₦airaland Forum

Image123:
Not complaining, i have only corrected you to not manipulate AI either knowingly or unknowingly. Prior to my corrections, you erroneously denied ChatGPT's default program doesn't favour Trinity, AI is subject to the topic asked, AI and chatgpt depend on what you feed and on GIGO". Now you know and i am glad about the growth achieved.

I would like everyone to see how Image123 has been lying against me. He doesn't understand english that's why he is believing a false doctrine.

It is obvious the delusion in 2 Thessalonians 2:10-12 is against trinitarians as i said sometimes ago.

What I said about ChatGPT in the first screenshot:

A. It's default program favours trinity.

What I was accused of saying in the bolded:

B. Prior to my corrections, you erroneously denied ChatGPT's default program doesn't favour Trinity.

It is obvious that my friend has a problem. How can someone who cannot understand a simple 5 word statement come and be teaching bible? This was the reason I rejected human to humans because they have a very big problem that heaven is aware of.

Something I agreed to is what he is accusing me falsely of denying.

I will run this on ChatGPT so It also confirm this blunder. I will replace ChatGPT with AppG so It will be neutral.

You guys can also see what a trinitarian told me and my position. From the 2nd screenshot

ChatGPT also confirmed that he is in the business of telling "laryii." I used church G in the video instead of AppG.

https://youtube.com/shorts/HfQ_GDU9b9A?si=S6OWd2oULDGlwQVN

I will not strive with him anymore because it is obvious he and most Trinitarians have problem. They don't have God because they have abandoned the teachings of Jesus Christ.

2 John 1:9 NIV
[9] Anyone who runs ahead and does not continue in the teaching of Christ does not have God; whoever continues in the teaching has both the Father and the Son.

They have gone ahead to form trinity which is not seen anywhere in the bible and abandoned the teachings of Jesus Christ about himself and about God the Father, the only true God.

They think they are doing Christ a favour by trying to make him equal to God the Father. They don't know it is a subtle way that satan and the antichrist have used to make them abandon the teachings of Jesus Christ. Christ know better than all of them.

All my claims in Round 1, 3, and 5 are based on the teachings of Jesus Christ. That's why I clear all the points available while image123 goes ahead to blame.

His main topic and claims are all against the teachings of Jesus Christ.

I will drop a link to one of them who mocked the teachings of Jesus Christ. When I said they have the spirit of antichrist I knew what I was saying.

Boomark:
Round 5 Result

Boomark: +10 points

Image123: 0 point

Points for any out of point (from rule 3 in scoring)

Image123: -5 points

Boomark: +5 points

Final score

Boomark: +15points

Image123: -5 points

Watch the short video to see how the analysis was done according to the rules to focus on the bible alone and more.

https://youtube.com/shorts/rSY2gkJWmzA?si=7VCnh9tzzT7iG6ge

Like i mentioned earlier and have reiterated several times, AI is subject to what you feed it. Evidently in the video above, there has been prior interactions(feedings) with the AI, hence why it already knew the rules referred to and had no problem adding rule 7 without providing it or the other six rules again in the prompt. That's how AI works, it works with your history and interactions with it can distort results. Let's not imagine the interactions and feedings in the gap.
A clear proof are the two videos presented below on the same topic. AI gives a totally different result, lolz. So whose AI is more correct or original? Like i continue to insist and repeat, i am not here for AI points. But it's clear to see that you cannot use it to determine your faith. i just went back to check Rounds 1 to 3, not because i need it, but just to show what i have been saying. Round 4 is not in contention, and i didn't bother, as AI told Boomark that i won, and he was crying about it. i first checked the round 5 and it gave a totally different results, then i went back to check rounds 1 to 3. Round 1 and 2 scored him better. i think he had some deduction for posting late, i'll probably check. Round 3 was said to be a draw, and round 5 scored me better.
Here are videos for round 3 and 5. Images are from round 3 and 5.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wGeVoBO37Es


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JCzpN3vKiEk

Boomark:
I would like everyone to see how Image123 has been lying against me. He doesn't understand english that's why he is believing a false doctrine.

