₦airaland Forum

The Niger State Government has taken the Federal Government to the Supreme Court to challenge its omission as a beneficiary of the 13 per cent derivation.

The state, in the originating summons it filed through its team of lawyers led by Mr. Mohammed Ndarani, SAN, listed the Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice as the sole defendant in the case.

The plaintiff, among other things, urged the apex court to determine whether Niger State does not qualify to be classified among the states that produce natural resources and therefore is entitled to 13 per cent derivation within the meaning of 162(2) of the 1999 Constitution, as amended.

It further prayed the court to interpret and apply section 232 (1) & (2) of the Constitution to compel its inclusion by FG, in line with the Enactment of Allocation of Revenue (Federation Account, etc.) Act, 2004.

The state alleged a failure to include remittances from proceeds of fiscal revenue generated and accrued through Hydroelectric Power dams within its territory, which it argued formed part of the resources it contributes to the overall electricity generation to the national grid since 1968.

According to the plaintiff, it hosts four major hydroelectricity dams: Kainji Dam, Jebba Dam, Shiroro Dam and Zungeru Dam, which serve as a power house for electricity supply to various states in the country.

It argued that through these power stations, FG extended electricity supply to the Republics of Benin, Togo and Niger.

The state said its decision to list the AGF as the sole defendant in the matter was because he statutorily offers oversight legal advice function and represents the Federal Government, including the Accountant-General of the Federation.

It noted that the Accountant-General has the constitutional role of preparing the nation’s financial statements from collection and receipts of income, fees, rentals and taxes, and payments from the federation account.

“That the attorney general at all times is charged with legally advising and representing the Auditor-General of the Federation and the Revenue Mobilisation Allocation and Fiscal Commission that oversees revenue accruing to, and disbursement of such funds from the Federation Account,” it argued.

It accused the defendant of failing to properly advise the President, especially on how to ensure equitable distribution of resources in conformity with current realities, particularly with the enormous fiscal revenue generated by Niger State.

The plaintiff stressed that it is a purely agrarian state as its inhabitants are subsistence farmers whose produce is enjoyed across the state and beyond.

It contended that as a result of the large expanse of the land occupied by the dams, a large population of its citizens and residents are denied the opportunity of engaging in agricultural activities.

Niger state maintained that it has continued to host the dams that were established since 1968, decrying that despite its contributions in terms of revenue, it has been a victim of incessant and continuous flooding.

“This has resulted in wanton loss of human lives and livestock as well as destruction of properties, leading unavoidably to displacement of many residents from their homes,” it averred.

More so, the plaintiff claimed that the Physicochemical/Microbiological Impact Assessment Report it conducted showed a high level of degradation in the affected areas.

“This represents an impending danger that looms large in the horizon for the state over the coming years if urgent stringent environment protection measures are not taken.

“To the chagrin, detriment, continuous exploitation and utter impoverishment of the people of Niger State, the defendant continuously and continually whisked off profits from the state.

“The federal government should not be only concerned about benefiting from the dams located in the territory of the state without a care for its people,” the plaintiff added.

More so, the plaintiff said it was unfortunate that the office of the National Bureau of Statistics, NBS, had no information on the volume of electricity by megawatts, generated by the dams since 1968 and 2019, except for those of 2020, 2021, 2022 and 2023.

It said the NBS computation of the volume of electricity by megawatts generated into the national grid from 2020 – 2023, was: “The sum total megawatt generated in 2020 is equal to 2,232,706.27, 2021 equal to 2,632,348.00, 2022 equal to 2,830,002.96 and in 2023 equal to 2,658,612.96.”

“These dams have generated fiscal revenue which has been controlled by the federal government and have been indisputably redistributed equally amongst the constituent states without considering the host (Niger State) since 1968 till date,” Ndarani, SAN, added.

He said the plaintiff, its citizens and residents suffered continuous exploitation, neglect and ravaging floods due to the power generating activities of FG and its agencies.

Consequently, the plaintiff prayed the apex court to intervene and order its inclusion in the 13 per cent derivation.

Meantime, no date has been fixed for the matter to be heard.

helinues:
Hahahaha, una want to collect 13% because of dam. Damn

Celestialsword:
No northern states is among the oil producing states in Nigeria.

helinues:
Hahahaha, una want to collect 13% because of dam. Damn

Urgent1Million:
FG should give them 13% of debts from electricity generation and supply.
Or they want to collect 13% of oil revenues?

Qc1:
What is the definition of natural resources? Is a dam natural or created? Is water a natural mineral? Is electricity a resources, if yes, is it natural? I believe those are the questions that will be settled in court.

This will be an interesting case. I will wish Niger State win this impossible case so that Lagos State will also sue the FG that will subsequently lead to change of derivation distribution in Nigeria.

Godfullsam:
their request is tenable to be honest.

what i find difficult to believe is the claim that many residents who were subsistence farmers do not have enough land to farm because of these dams.
this is a blatant lie from the shallow pit of zungeru dam.

seunmsg:
Why not? If Akwa Ibom can be collecting money on oil extracted offshore from within 200 nautical miles, why should Niger not benefit from a dam that is within less than 1 nautical miles and directly affects the environment and the people of the state?

seunmsg:
Can a dam be built onshore? If the water is not there, can the dam be built? Is the dam affecting the environment and the ecosystem of the state?

By law, water is classified as a natural resources and under the control of FG. So, I 100% agree with the position of the state government. Considering the closeness of the water to the people, I think they even deserve the derivation far more than states like Akwa Ibom that claim derivation from oil wells as far as 200 nautical miles.

Bellotelli:
They equally deserve it. Nigeria has been and is still benefiting greatly from the hydro power stations.