know that Jesus is not the Father. He also toid them that no one has seen the Father. Jesus gave reason why he said he who has seen him has seen the Father in verses 10 and 11. He said this because everything he tells his disciples comes from the Father. He doesn't say anything from his own authority. The Father commands him on the things to say, John 12:49-50.

If you don't have authority of your to say anything apart from what your mother tells you to say, whoever sees you will likened to haven seen your mother at home because what your mother will use her mouth to tell them is exactly what you will tell them. But you are not your mother.

In verse 16, he said he will pray to the Father. He is not praying to himself. In verse 28, he told them clearly that he is going to the Father and that the Father is greater than him. He is not the Father whom he told them is greater than him. He told them all these still in this same chapter so they don't go and start assuming he is the Father.


Do you disagree?

The bolded below in his response is actually funny😂.

Boomark:
So Jesus is now the fullness of God according to the bible of the antichrist?

It like you came here to mock the word of God and make fun of Christians by lying anyhow you want?

All in all, he has a composite God. He has a skewed perception of trinity and has committed an high degree of inaccuracies.

Boomark:
Since I was asking for a challenger you didn't take it. Now we have started already.

Ok answer this one and don't run or disappear.

See here and answer this with options A or B copied out as your answer. Follow this instruction. You can add your own statement after. If you reject Both A and B or run away then you have rejected Christ's word.

John 17:3 NIrV
[3] And what is eternal life? It is knowing you, the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom you have sent.

Revelation 3:12 NIV
[12] The one who is victorious I will make a pillar in the temple of my God. Never again will they leave it. I will write on them the name of my God and the name of the city of my God, the new Jerusalem, which is coming down out of heaven from my God; and I will also write on them my new name.


1. From the scriptures above, do you believe and accept that the Father is the only true God and that the Father is the God of Jesus Christ as Jesus said?

Option:

A. I believe and accept

B. I don't believe and I reject it because he is not correct


Remember to follow instruction and copy out your answer from the given options.

so you think I kingsempires will come out to print long sentence about how holy Trinity is biblical. No !! No !! no !! no !! That's just like puring water on stone. I have seen most of your thread on nairaland you always make thread like this even with all the points giving to you on your thread you still disagree. These are lists of early Christians from 1st to 10th century;

Roman Catholic Church


Eastern Orthodox Church


Armenian Apostolic Church


Coptic Orthodox Church


Syriac Orthodox Church


As you can see this are the oldest christian denominations right now. They all believe in the holy Trinity. This teaching has been for long no need for me going to bring bible quotes like I said "debating the topic holy Trinity with you is like puring water on stone" you can never accept my fact so I won't go further 😏

Qasim6:
Just a honest question

Are u a polytheist?

Just a honest question


Are you a Muslim?

Gabrielshow24:
😅I caught you severally, red handed and pants down, on your differing understanding of scripture. From this:



To this:


his below response includes his Angelic gaffe, along with him giving expostulations to dismiss the modalist view, also he acknowledges the Spirit is God's power, hence nothing God can do that his Spirit can't😅, but we know from his write-up he has a compositional God 😂, one that is different from our God. Perhaps, he has Allah in mind!



Look at the below response 😂, it's so funny, how someone can unwittingly refute himself.
Someone should kindly explain to him, why "God" and "God almighty" are essentially the same! His straw in the form of Moses is also far fetched 😂!



This below is another proof that he targets modalists. His entire thesis indicates he has the perception of trinity as God being the Father,Son and the Holy Spirit are modes. A modalist or sabellian view contests that God existed as modes or nodes with each node: The Father, Son and the Holy Spirit being the same person. Thus when God was in heaven, he was called, the Father when he was on Earth, the Son and finally, the Holy Spirit.😅

This is what he aims to disprove!



Can someone kindly tell him that the bolded below is not a suitable reconciliation in academia? 😂
The other bolded parts are indications that his arguments are against modalists! He has a skewed perception hence the refusal to define the term "trinity" as people will latch on to his misconceptions.


The bolded below in his response is actually funny😂.



All in all, he has a composite God. He has a skewed perception of trinity and has committed an high degree of inaccuracies.