It is obvious the delusion in 2 Thessalonians 2:10-12 is against trinitarians as i said sometimes ago.

What I said about ChatGPT in the first screenshot:

A. It's default program favours trinity.

What I was accused of saying in the bolded:

B. Prior to my corrections, you erroneously denied ChatGPT's default program doesn't favour Trinity.

It is obvious that my friend has a problem. How can someone who cannot understand a simple 5 word statement come and be teaching bible? This was the reason I rejected human to humans because they have a very big problem that heaven is aware of.

Something I agreed to is what he is accusing me falsely of denying.

I will run this on ChatGPT so It also confirm this blunder. I will replace ChatGPT with AppG so It will be neutral.

You guys can also see what a trinitarian told me and my position. From the 2nd screenshot

Facepalm for you several times. It's called a double negative. There's nothing wrong with what i said, though obviously it confused you, because i spoke/wrote in double negatives. But typical of you, you ignored the fact that i had previously showed you that you are wrong and that AI's default program DOES NOT favour trinity.
https://www.nairaland.com/8486945/bible-challenge-trinity-boomark-image123/2#136343246

Instead you are attempting to win an argument yet again, instead of embrace the truth. My dear, arguments are for lawyers and about better presentation, not about truth. Discuss like a human being that God created you to be and be free.

Boomark:
ChatGPT also confirmed that he is in the business of telling "laryii." I used church G in the video instead of AppG.

https://youtube.com/shorts/HfQ_GDU9b9A?si=S6OWd2oULDGlwQVN

I will not strive with him anymore because it is obvious he and most Trinitarians have problem. They don't have God because they have abandoned the teachings of Jesus Christ.

2 John 1:9 NIV
[9] Anyone who runs ahead and does not continue in the teaching of Christ does not have God; whoever continues in the teaching has both the Father and the Son.

They have gone ahead to form trinity which is not seen anywhere in the bible and abandoned the teachings of Jesus Christ about himself and about God the Father, the only true God.

They think they are doing Christ a favour by trying to make him equal to God the Father. They don't know it is a subtle way that satan and the antichrist have used to make them abandon the teachings of Jesus Christ. Christ know better than all of them.

All my claims in Round 1, 3, and 5 are based on the teachings of Jesus Christ. That's why I clear all the points available while image123 goes ahead to blame.

His main topic and claims are all against the teachings of Jesus Christ.

I will drop a link to one of them who mocked the teachings of Jesus Christ. When I said they have the spirit of antichrist I knew what I was saying.

Lolz, this is a whole new level of hypocrisy. So you were too cowardly to tell AI that you were referring to it, you went to carry church G? Who is church G? i gave you clear proof that ChatGPT's default program doesn't favour Trinity. You went to tell it Church G. Who is this unserious fellow? Be courageous enough to know when you are wrong. It is very simple. Not wrapping nonsense around yourself.

Image123:
Lolz, this is a whole new level of hypocrisy. So you were too cowardly to tell AI that you were referring to it, you went to carry church G? Who is church G? i gave you clear proof that ChatGPT's default program doesn't favour Trinity. You went to tell it Church G. Who is this unserious fellow? Be courageous enough to know when you are wrong. It is very simple. Not wrapping nonsense around yourself.

So church G is now an excuse for your lies and out of point talk? If I use ChatGPT you will also lament that ChatGPT know we are talking about it and became biased. I made it neutral and you are still lamenting.

You laryid against me period. Church G has no business in how you twisted what I said. That's exactly how you twist scriptures.

I thought you should be apologising to me for making false claim against me? But you have abandoned it you are now blaming a neutral Church G.

Boomark:
So church G is now an excuse for your lies and out of point talk? If I use ChatGPT you will also lament that ChatGPT know we are talking about it and became biased. I made it neutral and you are still lamenting.

