₦airaland Forum

Blakjewelry:
You still not getting the picture, nuclear war start and end in days not even a week.

WriteerNg:
⚡3 Russian missiles entered Romanian airspace.

WriteerNg:
Some fools here think China has a more powerful sovereign military than Russia... I laugh.

Chinese President's plane is a Boeing 747 plane, a US made plane.

Meanwhile Russia uses their own ilyushin and Sukhoi planes to transport the President and all government officials.

The only foreign planes in Russia's airports are for foreign airlines that fly through Russia. The rest are Russian made.

You want to defeat the west but you transport your president in their planes. How foolish can China be??

More foolish than Iran? It appears so.

Russia used to produce everything even down to Televisions in the USSR days. But opened up their markets to western brands as a sign of corporation. How did that end?

I'm so happy they got sanctioned, now they can rid their country of every western tool.

WriteerNg:
Russian jets entered Polish airspace yesterday

Polish PM boasted about shooting them down. What happened??

Rilwayne001:
Everyone knows Russia uses more of western made products than China.

WriteerNg:
And you're still not getting the picture.

If the Burevestnik was launched before the nuclear war then all those who somehow managed to survive the nuclear strikes like POTUS and top military brass would get hit again.

They might wait decades in their underground bunkers but the Burevestnik can wait even longer 💀

WriteerNg:
⚡Russian MiG-31k has just fired a Kinzhal.

12 Iskanders struck Zaporozhye HPP

Blakjewelry:
It is going to fly forever? Though nuclear reaction can sustain for a long time with small amount of material compared to chemical reaction, I believe the container and other factors can't hold for so long. The only good thing I see there is extended flight time but I doubt if it can fly for days.

Then again the tech is not entirely new as the US first tested theirs in the 50s but had to pull the plug as it flight can contaminate the environment.

Blakjewelry:
It is going to fly forever? Though nuclear reaction can sustain for a long time with small amount of material compared to chemical reaction, I believe the container and other factors can't hold for so long. The only good thing I see there is extended flight time but I doubt if it can fly for days.

Then again the tech is not entirely new as the US first tested theirs in the 50s but had to pull the plug as it flight can contaminate the environment.

FXtrader2025:
Scientists made something and a Public University Graduate from Nigeria (that is if you are a graduate sef) says he highly doubt it and even went ahead to say the US first tested it but didnt make it operational because of safety reasons lol

Okay now you must post proves that US first tested the Burevetnisk Missile. Waiting for proves not believe me bro bullsh!t that your ilks are used to

LordAdam16:
It can fly for months, if not years.
We've had the ISS up there for decades.

Neither the US nor the Soviet Union could have fielded the technology in the 50s.
Technology progresses.
Just because it caused contamination in the 1950s, does not mean it would do so today.
And just because the US failed at it does not mean no one else will succeed at it.

Were there smartphones in the 50s?

-Lord

WriteerNg:
Oya name them.

This guy I go soon block you like the rest. u don dey irritate me.

The oga patata of China dey use US made plane but na Russia dey use western products more? Because of civilian gadgets like iPhone wey be say na China dey make?

Abi u never hear of Runet or VK or Rutube and others?

If ur number one man dey use wetin ur enemy dey make, den you are finished, u stand no chance.

Uprightness100:
The massacre in Sudan is so massive that you can literally see bloodstains from space, visible in satellite footage.
The Islamist-led ethnic cleansing is still raging on, relentless and unpunished.

Where are the HUMAN RIGHTS ACTIVISTS??!

(Sana Ebrahimi on X)

WriteerNg:
They call it strategic now, as soon as Russia captures it, it becomes non strategic lol.