You lie on a 12 word sentence, how much more all these.

If you like call me a modalist, tribalist, or analyst, I will destroy the out point trinity doctrine before your very eyes.

That's when you will know that I am also a Slayerlist

Kingsempires:
so you think I kingsempires will come out to print long sentence about how holy Trinity is biblical. No !! No !! no !! no !! That's just like puring water on stone. I have seen most of your thread on nairaland you always make thread like this even with all the points giving to you on your thread you still disagree. These are lists of early Christians from 1st to 10th century;

Roman Catholic Church


Eastern Orthodox Church


Armenian Apostolic Church


Coptic Orthodox Church


Syriac Orthodox Church


As you can see this are the oldest christian denominations right now. They all believe in the holy Trinity. This teaching has been for long no need for me going to bring bible quotes like I said "debating the topic holy Trinity with you is like puring water on stone" you can never accept my fact so I won't go further 😏

This "I am not afraid your question" cannot even see or understand or know what a question looks like.

Despite all my effort to make the question bold. Out of fear he is not lecturing me. It's like he doesn't know that broad is the way that leads to destruction.

Sometimes if you people even understand english. Or you are just afraid of the question. It is only those who are serving satan and the antichrist that will reject or ignore the words of Jesus Christ.

You new name is now Afraidempires.

FxMasterz

Good evening bro.

What I meant is that you can discuss with image123 here incase you have something to discuss with respect to trinity. You will talk when you can post it during his turn. You have seen how we make our presentation. I am not answering any question.

Just make claim to what you believe in with your key verses and I will present a rebuttal.

No vex for the removal of your post. It was part of the rule.

Boomark:
You lie on a 12 word sentence, how much more all these.

If you like call me a modalist, tribalist, or analyst, I will destroy the out point trinity doctrine before your very eyes.

That's when you will know that I am also a Slayerlist

No one is impressed by your thrasonical remarks. You can claim anything you want but if you can't substantiate it with proof then it's a hodgepodge of lies🤨.

You have lied before and you will still continue to lie. Also, no one called you a modalist😂—Kindly educate yourself. Infact, we all find your farrago of ab-.(s)urdity really funny😂.

By the way, It's really fun to have people like you around to entertain us🧐. I have made my point, using your own words to show a faulty foundation—No haven for you😂 there.

No matter, what you do. You certainly cannot slay the truth!😂

Boomark:
I want to use this opportunity to call for a bible challenge on Trinity. I want to prove to the whole world that trinity is a false doctrine from the antichrist and not the will of God. The challenge will actually expose those who have been believing a lie and are subtly opposing Christ. I call on trinitarians to nominate any person who you feel is capable.

This place will be used as the discussion platform. Apart from the contestants and referee, no post will be allowed in the main challenge thread until it is over and a winner emerge.

If no one turns up to challenge me, then it will be obvious that trinity doctrine is truly a false doctrine. By then, I will fly around with the name of Jehovah God like a bird with ten thousand wings. And you will also know the I am Boomark of God.

So if you feel you are capable and not scared, take up the challenge. You people are plenty so I believe you won't disappoint your belief. The challenge will start on Wednesday 30th July 2025, that is next week.

These are the guidelines which will be copied to the main challenge thread.


Bible Challenge Topic: The Father is One God over all Vs Trinity.

Participants:
Boomark [The Father is One God over all]

And

Name [Trinity- define it]

Duration: Till the last claim

Bible Versions:
Any version allowed. Each participant must state the version used when quoting scripture.

Challenge Rules:

Rule 1: The Bible Alone
Only the Bible will be used as authority. Each person must prove their claim with scripture. No assuming or borrowing anything from science, commentaries, traditions, creeds, etc.

Rule 2: Context Always
Verses must be explained in their immediate and full context. Never isolate a verse to prove a point.

Rule 3: Equal Turns
Each person gets the same number of responses per point/claim. Till any exhaust their claim.

Rule 4: Respect and Clarity
Use respectful language. Focus on proving truth, not mocking.

Rule 5: One Topic at a Time
The challenge or claim must be focused on proving or disproving the Trinity. Do not bring in unrelated topics (e.g., Sabbath, tithing, etc.).

