₦airaland Forum

triplechoice:
Your demand for video evidence of these degrading sexual acts is problematic from an ethical and legal standpoint.

Distributing videos of sexual assault and degradation would be a further exploitation of the victims. It would permanently circulate their trauma online for public consumption, violating their dignity and privacy. A credible news organization like the BBC has a duty to protect victims, not exploit them for evidence.

You should also expect that perpetrators to enforce strict rules (no use of cameras) to avoid leaving evidence that could lead to prosecution, the same way strip clubs operate. You're never allowed to use your phone to record anything that goes on within such places .

In any case, the report contained enough evidence. Evidence is not always in pictures and videos.

Evidence without prosecution is waste of evidence.

I regretted spending my data to watch that episode. Total rubbish! If I were that man I'll sue BBC for character deformation. The guy clearly said he only helps out in connecting the girls to his rich contacts. The deseased girls so sad, can't speak from their grave. Didn't tell anyone or leave any trace of who took them to Dubia for prostitution.

How about the Dubia police, they know these things are happening in their country, what have they done to stop it?

Why don't BBC go and arrest them? Funny.

What BBC should do is create awareness to our young ladies of the so called promised life abroad. Another thing is most of these girls know what they're going there to do but what they dint know is that things can be so unlucky for them, they dont imagine that the Arabs see blacks as animal... they can tell their snakes, dogs to make love to them in a family party in front of everyone while they video and watch the play and have fun about it. The girls would have been drugged heavily b4 they present them, so they dont even know what they're doing.

So most of these girls know its prostitution they're going there for but they don't know its to the extreme.

The whites in general are devil's, and they identify a black person to carry out their evil doings.

BBC should do better.

R-kelly was investigated and was prosecuted... so its not abiut just investigating, what happens after then.

Now, is there justice for the deseased girls? The answer is a big NO!

Evidence without prosecution is waste of evidence.

I regretted spending my data to watch that episode. Total rubbish! If I were that man I'll sue BBC for character deformation. The guy clearly said he only helps out in connecting the girls to his rich contacts. The deseased girls so sad, can't speak from their grave. Didn't tell anyone or leave any trace of who took them to Dubia for prostitution.

How about the Dubia police, they know these things are happening in their country, what have they done to stop it?

Why don't BBC go and arrest them? Funny.

What BBC should do is create awareness to our young ladies of the so called promised life abroad. Another thing is most of these girls know what they're going there to do but what they dint know is that things can be so unlucky for them, they dont imagine that the Arabs see blacks as animal... they can tell their snakes, dogs to make love to them in a family party in front of everyone while they video and watch the play and have fun about it. The girls would have been drugged heavily b4 they present them, so they dont even know what they're doing.

So most of these girls know its prostitution they're going there for but they don't know its to the extreme.

The whites in general are devil's, and they identify a black person to carry out their evil doings.

BBC should do better.

R-kelly was investigated and was prosecuted... so its not abiut just investigating, what happens after then.

Now, is there justice for the deseased girls? The answer is a big NO!

Softmirror:
The exact answer I was expecting. Well, before this age of 'FAKE NEWS'. Fabricating lies has been a long time mastered trade by BBC since many decades of international politics and affairs.

I don't have any evidence to prove this story to be untrue. But the credibility of BBC is not 100% through the ages especially when the have an agenda to pursue.

My point exactly, what BBC did to that man by posting his face is character deformation... im.very sure that by now that man's business must have crumbled, or the same Arab guys would have find a way to eliminate him.because they wouldn't want to leave any trace for them to be caught and be prosecuted by the higher authority.

Any other angle us, if the Abdul guy is sure that he's clean let him come forward and proof his innocence and there after sue BBC for deformation of character.

BBC crumble, die a natural death.
Im sure thales man is dead already reason they have the audacity to publish this nonsense.

Softmirror:
I already told you that it is not about this report. It is about the notion that since it is BBC hence it means it is 100%. Every news outlet have their own agenda. BBC has been responsible for propaganda as far back as the 50s during the overthrow of governments.

Then,you're shifting the goalpost .The conversation started with you dismissing this particular horrific investigation into sex trafficking in Dubai because you doubt the BBC. Till this moment, you've still not addressed a single factual claim within the report.

Oga listen,I didn't not claim the BBC is 100% or perfect, nothing is ,in fact; I clearly stated that they've a public 'Correction and Clarification' page where they officially acknowledge and amend errors. This mechanism which they've is a sign of integrity,not weakness. All reputable news organisations have them.

However, this particular investigation stands on its own overwhelming evidence: Corroborated victims testimonies, undercover evidence, Corroboration from a former insider, and documentary evidence.

Your argument is a perfect example of the 'genetic fallacy', dismissing a claim based on its source rather than its actual content. You can't dismiss this mountain of evidence by mentioning unrelated controversies from the 1950s. It doesn't work that way.

So,,for the final time, If you think this particular report is not factual, engage with its content. Mention a particular piece of evidence,, a claim, a testimony,or document, that you confirm is fabricated.Until you do that,your criticism remains a vague, baseless opinion that disrespectfully ignore the traumatic experiences of the victims who took the courage to come forward .

