₦airaland Forum

Harnny:
like I said... you scream context when I referred to the Bible but ignore it easily when you refer to the Quran.

If you know the meaning of context, you'll know that Quran can't hide behind the excuse of context.

For example, Quran 9:29 clearly explained why Muslims should fight against non-Muslims. It says Muslims should fight against non-Muslims just because those non-Muslims choose a different religion (not because they are fighting war with Muslims, like alfas want to deceive people to think). The verse went further by saying Muslims should stop fighting the non-Muslims after the latter has accepted Islam or agreed to pay jizya as a sign of Muslim superiority.

Don't be fooled by the so-called apology. It's just to save his career. The airforce officer is simply deploying Taqqiya. If he ever runs into the social media influencer alone, he will definitely cut him in pieces.

olabrad:
If you know the meaning of context, you'll know that Quran can't hide behind the excuse of context.

For example, Quran 9:29 clearly explained why Muslims should fight against non-Muslims. It says Muslims should fight against non-Muslims just because those non-Muslims choose a different religion (not because they are fighting war with Muslims, like alfas want to deceive people to think). The verse went further by saying Muslims should stop fighting the non-Muslims after the latter has accepted Islam or agreed to pay jizya as a sign of Muslim superiority.

the same way you google this verse. Google the context too and be truthful with yourself. I have nothing to drag with someone who obviouse cherrypick Information to suit his own arguement. I can also cherrypick the Bible for arguement sake but there is a basis and explanation for those verses. If you are being deceitful just to suit your purpose then I wonder how you call yourself a believer.

olabrad:
It is not context. It is clearly written in the bible that I should love my neighbor. Those violent verses were also clearly referring to the Jews.

If you study the bible instead of cherry-picking verses to deceive people, you will see what I'm saying.

The same way the violent verses in the bible CLEARLY referred to the Jews is the same way the Quran CLEARLY told .Muslims to hate, attack and make Life difficult for their non-Muslim neighbors.

o... I am the one cherrypicking now? I never quoted any Bible verse... you are the one quoting the Quran. I mentioned that there are a lot more destructive verses in the Bible and tou argued it is for the Jews. I did not argue that with you did I?. It is not okay for the US to drop atomic bomb on Hiroshima and claim they did it because the Bible commanded destruction is it?. You also claimed the Bible preached love your neighbor. So you cannot you cannot find any such directives in the Quran?. If you are going to argue then at least do it truthfully.

LagosOrigin:
But Nnamdi kanu is being held like he committed a heinous crime while this irresponsible officer is still walking a free man.

One day, kasala go burst and everybody go answer him mama name .

WHAT THIS AIRFORCEMAN MAN WROTE AND SAID IS DETESTABLE BEYOND REASONING, but that doesn't belittle whatever your MNK has also done!!!
Kanu is responsible for the countless number of deaths in the South East....either directly or indirectly. He was also given bail back in 2017/2018 and he jumped bail, absconding to the UK. Where he continued unashamedly supporting violent agitations against HIS OWN PEOPLE.

Giving rise to unknown gunmen, esn, ipob, sit-at-home, etc......During which time people like late Mrs Akunyili's husband, Ahmed Gulek, other natble people were killed in Iboland!! I AM NOT SAYING HE PERSONALLY ORDERED THESE, but he was definitely influential to it.
SO he is now a saint because he is your tribesman ni?

And To be fair to him too, the Justice System in Nigeria is way toooo slow. They should let him know his fate by passing judgement asap!

He is showing the real face of the religion, the extremists are intolerant of other views, they believe in killing over anything. Demons.

He should be removed from the service of Nigerian military, fanatics and extremists will compromise and sabotage military efforts.

Una no even check am maybe those wicked people trying to spoil his personality bruh
Make una think am everyone

Harnny:
o... I am the one cherrypicking now? I never quoted any Bible verse... you are the one quoting the Quran. I mentioned that there are a lot more destructive verses in the Bible and tou argued it is for the Jews. I did not argue that with you did I?. It is not okay for the US to drop atomic bomb on Hiroshima and claim they did it because the Bible commanded destruction is it?. You also claimed the Bible preached love your neighbor. So you cannot you cannot find any such directives in the Quran?. If you are going to argue then at least do it truthfully.

