₦airaland Forum

soqmeov:
Ok, Let's put Putin in the place of an African head of state with an ICC arrest warrant on head. Can you confidently say that he wouldn't be bundled up and handed over to the ICC yesterday?

shoodboi2:
Let them keep assuring themselves. When you are big, you are big. Everyone of them was dead silent yesterday. Not even one of them left a comment for the most part of the day. It's after that Putin left that they're trying to make mouth

obedience4:
Gbadebo19 mate!!! can you see your brother?? After getting caught for the umpteenth time making false narratives, dude wants to derail the thread!!

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

WriteerNg:
Squeaking Rats.

That's what I call them.

Hoaxen:
They just as stealthy as the su 57 that you can't see them. They are conducting air operations in Russian air space 🤡🤡🤡

Air dominance means total control over an airspace

Hoaxen:
The f16s are just as stealthy as the su 57 that you can't see them. They are conducting air operations in Russian air space 🤡🤡🤡

Hoaxen:
did you even read what you posted?

Gbadebo19:
Ehn? Who's brother? 😂😂😂
I know my mama pikins ooo. Stray 🐕‍🦺🐕‍🦺 no be part of them oo. 🤣🤣🤣

soqmeov:
Ok, Let's put Putin in the place of an African head of state with an ICC arrest warrant on head. Can you confidently say that he wouldn't be bundled up and handed over to the ICC yesterday?


Pls beat your chest and say it!

obedience4:
These guys never seems to amaze me, the US president invites a foreign president to his country, the same US president will then arrest the same president he invited and hand them over to the ICC

[i]Bearing in mind the ICC don't even have jurisdiction in the US[/i]

😂😂😂😂😂😂

soqmeov:
I said what I said. Can a non-alligned African head of state with an ICC arrest warrant confidently go to the US without being bundled up and handed over to the Hague.

Pls beat your chest and say this.


Like your overlord🇺🇲, y'all seriously need to make your position about the ICC clear.

Hoaxen:
oga I don answer you.

Take vitamin a cuz you may have eye problems

Gbadebo19:
In obedience voice: "You guys are a gift that keeps giving. This one is even oblivious to the fact that US is not a signatory to the ICC. See people we've been arguing with. #Jesus Wept...

Hoaxen:
The f16s are just as stealthy as the su 57 that you can't see them. They are conducting air operations in Russian air space 🤡🤡🤡

Why didn't the advanced su 57 prevent Israeli f35 strikes on assad's Syria?

soqmeov:
I said what I said. Can a non-alligned African head of state with an ICC arrest warrant confidently go to the US without being bundled up and handed over to the Hague.

Pls beat your chest and say this.


Like your overlord🇺🇲, y'all seriously need to make your position about the ICC clear.

WriteerNg:
What Israeli F-35 strike on Assad?

You mean after Assad left Syria?

Shouldn't you be asking why Israel F-35 did not strike Assad while he was still in Syria?

soqmeov:
Of course, they're not, but with some "little technical backing" here and there when it does align with their interest, of course.
And who knows, bundling up a hapless head of state could be one of those "benevolent assistance".

Hoaxen:
nope, there were strikes during Assad's regime.

They were targeting Iranian proxies in Syria.

obedience4:
Go and look up the word "Jurisdiction". The US dosent have the right nor the ability to enforced a arrest warrant on behalf of the ICC

Go and read about "American Service-Members' Protection Act" ASPA
This law gives the US President the authorization to "use all means necessary and appropriate to bring about the release of any U.S. or allied personnel being detained by, on behalf of, or at the request of the International Criminal Court

The US have a law that gives the US government the right to initiate a military operation against the ICC if US or allied personnel are detained, is that the same US that would now arrest individuals on behalf of the ICC??

Are you Vic2023??