You laryid against me period. Church G has no business in how you twisted what I said. That's exactly how you twist scriptures.

I thought you should be apologising to me for making false claim against me? But you have abandoned it you are now blaming a neutral Church G.

i have asked you several times to ask ChatGPT the direct question, but you come here giving silly assumptions. What is laryid BTW, you've mentioned it a couple of times.

Image123:
i have asked you several times to ask ChatGPT the direct question, but you come here giving silly assumptions. What is laryid BTW, you've mentioned it a couple of times.

It means lied.

I couldn't post because of it.

I will call on gohf, Janosky, FxMasterz, and Emusan to tell us for the sake of truth. In all honesty, if what I said, is the same as what Image123 is accusing me of saying. 2 non-trinitarian and 2 trinitarian.

We will continue when we see what they say. Its like Image123 has a problem.

Boomark:
It means lied.

I couldn't post because of it.

I will call on gohf, Janosky, FxMasterz, and Emusan to tell us for the sake of truth. In all honesty, if what I said, is the same as what Image123 is accusing me of saying. 2 non-trinitarian and 2 trinitarian.

We will continue when we see what they say. Its like Image123 has a problem.

You don't need anyone except your English teacher, sorry your knowledge of the language is poor. But suit yourself anyway. Have you finally asked ChatGPT the direct question?

Boomark:
It means lied.

I couldn't post because of it.

I will call on gohf, Janosky, FxMasterz, and Emusan to tell us for the sake of truth. In all honesty, if what I said, is the same as what Image123 is accusing me of saying. 2 non-trinitarian and 2 trinitarian.

We will continue when we see what they say. Its like Image123 has a problem.

What are you guys even fighting about? You're discussing scriptures and still have the guts to call one another 'silly' and referring to yourselves as having a problem. Who do you guys really represent?

Image123:
Like i mentioned earlier and have reiterated several times, AI is subject to what you feed it. Evidently in the video above, there has been prior interactions(feedings) with the AI, hence why it already knew the rules referred to and had no problem adding rule 7 without providing it or the other six rules again in the prompt. That's how AI works, it works with your history and interactions with it can distort results. Let's not imagine the interactions and feedings in the gap.
A clear proof are the two videos presented below on the same topic. AI gives a totally different result, lolz. So whose AI is more correct or original? Like i continue to insist and repeat, i am not here for AI points. But it's clear to see that you cannot use it to determine your faith. i just went back to check Rounds 1 to 3, not because i need it, but just to show what i have been saying. Round 4 is not in contention, and i didn't bother, as AI told Boomark that i won, and he was crying about it. i first checked the round 5 and it gave a totally different results, then i went back to check rounds 1 to 3. Round 1 and 2 scored him better. i think he had some deduction for posting late, i'll probably check. Round 3 was said to be a draw, and round 5 scored me better.
Here are videos for round 3 and 5. Images are from round 3 and 5.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wGeVoBO37Es


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JCzpN3vKiEk

Like i said earlier, AI is not as reliable as you think and it doesn't claim to be. ChatGPT will always tell you "ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info." It can give you different answers, based on many factors like what you feed it either knowingly or unknowingly.
i just fed in Round 1 and 2 and it gave different results. i was still asking it to remark again. You can see it in the two videos below. Same AI that told you and me that Mr A had the edge is telling me now that it is a draw. Who knows maybe tomorrow, it will say Mr B has the edge.
Am i trying to prove that i won or i am winning and have more points? NO, i don't care. i am only showing you the frailty of what you are resting on.

Round 1 result below, you can pause at any time like you usually say. i even challenged it that it initially said that you won. See it there in the video.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6bx04SSk0kU

Round 2 result below.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FGQAq1i8Lp0

FxMasterz:
What are you guys even fighting about? You're discussing scriptures and still have the guts to call one another 'silly' and referring to yourselves as having a problem. Who do you guys really represent?