The US never said the bible commanded them to drop Hiroshima lol, they dropped it so the war can end, the Japanese didn't want to surrender and started using kamikaze tactics, this forced the hand of the US, so they can prevail.

dederocs:
The US never said the bible commanded them to drop Hiroshima lol, they dropped it so the war can end, the Japanese didn't want to surrender and started using kamikaze tactics, this forced the hand of the US, so they can prevail.

but was the US government then made up of Christians or not? Did they not pray before carrying out the operations that will kill hundreds of thousands of people?. They they not believe they were doing it for the greater good?

Harnny:
o... I am the one cherrypicking now? I never quoted any Bible verse... you are the one quoting the Quran. I mentioned that there are a lot more destructive verses in the Bible and tou argued it is for the Jews. I did not argue that with you did I?.

The destructive verses in the bible address the Jews. Go and read them again.

The destructive verses in the Quran addresses Muslims. Go and read them again. Check them in Quran 9:29 and Quran 9:123. The verses are straightforward and specific. They can't hide behind any context of war. It is pure violence against Jews and Christians.

It is not okay for the US to drop atomic bomb on Hiroshima and claim they did it because the Bible commanded destruction is it?.

The battle between US and Japan was not a religion battle. Don't muddle things together. I challenge you to show me where US said they are doing it for Jesus, the same way Muslims commit murder/genocide for allah

You also claimed the Bible preached love your neighbor. So you cannot you cannot find any such directives in the Quran?. If you are going to argue then at least do it truthfully.

I challenge you to show me a verse in the Quran that told Muslims to love their non-Muslim neighbors! Such a verse doesn't exist. The Quran is majorly about violence against non-Muslims.

Harnny:
the same way you google this verse. Google the context too and be truthful with yourself. I have nothing to drag with someone who obviouse cherrypick Information to suit his own arguement. I can also cherrypick the Bible for arguement sake but there is a basis and explanation for those verses. If you are being deceitful just to suit your purpose then I wonder how you call yourself a believer.

Qur'an says it is easy to understand. If I need google to explain Quran verses to me, it means Quran is not easy to understand, which means Quran lied about being easy to understand. Conclusively, Quran is a book of lies!

Every present day Christian who were once followers of Yehushua should read Deuteronomy chapter 28 over and over again to understand their predicament..

Challenge me and see

olabrad:
The destructive verses in the bible address the Jews. Go and read them again.

The destructive verses in the Quran addresses Muslims. Go and read them again. Check them in Quran 9:29 and Quran 9:123. The verses are straightforward and specific. They can't hide behind any context of war. It is pure violence against Jews and Christians.




The battle between US and Japan was not a religion battle. Don't muddle things together. I challenge you to show me where US said they are doing it for Jesus, the same way Muslims commit murder/genocide for allah





I challenge you to show me a verse in the Quran that told Muslims to love their non-Muslim neighbors! Such a verse doesn't exist. The Quran is majorly about violence against non-Muslims.

na you dey do the research now... I just dey point you to where to go. Like I said... its eazy for you to say the verses in the bible only addresses the Jews but are you not all children of Israel again?. Cos Jesus said he was sent to the Jews who's lost thier ways. So I do not understand how you easily absolve yourself of the destructive instructions in the Bible. Also... the crises is not religious war but majority American government are Christians as at the event and Majority Japanese are not. It could be easily claimed to be a religious war. It is the same analogy in the case of the crises in Nigeria. If some hausa Fulani terrorists clusters together. Majority identify as Muslims and they can't even recite a verse of the Quran rather than scream Allahu Akbar. It automatically makes it a Muslim war right?. So i say to you, we can as well claim the US bombing of Hiroshima is a Christian offense because they definitely prayed and covered the operation in the blood of Jesus.

So if I go about claiming it is a Christian offensive without looking at the underlying political motivations. Does that not make me stupid?

You also said I cannot hide behind context. Alas, I am not... you are. The verse relates to a peaceful treaty that was not honored and it further provided explanations how to deal with such cases. I do know you know this already. So if you are not truthful in your arguement then what makes you a believer?

Harnny:
o... I am the one cherrypicking now? I never quoted any Bible verse... you are the one quoting the Quran. I mentioned that there are a lot more destructive verses in the Bible and tou argued it is for the Jews. I did not argue that with you did I?. It is not okay for the US to drop atomic bomb on Hiroshima and claim they did it because the Bible commanded destruction is it?. You also claimed the Bible preached love your neighbor. So you cannot you cannot find any such directives in the Quran?. If you are going to argue then at least do it truthfully.