FXtrader2025:
Scientists made something and a Public University Graduate from Nigeria (that is if you are a graduate sef) says he highly doubt it and even went ahead to say the US first tested it but didnt make it operational because of safety reasons lol

Okay now you must post proves that US first tested the Burevetnisk Missile. Waiting for proves not believe me bro bullsh!t that your ilks are used to

Blakjewelry:
Do your research on project pluto. The iss is in space and experience weightlessness, it experience drag and reduce it height so it has to be readjusted occasionally using thrusters to reposition once in a while.

And nope it can't fly for days, it's ramjet base tech using nuclear power. I think information from the Russians says it has a 14k kilometers and 15hrs flight time, which is something experts in field agrees, it is pegged at 10k to 20k range.

shoodboi2:
The same US built nuclear weapons. They built nuclear powered ships and submarines. But once it turned to building conventional missiles powered by nuclear power, they decided not to because “it’s not safe.” How does that make sense?

Safety was never an issue when they could do it. But once they cannot do it, safety becomes their go-to excuse.

The amount of excuses the NVBs will make whenever Russia has the upper hand over the United States is always amusing.

Blakjewelry:
It is going to fly forever? Though nuclear reaction can sustain for a long time with small amount of material compared to chemical reaction, I believe the container and other factors can't hold for so long. The only good thing I see there is extended flight time but I doubt if it can fly for days.

Then again the tech is not entirely new as the US first tested theirs in the 50s but had to pull the plug as it flight can contaminate the environment.

LordAdam16:
Stick to topics you have competence in.

The 14k km, 15h figures are the test parameters.
Not the max limit.

The Earth's equatorial circumference is 40km.
The Burevestnik will circumnavigate the planet once every 48 hours.

To put this in perspective, the longest range cruise missile the US has EVER deployed is the AGM-129A ACM.
It's pegged range was 3.2k km.
Clearly, you can see why the nuclear propulsion in the Burevestnik is a game changer.
No cruise missile with non-nuclear propulsion can do those numbers because of physical constraints.
It will fly for months easily.

The ISS has thrusters.
The Burevestnik has a miniature nuclear reactor.
It seems you do not know the meaning of the words you type.
I used the analogy of the ISS for a reason. But you can also use airplanes. They need major overhauls every few years and they have magnitude more internal components than a cruise missile. Much of it has to do with taking off, navigating, and landing hundreds of times.
If a plane only has to take off once, never need tires, never care about cabin pressure, and has nuclear propulsion; does your intuition tell you that it'll only be able to stay airborne for 15 hours?
Why are you exposing your incapacity to engage in inductive and abductive reasoning.

Project Pluto is from 60 years ago, when semiconductor tech was still in the micrometer range.
No one could miniaturize a nuclear reactor that'd fit in a cruise missile and be reliable 60 years ago.
Stop smashing your keyboard because you feel you have to say something.
You're just typing easily dispelled nonsense.
So if someone talks about the marvel of the internet, you'd ask the person to go read about the Abacus that was invented 4700 years ago.

This is the peril of fencism.
You've tied your identity to not being in a camp, so you feel like you have to downplay Russia's achievement and play up non-existent US successes
Except in this case, there is nothing to play up.
Right now, the Chinese are researching quantum computing and nuclear fusion, but they're still struggling with turbofan engine technology for their civilian jetliner.
There is a mammoth gulf between research and operational deployment.
The US has research projects for FTL and terraforming. Neither is feasible in the next 100 years. So pulling up Project Pluto is nonsensical.
The US at this moment is at least a decade behind Russia in missile technology. It's nothing to be ashamed of. Everyone has their strengths.
For instance, I have highlighted here that the US has a larger tanker fleet than the rest of the world combined.

-Lord

Mikasaobi:
Why do you believe the container and other factors can’t hold? Same container and other factors are operational for decades in a nuclear submarine. Am sure this missile was built to withstand atmospheric wear and tear the same way submarines withstand deep sea pressure. The Russians said the test is not the maximum range, they say it has unlimited range. I don’t know what unlimited range means but I won’t be surprised if it’s years.

Can you drop the link for the propulsion system, the ramjet article.