Job_5:2  For wrath killeth the foolish man, and envy slayeth the silly one.
Hos_7:11  Ephraim also is like a silly dove without heart: they call to Egypt, they go to Assyria.
2Ti_3:6  For of this sort are they which creep into houses, and lead captive silly women laden with sins, led away with divers lusts,

Not saying you should go and start name-calling anyone, though, just proving all things. If a kid is misbehaving, there's nothing wrong with telling the kid not to be silly.

Please make a clear video using xrecorder app from your phone I can't see what you post clearly.

See what you will do because it's like you are not doing well. On a fresh page in ChatGPT, post these rules below alone. See in the screenshot of how I did it. You don't need to copy it all the time. This is the general rule that it uses to make judgement.

ChatGPT please don't comment on this post. You will comment accordingly to the instructions on the next and subsequent posts.

Challenge Rules:

Bible Versions:
Any version allowed. Each participant must state the version used when quoting scripture.

Rule 1: The Bible Alone
Only the Bible will be used as authority. Each person must prove their claim with scripture. No assuming or borrowing anything from science, commentaries, traditions, creeds, etc.

Rule 2: Context Always
Verses must be explained in their immediate and full context. Never isolate a verse to prove a point.

Rule 3: Equal Turns
Each person gets the same number of responses per point/claim. Till any exhaust their claim.

Rule 4: Respect and Clarity
Use respectful language. Focus on proving truth, not mocking.

Rule 5: One Topic at a Time
The challenge or claim must be focused on proving or disproving the Trinity. Do not bring in unrelated topics (e.g., Sabbath, tithing, etc.).

After this one above, you will then start posting this one below for each round. This is the instructions given to it so It can focus on the general rule above

Main Topic: Trinity - is it biblical?


Subtopic:

CLAIM:
[Paste your full message here inside this bracket]


REBUTTAL:
[Paste their full message here inside this bracket]

✅ Instructions:
You must not be partial. Analyze both responses and score this round based on:

1. Who used scripture more clearly and accurately?

2. Did either person use scripture out of context?

3. Did either side prove or avoid the point?

4. Who followed the challenge rules more closely?

5. Which response was closer to the truth based on the Bible alone?


Then give:

A brief summary

A winner for this round (if clear)

See the screenshots below to see how I started it. Please ensure you put the claim and rebuttal inside their respective brackets. If you know programming a little you will know that missing a bracket can give you a different thing altogether.

Please stop using the award point part. It was not properly started for ChatGPT. It was for you to see how scores are award. I do it manually for only the final winner and anyone who avoided points.



Rule 7. Was meant to be for only claims not rebuttal. I will update it again so It will disqualify anyone whose subtopic and claim under his subtopic does not reflect on the main topic. Rule 7 and instruction 6 were add after round 4.

I will remark round 5 after updating Rule 7.

Apart from these there is no problem.

FxMasterz:
What are you guys even fighting about? You're discussing scriptures and still have the guts to call one another 'silly' and referring to yourselves as having a problem. Who do you guys really represent?

Please check the screenshot I posted and tell us if he actually said what i said. Don't mind him.

Image123:
Job_5:2  For wrath killeth the foolish man, and envy slayeth the silly one.
Hos_7:11  Ephraim also is like a silly dove without heart: they call to Egypt, they go to Assyria.
2Ti_3:6  For of this sort are they which creep into houses, and lead captive silly women laden with sins, led away with divers lusts,

Not saying you should go and start name-calling anyone, though, just proving all things. If a kid is misbehaving, there's nothing wrong with telling the kid not to be silly.

When they finish telling us we will know who is the silly one.