Muslims murdered Deborah Samuel in the North. Was she fighting war with Muslims before they killed her?

Muslims have been threatening Noah Ezekiel with death since he started exposing the lies of Mallam Yusuf adepoju. Did Noah fight war with Muslims before they started threatening him?!
Two Muslims killed a man in Egypt because he didn't pay jizya
Did he also fight against Muslims before they murdered him?

Muslims invaded North Africa and Europe without any provocation.

Muslims attack Christians with impunity n Pakistan without the Christians provoking such attacks.

Boko Haram attacked and bombed churches in 2012 and subsequent years. Were those churches fighting war against Muslims to warrant the attacks?!

When Boko Haram invaded chibok, a Christian community in borno, was it because chibok people fought against Muslims to warrant the attack?!

Qutan commands Muslims to attack and kill Christians
The Christians do not have to fight against Muslims before Muslims attack them. So, Muslims can't hide behind context at all regarding Quran 9:29 or Quran 9:123.

Harnny:
na you dey do the research now... I just dey point you to where to go. Like I said... its eazy for you to say the verses in the bible only addresses the Jews but are you not all children of Israel again?.

It's obvious you don't read bible. You just pick verse that are convenient for you and start giving them your own meanings. Stop cherry-picking verses and start studying the Bible. Don't just focus on some.parts; read the entire bible!

Cos Jesus said he was sent to the Jews who's lost thier ways. So I do not understand how you easily absolve yourself of the destructive instructions in the Bible.

This is why I said you know little about bible
You are just cherry-picking. Read Mark 15:15-16 and Acts of Apostles 1:8. They'll show you who Jesus was sent to. Also read Daniel 7 to show you Jesus wasn't just sent to Jews. If you read the entire bible, you'll know how and why Jesus said he was only sent to the lost house of Israel. Read and stop cherry-picking.

Also... the crises is not religious war but majority American government are Christians as at the event and Majority Japanese are not. It could be easily claimed to be a religious war.[/quote ]

Show me where US said they attacked Japan because of religion. Simple knowledge of history says the US attacked Japan as a retaliation to Japan attack on Pearls Harbor
You need a good knowledge of history! Your cherry-picking is disturbing!
[quote]It is the same analogy in the case of the crises in Nigeria. If some hausa Fulani terrorists clusters together. Majority identify as Muslims and they can't even recite a verse of the Quran rather than scream Allahu Akbar. It automatically makes it a Muslim war right?.

Rebecca Joseph was killed because she abused Islam fake prophet Muhammad. Don't you dare lie that they didn't attack her because of religion.

When Boko Haram want to behead people, they read from Quran on the victim.

The inscription on Boko Haram flag is Islamic inscription called the shahada. So, don't come here and lie that Boko Haram attacks are not religion attacks.

So i say to you, we can as well claim the US bombing of Hiroshima is a Christian offense because they definitely prayed and covered the operation in the blood of Jesus.

There is clear evidence that Boko Haram attacks and killing of Rebecca Joseph were religion attacks on Christians. Show me clear proof that US retaliation on Japan was a religion war. Show me proof that they prayed and covered the operation in blood of Jesus. Since you claimed they definitely did so, it means you have a concrete evidence. I'm waiting for that evidence. I hope you knew the meaning of definitely before using it.

So if I go about claiming it is a Christian offensive without looking at the underlying political motivations. Does that not make me stupid?

Show me evidence to prove that US retaliation against Japan was a religion war and they definitely prayed and plead blood of Jesus before they went for the attack. Don't beat about the bush
Show me evidence!

You also said I cannot hide behind context. Alas, I am not... you are. The verse relates to a peaceful treaty that was not honored and it further provided explanations how to deal with such cases. I do know you know this already. So if you are not truthful in your arguement then what makes you a believer?

Quran 9:29 says Muslims should attack non-Muslims and stop attacking them of the non-Muslims accept Islam. Irt didn't say they should stop attacking them if the non-Mslims fulfill the condition of a treaty.

Qur'an 9:123 says Muslims should fight against non-Muslims around them, not those who don't fulfil treaty agreement.

