₦airaland Forum

Humans Could Live For 1,000 Years by 2050—Ushering in the Dawn of ‘Practical Immortality,’ Futurists Say

Some experts warn that this radical change may remain out of reach for many, due to societal and economic challenges.

.Technology futurists foresee advances that will enable humans to live up to 1,000 years.

. They anticipate breakthroughs in AI, robotics, and digital consciousness transfer that could make “practical immortality” a reality by mid-century.

. A “techno-optimism” mindset fuels these predictions, but critics warn technology can’t address every problem and may create new ones, like unequal access.

Some futurists believe that humanity is edging closer than ever to the possibility of “practical immortality.” These tech visionaries aren’t looking at an increased lifespan in the same way as mainstream longevity researchers, though, who are working to slow aging so we can live for up to a century in relatively good health. Instead, we can extend our natural lifespan by a factor of ten, according to science, technology, and medical visionaries like Ray Kurzweil, Ian Pearson, and Aubrey de Grey.

These visionaries anticipate that, about 25 years from now, humanity may achieve what is biologically impossible through a combination of advances in AI, cloud computing, and robotics. It’s more a matter of when these breakthroughs are coming—not if. For instance, famed futurist, author, and computer scientist Ray Kurzweil anticipates the arrival of the AI-driven singularity by 2029, when artificial intelligence will transcend human intelligence. By 2045, Kurzweil forecasts a true merger between humans and machines, via brain‑computer interfaces and cloud‑based consciousness, as well as nanobots non-invasively inserted into our bodies. Together, these innovations will lead not only to immortality—at least of the mind—but to a collective human intelligence millions of times more powerful than what it is today, he says.

But is staving off death just a “techno-optimism” pipe dream? The concept of technology as our savior isn’t a new idea, but its popularity is only growing among tech visionaries, who say the only viable source of growth and advancement is technology—no matter how far you look into the future. Billionaire venture capitalist Marc Andreessen, the cofounder of the early 1990s internet browser Netscape, fervently believes in the future promises of technological innovation, as he expressed in his 2023 “Techno-Optimist Manifesto” blog.

“Our civilization was built on technology. Our civilization is built on technology. Technology is the glory of human ambition and achievement, the spearhead of progress, and the realization of our potential,” he wrote.

While techno-optimism matters for developing creative solutions, it can’t solve every problem, according to two professors who study the societal effects of digital technology and innovation. In an April 2024 article published in The Conversation, a non-profit researcher-written news site, they say complex issues like poverty will necessarily have a multi-pronged solution, only part of which may include technology. And other concerns emerge with the belief that technology solves all societal ills. “There are also political, environmental and economic ramifications for holding these views. As an ideological position, it puts the interests of certain people—often those already wielding immense power and resources—over those of everyone else,” they say.

British scientist and futurist Ian Pearson acknowledges that it seems only the wealthiest individuals may attain the fruits of any aspirational technology feeding into the millennium-long lifespan. He predicts that by 2050, lucky individuals could achieve such longevity through a combination of genetic engineering, robotics, and a digital consciousness uploaded into a virtual space, or even into new, artificial bodies. That way, normal aging bodies would no longer be a hindrance to humans who want to go on living. He does think that these technologies will trickle down gradually to the middle class. But, Pearson also foresees great advances in treatments for diseases like cancer and heart disease, as well as the ability to reverse cellular damage, which ultimately causes cell death and contributes to disease.

Biomedical gerontologist and futurist Aubrey de Grey agrees aging can one day be cured through medical advances. Instead of being an inevitable part of life, aging will become a treatable condition by 2050, he predicts. Suppose we really do achieve 1,000-year-long lives. De Grey said in an interview in the journal EMBO Reports that he’s tired of hearing a common question about it: Will people lose their sense of urgency and ambition if they think they’ll live for centuries?

It’s hard to say how the human brain will respond during such a long life, he says. But people aren’t motivated simply by the thought of death, he said. “Young people now, in their teens or 20s, aren’t driven by death or the fact that they are going to die 50 years from now.”

TouchNfollow:
https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/a65637132/immortality-singularity/

TouchNfollow:
https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/a65637132/immortality-singularity/

TouchNfollow:
https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/a65637132/immortality-singularity/

TouchNfollow:
https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/a65637132/immortality-singularity/

kpankpangolo:
I’m good with 101 years. Old age is not fun. What is there to explore after 80 years?

arantess:
True...
but because Jesus will be in charge for the millennium reign, not this rubbish they are talking about