Image123:
Like i said earlier, AI is not as reliable as you think and it doesn't claim to be. ChatGPT will always tell you "ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info." It can give you different answers, based on many factors like what you feed it either knowingly or unknowingly.
i just fed in Round 1 and 2 and it gave different results. i was still asking it to remark again. You can see it in the two videos below. Same AI that told you and me that Mr A had the edge is telling me now that it is a draw. Who knows maybe tomorrow, it will say Mr B has the edge.
Am i trying to prove that i won or i am winning and have more points? NO, i don't care. i am only showing you the frailty of what you are resting on.

Round 1 result below, you can pause at any time like you usually say. i even challenged it that it initially said that you won. See it there in the video.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6bx04SSk0kU

Round 2 result below.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FGQAq1i8Lp0

There is an error in what you posted. In round 5. It is saying that I made my claim because Jesus was CALLED servant. I clearly said that Jesus IS a servant of God not that he is called a servant.

I also saw CLAIM above the subtopic and the claim was not in a bracket. These are errors in what you post. I couldn't see detail of what you post because the characters are tiny. Please make a clear video and post.

I will amend rule 7 and instructions 6. Through it was okay in my own but I meant to to be for the claims alone. In your own, it analysed the main topic separately and wrote "Valid" for both of us. This is an error on your part because we are not opposing each other on that subtopic.

So try and feed the rules as I have shown you. Start on a fresh ChatGPT page.

Boomark:
There is an error in what you posted. In round 5. It is saying that I made my claim because Jesus was CALLED servant. I clearly said that Jesus IS a servant of God not that he is called a servant.

I also saw CLAIM above the subtopic and the claim was not in a bracket. These are errors in what you post. I couldn't see detail of what you post because the characters are tiny. Please make a clear video and post.

I will amend rule 7 and instructions 6. Through it was okay in my own but I meant to to be for the claims alone. In your own, it analysed the main topic separately and wrote "Valid" for both of us. This is an error on your part because we are not opposing each other on that subtopic.

So try and feed the rules as I have shown you. Start on a fresh ChatGPT page.

You're quoting round 1 and result and talking about round 5. i used the prompt that you gave in the OP, check it. i am not AI, so i am not responsible for this word jangle you are talkind about, called.
Kindly make a screenshot or marking so i understand your concerns about brackets. i simply copied your post, just like others or is it no more a claim. As for video, i'll try making clearer if i make another but it's clear enough on landscape on phone.

Boomark:
When they finish telling us we will know who is the silly one.

Are you feeling guilty?

Image123:
Job_5:2  For wrath killeth the foolish man, and envy slayeth the silly one.
Hos_7:11  Ephraim also is like a silly dove without heart: they call to Egypt, they go to Assyria.
2Ti_3:6  For of this sort are they which creep into houses, and lead captive silly women laden with sins, led away with divers lusts,

Not saying you should go and start name-calling anyone, though, just proving all things. If a kid is misbehaving, there's nothing wrong with telling the kid not to be silly.

But, the situation right now is different. All those silly ones mentioned in the scriptures you quoted are not believers.

Jesus said if you call your brother 'Raca' you'll be in danger of hell. Please be guided. It's not good to call a fellow believer or even anyone whatsoever such names.

I do not understand your points on contention yet. Please can you briefly explain? I've been away for sometime, just logged in again yesterday.

Boomark:
Please check the screenshot I posted and tell us if he actually said what i said. Don't mind him.

Please kindly briefly explain better so that I can know what to verify.

I don't yet understand what you're vith dragging because I've been away for sometime now. I just logged in yesterday.

FxMasterz:
But, the situation right now is different. All those silly ones mentioned in the scriptures you quoted are not believers.

Jesus said if you call your brother 'Raca' you'll be in danger of hell. Please be guided. It's not good to call a fellow believer or even anyone whatsoever such names.

I do not understand your points on contention yet. Please can you briefly explain? I've been away for sometime, just logged in again yesterday.

Ask Boomark, he called you. i don't have enough to say.

Image123:
Round 6

Subtopic: The Holy Spirit performs functions that make Him divine and He is referred to several times as either belonging to God or Christ or the Lord.