And I hope you're not one of those Trump supporters who have been brainwashed by him that both the CNN and BBC are false news outlets?. Your kind of argument make me suspect that

Felicity001:
Evidence without prosecution is waste of evidence.

I regretted spending my data to watch that episode. Total rubbish! If I were that man I'll sue BBC for character deformation. The guy clearly said he only helps out in connecting the girls to his rich contacts. The deseased girls so sad, can't speak from their grave. Didn't tell anyone or leave any trace of who took them to Dubia for prostitution.

How about the Dubia police, they know these things are happening in their country, what have they done to stop it?

Why don't BBC go and arrest them? Funny.

What BBC should do is create awareness to our young ladies of the so called promised life abroad. Another thing is most of these girls know what they're going there to do but what they dint know is that things can be so unlucky for them, they dont imagine that the Arabs see blacks as animal... they can tell their snakes, dogs to make love to them in a family party in front of everyone while they video and watch the play and have fun about it. The girls would have been drugged heavily b4 they present them, so they dont even know what they're doing.

So most of these girls know its prostitution they're going there for but they don't know its to the extreme.

The whites in general are devil's, and they identify a black person to carry out their evil doings.

BBC should do better.

R-kelly was investigated and was prosecuted... so its not abiut just investigating, what happens after then.

Now, is there justice for the deseased girls? The answer is a big NO!

What the BBC did is called investigative journalism. It's not their job to prosecute the perpetrators. Those who would do so have received the report already .So, it's now left for them to act on it or not.

meobizy:
Without videos and pictures past vanilla sex acts.

You are on a long thing. Google is your friend but be warned! What you will see will scar you for life when you hear those horrible words. I fled and couldn't bring myself to comprehend what I was seeing. That has got to be the highest form of demonic possession on the part of those animals doing that to those poor girls.

triplechoice:
What the BBC did is called investigative journalism. It's not their job to prosecute the perpetrators. Those who would do so have received the report already .So, it's now left for them to act on it or not.

Investigative journalism should ve well documented after prosecution has been carried out, not in this manner. To me it's see this as tatafo... false accusations.

Felicity001:
Investigative journalism should ve well documented after prosecution has been carried out, not in this manner. To me it's see this as tatafo... false accusations.

It's investigation first to gather evidence and then prosecution. That's how it works.

And BTW, which 'tatafo... false accusations ' are you refering to? Did you watch the video? I doubt you did.

While being secretly filmed by an undercover BBC reporter, Charles Mwesigwa described how he could easily provide girls' to do 'crazy stuff' for one thousand Us dollars . This recording has already implicated him.

triplechoice:
It's investigation first to gather evidence and then prosecution. That's how it works.

And BTW, which 'tatafo... false accusations ' are you refering to? Did you watch the video? I doubt you did.

While being secretly filmed by an undercover BBC reporter, Charles Mwesigwa described how he could easily provide girls' to do 'crazy stuff' for one thousand Us dollars . This recording has already implicated him.

I watched pitch of the video, yes he said so, we all know human trafficking is real and im totally against it 💯 % reason why I like the fact R-Kelly is still serving jail time for his atrocities. But, why publish an on going investigation when youve not proven the person us duty as accused.

Any accusation not judge by a judge is just false accusation, BBC cant just publish people's faces all over the world just to drive a narrative... you may have facts, yes, but it should ve properly investigated and let a judge pass h/h judgement b4 you document it for the public to know.

That is my point. Anything out of that, I call it defamatory. Totally wrong and should not be encouraged

Felicity001:
I watched pitch of the video, yes he said so, we all know human trafficking is real and im totally against it 💯 % reason why I like the fact R-Kelly is still serving jail time for his atrocities. But, why publish an on going investigation when youve not proven the person us duty as accused.

Any accusation not judge by a judge is just false accusation, BBC cant just publish people's faces all over the world just to drive a narrative... you may have facts, yes, but it should ve properly investigated and let a judge pass h/h judgement b4 you document it for the public to know.

That is my point. Anything out of that, I call it defamatory. Totally wrong and should not be encouraged

Seeing the video evidence and still calling it false accusation is the contradiction at the heart of your argument .

You admit you 've seen the part where he confesess to these activities in his own words, yet you still call the report defamatory.

Defamation requires a false statement. The video isn't BBC's opinion about him,but evidence of his own words

You can't dismiss a documented fact based on technicality about the judicial process. The role of a judge is to determine guilt and sentencing, while that of journalism is to uncover and publicise facts, which is exactly what the BBC has done


The public has every right to know that someone in Dubai is openly offering these services. By releasing the investigation, the BBC isn't defaming Mwesigwa, they're holding him accountable to his own statement and performing an important public services by exposing a dangerous network to protect potential victims.

It's too late now. You can't unsee what you saw. To call it defamation is denying the reality of the evidence presented to you.

Thank you.

What a cruei world.
Why can't we love each other and show human kindness?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hDBpTBPsxmQ?si=Bfr9YerhL7i5p6qf