Rule 6: ChatGPT for scoring
This will be used to determine claims and rebuttal that are in context and in line with the scripture. So no one will keep insisting on a claim or rebuttal that is out of point. No partialty.

Daily Challenge Format

Claim and rebuttal/support will be rotated in turn between Mr A and Mr B. And it must not exceed 24 hrs after it has been made, else, +10 point will be awarded to the opponent of the one who refused to respond.

Mr A will make his claim in favour or against trinity with one or more scriptures.

Mr B will either support or offer a rebuttal to his claim with scripture.

Note: Always remember the add, Do you agree? after each claim.

Make your presentation in this format:

Claim:

Key verses:

Or

Rebuttal:

Key verses:


SCORING

The admin or marker we choose will add our claim and rebuttal into this scoring prompt and paste into ChatGPT after each round of your Bible challenge:


Topic: The Father is one God over all or Trinity?

CLAIM:
[Paste your full message here]


REBUTTAL:
[Paste their full message here]

✅ Instructions:
Please analyze both responses and score this round based on:

1. Who used scripture more clearly and accurately?

2. Did either person use scripture out of context?

3. Did either side prove or avoid the point?

4. Who followed the challenge rules more closely?

5. Which response was closer to the truth based on the Bible alone?

Then give:

A brief summary

A winner for this round (if clear)


AWARDING POINTS

Successful claim = 10 points

Successful rebuttal = 10 points

Any out of point claim = - 5 points, + 5 to opponent

Any out of point rebuttal = - 5 points, + 5 to opponent

Claim without a counter or rebuttal will be regarded as successful after 24 hours.

If one of the participants has exhausted his claim, the one who still have claims will continue to make claims while the opponent has the right to rebuttal or support and points will be awarded accordingly.


Round 1, 2, 3, etc.

Boomark score:

Mr Trinity score:

Let's make clear the will of God.

Participating in this competition is not the will of God for me. You can go ahead with others. Thanks

Boomark:
Wow, I can see you have great knowledge.
Please you are free to take up the challenge.

Our goal is to end all these, "I talk you talk teachings" even when we are all talking out of point. The truth will do the talking henceforth.

If I can get a G.O or pastor or rev father, it will be wonderful.

But you guys are free to bring someone from here that will disgrace all of you. That's exactly why I am here. To make sure it happens for the sake of the truth about the word of our God which a lot of people are twisting.

Please let's click and follow this thread. The link for the challenge thread will be posted here

You should bring your G. O. too it will be easy tobreak this bondage of falsehood you've fallen into. We need to attack the source.

Boomark:
At this point we are not teaching anything.

You guys can start first. State what trinity stand for in your claim and back it up with key verses. I will counter whatever it is. After that round, I will make my own claim for you people to counter.

He won't state it
He just likes attention and is not ready to accept facts.... Conversing with him is like talking to recorded message 😔

Gabrielshow24:
Probably, you are not well informed @boomark, even ChatGpt you hope to use as a "marker" is flawed and not the ultimate "marker" of what is true in Christianity and not!

We take the scripture in its entirety, along with its implications 😂. You can't just run away from the implications of the fact that someone said He is the "first and the last" with books earlier, revealing God exactly as the "first and the last"!

Hopefully this time, you define your problem statement 😂 clearly! If you hope to dismiss trinity then you must state what trinity is! That's how a dissertation is! — All related statements and terms are well enunciated! e.g., You will define to us what makes God God! You will take the Son as well as the Spirit and look for ways to negate any fulfilling such a boundary!

ChatGpt can't be the judge of all these, it was trained with a dataset and I am very sure that most of its dataset are trinity oriented😂! You are definitely at an huge disadvantage here, and reason is not your forte🤔 — it's also not always on your side given the perfunctory fact that you are a product of those special centers🤧. Humor and sarcasm should be allowed, they help buttress the height of "wisdom" 😂😂—"Jesus is a God but not God almighty" , "No difference between God and God almighty" 😂, " Angels just saw Jesus only when he became flesh", "boomark is a Christian but not a Christian church" etc😂

He doesn't know that chatgpt is flawed.