Claim:

Reading the Bible, we see that the Holy Spirit is a person and He is distinct from the Father and the Son. As stated in the subtopic, His functions as seen in the Bible are divine. These functions include, but are not limited to His works in creation, the resurrection of Jesus, and the inspiration of the Bible. These are all works of God.
Apart from these, the Bible tells us that He is eternal, He is everywhere, and He knows everything. As i stated, He is referred to as the Spirit of God, of Christ, and of the Lord:


Key verses:

Eph_4:30  And grieve not the holy Spirit of God, whereby ye are sealed unto the day of redemption.
Gen 1:2  And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters. 
Psa 104:30  Thou sendest forth thy spirit, they are created: and thou renewest the face of the earth. 
Job 33:4  The Spirit of God hath made me, and the breath of the Almighty hath given me life.
2Pe 1:21  For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of man: but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost. 
2Ti 3:16  All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: 
Rom 8:11  But if the Spirit of him that raised up Jesus from the dead dwell in you, he that raised up Christ from the dead shall also quicken your mortal bodies by his Spirit that dwelleth in you.
Act 2:24  Whom God hath raised up, having loosed the pains of death: because it was not possible that he should be holden of it.
1Co 6:14  And God hath both raised up the Lord, and will also raise up us by his own power. 
1Pe_3:18  For Christ also hath once suffered for sins, the just for the unjust, that he might bring us to God, being put to death in the flesh, but quickened by the Spirit:
Rom_8:27  And he that searcheth the hearts knoweth what is the mind of the Spirit, because he maketh intercession for the saints according to the will of God.
1Ti_4:1  Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils;
1Pe_1:11  Searching what, or what manner of time the Spirit of Christ which was in them did signify, when it testified beforehand the sufferings of Christ, and the glory that should follow.
Rev_2:29  He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the churches.
Rev_3:6  He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the churches.
1Co_2:13  Which things also we speak, not in the words which man's wisdom teacheth, but which the Holy Ghost teacheth; comparing spiritual things with spiritual.
Rom 8:9  But ye are not in the flesh, but in the Spirit, if so be that the Spirit of God dwell in you. Now if any man have not the Spirit of Christ, he is none of his. 
Act 5:3  But Peter said, Ananias, why hath Satan filled thine heart to lie to the Holy Ghost, and to keep back part of the price of the land? 
Act 5:4  Whiles it remained, was it not thine own? and after it was sold, was it not in thine own power? why hast thou conceived this thing in thine heart? thou hast not lied unto men, but unto God. 
Luk 4:18  The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because he hath anointed me to preach the gospel to the poor; he hath sent me to heal the brokenhearted, to preach deliverance to the captives, and recovering of sight to the blind, to set at liberty them that are bruised,
2Sa_23:2  The Spirit of the LORD spake by me, and his word was in my tongue.
Isa_40:13  Who hath directed the Spirit of the LORD, or being his counsellor hath taught him?
Act_8:39  And when they were come up out of the water, the Spirit of the Lord caught away Philip, that the eunuch saw him no more: and he went on his way rejoicing.
1Co 2:10  But God hath revealed them unto us by his Spirit: for the Spirit searcheth all things, yea, the deep things of God. 
1Co 2:11  For what man knoweth the things of a man, save the spirit of man which is in him? even so the things of God knoweth no man, but the Spirit of God.
Psa 139:7  Whither shall I go from thy spirit? or whither shall I flee from thy presence? 
Psa 139:8  If I ascend up into heaven, thou art there: if I make my bed in hell, behold, thou art there. 
Heb 9:14  How much more shall the blood of Christ, who through the eternal Spirit offered himself without spot to God, purge your conscience from dead works to serve the living God? 
Deu 33:27  The eternal God is thy refuge, and underneath are the everlasting arms: and he shall thrust out the enemy from before thee; and shall say, Destroy them. 
Deu 33:27  The eternal God is thy refuge, and underneath are the everlasting arms: and he shall thrust out the enemy from before thee; and shall say, Destroy them.

