₦airaland Forum

ravensckar:
That's why I said in terms of tactics, he's an AMODU SHUAIBU.

Common sense should have beckoned on him that both teams are not the same. Hence, his approach shouldn't be the same. For a start, the then PSG TEAM didn't use a top striker. They prefer using Dembele as a false 9. But Bayern has a top striker in Harry Kane. If not SHUAIBU, which world class coach would take similar approach?

Secondly, PSG midfield style isn't the combative type. They hold the ball and do more of pressing play. Bayern's midfield is more aggressive and plays counter attack mostly. Hence, a sensible coach needs people that can mark the ball or intercept passes. If a coach of Maresca's calibre doesn't know this, then, I'm afraid he's even worse than AMODU SHUAIBU.

Today's match was lost woefully due to his tactical ineptitude. Although it wouldn't be the first though and trust me, it won't be the last either.

Do you have a coaching licence and have you ever coached any team before even if it is a secondary school team? Please do not be offended. There is a reason I am asking this important question.

And another question I have is that, have you ever given it a thought why most ex-footballers or football analysts/commentators are often very brilliant as pundits analysing the game on TV from sport studios like Supersport until they are given a real team to manage on the real field?

Oliseh is a good case study of this sweet mouth analysis phenomenon when he used to be referred to as the Guardiola of Africa as a pundit on Supersport until he was given the Super Eagles job.

Scarrr:
Jeshurun101
Teeroyzimma
Bahamas95
geoworldedu

😹😹😹 World champion indeed....another proof you played a fatigued Psg after he don beat Madrid and Bayern wey dey currently beat una like goat..

Y you mention me now

Normally, e go dey on us as we win world club cup. Every team go wan flex their muscles. Another thing be say, Chelsea get defensive issue for now. I no know why the board no invest in defence.

Jeshurun101:
Y you mention me now

Normally, e go dey on us as we win world club cup. Every team go wan flex their muscles. Another thing be say, Chelsea get defensive issue for now. I no know why the board no invest in defence.

after una don spend like 3billion and buy like over 700 players😹😹.. una still get defensive issue 😹😹

Scarrr:
after una don spend like 3billion and buy like over 700 players😹😹.. una still get defensive issue 😹😹

Give me Arsenal defence if I no go beat Bayern. Banter aside, out of all the top 6 in premiership now, Chelsea's defence worst pass.

yummy001:
Do you have a coaching licence and have you ever coached any team before even if it is a secondary school team? Please do not be offended. There is a reason I am asking this important question.

And another question I have is that, have you ever given it a thought why most ex-footballers or football analysts/commentators are often very brilliant as pundits analysing the game on TV from sport studios like Supersport until they are given a real team to manage on the real field?

Oliseh is a good case study of this sweet mouth analysis phenomenon when he used to be referred to as the Guardiola of Africa as a pundit on Supersport until he was given the Super Eagles job.

The three times that I tried to reply you, I was banned. So, I'll try to be civil with my response. Perhaps, I won't be banned this time around.

Firstly, I'll pretend that I didn't see the question you asked in your first paragraph. It's not only ludicrous, but also puerile. For once, you got me thinking if I'm not wasting my time bandying words with an O'LEVEL holder. Your reasoning does seem like one. No offence!

Secondly, for every OLISEH & NEVILLE (great pundits that failed miserably at coaching job), there are several other ZIDANES, ENRIQUES, SIMEONE, MANCINI, ALONSOS, etc that succeeded. So, exactly what is your point? That great pundits don't make good coaches or what?

It's because of infantile assertions like this that the subject of LOGIC exists. Bros, your reasoning is horribly shallow and I'm shocked by the audacity with which you even displayed it. Anyways, it's a faceless forum, hence, even dumbos can have a say.

#Picks_tooth

ravensckar:
The three times that I tried to reply you, I was banned. So, I'll try to be civil with my response. Perhaps, I won't be banned this time around.

Firstly, I'll pretend that I didn't see the question you asked in your first paragraph. It's not only ludicrous, but also puerile. For once, you got me thinking if I'm not wasting my time bandying words with an O'LEVEL holder. Your reasoning does seem like one. No offence!

Secondly, for every OLISEH & NEVILLE (great pundits that failed miserably at coaching job), there are several other ZIDANES, ENRIQUES, SIMEONE, MANCINI, ALONSOS, etc that succeeded. So, exactly what is your point? That great pundits don't make good coaches or what?

It's because of infantile assertions like this that the subject of LOGIC exists. Bros, your reasoning is horribly shallow and I'm shocked by the audacity with which you even displayed it. Anyways, it's a faceless forum, hence, even dumbos can have a say.

#Picks_tooth

I knew you were going to avoid the first question.. Whenever you have succeeded in coaching your first team, then we can have this conversation..


Like you said, Nairaland is a faceless forum when someone who has never coached any football team in their entire life is better than all Premier league coaches put together..

Beremx:
I told my husband who's a Chelsea fan say Bayern Munich go beat dem wotowoto.
Hehehehe the game na over 3.5 for Bayern Munich

So your husband na football tout
Imagine if him decide knack u as coping mechanism after chelsea loose match
na ur kpêkus i pity

Ezeego1:
Which everybody?

Na only chelshit dey collect shock.
Liverpool and Arsenal won

Okay naaa dey watch