Can you show me the treaty that north Africa and Europe didn't fulfill that caused Muslims to invade those continents?!

olabrad:
It's obvious you don't read bible. You just pick verse that are convenient for you and start giving them your own meanings. Stop cherry-picking verses and start studying the Bible. Don't just focus on some.parts; read the entire bible!



This is why I said you know little about bible
You are just cherry-picking. Read Mark 15:15-16 and Acts of Apostles 1:8. They'll show you who Jesus was sent to. Also read Daniel 7 to show you Jesus wasn't just sent to Jews. If you read the entire bible, you'll know how and why Jesus said he was only sent to the lost house of Israel. Read and stop cherry-picking.

So the gospel only applies to Jews not everyone who received it?

At some point, was blasphemy not punishable by death in the Roman Empire. Was that not killing people in the name of the religion?

You obviously cannot tell the difference between analogy and actual events. The case of the US is an analogy. If majority of a perpetuator of an event are of certain religion, is it safe to say it is a religion cause without reviewing the underlying political event. So we can say the slave trade and colonization are all religiously motivated right?

olabrad:
It's obvious you don't read bible. You just pick verse that are convenient for you and start giving them your own meanings. Stop cherry-picking verses and start studying the Bible. Don't just focus on some.parts; read the entire bible!



This is why I said you know little about bible
You are just cherry-picking. Read Mark 15:15-16 and Acts of Apostles 1:8. They'll show you who Jesus was sent to. Also read Daniel 7 to show you Jesus wasn't just sent to Jews. If you read the entire bible, you'll know how and why Jesus said he was only sent to the lost house of Israel. Read and stop cherry-picking.

still, you skipped the context around the verses but will willingly add explanation for such occurences in the Bible. So if you can explain the reason for a verse in a Bible, why can't that of the Quran not have a context around it?. The the Roman Empire not conquer most of Europe and also pursue Crusades?. Where they instructed by the Bible to do so?

Harnny:
So the gospel only applies to Jews not everyone who received it?

Mark 15:15-16 iand John 1:11-13 are parts of the gospel. Take some time to read them by yourself. Then ask yourself if the gospel only concern Jews!

At some point, was blasphemy not punishable by death in the Roman Empire. Was that not killing people in the name of the religion?

Christianity is not following Roman Empire! We are following Jesus Christ. A true Christian follows the examples of Jesus Christ to love our neighbors as ourselves. Likewise, a true Muslim will follow the examples of Muhammad to hate his neighbors that are not Muslims.

Islam is a religion of violence, not peace!

Harnny:
still, you skipped the context around the verses but will willingly add explanation for such occurences in the Bible.

Show me the "context" that says the laws in Exodus, Leviticus or Deuteronomy concern Christians. I'm waiting for your evidence?

So if you can explain the reason for a verse in a Bible, why can't that of the Quran not have a context around it?

I didn't "explain the reasons" for any verse in the Bible. I simply showed you what was written there.

Quran 9:29 already told you why you should fight against non-Muslims and when to stop fighting. The verse says Muslims should fight against non-Muslims BECAUSE they do not accept allah as God, not because the didn't fulfill a treaty. It is clear as day!

The the Roman Empire not conquer most of Europe and also pursue Crusades?. Where they instructed by the Bible to do so?

Show me where the bible instructed Roman Empire to conquer Europe. Bring clear evidence. Don't beat about the bush!


You jumped from US/JAPAN altercation to Roman Empire

Keep jumping around looking for something to excuse the violence in the Quran.

olabrad:
Show me the "context" that says the laws in Exodus, Leviticus or Deuteronomy concern Christians. I'm waiting for your evidence?



I didn't "explain the reasons" for any verse in the Bible. I simply showed you what was written there.

Quran 9:29 already told you why you should fight against non-Muslims and when to stop fighting. The verse says Muslims should fight against non-Muslims BECAUSE they do not accept allah as God, not because the didn't fulfill a treaty. It is clear as day!


Show me where the bible instructed Roman Empire to conquer Europe. Bring clear evidence. Don't beat about the bush!


You jumped from US/JAPAN altercation to Roman Empire

Keep jumping around looking for something to excuse the violence in the Quran.

Since you refused to get the point, I needed to use another example.