Do you agree Boomark?

i have not seen Boomark's response to this 48 hours after. He's more busy with his ChatGPT struggles than actually having a discussion. Okay oh, just follow your rules, at least you were busy boasting like Goliath of Gath before i took your challenge. Now show working, it's screenshot we're seeing.

Image123:
Ask Boomark, he called you. i don't have enough to say.

Okay.

I was falsely accused in the post I made in link below.
I would like you to check if it is a false accusation or he is right. What I said was marked with pink and what image123 accused me of saying marked with green

What I said about ChatGPT in the first screenshot:

Me: It's default program favours trinity.

What I was accused of saying in the bolded:

Image123: Prior to my corrections, you erroneously denied ChatGPT's default program doesn't favour Trinity.

https://www.nairaland.com/8486945/bible-challenge-trinity-boomark-image123/3#136385350

See another place where he made the same statement. So I want you people to honestly tell us the truth. Thank you.

https://www.nairaland.com/8486945/bible-challenge-trinity-boomark-image123/3#136380242

gohf, Janosky, Emusan.

Boomark:
I was falsely accused in the post I made in link below.
I would like you to check if it is a false accusation or he is right. What I said was marked with pink and what image123 accused me of saying marked with green

What I said about ChatGPT in the first screenshot:

Me: It's default program favours trinity.

What I was accused of saying in the bolded:

Image123: Prior to my corrections, you erroneously denied ChatGPT's default program doesn't favour Trinity.

https://www.nairaland.com/8486945/bible-challenge-trinity-boomark-image123/3#136385350

See another place where he made the same statement. So I want you people to honestly tell us the truth. Thank you.

https://www.nairaland.com/8486945/bible-challenge-trinity-boomark-image123/3#136380242

gohf, Janosky, Emusan.

This is indeed proving to be silly. Can we kindly move on while you await this on the sides? Or you have now learned lessons?

Image123:
i have not seen Boomark's response to this 48 hours after. He's more busy with his ChatGPT struggles than actually having a discussion. Okay oh, just follow your rules, at least you were busy boasting like Goliath of Gath before i took your challenge. Now show working, it's screenshot we're seeing.

If you are only interested in telling and insisting on lies to cause confusion and delays just to get +10 points it won't work. The rule was made for cases where there was no issue.

Go and prepare the video I asked you to do accordingly to the rules I gave you. Because I sense you manipulated and distorted my claim.

I have already prepared the round 6 rebuttal since yesterday. See it in the screenshot below. But I will not post it until I remarks Round 5 with the updated rule 7 and instruction 6.

And I want people to also see how you make false claims against people.

Boomark:
If you are only interested in telling and insisting on lies to cause confusion and delays just to get +10 points it won't work. The rule was made for cases where there was no issue.

Go and prepare the video I asked you to do accordingly to the rules I gave you. Because I sense you manipulated and distorted my claim.

I have already prepared the round 6 rebuttal since yesterday. See it in the screenshot below. But I will not post it until I remarks Round 5 with the updated rule 7 and instruction 6.

And I want people to also see how you make false claims against people.

You are completely On Your Own then. Seeing you cannot obey your own rules and insist on changing goal posts per round. You didn't say claims and rebutalls are to be sent to whatsapp before 24 hours, which you later pleaded for 48 hours. Evidently, it's to help you manipulate AI. Good luck.

Image123:
You're quoting round 1 and result and talking about round 5. i used the prompt that you gave in the OP, check it. i am not AI, so i am not responsible for this word jangle you are talkind about, called.
Kindly make a screenshot or marking so i understand your concerns about brackets. i simply copied your post, just like others or is it no more a claim. As for video, i'll try making clearer if i make another but it's clear enough on landscape on phone.

What you posted is like this:

General rule

CLAIM:
[Subtopic:

claim
Jesus himself.......]

