₦airaland Forum

Arda1000:
in the Bible right?

Yes, in the bible.

Eideoits like uuu disbelieve bible, but believe history book that says amerigo discovered America and mongo park discovered river Niger!

Atheists and steupedety are related by bl00d!

olabrad:
Yes, in the bible.

Eideoits like uuu disbelieve bible, but believe history book that says amerigo discovered America and mongo park discovered river Niger!

Atheists and steupedety are related by bl00d!

it’s funny how u think u make sense with stupid comparisons.

Your analogies are so dumb,wasn’t it the native that took Mongo Park to the River?
Am not atheist but I’d rather be an atheist than be a dumb religious person

Arda1000:
it’s funny how u think u make sense with stupid comparisons.

Your analogies are so dumb,wasn’t it the native that took Mongo Park to the River?
Am not atheist but I’d rather be an atheist than be a dumb religious person

Read the account of St Peter in the Bible. He is.a eye witness. Scientific investigation shows that the book was written by St Peter around 60AD

olabrad:
Read the account of St Peter in the Bible. He is.a eye witness. Scientific investigation shows that the book was written by St Peter around 60AD

in the Bible?
What other sources?

Arda1000:
in the Bible?
What other sources?

The bible is the source. The bible is a traceable source of information. The death and resurrection of Jesus happened in the first century and book of 1Peter and many other books in the bible were written in the same first century

I challenge you to bring a book written in the first century that denied the existence, death and resurrection of Jesus Christ!

olabrad:
The bible is the source. The bible is a traceable source of information. The death and resurrection of Jesus happened in the first century and book of 1Peter and many other books in the bible were written in the same first century

I challenge you to bring a book written in the first century that denied the existence, death and resurrection of Jesus Christ!

you really think the acclaimed Jesus is so relevant that all the world would write about him?
Lol
Even his native Jews never bothered to write about him aside his cult groups no other people were interested in him so aside the story written by his group member which other independent source wrote about him?

FayaBall:
Nah, you were following churchgoing sense-nonely for a full 38 years. Ha! what a greeeeaaat shame. And now you are following another group of people this time it's atheism, for another, I wonder how many years?

True true, You are a case study in "No Sense and How to Live with it"

In fact you have given me an Idea for a book. Let me get writing right away.

Go ahead and write your nonsensical book.
It wouldn't prove that your useless god exists.
Have a great night.

Arda1000:
you really think the acclaimed Jesus is so relevant that all the world would write about him?
Lol
Even his native Jews never bothered to write about him aside his cult groups no other people were interested in him so aside the story written by his group member which other independent source wrote about him?

So, you don't have any evidence to disprove the existence of Jesus?!

So, what's now the basis for your steuped comments for the past 2 days?

olabrad:
So, you don't have any evidence to disprove the existence of Jesus?!

So, what's now the basis for your steuped comments for the past 2 days?

the burden of proofs falls on you

Arda1000:
the burden of proofs falls on you

I gave uuu proof, but uuu rejiected then all like a man who has made up his mind to be bilaind.

Uuur socalled rejections even showcased uuu r steuped igneuriance. It doesn't show uuu as someone with comon sience!

Is it not strange that uuu can't bring forward a single evidence to show that Jesus didn't exist.

I thought nonreeligioous pipu are some especially clever pipu, but uuur show of chiam here has changed my mind about them!

olabrad:
I gave uuu proof, but uuu rejiected then all like a man who has made up his mind to be bilaind.

Uuur socalled rejections even showcased uuu r steuped igneuriance. It doesn't show uuu as someone with comon sience!

Is it not strange that uuu can't bring forward a single evidence to show that Jesus didn't exist.

I thought nonreeligioous pipu are some especially clever pipu, but uuur show of chiam here has changed my mind about them!

for a fact to be established as a proof/evidence a number of things has to be satisfied,witnesses or records.
A single record with no witnesses isn’t a proof,reason why the Bible can never be accepted as proof for historical or archaeological evidences today.

You are welcome back, there is a sit for you, we will celebrate with you. You are always free, ask as much questions as you can.