I am not looking for an excuse to justify any violence. Violence is violence: defence or attack. What you have refused to acknowledge is the fact that the verse has a context. Would you rather they wait to be killed by their attackers instead? You have seen multiple times that the context refers to a treaty, but if it is not explicitly stated in the verse, it definitely is in the interpretation. However, you choose to stick to ignoring it. I can also stick to saying Jesus was only sent to the Jews and ignore the context, no matter how many times you try to explain it.

I am not showing you shit, I only asked you this. You mean as a Christian, not all parts of the Bible apply to you?

Was the Roman Empire not a Christian state? Can we say they are following the Bible? Aren't all the chapters you mentioned quoted by pastors in church? If it is not part of the Church, why are they still in the Bible?

Goodlady:
Who's tarnishing which image?
Why did the army say that and play religious card?
Blame yaself and those extremists of ya faith

The soldier man made his threat as an individual and not as an institution and he did not threatened to kill Christians but another person. Therefore he should be dealt with as an individual threatening another and not using that to justify a false narrative.

Goldbw122:
I get where you’re coming from — it’s hard to trust an apology that comes after such a serious threat. Words like that can’t just be erased overnight. But at the same time, if someone genuinely realizes their mistake and takes responsibility, forgiveness doesn’t mean forgetting — it just means choosing peace over holding on to anger. What really matters now is whether his future actions match his apology.

Only a fool will be waiting for his future actions. That is a terrorist who hates Christians. It’s very obvious from what he has said. His apology is simply taqqiya. It is to decieve him until he can carry out his plans. Muslims are permitted to lie or deceive just to spread Islam. Even the fact that you disagree with this is part of taqqiya or whatever you people call it. Only a fool will believe sincerely that a Muslim terrorist who apologizes really means peace.

Bellotelli:
The soldier man made his threat as an individual and not as an institution and he did not threatened to kill Christians but another person. Therefore he should be dealt with as an individual threatening another and not using that to justify a false narrative.

Yenyenyen. He's repping abdulganus family members. Call ya people to order.

Harnny:
Since you refused to get the point, I needed to use another example.

I am not looking for an excuse to justify any violence. Violence is violence: defence or attack. What you have refused to acknowledge is the fact that the verse has a context. Would you rather they wait to be killed by their attackers instead? You have seen multiple times that the context refers to a treaty, but if it is not explicitly stated in the verse, it definitely is in the interpretation.

Let's stop deceiving ourselves. There is no context anywhere.. The verse is explicit and straightforward. It says Muslims should hate and kill non-Muslims just because they choose a different religion.

Nothing like treaty was mentioned in the verse. Anyone saying it is because of a treaty is only trying to give the verse his own meaning to cover up the evil the verse portrayed.

If you are the one giving treaty excuse to the verse, then you are only trying to deceive people about the true meaning of the verse. The verse told Muslims why they should attack non-Muslims and also told them when they should stop the attack. The reason for attack as given by the verse is far from anything like treaty. Bro, stop Lying. People are not fools anymore.

However, you choose to stick to ignoring it. I can also stick to saying Jesus was only sent to the Jews and ignore the context, no matter how many times you try to explain it.
Oga, stop lying. The content of that verse is not even related to treaty in any way, not even in the faintest way!

[quote]I am not showing you shit, I only asked you this. You mean as a Christian, not all parts of the Bible apply to you?

Yes, not all parts relate to me as a Christian. Any part Jesus doesn't represent doesn't relate to me. I follow Jesus, not the law. Anything contrary to preachings do not concern a Christian.

What Muslims don't know is that bible is a combination of many books, including Torah,Zabur, book of prophets, Gospels, letters and revelation! Bible is not a single book!

Was the Roman Empire not a Christian state? Can we say they are following the Bible? Aren't all the chapters you mentioned quoted by pastors in church? If it is not part of the Church, why are they still in the Bible?

The Roman Empire persecuted Christians for 330 years as a pagan Empire.

I don't care if it accepted Christianity as a state religion later; I don't support anything it did that went against the teachings of Jesus.

olabrad:
Let's stop deceiving ourselves. There is no context anywhere.. The verse is explicit and straightforward. It says Muslims should hate and kill non-Muslims just because they choose a different religion.

Nothing like treaty was mentioned in the verse. Anyone saying it is because of a treaty is only trying to give the verse his own meaning to cover up the evil the verse portrayed.