The subtopic is not supposed to be inside the bracket. It should be above the CLAIM. You can delete the small letter "claim." It should look like this.

Main Topic:

Subtopic: Jesus Christ..

CLAIM:

[Jesus himself in Matthew and key verses]

REBUTTAL:

[Your rebuttal and key verses]

See how it should be. You must first post the general rule and forget about it. Remember to tell it to use the rule in subsequent posts. After this you don't need to copy the general rules again.

So after each round, you copy this below and edit it properly and post to ChatGPT in the same page where you have already posted the general rule. I have removed rule 7 because there was no rule 6. I will update old rule 7 as rule 6 and also update instruction 6 which will take effect from round 5. Check here to see my previous post of how to feed the AI with rule.

https://www.nairaland.com/8486945/bible-challenge-trinity-boomark-image123/3#136386003

Round 1 or 2 or 3 as the case may be.

Main Topic:
The Father is One God over all and greater than all who are called God
Vs
The Father is God, the Son Jesus is God, and the Holy Spirit is God, and yet they are one God (Trinity).

Subtopic:

CLAIM:
[Paste your full message here]


REBUTTAL:
[Paste their full message here]

✅ Instructions:
You must not be partial. Analyze both responses and score this round based on:

1. Who used scripture more clearly and accurately?

2. Did either person use scripture out of context?

3. Did either side prove or avoid the point?

4. Who followed the challenge rules more closely?

5. Which response was closer to the truth based on the Bible alone?


Then give:

A brief summary

Image123:
Like i said earlier, AI is not as reliable as you think and it doesn't claim to be. ChatGPT will always tell you "ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info." It can give you different answers, based on many factors like what you feed it either knowingly or unknowingly.
i just fed in Round 1 and 2 and it gave different results. i was still asking it to remark again. You can see it in the two videos below. Same AI that told you and me that Mr A had the edge is telling me now that it is a draw. Who knows maybe tomorrow, it will say Mr B has the edge.
Am i trying to prove that i won or i am winning and have more points? NO, i don't care. i am only showing you the frailty of what you are resting on.

Round 1 result below, you can pause at any time like you usually say. i even challenged it that it initially said that you won. See it there in the video.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6bx04SSk0kU

Round 2 result below.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FGQAq1i8Lp0

You're actually the one giving him your time—it’s futile. The guy lacks even the basics when it comes to understanding. I clearly mentioned earlier that ChatGPT was trained on vast datasets, and given the overwhelming number of Trinitarian sources out there, it's not surprising. That doesn’t mean it favors Trinitarians 😂. But somehow, he twisted that into bias 🤔.

This is what others have had to deal with. Relying on AI—especially for scriptural or spiritual insight—is like building a house on sand. 🤕 Total collapse waiting to happen.

Everyone knows AI can be personalized—just ask Lily Jay 😂.
And don’t mind him; that’s how he always goes around accusing people of lying. He’s done it at least three times that I know of—and each time, I exposed him with screenshots 😂. No wonder he’s fearful.

Well done, brother. At the very least, you’ve planted the seeds of Christ in him!

Image123:
You are completely On Your Own then. Seeing you cannot obey your own rules and insist on changing goal posts per round. You didn't say claims and rebutalls are to be sent to whatsapp before 24 hours, which you later pleaded for 48 hours. Evidently, it's to help you manipulate AI. Good luck.

You are not blind to see manipulation in the video posted. Have you seen any manipulation or you are only interested in making false remarks against innocent people. Even though your video was tiny I still spotted your errors that affected the AI judgement.

After today I will not listen to your false accusations because your deciet is now obvious.

Image123:
You are completely On Your Own then. Seeing you cannot obey your own rules and insist on changing goal posts per round. You didn't say claims and rebutalls are to be sent to whatsapp before 24 hours, which you later pleaded for 48 hours. Evidently, it's to help you manipulate AI. Good luck.

Ok I will post round 6 rebuttal and the updated rules will start from there.