@ olabrad
If you are reading this know that the bot on Nairaland forum is against any of your posts so stop quoting the same post or trying to repost what the bot has registered it will continue to ban you!😟

Arda1000:
for a fact to be established as a proof/evidence a number of things has to be satisfied,witnesses or records.
A single record with no witnesses isn’t a proof,reason why the Bible can never be accepted as proof for historical or archaeological evidences today.

The Bible is a collection of books not just a book written by one person so if you want to talk about witnesses think of over 40 men who wrote the books in the Bible, they are WITNESSES!🙂

MaxInDHouse:
@ olabrad
If you are reading this know that the bot on Nairaland forum is against any of your posts so stop quoting the same post or trying to repost what the bot has registered it will continue to ban you!😟

Thank you bro. Are you one of the admins?

olabrad:
Thank you bro. Are you one of the admins?

NO, that's just the way the forum works.

Once the bot hings on a particular post it will continue to ban you each time you quote such a post but if you still want to quote it without being banned then you have to minimize the post by adding in the beginning of the post you wish to quote and at the end, in that manner the quoted post will appear tiny while your comment will be seen.

And don't use any vulgar speech that's also what the admin may ban you for.

You're welcome.

olabrad:
I gave uuu proof, but uuu rejiected then all like a man who has made up his mind to be bilaind.

Uuur socalled rejections even showcased uuu r steuped igneuriance. It doesn't show uuu as someone with comon sience!

Is it not strange that uuu can't bring forward a single evidence to show that Jesus didn't exist.

I thought nonreeligioous pipu are some especially clever pipu, but uuur show of chiam here has changed my mind about them!

no wonder the bot keep hitting u with numerous bans whenever you write

MaxInDHouse:
The Bible is a collection of books not just a book written by one person so if you want to talk about witnesses think of over 40 men who wrote the books in the Bible, they are WITNESSES!🙂

can the Bible be used as a source for historical evidence?
No! No! No!!!!!
Never!!!!!!!!!!!!’

Fairytales and few words from deranged cult members of Jews and Jesus can never be taken serious

Arda1000:
can the Bible be used as a source for historical evidence?

YES!
Do you know why Iraq and Iran have been enemies for thousands of years?
Do you know why many tribes are fighting over Jerusalem?
Do you know why modern day Egyptians demanded payments for treasures from Israel?
Do you know how many nations have ruled the world in times past?

Answers to these all questions and many more are found in the Bible!

MaxInDHouse:
YES!
Do you know why Iraq and Iran have been enemies for thousands of years?
Do you know why many tribes are fighting over Jerusalem?
Do you know why modern day Egyptians demanded payments for treasures from Israel?
Do you know how many nations have ruled the world in times past?

Answers to these all questions and many more are found in the Bible!

bullocks and nonsense

Arda1000:
bullocks and nonsense

So you can't deny the fact that the Bible is relevant when talking about history!

MaxInDHouse:
So you can't deny the fact that the Bible is relevant when talking about history!

relevant?
I don’t see scientists,paleontologists or Archaeologists using bible as a reference or a source for any historical information.
The only people that see bible as a relevant thing is religious indoctrinated folks like you

Arda1000:
relevant?
I don’t see scientists,paleontologists or Archaeologists using bible as a reference or a source for any historical information.
The only people that see bible as a relevant thing is religious indoctrinated folks like you

What the Bible God promised is far much more than such professions.

What He wants is for all faithful people throughout the earth to become one big and happy family of peace loving worshipers {Isaiah 2:2-4} something all those professions you mentioned can never ever achieve!😟

MaxInDHouse:
What the Bible God promised is far much more than such professions.

What He wants is for all faithful people throughout the earth to become one big and happy family of peace loving worshipers {Isaiah 2:2-4} something all those professions you mentioned can never ever achieve!😟

Goodluck with ur delusions

Arda1000:
Goodluck with ur delusions

So know today that the Bible is worth more than any history book a million times because no book or profession can achieve what the Bible is doing globally today!🙂

MaxInDHouse:
So know today that the Bible is worth more than any history book a million times because no book or profession can achieve what the Bible doing globally today!🙂

what!!
Stop the self deceit