If you are the one giving treaty excuse to the verse, then you are only trying to deceive people about the true meaning of the verse. The verse told Muslims why they should attack non-Muslims and also told them when they should stop the attack. The reason for attack as given by the verse is far from anything like treaty. Bro, stop Lying. People are not fools anymore.

The way you coin your way out of the things in the Bible is amazing. You have given your own interpretation to it. Choose what you want out of it, saying it does not apply to you as a Christian. Does your pastor quote those books?. It is a simple question. So what if a Muslim says what you quoted out of the Quran only applies to the situation then and not to him as a present-day Muslim, as the scenario for the verse being revealed is not currently at play, you will shout Taqiya. You mentioned the Bible has many books. You forgot to realize that the Quran also referenced many events in that book. The verses you mentioned do not apply to you as a Christian. Did they explicitly state that this does not apply to Christians? Abi una all no be children of Israel again?

Harnny:
The way you coin your way out of the things in the Bible is amazing. You have given your own interpretation to it. Choose what you want out of it, saying it does not apply to you as a Christian. Does your pastor quote those books?. It is a simple question.

I challenge you to show me a pastor that preaches the violent laws in the old testament to his congregation. Don't beat about the bush. Go straight to the point and show me where a pastor is preaching to his congregation to kill people!

So what if a Muslim says what you quoted out of the Quran only applies to the situation then and not to him as a present-day Muslim, as the scenario for the verse being revealed is not currently at play, you will shout Taqiya.

This your argument will further destroy Islam. It means you are saying that some.of the things in the Quran are outdated! Which means Allah was myopic and couldn't see into the future when he was giving those commandments!

You mentioned the Bible has many books. You forgot to realize that the Quran also referenced many events in that book.

I can't pick any sense in this comment. Because Quran picked stories from bible doesn't negate the fact that bible contains many books

The verses you mentioned do not apply to you as a Christian. Did they explicitly state that this does not apply to Christians? Abi una all no be children of Israel again?

That's why I said you should study the entire bible and stop cherry-picking verses. Study the old testament and compare with the new testament. Study the things Jesus said and you won't be asking this kind of question.

olabrad:
I challenge you to show me a pastor that preaches the violent laws in the old testament to his congregation. Don't beat about the bush. Go straight to the point and show me where a pastor is preaching to his congregation to kill people!



This your argument will further destroy Islam. It means you are saying that some.of the things in the Quran are outdated! Which means Allah was myopic and couldn't see into the future when he was giving those commandments!


I can't pick any sense in this comment. Because Quran picked stories from bible doesn't negate the fact that bible contains many books



That's why I said you should study the entire bible and stop cherry-picking verses. Study the old testament and compare with the new testament. Study the things Jesus said and you won't be asking this kind of question.

You mentioned Deutronomy and the likes do not refer to Christianity and I asked you if your pastors never refer to those books or they only choose what they want out of them.

Goodlady:
Yenyenyen. He's repping abdulganus family members. Call ya people to order.

I don't even know why I'm talking to a woman.

Harnny:
You mentioned Deutronomy and the likes do not refer to Christianity and I asked you if your pastors never refer to those books or they only choose what they want out of them.

They do not refer to any of the violent laws or commands in Deuteronomy because Jesus told us in the same bible that those laws are not applicable anymore. Read book of Matthew chapters 5,6 and 7. It will help you to understand why Christians ignore the violent laws in the bible.

Harnny:
You mentioned Deutronomy and the likes do not refer to Christianity and I asked you if your pastors never refer to those books or they only choose what they want out of them.

Are you circumcised?
You need to be feeding well cos of this economy.
Stop cherry picking.
Reference to OT is different from you bringing out a verse that you wished to suit ya narratives.

olabrad:
They do not refer to any of the violent laws or commands in Deuteronomy because Jesus told us in the same bible that those laws are not applicable anymore. Read book of Matthew chapters 5,6 and 7. It will help you to understand why Christians ignore the violent laws in the bible.

So you have a basis to say why that is no longer applicable and I understand but it is difficult for you to understand there was a reason for a similar verse in the Quran. Is that not double standard?

Goodlady:
Are you circumcised?
You need to be feeding well cos of this economy.
Stop cherry picking.
Reference to OT is different from you bringing out a verse that you wished to suit ya narratives.

bro... you are feeling the economy, I am not. We are not even resident of the same country. Why do you jump into conclusions? Same way you are jumping into conversations.